What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Official Greg Jennings Thread** (1 Viewer)

does this "H.K's reverse psychology since we all know he has Jennings" thread really need any more responses and debate?

Let's let it die its rightful death and all enjoy winning it all with Jennings (H.K. included).

 
3) Not necessarily...Driver is getting older and may lose out on some the more Favre grows and trusts Jennings...But its clear he is the deep ball threat for that team.

This is part of the problem. It's harder to complete the deep ball than the shorter or intermediate routes. Low probability. That has been Jennings staple, it's going to be his downfall.

4) I disagree completely. Did Favre make Jennings look good as he ran past Bly? Yes. Few if any, QB's can make that throw.

Did he make Jennings look good as he streaked past all of the Charger's defenders?

"streaked past"? The Chargers blew the coverage. Favre is great so he saw it immediately.

Favre and the coaches have praised him and his talent over and over again. Have you heard Favre say that about alot of WRs?

As long as Favre has played, yes, he has siad that about plenty of WR's.

Finally...you have claimed this how many times the past few weeks? You just think you can keep saying it and one day it might come true.

This week I am guaranteeing it. No other outcome is possible.
He makes big plays on deep balls...but how many of those 12 TDs were because of deep passes...3? 4?So 8 others in redzone looks or where he took a shorter pass and made great moves.

Yes...streaked past.

And no...Favre has not said that about plenty of WRs. Not about Freeman...not about Brooks...not about Rison...not about Shroeder.

No other outcome is possible? Thanks for being narrow minded and proving you know nothing.

 
Jennings has helped me get this far this year. yep, he hasn't been reliable at all. Silly me for still being alive starting him every week.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My main concern this week is not Jennings but the fact that I am already starting Grant and the weather looks a bit frightful in CHI. I may use Welker instead.

 
My main concern this week is not Jennings but the fact that I am already starting Grant and the weather looks a bit frightful in CHI. I may use Welker instead.
:goodposting: How is this even a question? Welker is the best WR play in the history of FF this week. The guy has over 1000 yards and twice as many receptions as Jennings. Any team that starts Welker can't lose. Guaranteed.
 
My main concern this week is not Jennings but the fact that I am already starting Grant and the weather looks a bit frightful in CHI. I may use Welker instead.
:angry: How is this even a question? Welker is the best WR play in the history of FF this week. The guy has over 1000 yards and twice as many receptions as Jennings. Any team that starts Welker can't lose. Guaranteed.
Even better than Deion Branch (who had nothing to do with Chad Johnson really...)
If you have Deion Branch, he will lead all WR's in receptions this week. No other outcome is possible.
You have guaranteed a whole lot this week.I have a feeling I should go against every piece of advice you give and I would be better off.
 
Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10. Only his third week without a td all year (not counting weeks 1 and 2 while he sat out with injury).

 
Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
Told ya. The guy is FF death.
Really?
:P How is this even a question? Welker is the best WR play in the history of FF this week. The guy has over 1000 yards and twice as many receptions as Jennings. Any team that starts Welker can't lose. Guaranteed.
Jennings...3 receptions, 42 yards, 0 TDs - 4 points in my leauge.Welker...5 receptions, 49 yards 0 TDs - 4 points in my league.I guess you had the weather all figured out too huh? :unsure:
 
Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
Told ya. The guy is FF death.
Hold up, so what about your Welker prediction?? How'd that work out??
A little bit off....but he crushed Jennings in PPR though, 28% more output this week by Welker.
the sad thing is that your reverse-psychology anti-jinx actually turned out to be truewhen we all know that you have Jennings on your squad and you're hating him comingup short in your FF Championship game just like the rest of us.Many in this thread don't get it but I get it. You love Jennings and are happy as hellthat you had him on your squad this year. Even losing the FF championship doesn'tfeel so bad knowing you at least made it to the final game riding a WR who most draftedafter the 10th round.keeper next year? In a Keep 4+ format, I'd say so.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the sad thing is that your reverse-psychology anti-jinx actually turned out to be truewhen we all know that you have Jennings on your squad and you're hating him comingup short in your FF Championship game just like the rest of us.Many in this thread don't get it but I get it. You love Jennings and are happy as hellthat you had him on your squad this year. Even losing the FF championship doesn'tfeel so bad knowing you at least made it to the final game riding a WR who most draftedafter the 10th round.keeper next year? In a Keep 4+ format, I'd say so.
:ptts: 10th round, though?....that loser cost me a 7th.....Tough call on his keeper status....it will be fun to discuss it over the coming months. Thanks to all for a great thread.Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays Everyone!
 
Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
Told ya. The guy is FF death.
Hold up, so what about your Welker prediction?? How'd that work out??
A little bit off....but he crushed Jennings in PPR though, 28% more output this week by Welker.
Yeah...those 2 extra receptions.Weather killed Jennings (which was not your claim all week long anyway).Your predictions sucked.
 
everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzle

and stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's getting

pretty sad, really :thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many in this thread don't get it but I get it. You love Jennings and are happy as hellthat you had him on your squad this year. Even losing the FF championship doesn'tfeel so bad knowing you at least made it to the final game riding a WR who most draftedafter the 10th round.keeper next year? In a Keep 4+ format, I'd say so.
I'm in competitive leagues so he went in the 7th and 8th. His 1st 4 games last year let people know his potential.
 
everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzleand stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's gettingpretty sad, really :thumbup:
I posted that like on page 2 anyway.
if you get the joke, then why do you keep challenging H.K.'s FAKE analysisof Jennings stats vs. other receivers? time to let this thread fade away until it turns intoamoff-season thread of Jennings draft/keeper status for 2008.it's been a great ride aboard the Jennings Bandwagon this year. Hope we all enjoyed it!
 
everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzleand stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's gettingpretty sad, really :thumbup:
I posted that like on page 2 anyway.
if you get the joke, then why do you keep challenging H.K.'s FAKE analysisof Jennings stats vs. other receivers? time to let this thread fade away until it turns intoamoff-season thread of Jennings draft/keeper status for 2008.it's been a great ride aboard the Jennings Bandwagon this year. Hope we all enjoyed it!
I liked to post where he was foolish in his "guarantees". Its fun.I did enjoy it with Jennings all year (until yesterday)...but will probably let someone pay too much for him next year.
 
it's been a great ride aboard the Jennings Bandwagon this year. Hope we all enjoyed it!
:useless: It ended like "A Bridge Too Far", but we never would have gotten there without him anyway.I was being semi-honest about him in my assessment though, he can't replicate the TD's he had, and as great as Favre is, Father Time is undefeated and always will be...Wouldn't want Jennings as anything other than a WR3 next year and I think he'll cost way more than that next season.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I need one more catch tonight to win one of my leagues. Please? Is one more catch too much to ask for? Pretty please?

 
Wait...but I thought it was all Favre hitting him in stride that was leading to these big plays.

Funny, #12 seemed to find him just fine...and had him for a TD too if Jones had not stepped in front of it to steal it from him.

 
H.K. said:
Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?
:rolleyes:
:( It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
So?I thought it was not about TDs...but targets and receptions...Both Jennings and Driver have 11 receptions.The difference...Jennings has gone for 258 with his...Driver for 90.Oh...and Jones stole Jennings TD. :shrug:
 
Jennings looks to be a real quality sleeper this year. I wish I had drafted him in more leagues. I just wish he would stop getting caught before the end zone on some of those ridiculously long receptions...

 
H.K. said:
Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?
:yawn:
:yawn: It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
i just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.
How so?2008 Red Zone Targets:Driver 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
 
Jennings looks to be a real quality sleeper this year. I wish I had drafted him in more leagues. I just wish he would stop getting caught before the end zone on some of those ridiculously long receptions...
Jennings clearly is a favorite target for Rodgers. Rodgers just needs to get a bit more air under some of those throws so Jennings doesn't have to come back for them.The complaint last year was Jennings relying too much on getting TDs for his scoring and not on receptions/yards. Now he has reversed that, but it is pretty apparent that he will get many TD opportunities this year.My biggest concern was not with Jennings, but with Rodgers. It sure looks like Rodgers is going to keep the GB offense humming along at a high level. That makes Jennings a WR1 this year and a big steal based on his ADP.
 
H.K. said:
Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?
:lmao:
:lmao: It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
i just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.
How so?2008 Red Zone Targets:Driver 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
His TDs have dried up because of 2 games? Really?Driver is tied with Jennings in receptions and has done far less with the receptions he has got...you whined all year about Jennings receptions, and now they mean nothing to you.Virtually interchangable? Not really.So far, you have only proven you know little about the packers WRs.
 
H.K. said:
Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?
:yawn:
:unsure: It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
i just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.
How so?2008 Red Zone Targets:Driver 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
Unreal. Jennings is not an interchangeable WR2 with Jones on GB. He may not have the TDs - and I agreed with you last year - but he will have the yards and be 1a or 1b with Driver. It's really that simple.
 
As a Jennings owner, yeah, he's be solid so far, but wtf has gone on in the second half of both games? He has yet to catch a single ball in the 2nd half. of either game.

Fairly frustraing....

 
H.K. said:
Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?
:rolleyes:
:shrug: It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
i just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.
How so?2008 Red Zone Targets:Driver 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
How's that Holmes guy doing for ya? Not as good as Jennings now is he? NOPE! If I recall you were touting him as better than Jennings. He's not.
 
H.K. said:
Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?
:rolleyes:
:shrug: It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
i just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.
How so?2008 Red Zone Targets:Driver 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
How so? It's simple.Your whole debate has been that Jennings cannot be a stud without the rediculous TD ratio and target percentage from last year, but he is already proving you wrong by being effective wihtout TD's this year. He's doing it with yardage and Receptions. Wake up buddy! It's ok to be wrong.
 
H.K. said:
Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?
:lmao:
:lmao: It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
i just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.
How so?2008 Red Zone Targets:Driver 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
Dude. This gets so old. You also said Jennings:a) would get fewer targets than Driver and possibly Jones this year;b) could not possibly sustain his high ypc average.Well, Jennings as 15 targets to Driver's 13. An average of 7.5 a year. That is above last years pace.Jennings is averaging 23.5 yards per reception vs. 17.4 last year.
 
Well, Jennings as 15 targets to Driver's 13. An average of 7.5 a year. That is above last years pace.Jennings is averaging 23.5 yards per reception vs. 17.4 last year.
Let's just agree to disagree. I don't expect him to finish with a 23.5 YPC. Also, the Packers don't play the Lions every week, so the numbers will only go down from here ,and as has already been proven, the TD's have vanished.
 
As a Jennings owner, yeah, he's be solid so far, but wtf has gone on in the second half of both games? He has yet to catch a single ball in the 2nd half. of either game.

Fairly frustraing....
I think you need to look at the game log from the last game. Jenning caught a 60 yard pass that set up the go ahead TD in the fourth quarter.http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/p...1/80914052/1058

September 14, 2008

Jennings keys Rodgers' first comeback win

By Rob Demovsky

rdemovsk@greenbaypressgazette.com

DETROIT — Add a comeback road victory to Aaron Rodgers’ short but noteworthy list of accomplishments.

Six days after beating the rival Minnesota Vikings in his first NFL start, the Green Bay Packers’ neophyte quarterback completed what some consider the toughest task in football — a fourth-quarter, come-from-behind victory on the road.

Rodgers has Greg Jennings to thank for it.

After giving away leads of 21-0 in the second quarter, 24-9 in the third quarter and 24-16 in the fourth quarter, Rodgers faced the most crucial series of the young season. Trailing 25-24, the Packers took over at their 20-yard line with 7:41 remaining. Little was said in the huddle while the offense waited through a television timeout, but Rodgers picked up on a vibe from veteran tackles Chad Clifton and Mark Tauscher.

“I looked at those guys, and they just nodded,” Rodgers said. “I think they were confident that we were going to go down and put points on the board.”

The drive did not start well. Brandon Jackson ran for just 2 yards on first down. Then, a false start by left guard Daryn Colledge put the Packers in second-and-13 at their 17. At that moment, Packers coach Mike McCarthy called a play similar to one he used two series earlier in which Rodgers missed Jennings on a short slant route.

This time, it worked nearly to perfection. Out of a four-receiver set, Jennings lined up in the near slot to the left. He put cornerback Keith Smith on his outside hip and darted inside, where Rodgers delivered a strike. Jennings quickly turned up the field and scampered 60 yards.

“We had a similar play on a previous drive where I tried to hit Greg real quick, and I threw it behind him,” Rodgers said. “I was pretty upset at myself. We came back to a similar play call, a quick slant to Greg. I feel like, and I know our coaching staff does as well, if you can get Greg Jennings the ball with separation, good things are going to happen.”

Though the drive stalled at the Lions’ 21-yard line, Mason Crosby’s 39-yard field goal with 5:17 to play was enough to give Rodgers his first comeback win.

“My idol growing up, Joe Montana, was a guy who could always bring his team back in the fourth quarter, a guy who his teammates trusted with the ball in his hands late in the game,” Rodgers said after the 48-25 win at Ford Field. “You don’t want to have a lot of comebacks because you want to be ahead. Unfortunately, our lead dwindled, Detroit got the crowd back in the game and we were able to put together really one big play.”

It capped another near mistake-free performance by Rodgers, who has not thrown an interception in two games. His only major miscue was a third-quarter sack — on which he admitted he held the ball too long — that resulted in a fumble and turnover.

Rodgers bettered his 115.5 passer rating from last week with a 117.0 mark against the Lions. He threw for 328 yards and three touchdowns on 24-of-38 passing. His completion rate through two games stands at 70 percent.

“I thought he played pretty well again,” offensive coordinator Joe Philbin said. “We’ll have to take a look at the tape, but he hung in there, kept his composure, made some plays for us. Overall, we’ve got to be pleased so far. He hasn’t thrown it to the other team yet. That’s always big, so I think he’s off to a good start.”

An early trend in Rodgers’ play has been his efficiency on third down. All four of his touchdown passes have come on third-down plays. His first one on Sunday came on third-and-goal from 9, when Rodgers avoided a sack and threw toward the back corner of the end zone, where Jennings was open. Teammate James Jones, who was running a shorter route in the end zone, thought the ball was for him, so he jumped up to make the catch.

The second touchdown was a third-and-goal play from the 2 in which Rodgers recognized that receiver Donald Driver had a mismatch against linebacker Ernie Sims. Driver made a jab step to the inside to freeze Sims and cut to the outside, where Rodgers hit him.

The third one was a third-and-2 play from the Lions’ 29 in which rookie receiver Jordy Nelson beat cornerback Brian Kelly on a go route for his first NFL score.

The Packers were 9-for-16 on third downs, including 5-for-7 in the first half and stand at an even 50 percent on third downs through two games.

Though Jennings did not get into the end zone, he put together a monster day. In addition to his key, 60-yard gain in the fourth quarter, he caught a bomb from Rodgers for a 62-yard gain that set up Driver’s touchdown. On that play, Jennings was open deep, and Rodgers carried the ball 70 yards in the air. Jennings would have scored had he not had to wait for the ball to reach him.

Driver caught a team-high seven passes, but Jennings had six receptions for a career-high 167 yards.

“Aaron is very comfortable back there,” Jennings said. “The offensive line is giving him a lot of time to make his reads and find his open receivers, and we’re trying to make plays when we can. I think that’s the biggest thing that builds a quarterback’s confidence. If your receivers are making plays, and you’re making good throws, you’re going to perform pretty well.”

 
Well, Jennings as 15 targets to Driver's 13. An average of 7.5 a year. That is above last years pace.Jennings is averaging 23.5 yards per reception vs. 17.4 last year.
Let's just agree to disagree. I don't expect him to finish with a 23.5 YPC. Also, the Packers don't play the Lions every week, so the numbers will only go down from here ,and as has already been proven, the TD's have vanished.
2 games prove the TDs have vanished?Hell...I guess LT's TDs have vanished.Santonio Holmes too.Hell, Moss did not score last game, I guess his TDs have vanished. :confused:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top