Jennings numbers with Rogers in just over a half of football:5 targets, 3 catches, 69 yards, 1 TD4) Favre is the GOAT, and Jennings is yet one other guy he is making look good.Why is H.K. in such denial over Jennings? Anyone?
He makes big plays on deep balls...but how many of those 12 TDs were because of deep passes...3? 4?So 8 others in redzone looks or where he took a shorter pass and made great moves.3) Not necessarily...Driver is getting older and may lose out on some the more Favre grows and trusts Jennings...But its clear he is the deep ball threat for that team.
This is part of the problem. It's harder to complete the deep ball than the shorter or intermediate routes. Low probability. That has been Jennings staple, it's going to be his downfall.
4) I disagree completely. Did Favre make Jennings look good as he ran past Bly? Yes. Few if any, QB's can make that throw.
Did he make Jennings look good as he streaked past all of the Charger's defenders?
"streaked past"? The Chargers blew the coverage. Favre is great so he saw it immediately.
Favre and the coaches have praised him and his talent over and over again. Have you heard Favre say that about alot of WRs?
As long as Favre has played, yes, he has siad that about plenty of WR's.
Finally...you have claimed this how many times the past few weeks? You just think you can keep saying it and one day it might come true.
This week I am guaranteeing it. No other outcome is possible.
My main concern this week is not Jennings but the fact that I am already starting Grant and the weather looks a bit frightful in CHI. I may use Welker instead.
How is this even a question? Welker is the best WR play in the history of FF this week. The guy has over 1000 yards and twice as many receptions as Jennings. Any team that starts Welker can't lose. Guaranteed.Even better than Deion Branch (who had nothing to do with Chad Johnson really...)My main concern this week is not Jennings but the fact that I am already starting Grant and the weather looks a bit frightful in CHI. I may use Welker instead.How is this even a question? Welker is the best WR play in the history of FF this week. The guy has over 1000 yards and twice as many receptions as Jennings. Any team that starts Welker can't lose. Guaranteed.
You have guaranteed a whole lot this week.I have a feeling I should go against every piece of advice you give and I would be better off.If you have Deion Branch, he will lead all WR's in receptions this week. No other outcome is possible.
Told ya. The guy is FF death.Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
I can't believe he didn't score a TD every week for the rest of his career.I have a prediction too. Tom Brady is FF death.Told ya. The guy is FF death.Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
I'll be back to say "Told ya" on his next bad week.Really?Told ya. The guy is FF death.Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
Jennings...3 receptions, 42 yards, 0 TDs - 4 points in my leauge.Welker...5 receptions, 49 yards 0 TDs - 4 points in my league.I guess you had the weather all figured out too huh?How is this even a question? Welker is the best WR play in the history of FF this week. The guy has over 1000 yards and twice as many receptions as Jennings. Any team that starts Welker can't lose. Guaranteed.

Hold up, so what about your Welker prediction?? How'd that work out??Told ya. The guy is FF death.Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
A little bit off....but he crushed Jennings in PPR though, 28% more output this week by Welker.Hold up, so what about your Welker prediction?? How'd that work out??Told ya. The guy is FF death.Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
the sad thing is that your reverse-psychology anti-jinx actually turned out to be truewhen we all know that you have Jennings on your squad and you're hating him comingup short in your FF Championship game just like the rest of us.Many in this thread don't get it but I get it. You love Jennings and are happy as hellthat you had him on your squad this year. Even losing the FF championship doesn'tfeel so bad knowing you at least made it to the final game riding a WR who most draftedafter the 10th round.keeper next year? In a Keep 4+ format, I'd say so.A little bit off....but he crushed Jennings in PPR though, 28% more output this week by Welker.Hold up, so what about your Welker prediction?? How'd that work out??Told ya. The guy is FF death.Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
the sad thing is that your reverse-psychology anti-jinx actually turned out to be truewhen we all know that you have Jennings on your squad and you're hating him comingup short in your FF Championship game just like the rest of us.Many in this thread don't get it but I get it. You love Jennings and are happy as hellthat you had him on your squad this year. Even losing the FF championship doesn'tfeel so bad knowing you at least made it to the final game riding a WR who most draftedafter the 10th round.keeper next year? In a Keep 4+ format, I'd say so.
10th round, though?....that loser cost me a 7th.....Tough call on his keeper status....it will be fun to discuss it over the coming months. Thanks to all for a great thread.Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays Everyone!Yeah...those 2 extra receptions.Weather killed Jennings (which was not your claim all week long anyway).Your predictions sucked.A little bit off....but he crushed Jennings in PPR though, 28% more output this week by Welker.Hold up, so what about your Welker prediction?? How'd that work out??Told ya. The guy is FF death.Well, the didn't help any of his owners really. First week without a TD since week 10.
I posted that like on page 2 anyway.everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzleand stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's gettingpretty sad, really![]()
I'm in competitive leagues so he went in the 7th and 8th. His 1st 4 games last year let people know his potential.Many in this thread don't get it but I get it. You love Jennings and are happy as hellthat you had him on your squad this year. Even losing the FF championship doesn'tfeel so bad knowing you at least made it to the final game riding a WR who most draftedafter the 10th round.keeper next year? In a Keep 4+ format, I'd say so.
He hates anyone who ever played for Green Bay past or present.everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzleand stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's gettingpretty sad, really![]()
if you get the joke, then why do you keep challenging H.K.'s FAKE analysisof Jennings stats vs. other receivers? time to let this thread fade away until it turns intoamoff-season thread of Jennings draft/keeper status for 2008.it's been a great ride aboard the Jennings Bandwagon this year. Hope we all enjoyed it!I posted that like on page 2 anyway.everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzleand stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's gettingpretty sad, really![]()
I liked to post where he was foolish in his "guarantees". Its fun.I did enjoy it with Jennings all year (until yesterday)...but will probably let someone pay too much for him next year.if you get the joke, then why do you keep challenging H.K.'s FAKE analysisof Jennings stats vs. other receivers? time to let this thread fade away until it turns intoamoff-season thread of Jennings draft/keeper status for 2008.it's been a great ride aboard the Jennings Bandwagon this year. Hope we all enjoyed it!I posted that like on page 2 anyway.everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzleand stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's gettingpretty sad, really![]()
He hates anyone who ever played for Green Bay past or present.everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzleand stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's gettingpretty sad, really![]()
This never gets old....Merry Christmas, GB!it's been a great ride aboard the Jennings Bandwagon this year. Hope we all enjoyed it!
It ended like "A Bridge Too Far", but we never would have gotten there without him anyway.I was being semi-honest about him in my assessment though, he can't replicate the TD's he had, and as great as Favre is, Father Time is undefeated and always will be...Wouldn't want Jennings as anything other than a WR3 next year and I think he'll cost way more than that next season.I think people were just picturing Lee Evans II or something. Greg Jennings got very little respect in the offseason.Bumping... Don't own him this year, but he is off to a good start.
...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?

:( It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()
So?I thought it was not about TDs...but targets and receptions...Both Jennings and Driver have 11 receptions.The difference...Jennings has gone for 258 with his...Driver for 90.Oh...and Jones stole Jennings TD.:( It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()

:( Looks well on his way to a WR1 again (believe he finished as WR #12 in PPR last year)Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?
i just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()
It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
How so?2008 Red Zone Targetsi just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()
It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
river 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.Jennings clearly is a favorite target for Rodgers. Rodgers just needs to get a bit more air under some of those throws so Jennings doesn't have to come back for them.The complaint last year was Jennings relying too much on getting TDs for his scoring and not on receptions/yards. Now he has reversed that, but it is pretty apparent that he will get many TD opportunities this year.My biggest concern was not with Jennings, but with Rodgers. It sure looks like Rodgers is going to keep the GB offense humming along at a high level. That makes Jennings a WR1 this year and a big steal based on his ADP.Jennings looks to be a real quality sleeper this year. I wish I had drafted him in more leagues. I just wish he would stop getting caught before the end zone on some of those ridiculously long receptions...
His TDs have dried up because of 2 games? Really?Driver is tied with Jennings in receptions and has done far less with the receptions he has got...you whined all year about Jennings receptions, and now they mean nothing to you.Virtually interchangable? Not really.So far, you have only proven you know little about the packers WRs.How so?2008 Red Zone Targetsi just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()
It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
river 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
Unreal. Jennings is not an interchangeable WR2 with Jones on GB. He may not have the TDs - and I agreed with you last year - but he will have the yards and be 1a or 1b with Driver. It's really that simple.How so?2008 Red Zone Targetsi just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()
It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
river 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
Merry Christmas to you too!He hates anyone who ever played for Green Bay past or present.everyone please see post #165 for the answer to this puzzleand stop thinking that H.K. actually dislikes Jennings. It's gettingpretty sad, really![]()
This never gets old....Merry Christmas, GB!

How's that Holmes guy doing for ya? Not as good as Jennings now is he? NOPE! If I recall you were touting him as better than Jennings. He's not.How so?2008 Red Zone Targetsi just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()
It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
river 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
How so? It's simple.Your whole debate has been that Jennings cannot be a stud without the rediculous TD ratio and target percentage from last year, but he is already proving you wrong by being effective wihtout TD's this year. He's doing it with yardage and Receptions. Wake up buddy! It's ok to be wrong.How so?2008 Red Zone Targetsi just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()
It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
river 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
Dude. This gets so old. You also said Jennings:a) would get fewer targets than Driver and possibly Jones this year;b) could not possibly sustain his high ypc average.Well, Jennings as 15 targets to Driver's 13. An average of 7.5 a year. That is above last years pace.Jennings is averaging 23.5 yards per reception vs. 17.4 last year.How so?2008 Red Zone Targetsi just read this whole thread. Before you had a debate, now you're just ignorant, wrong and changing the topic.H.K. said:...or who leads the Packers in receiving TD's?Anyone know who is leading the league in receiving yards?![]()
It's a four way tie between Driver, Jones, Nelson and Hall.
river 2 Jones 2Jennings 1Jennings' TD's have dried up just like I said they would. Driver is still leading the team in receptions and is the primary red zone guy (just like I said he would be) and after Jones first game returning from injury, Jones had only two fewer targets than Jennings, making Jones and Jennings virtually interchangable as the WR 2 in GB.
As a Jennings owner, yeah, he's be solid so far, but wtf has gone on in the second half of both games? He has yet to catch a single ball in the 2nd half. of either game.Fairly frustraing....
He had a huge catch and run in the 4th quarter yesterday.Let's just agree to disagree. I don't expect him to finish with a 23.5 YPC. Also, the Packers don't play the Lions every week, so the numbers will only go down from here ,and as has already been proven, the TD's have vanished.Well, Jennings as 15 targets to Driver's 13. An average of 7.5 a year. That is above last years pace.Jennings is averaging 23.5 yards per reception vs. 17.4 last year.
I think you need to look at the game log from the last game. Jenning caught a 60 yard pass that set up the go ahead TD in the fourth quarter.http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/p...1/80914052/1058As a Jennings owner, yeah, he's be solid so far, but wtf has gone on in the second half of both games? He has yet to catch a single ball in the 2nd half. of either game.
Fairly frustraing....
2 games prove the TDs have vanished?Hell...I guess LT's TDs have vanished.Santonio Holmes too.Hell, Moss did not score last game, I guess his TDs have vanished.Let's just agree to disagree. I don't expect him to finish with a 23.5 YPC. Also, the Packers don't play the Lions every week, so the numbers will only go down from here ,and as has already been proven, the TD's have vanished.Well, Jennings as 15 targets to Driver's 13. An average of 7.5 a year. That is above last years pace.Jennings is averaging 23.5 yards per reception vs. 17.4 last year.
