Otis
Footballguy
Already referenced that. Not sure what your point is. MY point is you idiots can't be trusted. Seriously.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
***OFFICIAL GUN CONTROL DEBATE*** (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter ATC1
- Start date
Apple Jack
Footballguy
Who wants to spend all that time and effort building a pipe bomb that may or may not work when all you have to do is have the impulse, jump in the car and go shoot 20 kindergarteners.
The convenience and lack of barriers between impulse and execution is a huge part of the issue. Not to mention, the framers didn't have repeating guns when they drafted the Second Amendment. They also had a much more unstable sociopolitical environment.
The convenience and lack of barriers between impulse and execution is a huge part of the issue. Not to mention, the framers didn't have repeating guns when they drafted the Second Amendment. They also had a much more unstable sociopolitical environment.
Last edited by a moderator:
Otis
Footballguy
BUT SOMEONE TRIED TO STEAL MY STEREO BRAH!! AND I STOPPED THEM!! WHAT ABOUT THAT.:facepalm:
Apple Jack
Footballguy
Just need some more guns out their Otis. You'll see.
Ilov80s
Footballguy
So we have this: He made a pipebomb. You didn't know how. It sounds like neither of you proved anything.That still doesn't refute my original claim that on the whole, it is easier to obtain and fire a gun than build a pipe bomb nor does it refute the immediacy of things. Not sure how many future killers have pipe bombs just sitting around but I'd wager a lot more have guns sitting around.Me and my friends made a pipe bomb long before the internet and blew it up in a cemetary. I'm sure there are much more detailed instructions nowadays.I beg to differ. I have no idea how to make a pipe bomb and I've taken college science classes. But I figured out how to operate a gun at a range after only shooting a BB gun before. In order to build a pipe bomb, you presumably have to go online and post in forums which are monitored by the DHS. Then you have to proceed and buy stuff for pipe bombs. I'm sure you can make one with relatively most homemade stuff but it would still be difficult, the guarantee of success that you actually built correctly aren't 100% and perhaps most importantly, you have to plan it out. We don't know how this went down but some gun crimes seem to be spur of the moment and even massacres like this seem to be that people snap. Guns don't really give you a chance to sit back and think. Building a pipe bomb, you have to go through all the steps which would be a deterrent in itself. Sure it wouldn't stop people like Columbine who planned for it, but it would stop other senseless crimes which happen at a moment's notice.Let's keep talking about the how and not the why. You could just as easily throw a homemade pipe bomb into a classroom.
Last edited by a moderator:
Cliff Clavin
Footballguy
Apple Jack
Footballguy
Would this pipe bomb have made it past all the adults between the door and the classrooms? Would 22 kids in two rooms have been killed? Doubt it.
jamny
Footballguy
Yeah, it's funny when some people are tied up, raped and killed by armed assailants. No, having a gun wouldn't have helped. I agree with assault bans and strict gun control but there is no reason why a responsible home owner shouldn't be allowed to own a gun to protect himself from some of these animals. btw..I don't own one.
Last edited by a moderator:
Otis
Footballguy
Sure sounds like a gun problem when 20 small children get shot with guns. But yeah, you've got this one solved, Matlock.
Apple Jack
Footballguy
That why not how strategy is going great.
Otis
Footballguy
Thank goodness for all those times when innocent civilians had guns in their pockets to stop the tying up, rape, and killing. That happens SO frequently. Seriously. Just thank ####### Moses for the guns.
Apple Jack
Footballguy
Yes there is; because we can't tell who the responsible ones are and the downside for society far trumps the upside. It's just that enough paranoid people have enough money to keep the NRA and the gun lobby funded.
Cliff Clavin
Footballguy
Wrong Sherlock. The problem was with a nutjob who decided he wanted to kill a bunch of kids. The method isn't nearly as important.Sure sounds like a gun problem when 20 small children get shot with guns. But yeah, you've got this one solved, Matlock.
IvanKaramazov
Footballguy
Ouch.
Cliff Clavin
Footballguy
And breeding.
Otis
Footballguy
Totally not important. It would have played out exactly the same way if he had a bucket of water balloons.Thanks Cliff for being so spot on again.Wrong Sherlock. The problem was with a nutjob who decided he wanted to kill a bunch of kids. The method isn't nearly as important.Sure sounds like a gun problem when 20 small children get shot with guns. But yeah, you've got this one solved, Matlock.
Maybe we just need MORE guns. Think about it. If all of those 5-year-olds were armed, this would have ended way better.
We need to put the hicks on an island out in the ocean and let them pretend they're still living in the 1800's. Only solution. Go shoot each other, who cares at that point.
Otis
Footballguy
Fine by me.
Mr Two Cents
Footballguy
Like it or not, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed in the US. Just like freedom of speech - it's fundamental.
Cliff Clavin
Footballguy
Oh, sorry, you're right. This guy just thought GUNS! "I can get GUNS! I'm gonna go kill a bunch of kids because GUNS!"Totally not important. It would have played out exactly the same way if he had a bucket of water balloons.Thanks Cliff for being so spot on again.Wrong Sherlock. The problem was with a nutjob who decided he wanted to kill a bunch of kids. The method isn't nearly as important.Sure sounds like a gun problem when 20 small children get shot with guns. But yeah, you've got this one solved, Matlock.
Maybe we just need MORE guns. Think about it. If all of those 5-year-olds were armed, this would have ended way better.
We need to put the hicks on an island out in the ocean and let them pretend they're still living in the 1800's. Only solution. Go shoot each other, who cares at that point.
Otis
Footballguy
I don't have one. I wouldn't mind it, because I'm surrounded by hillbilllies and morons in this world. But I'd gladly give up my right to have one to make it harder for the morons to get one. That's the key.
jamny
Footballguy
Stop being so elitist and live in the real world.
sporthenry
Footballguy
It proved for one, the immediacy of guns being readily available. What happens in these situations when someone gets upset and doesn't have a gun? You can't just make a pipe bomb up in minutes can you? If guns weren't readily available, would these situations escalate as quickly?So we have this: He made a pipebomb. You didn't know how. It sounds like neither of you proved anything.That still doesn't refute my original claim that on the whole, it is easier to obtain and fire a gun than build a pipe bomb nor does it refute the immediacy of things. Not sure how many future killers have pipe bombs just sitting around but I'd wager a lot more have guns sitting around.Me and my friends made a pipe bomb long before the internet and blew it up in a cemetary. I'm sure there are much more detailed instructions nowadays.I beg to differ. I have no idea how to make a pipe bomb and I've taken college science classes. But I figured out how to operate a gun at a range after only shooting a BB gun before. In order to build a pipe bomb, you presumably have to go online and post in forums which are monitored by the DHS. Then you have to proceed and buy stuff for pipe bombs. I'm sure you can make one with relatively most homemade stuff but it would still be difficult, the guarantee of success that you actually built correctly aren't 100% and perhaps most importantly, you have to plan it out. We don't know how this went down but some gun crimes seem to be spur of the moment and even massacres like this seem to be that people snap. Guns don't really give you a chance to sit back and think. Building a pipe bomb, you have to go through all the steps which would be a deterrent in itself. Sure it wouldn't stop people like Columbine who planned for it, but it would stop other senseless crimes which happen at a moment's notice.
Otis
Footballguy
Let me help you here, Cliff.There were two pieces in this puzzle today: a person, and guns.Oh, sorry, you're right. This guy just thought GUNS! "I can get GUNS! I'm gonna go kill a bunch of kids because GUNS!"Totally not important. It would have played out exactly the same way if he had a bucket of water balloons.Thanks Cliff for being so spot on again.Wrong Sherlock. The problem was with a nutjob who decided he wanted to kill a bunch of kids. The method isn't nearly as important.Sure sounds like a gun problem when 20 small children get shot with guns. But yeah, you've got this one solved, Matlock.
Maybe we just need MORE guns. Think about it. If all of those 5-year-olds were armed, this would have ended way better.
We need to put the hicks on an island out in the ocean and let them pretend they're still living in the 1800's. Only solution. Go shoot each other, who cares at that point.
It's gonna be hard to ban persons. Would make for a really awkward civilization to continue on. But hey, guess what? Guns? As between these two things, I think we could get rid of the guns and still get on alright.
Hope this lesson in logic for dummies helped.
Best,
Oats
IvanKaramazov
Footballguy
I'm kind of suprised LHUCKS got banned today but Otis is still running wild with stuff that's way beyond anything the other guy posted.
jamny
Footballguy
Otis
Footballguy
Why? If this is the real world, I'd rather have higher standards.
Meat for my freezer.
Apple Jack
Footballguy
The framers were not aware of the future of gun technology and therefore were not addressing it.
Otis
Footballguy
I'm not posting it in a thread about the children who were killed. I'm posting comments about gun control in a thread about gun control. I think the comments that were made today in that other thread bordered on horrifying. I didn't post a single thing about gun control over there. But the freaking hillbillies need to be shut down here. It's enough already.
jamny
Footballguy
We all would but you seem to be ignoring reality.
Cliff Clavin
Footballguy
Hi Oats,Let me help you out here. Someone ####ed up enough to want to kill a bunch of kids is going to find a way to do it. Not being able to find a gun isn't going to stop him. HTH.Let me help you here, Cliff.There were two pieces in this puzzle today: a person, and guns.Oh, sorry, you're right. This guy just thought GUNS! "I can get GUNS! I'm gonna go kill a bunch of kids because GUNS!"Totally not important. It would have played out exactly the same way if he had a bucket of water balloons.Thanks Cliff for being so spot on again.Wrong Sherlock. The problem was with a nutjob who decided he wanted to kill a bunch of kids. The method isn't nearly as important.Sure sounds like a gun problem when 20 small children get shot with guns. But yeah, you've got this one solved, Matlock.
Maybe we just need MORE guns. Think about it. If all of those 5-year-olds were armed, this would have ended way better.
We need to put the hicks on an island out in the ocean and let them pretend they're still living in the 1800's. Only solution. Go shoot each other, who cares at that point.
It's gonna be hard to ban persons. Would make for a really awkward civilization to continue on. But hey, guess what? Guns? As between these two things, I think we could get rid of the guns and still get on alright.
Hope this lesson in logic for dummies helped.
Best,
Oats
Yours in Christ,
Cliff.
sporthenry
Footballguy
Just like the right to catch slaves who fled to other states?
BigJohn
Footballguy
Otis
Footballguy
I may be the only one facing it.
Cliff Clavin
Footballguy
This. And I'd also rather not give up the pistol my grandfather used in WW2.
Otis
Footballguy
Why did you weld the doors shut on your General Lee, H8tank?
Apple Jack
Footballguy
This is the most important element of the gun debate.It proved for one, the immediacy of guns being readily available. What happens in these situations when someone gets upset and doesn't have a gun? You can't just make a pipe bomb up in minutes can you? If guns weren't readily available, would these situations escalate as quickly?So we have this: He made a pipebomb. You didn't know how. It sounds like neither of you proved anything.That still doesn't refute my original claim that on the whole, it is easier to obtain and fire a gun than build a pipe bomb nor does it refute the immediacy of things. Not sure how many future killers have pipe bombs just sitting around but I'd wager a lot more have guns sitting around.Me and my friends made a pipe bomb long before the internet and blew it up in a cemetary. I'm sure there are much more detailed instructions nowadays.I beg to differ. I have no idea how to make a pipe bomb and I've taken college science classes. But I figured out how to operate a gun at a range after only shooting a BB gun before. In order to build a pipe bomb, you presumably have to go online and post in forums which are monitored by the DHS. Then you have to proceed and buy stuff for pipe bombs. I'm sure you can make one with relatively most homemade stuff but it would still be difficult, the guarantee of success that you actually built correctly aren't 100% and perhaps most importantly, you have to plan it out. We don't know how this went down but some gun crimes seem to be spur of the moment and even massacres like this seem to be that people snap. Guns don't really give you a chance to sit back and think. Building a pipe bomb, you have to go through all the steps which would be a deterrent in itself. Sure it wouldn't stop people like Columbine who planned for it, but it would stop other senseless crimes which happen at a moment's notice.
jamny
Footballguy
In your mind, yes you are.
MAC_32
Footballguy
So, good reason, please.
IvanKaramazov
Footballguy
I get that part, but everybody's nerves are on edge, and it's not helpful when every post calls somebody an idiot or a moron or a hillbilly or a hick. This just isn't a good time to be inflammatory. I'm not saying this to pick on you or play board cop -- on the contrary, I try to just ignore the people I dislike who do this.
Neovivo
Footballguy
So have we come up with a solution?
I keep hearing the same arguments over and over again...Well it wasn't the guns that killed those kids, responsible people are ok with guns, USA! USA! USA! love it or leave it!, people should be allowed to shot people who would harm them or their family, responsible people who hunt and want to target practice or a hobby.
We are never going to have any real reform. I am starting to agree with Otis. No intelligent person needs a gun.
I keep hearing the same arguments over and over again...Well it wasn't the guns that killed those kids, responsible people are ok with guns, USA! USA! USA! love it or leave it!, people should be allowed to shot people who would harm them or their family, responsible people who hunt and want to target practice or a hobby.
We are never going to have any real reform. I am starting to agree with Otis. No intelligent person needs a gun.
Apple Jack
Footballguy
You can hunt with bows and knives. Like real men. Guns are the height of chicken ####.
Mr Two Cents
Footballguy
Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. Their violent crime rate is through the roof.
sporthenry
Footballguy
This is a fallacy. You can't just assume that any or all of them would do it/be nearly as successful without the gun. What else are they going to use? How often are people killed by pipe bombs? Is the success rate as high? Someone posted an earlier article about a Chinese Massacre where a guy knifed 22 primary school kids. You know how many died? 0. Guy was subdued by security guards.Hi Oats,Let me help you out here. Someone ####ed up enough to want to kill a bunch of kids is going to find a way to do it. Not being able to find a gun isn't going to stop him. HTH.Let me help you here, Cliff.There were two pieces in this puzzle today: a person, and guns.Oh, sorry, you're right. This guy just thought GUNS! "I can get GUNS! I'm gonna go kill a bunch of kids because GUNS!"Totally not important. It would have played out exactly the same way if he had a bucket of water balloons.Thanks Cliff for being so spot on again.Wrong Sherlock. The problem was with a nutjob who decided he wanted to kill a bunch of kids. The method isn't nearly as important.Sure sounds like a gun problem when 20 small children get shot with guns. But yeah, you've got this one solved, Matlock.
Maybe we just need MORE guns. Think about it. If all of those 5-year-olds were armed, this would have ended way better.
We need to put the hicks on an island out in the ocean and let them pretend they're still living in the 1800's. Only solution. Go shoot each other, who cares at that point.
It's gonna be hard to ban persons. Would make for a really awkward civilization to continue on. But hey, guess what? Guns? As between these two things, I think we could get rid of the guns and still get on alright.
Hope this lesson in logic for dummies helped.
Best,
Oats
Yours in Christ,
Cliff.
Otis
Footballguy
Yeah, he could have got them all just as fast with a butter knife from the school cafeteria.You're completely ignoring reality, This discussion is a waste of my time.Hi Oats,Let me help you out here. Someone ####ed up enough to want to kill a bunch of kids is going to find a way to do it. Not being able to find a gun isn't going to stop him. HTH.Let me help you here, Cliff.There were two pieces in this puzzle today: a person, and guns.Oh, sorry, you're right. This guy just thought GUNS! "I can get GUNS! I'm gonna go kill a bunch of kids because GUNS!"Totally not important. It would have played out exactly the same way if he had a bucket of water balloons.Thanks Cliff for being so spot on again.Wrong Sherlock. The problem was with a nutjob who decided he wanted to kill a bunch of kids. The method isn't nearly as important.Sure sounds like a gun problem when 20 small children get shot with guns. But yeah, you've got this one solved, Matlock.
Maybe we just need MORE guns. Think about it. If all of those 5-year-olds were armed, this would have ended way better.
We need to put the hicks on an island out in the ocean and let them pretend they're still living in the 1800's. Only solution. Go shoot each other, who cares at that point.
It's gonna be hard to ban persons. Would make for a really awkward civilization to continue on. But hey, guess what? Guns? As between these two things, I think we could get rid of the guns and still get on alright.
Hope this lesson in logic for dummies helped.
Best,
Oats
Yours in Christ,
Cliff.
MAC_32
Footballguy
If it'll save some lives I think you can pay for your meat like the rest of us do, or run it over like some of the hillbillies where I grew up.
Similar threads
