James Daulton
Footballguy
Sex Island? Is that on Travelocity?
No, but for an extra charge, I think they can provide a Gnome.Sex Island? Is that on Travelocity?
Your unemployment stat is true, but it ignores the fact that more blacks are nit even looking for work. Your claim about poverty is blantamtly false, the poverty rate bottomed out in 1973, there are more blacks in poverty today than ever. Let's look how blacks have done under Obama (see link below).
But, more ominously, the seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black Americans across the board has slipped from 63.2 percent to 61.7 percent — down 2.4 percent.
The seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black teenagers also sagged from 29.6 percent to 28.8 percent — down 2.7 percent.
During Obama’s tenure, the percentage of black Americans struggling below the poverty line has advanced, according to the most recent Census Bureau data, from 25.8 in 2009 to 26.2 in 2014 — up 1.6 percent.
Real median income among black households during those years, according to the Census Bureau, sank from $35,954 to $35,398 — down 1.5 percent.
The number of black food-stamp participants exploded across that time frame from 7,393,000 to 11,699,000, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reports — up 58.2 percent.
Also, from Obama’s oath of office through the fourth quarter of 2015, the percentage of black Americans who own homes foundered from 46.1 percent to 41.9 percent, according to the Census — down 9.1 percent.Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/433222/black-americans-barack-obama-going-backwards-under-president-obama
Skinemax.Hillary visited Sex Island 6 times? Sure she did.
We need to have a show about this, a new Fantasy Island, with special guest stars Donald Trump, both Clintons, Anthony Weiner, Alan Dershowitz, and lots of other celebrities, all coming to visit.
Marco Rubio, who Trump called "Little Marco", could play the guy who yells "De plane! De plane!" at the start of each episode.
Wait wait wait, you're telling me Trump's team doesn't use cutting edge metrics and data analysis? Unpossible.Dems with huge edge in early Nevada voting. Massive Hispanic turnout.
As Koya noted above, Hispanic vote combined with huge and highly sophisticated Democratic Get Out the Vote effort likely to put this one away for Hillary.
Have read some fascinating stuff about how Democrats have built on Obama's online edge and partnered with left-leaning tech leaders to do groundbreaking political stuff with big data. They know down to the individual level who their key voters are and have built effort that will literally take every single one of them to the polls if necessary.
Meanwhile, Trump's ground game seems virtually nonexistent
The Foundation is not an ATM for the Clintons.Skinemax.
Point of fact - Epstein did give like $3-4 million to the Foundation. Maybe more.
How many millions does it take to become an agent? I would like to see which ones the Clintons have crossed the line with.Rohn Jambo said:It's a sure bet that Hillary will be indicted. Now, the question is how many other people will be arrested with her.
The Foundation is not an ATM for the Clintons.
As someone in the NYC metro, who has followed this long before anyone nationally got wind, there is nothing potential about it.As for Christie....we are including POTENTIAL mistakes?
No kidding but it does but access to Bill at a minimum.The Foundation is not an ATM for the Clintons.
They're rich enough to not need Foundation $ for that. Remember they get paid a #### load for speeches.![]()
Good one. The Foundation is the vehicle that provides the slush money for all their private jet travel. It provides the salaries for their political operatives. That's what we know. I'm sure there's lots we don't.
Close but not quite - it would require Trump to flip ColoradoIf Hilldog carries Nevada is it game over?
They're rich enough to not need Foundation $ for that. Remember they get paid a #### load for speeches.
maybe you missed/ignored the Band memo - where he outlines how he gets the foundation donors to pay for those speeches...So they donate to the Foundation and pay him to speak? Why not just pay him to speak?maybe you missed/ignored the Band memo - where he outlines how he gets the foundation donors to pay for those speeches...
Da club?Suggesting hispanic people to go "back" to a country they've never called their own is about as ignorant as suggesting a black person to go "back" to you know where.
But Trump's not flipping Colorado is he? I thought that was firmly blue.Close but not quite - it would require Trump to flip Colorado
It is. Very doubtful he can flip that stateBut Trump's not flipping Colorado is he? I thought that was firmly blue.
Good point. An ATM is too small to hold all that money. It's more like their personal bank vault.The Foundation is not an ATM for the Clintons.
And yet they do. Ravenously greedy and all for providing access.They're rich enough to not need Foundation $ for that. Remember they get paid a #### load for speeches.
Its unlikely - but I don't think it is firm Blue.But Trump's not flipping Colorado is he? I thought that was firmly blue.
Your position is that Hillary didn't do anything wrong.Hillary's position is that she did nothing wrong.
Such a slush fund that he Foundation gets a top ranking by all of the charitable watchdog groups.![]()
Good one. The Foundation is the vehicle that provides the slush money for all their private jet travel. It provides the salaries for their political operatives. That's what we know. I'm sure there's lots we don't.
And to add: from what we've seen that is technically true with regards to the Clintons. But what we've seen is that donations to the CF have strings - direct payments to Bill for speeches, honorary chairmanships, etc. were expected. Consulting fees from Teneo were also expected as they were the fixer doing the deals.
Epstein seem like a charitable humanist to you, wants to save starving babies in Africa, that kind of thing?They're rich enough to not need Foundation $ for that. Remember they get paid a #### load for speeches.
Vox piece on this is a good summary: http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bull####Your position is that Hillary didn't do anything wrong.
Hillary's position is that using a private server was wrong (though not criminal), and she's apologized for it.
I think the consulting fees were to Teneo, not from Teneo.![]()
Good one. The Foundation is the vehicle that provides the slush money for all their private jet travel. It provides the salaries for their political operatives. That's what we know. I'm sure there's lots we don't.
And to add: from what we've seen that is technically true with regards to the Clintons. But what we've seen is that donations to the CF have strings - direct payments to Bill for speeches, honorary chairmanships, etc. were expected. Consulting fees from Teneo were also expected as they were the fixer doing the deals.
But clients overlapped.I think the consulting fees were to Teneo, not from Teneo.
This is rich.....the guy that attacks sources used by those that he disagrees with posts this from Vox.Vox piece on this is a good summary: http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bull####
I get news from all over. I try to keep an open mind, and acknowledge known biases.Sinn, glad to see you're staying informed by getting your news from Breitbart.
Trump's not winnng Colorado. Don't be disingenuous, post your link.Its unlikely - but I don't think it is firm Blue.
Last 5 polls since Oct 31 - Clinton +5, +1, +6, tie, +3
Hello in there, Cliff.![]()
Based on what? Ghost Rider, though he despises Hillary and thinks she is guilty of criminal behavior, is absolutely right about this- Hillary's position is that she did nothing wrong. Obama will NEVER pardon Hillary Clinton. You're dreaming.
Breitbart is a joke and you know it. You're far too intelligent for that trash.I get news from all over. I try to keep an open mind, and acknowledge known biases.![]()
Relax pal. I am not being disingenuous....http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/co/colorado_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5974.html#pollsTrump's not winnng Colorado. Don't be disingenuous, post your link.
Clinton's won the vast majority of polls in Colorado since Oct. There's been a large number of polls conducted since then, over 30 by my count:
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/colorado/
IIRC Ralston is considered the go-to political reporter in Nevada. i.e. he's not just some crazy dude on a message board.More on Nevada:
----The Democrats won Clark County by more than 11,000 votes Friday (final mail count not posted yet), a record margin on a record-setting turnout day of 57,000 voters. The Dems now have a firewall -- approaching 73,000 ballots -- greater than 2012 when Barack Obama won the state by nearly 7 points. The 71,000 of 2012 was slightly higher in percentage terms, but raw votes matter. The lead is 14 percentage points -- right at registration. You know what else matters? Registration advantages (142,000 in Clark). Reminder: When the Clark votes were counted from early/mail voting in 2012, Obama had a 69,000 vote lead in Clark County. Game over. - Ralston
http://www.ktnv.com/news/ralston/the-nevada-early-voting-blog
What news sources should people be paying attention to that aren't slanted left or right?Breitbart is a joke and you know it. You're far too intelligent for that trash.
Thanks champ!Relax pal. I am not being disingenuous....http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/co/colorado_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5974.html#polls
Gunz does this all the time.I enjoy when people who mock links or info from a source that is ideologically slanted than link to a different source that it is ideologically slanted (that also happens to share that person's ideology)...
The local barbershop.What news sources should people be paying attention to that aren't slanted left or right?
Where do you get your news from?Sinn, glad to see you're staying informed by getting your news from Breitbart.
Right. But, TMZ and the National Enquirer are also trash, and they get stories correct from time to time.Breitbart is a joke and you know it. You're far too intelligent for that trash.
I don't mind finding out something from whacko sites like Breitbart, but that should be a starting point to research the story - not the ending point as it is for most Breitbart visitors.I get news from all over. I try to keep an open mind, and acknowledge known biases.![]()