This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Not sure how that plays, red meat for the faithful, maybe creates sympathy or suspicion with the skeptical. - Trump's got much bigger problems, he's getting hammered in the press, his party and in the courts.
Yeah, I'm a lone opinion on this. I'm sure this speech will have no legs whatsoever.
Agreed....there's no "usual" here. It's going to be depressing either way we go. I guess the good part for Obama is history will be very favorable for him given who's following in his footsteps. Something tells me his blunders are going to look like child's play.
I think that's a sound progressive SoCal type mentality. You show no awareness of other folks and their feelings anywhere East of the Rockies and maybe West of the Mississippi but go on believing that everyone in the World thinks like you do.
Whether the speech has legs or not is irrelevant. I am curious to see if we look back on this day as the turning point for Hillary, where the momentum started rolling in her direction for a change. We got the Obama endorsement, the #DeleteYourAccount posting, which was a drop the mic moment for Hillary, both against Trump and her email critics. And for the trifecta, the blistering Warren speech, which hopefully should goad Trump into a "Pocahontas" meltdown reaction, along with establishing Warren as perhaps the most articulate attack dog the Democrats could come up with against him.
Pretty silly and the more they bang the bigotry and hatred of women button the worse they seem to make it on themselves. We'll see.
Oh I am sorry you seemed so excited about the personal attacks that Goofahantas was throwing out what is a few more right?
And just like that within an hour of the Obama endorsement -- White House acknowledges for the first time that the FBI probe is criminal, and WSJ reports that details of pending drone strikes were sent to her server.
No way dude. Obama met with the head of the don prior to the endorsement. I have it on good authority that these are accurate transcripts.
His supporters sure couldn't wait 5 minutes to go there.That is what Warren is hoping for.
Can Trump resist taking the bait?
Which has always been Rodham Clintons problem, besides the racketeering, is that she doesn't have a clear message and doesn't stand for anything in particular except coal miners of course. Being anti Trump is not enough.
Jon Stewart said it best: "I imagine she's a bright woman without the courage of her convictions because I'm not even sure what they are."
This is already wrong. Warren has just spent the last 5 minutes on Maddows show praising Hillary.
What's she gonna say? "Oh, well, she's OK I guess. I mean we don't see eye to eye on a lot but she's not completely horrible."
She went on and on. Her praise was very lavish. Seems heartfelt.
All out war. Obama decided to put every bit of pressure on the DOJ to obstruct. Meanwhile, the "most transparent administration in history" refused to release details on a dozen Guantanemo inmates that were released and killed Americans in Afghanistan--citing some bull####.
"The 2011 and 2012 emails were sent via the "low side" -government slang for a computer system for unclassified matters"
Obama's no idiot. He knows how to win an election. You say stuff like that and the Tims of the world lap it up. They just hear the words and that's all they need.
Both of the facts I detailed are true. How the #### pending drone strikes can be discussed on a private server and no charges!!
