What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
so you agree she should stop being elusive and release her health records to put this issue behind her, right?
She's already admitted to taking blood thinners. If she releases a doctor's report stating that the fainting is caused by the blood thinners, it won't do a damn thing to put this behind her.

 
Just realize Wapo and NYT are both finally carrying their 4th estate responsibility and calling bull#### on her.  That's Hillary's kryptonite.

 
Just realize Wapo and NYT are both finally carrying their 4th estate responsibility and calling bull#### on her.  That's Hillary's kryptonite.

 
She's already admitted to taking blood thinners. If she releases a doctor's report stating that the fainting is caused by the blood thinners, it won't do a damn thing to put this behind her.
:lmao:

Like I said earlier, PLENTY of suckers in here.
You're pretty much proving the point. Nothing Hillary's doctor says will make you stop with the conspiracy theories. Therefore she has nothing to gain.

She has no interest in trying to convince the deplorables.

 
You're pretty much proving the point. Nothing Hillary's doctor says will make you stop with the conspiracy theories. Therefore she has nothing to gain.

She has no interest in trying to convince the deplorables.
Keep skating on this ice if you like cold baths.

 
[scooter] said:
You're pretty much proving the point. Nothing Hillary's doctor says will make you stop with the conspiracy theories. Therefore she has nothing to gain.

She has no interest in trying to convince the deplorables.
I see that like a good sycophant you're already off and running with her soundbites like a parrot.  Is that an example of bringing people together?  Is that an example of why we should vote for Hillary?

 
[scooter] said:
You're pretty much proving the point. Nothing Hillary's doctor says will make you stop with the conspiracy theories. Therefore she has nothing to gain.

She has no interest in trying to convince the deplorables.
I see that like a good sycophant you're already off and running with her soundbites like a parrot.  Is that an example of bringing people together?  Is that an example of why we should vote for Hillary?
Hillary holds no illusion that the deplorables would ever consider voting for her. Nothing she can do will change their minds, or your mind. You know that. (Message board faux outrage notwithstanding.)

It's similar to Mitt Romney and his 47% comment. Except that Mitt did not realize that the "47%" actually contained a large number of Republicans. Mitt needed a large chunk of the 47%. Hillary doesn't need any of the deplorables.

 
Hillary holds no illusion that the deplorables would ever consider voting for her. Nothing she can do will change their minds, or your mind. You know that. (Message board faux outrage notwithstanding.)

It's similar to Mitt Romney and his 47% comment. Except that Mitt did not realize that the "47%" actually contained a large number of Republicans. Mitt needed a large chunk of the 47%. Hillary doesn't need any of the deplorables.
If Hillary has a serious illness and is hiding it, is that deplorable?

 
Hillary holds no illusion that the deplorables would ever consider voting for her. Nothing she can do will change their minds, or your mind. You know that. (Message board faux outrage notwithstanding.)

It's similar to Mitt Romney and his 47% comment. Except that Mitt did not realize that the "47%" actually contained a large number of Republicans. Mitt needed a large chunk of the 47%. Hillary doesn't need any of the deplorables.
Again, is that an example of bringing people together?  By calling them names?  And "the deplorables", as you call them, are simply ANYONE who won't vote for her.  That's pretty bad to call a good portion of the electorate something like that.  It's like how the left calls anyone "racist, homophone or sexist" when they don't vote Democrat.  There is not difference here.

 
Hillary holds no illusion that the deplorables would ever consider voting for her. Nothing she can do will change their minds, or your mind. You know that. (Message board faux outrage notwithstanding.)

It's similar to Mitt Romney and his 47% comment. Except that Mitt did not realize that the "47%" actually contained a large number of Republicans. Mitt needed a large chunk of the 47%. Hillary doesn't need any of the deplorables.
Again, is that an example of bringing people together?  By calling them names?  And "the deplorables", as you call them, are simply ANYONE who won't vote for her.  That's pretty bad to call a good portion of the electorate something like that.  It's like how the left calls anyone "racist, homophone or sexist" when they don't vote Democrat.  There is not difference here.

 
Worst case scenario from this is that Hillary can't debate or she has "an episode" during a debate. If there is an issue that cannot be remedied with medication than the Democratic Party does need to remove her. In either scenario though... 

Kaine >>>>>>>> Trump. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hillary holds no illusion that the deplorables would ever consider voting for her. Nothing she can do will change their minds, or your mind. You know that. (Message board faux outrage notwithstanding.)

It's similar to Mitt Romney and his 47% comment. Except that Mitt did not realize that the "47%" actually contained a large number of Republicans. Mitt needed a large chunk of the 47%. Hillary doesn't need any of the deplorables.
Again, is that an example of bringing people together?  By calling them names?  And "the deplorables", as you call them, are simply ANYONE who won't vote for her.
Actually, it is an example of bringing people together. She wants to bring together her supporters along with the non-deplorable Trump supporters. She wants to isolate and ostracize the right-wing bigots.

Imagine telling Reagan that he needed to bring people together by being inclusive to radical fringe leftists.
 

 
Worst part was her "it's a beautiful day" reaction after emerging from Chelsea's condo. Like nothing happened, everything's fine, nobody will know.

This is the pathology of a walled off recidivist liar.

 
I'm at the Saints game but I will cut in during this commercial break as word is afoot here but to say to you Hillary supporters: 'YOU IDIOTS.'

Thank you.

 
Worst part was her "it's a beautiful day" reaction after emerging from Chelsea's condo. Like nothing happened, everything's fine, nobody will know.

This is the pathology of a walled off recidivist liar.
The real dumb part is that she said "it's a beautiful day". How can the day be beautiful if the heat caused you to faint, huh??

 
Actually, it is an example of bringing people together. She wants to bring together her supporters along with the non-deplorable Trump supporters. She wants to isolate and ostracize the right-wing bigots.

Imagine telling Reagan that he needed to bring people together by being inclusive to radical fringe leftists.
Looked like a turd.

 
She's sick. Time to come clean. Not sure how you can elect someone who may drop at a moments notice. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Today? It's been obvious for weeks there's something wrong. Either she opens up and tells all or she loses. 
Yeah, all of us know that but it hasn't been so blatantly front and center like this before.  The WaPo writer illustrates how today changed everything.

 
If she traveled back in time and was a midwife to Hitler's mom, is that deplorable?
After the fifth of sixth video of her with an infant on her ### with a tiny mustache, let's talk.  For now, let's focus on the fact that healthy people don't collapse in 82 degrees from heat exhaustion. Something is most likely quite wrong and she's hiding it.  This is material.  Her campaign cannot and should not be trusted.  This has rightly become a serious and legitimate campaign issue. 

 
Last edited:
I bet Clinton's aides feel a bit sheepish now...

Daily Mail U.S. Political Editor David Martosko was attacked online by current and former aides to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton for commenting about Clinton’s tired, listless appearance at a press conference on Friday about national security. Martosko was also challenged by two reporters who defended Clinton.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top