This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
If they recognized the truth of the situation it would be a bare-knuckled shock to their system that they most likely wouldn't be able to handle after investing so heavily in her and believing every single lie she utters (which is pretty much anytime she opens her mouth). So keeping their head in the sand about it is the only way to avoid their world from crashing in around them.. This is a typical sycophant defense mechanism.
Seriously. If you had to ask this question then you are completely clueless or so far in the tank that you, yourself, are compromised.
Hey Mr. President, here's the status of our ongoing investigation. This is what we have, this is what we don't have. We are going to interview Secretary Clinton, as you know. These are the questions we have about possible criminal activities. We know you are supporting her bid to succeed you in office, but if you would kindly not let her know any of what we discussed, that would greatly help our investigation. Thank you so much Mr. President.
So someone forwarding cryptic unclassified gibberish to her email account rises to the level of Hillary removing items concerning national defense? And I guess anyone else would have been in jail for receiving an email.
Do you honestly think the agents on the Clinton case are under any illusions about the amount of scrutiny they're under? Do you think there's any chance they don't know the outcome that the current administration would prefer? Are you so naive as to think that federal employees in an around Washington don't socialize and talk shop? Do you honestly think there hasn't been a ridiculous amount of gossip on this topic in Washington? So how exactly do you think a back channel update would compromise the investigation?
Like I said you tell me. Presidential nominee is under criminal investigation. Why? It's not the drones. It's not the secret names. It's not the secret programs. It's not the mishandling of class info. It's not the unauthorized server. It's not the deleted emails. Running out of guesses here.
More like - Senior Staffer: Mr. President, word is that there's nothing in the classified documents to get in a huff over.
That should do for @timschochet who has been asking for just this to happen so he can accept what's been known for months.
Obama has gone out of his way to say he hasn't been briefed so he can avoid the appearance of impropriety, if he accepts the importance of it you should too.
He wouldn't need to be briefed. He'd just need someone in a position to protect him be briefed.
The idea the FBI is investigating nothing is absurd. That's obviously your position. News reports say the investigation is about x, y, z you say there is nothing to be investigated. Ok then the investigation exists nonetheless.
Why does he need to be briefed at all? He knows that Congress has everything. He knows that they have been not shy about leaks. He has seen the "worst of the worst" of the "beyond top secret" emails in the media. And when this overly security conscious president stopped laughing so hard that it hurts about the threats he came to the only sane conclusion for someone lacking a presumption of guilt.
Ok that's Nixonian plausible deniability stuff. I've never accused him of that. You want to accuse him of games go right ahead.
When Hillary gets the nomination you will get yours. With a criminal investigation and uncommitted Suoer Delegates there is still a reasonable albeit slim chance Hillary is not the nominee. Be patient.
It's not the first time he's tried to keep someone involved in the birther nonsense out of the White House.
That's not the bet. The bet was about Obama's endorsement, that he wouldn't endorse anybody until the race was decided. The race was decided and he endorsed Hillary Clinton. Whatever happens now, the bet has been decided. Please pay up.
Same day his own spokesman acknowledged the person he endorsed is under criminal investigation.
Gosh the FBI consults on bad record keeping practices now? So when Josh Earnest says Hillary is under criminal investigation, what for?
I think that was a misquote btw. The FBI has steadfastly refused to call it criminal either on paper or in the public, and have made a big point of not doing so, and since they're the ones conducting the investigation they're the ones I trust.
You seem to be missing the point here. The point is that a GOP candidate who wasn't bigoted against Mexicans/Hispanics wouldn't have to conceded NV, CO and NM and thus would have a path to victory that wouldn't require them to sweep FL, OH and PA like Trump will have to do if we assume he loses all the battleground states with significant Hispanic populations.
I didn't hear but she probably was...if you notice in my posts I usually don't defend Trump (except with the racist BS which gets spewed out by everyone on the left)...he is what he is...he is the product of an inept GOP and a backlash against Political Correctness...what I don't go for his hypocritical liars like Hillary and Lizzie not practicing what they preach which they relentlessly do...they are both complete frauds who have risen to the top on very limited accomplishments and BS...
Of course it was compromised and of course it matters...it's not either/or. I was wondering what the new talking point was going to be and now I know....down the rabbit hole we go. What none of this changes is the lack of judgment and ethics on her part which is the most important part.
She is meeting with Warren today- I hope you're right. And I hope that Trump like you continues to refer to Warren in this manner as it will only solidify Hillary's support.
Trump won that little bout with his reply,
