Max believes that Hillary is SO untrustworthy that you can't trust what she will do (or at least try to do) on ANY issue. I don't think the majority of the public believe this.Max's point wasn't that they don't agree with her. It's that America's not sure they can trust her when she says it....two completely different things. I've noticed this a lot out of you yesterday and today.
Well, if the shoe fits...Max believes that Hillary is SO untrustworthy that you can't trust what she will do (or at least try to do) on ANY issue. I don't think the majority of the public believe this.
Not sure what "majority" means in Tim land, but here on earth, it's a term that means over 50%. The last polls posted here in the FFA a month or so ago had her passing 50% untrustworthy in her sleep. Both her and Donald were over the 55% mark....maybe even 60% (I don't remember since I am not really suppose to be paying attention to polls).Max believes that Hillary is SO untrustworthy that you can't trust what she will do (or at least try to do) on ANY issue. I don't think the majority of the public believe this.Max's point wasn't that they don't agree with her. It's that America's not sure they can trust her when she says it....two completely different things. I've noticed this a lot out of you yesterday and today.
I find Hillary Clinton to be generally an untrustworthy person.Not sure what "majority" means in Tim land, but here on earth, it's a term that means over 50%. The last polls posted here in the FFA a month or so ago had her passing 50% untrustworthy in her sleep. Both her and Donald were over the 55% mark....maybe even 60% (I don't remember since I am not really suppose to be paying attention to polls).
So even your sidebar tangent here doesn't appear to be correct.
None of what you posted is what I said at all. She's running for president..just like Trump and Sanders and Bush and Obama and Reagan and her husband. They all say/said what they think we want to hear.Two wrong don't make a right now, do they?
Besides, we always talk of wanting our politicians to be better but now you're just ready to throw that out the window because "everyone does it"? Also, to be fair, Hillary is a lot more slimy and dishonest more so than the average politician.
wonderful....has nothing to do with what you replied to. For someone who was whining about this thread being about things it shouldn't be, you aren't pulling your weight to get it out of that proverbial gutter.I find Hillary Clinton to be generally an untrustworthy person.Not sure what "majority" means in Tim land, but here on earth, it's a term that means over 50%. The last polls posted here in the FFA a month or so ago had her passing 50% untrustworthy in her sleep. Both her and Donald were over the 55% mark....maybe even 60% (I don't remember since I am not really suppose to be paying attention to polls).
So even your sidebar tangent here doesn't appear to be correct.
I trust that Hillary Clinton will attempt to do what she says about guns, about infrastructure spending, about certain other issues that I know are important to her.
These two statements are not necessarily contradictory.
Sure. Paul Ryan. I can trust him.None of what you posted is what I said at all. She's running for president..just like Trump and Sanders and Bush and Obama and Reagan and her husband. They all say/said what they think we want to hear.
Answer the question.
Yikes...thought it was shtick. There are a couple really good threads here. Take the time and hunt them down and read them.Really
Thanks. Of course helied about his running a marathon in 3 hours.Sure. Paul Ryan. I can trust him.
Translation: "Count on me to do nothing!"Hillary: "I believe Americans are capable of protecting the Second Amendment while at the same time keeping guns out of the wrong hands."
That's all you got?Thanks. Of course helied about his running a marathon in 3 hours.![]()
I really should stop responding to you because at this point most of your posts have become total nonsense. What I wrote had EVERYTHING to do with what I replied to. If you don't understand that, I'm forced to question your reading comprehension skills.wonderful....has nothing to do with what you replied to. For someone who was whining about this thread being about things it shouldn't be, you aren't pulling your weight to get it out of that proverbial gutter.
That's all you got?Wow. I'll take that every day of the week and twice on Sundays. I can't even give you an "A" for effort because that was terrible.
My bad. No beef.I asked. You answered. I quipped. I winked. What's the beef?
What hippie trailer park did they poll here?New Bloomberg Poll:
Hillary 49%
Trump 37%
Johnson 9%
Max is insane. He said he thought Hillary was more slimy and dishonest than the average politician.Max believes that Hillary is SO untrustworthy that you can't trust what she will do (or at least try to do) on ANY issue. I don't think the majority of the public believe this.
Runners don't forget their times. This was definitely a WTF moment.Thanks. Of course helied about his running a marathon in 3 hours.![]()
Delusions must be a ##### to live with. Not being able to tell reality from fiction must be terrifyingSome say there exists a gene for exemplary online forum jousting.
I think I have it.
Voting for a third party is the same as not voting. You're neither helping not hurting Donald's chancesyeah, no
I think most people are fairly confident that even if she's lying, she's not going to say something bat#### crazy every other dayMax's point wasn't that they don't agree with her. It's that America's not sure they can trust her when she says it....two completely different things. I've noticed this a lot out of you yesterday and today.
Maybe the point of the vote is to help neither the crook or idiot win. Who are you to tell people why or who to vote for?Voting for a third party is the same as not voting. You're neither helping not hurting Donald's chances
I'm a sane, rational, intelligent human being. And you?Maybe the point of the vote is to help neither the crook or idiot win. Who the #### are you to tell people who to vote for?
Of course you are. And how does that make you feel?I'm a sane, rational, intelligent human being. And you?
Someone in the Sanders thread said he might demand to be named chair of the Senate Budget Commit. Funny how some people think Sanders could ask for all this and Hillary could not have demanded and gotten the SOS position in 2008 with more delegates, more sway with core party leadership, more sway with SDs and holding the challenges from MI & FL.Sanders and Clinton wrapped up 2 hour meeting. I imagine what we will see in the end:
Superdelegates gone
DWS steps down after the election
1-3 additional planks added to platform pulling it leftward
I'd like to see a more comprehensive overhaul of the primary system but I imagine there will be some resistance on many levels there.
How does it feel to be sane, rational, and intelligent? Seems like a waste of time to explain it to you.Of course you are. And how does that make you feel?
I am less concerned about what she says every other day, I am more concerned with what she does (or does not do).I think most people are fairly confident that even if she's lying, she's not going to say something bat#### crazy every other day
Pretty sure Jill Stein has the hippie vote...What hippie trailer park did they poll here?
You've probably benefited more from the removal of nested quotes than anyone on this board. It's easier to spewI really should stop responding to you because at this point most of your posts have become total nonsense. What I wrote had EVERYTHING to do with what I replied to. If you don't understand that, I'm forced to question your reading comprehension skills.
DebatableI'm a sane, rational, intelligent human being. And you?
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED?!?!?!?!?!?I think most people are fairly confident that even if she's lying, she's not going to say something bat#### crazy every other dayMax's point wasn't that they don't agree with her. It's that America's not sure they can trust her when she says it....two completely different things. I've noticed this a lot out of you yesterday and today.
If we're being fair...both groups shouldn't really be going there, should they? The numbers are embarrassing all the way around.The Trump folks are a hoot with the "Hillary is so unpopular!" stuff.
Clinton +43/-55, net favorability of -12; Trump +29/-70, net favorability of -41. And 56% say it's "strongly unfavorable" with Trump. If those numbers hold it'll be an electoral wipeout for Republicans across the entire country.
And we're back full circle. Telling me what my vote is/means. So bizarreVoting for a third party is the same as not voting. You're neither helping not hurting Donald's chances
"On ANY issue" was the "qualification" that Commish says didn't exist. This is why, Commish, I questioned your reading skills.Max believes that Hillary is SO untrustworthy that you can't trust what she will do (or at least try to do) on ANY issue. I don't think the majority of the public believe this.
I made clear I wasn't interested in the things that YOU added to the comment. I was talking about the comment exactly as he made it. Again....this has been a pattern with you the last week or so. This is the comment that started this whole thing Tim:"On ANY issue" was the "qualification" that Commish says didn't exist. This is why, Commish, I questioned your reading skills.Max believes that Hillary is SO untrustworthy that you can't trust what she will do (or at least try to do) on ANY issue. I don't think the majority of the public believe this.
You and your buddies have told us not to pay attention to the polls until Bernie has dropped outSo how come nobody's talking about the Bloomberg poll? This is the first meaningful head to head poll we've had in this election cycle, because it's the first time we've had a poll featuring two presumptive nominees. And Hillary has a double digit lead.
Back when we had meaningless polls showing a tight race between Trump and Clinton (meaningless because Hillary was still fighting it out with Sanders at the time) there were dozens of posts in here about how weak a candidate Hillary was, how she was going to lose the election, etc. etc. Now? Silence.
For all practical purposes he dropped out last week. When he officially drops out (likely in a few days) it should only result in an even more positive outcome for Hillary.You and your buddies have told us not to pay attention to the polls until Bernie has dropped out![]()
oh....okFor all practical purposes he dropped out last week. When he officially drops out (likely in a few days) it should only result in an even more positive outcome for Hillary.You and your buddies have told us not to pay attention to the polls until Bernie has dropped out![]()