What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (7 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
timschochet said:
And once again Fox News, Sean Hannity, and Judge Andrew Napolitano look like total idiots. For months they have been swearing up and down that there would be indictments for sure, that they had "solid" inside sources.
Click to expand...
Well that's one thing we agree on, you would think that pack of dopes would lose cred with their core for the number of times they cry wolf with no info

 
She kinda seems a bit like Drebin now after hearing all that.  That's better then the way I thought of her before at least.  I think this helps her rep.  This country did elect W.  We embrace the fool.

 
MaxThreshold said:
I don't know what you're crowing about here.  I think most of us knew she would NOT be indicted, but this conference did her no favors and made her look very bad.
Click to expand...
Meh. People will just read the 'no indictment' headline, figure it means 'did nothing wrong', and move on. Everything forgiven by the next news cycle. Expect a major + bump for her in the polls. 

 
Apple Jack said:
Well, let's not get carried away, it's not like she went full Condi and put her weight behind supporting something as lethally reckless and bogus as the Iraq invasion. Er.

Still....Shrill >>>>>>>>>>> Cheeto Jesus in just about every conceivable way.
Click to expand...
Like Hillary?

 
Apple Jack said:
Well, let's not get carried away, it's not like she went full Condi and put her weight behind supporting something as lethally reckless and bogus as the Iraq invasion. Er.

Still....Shrill >>>>>>>>>>> Cheeto Jesus in just about every conceivable way.
Click to expand...
Condi isn't running

 
Personally, I'm not relieved by this; I'm disappointed. I honestly never thought this story was as big a deal as other people, like Saints did. Hillary said on several occasions that she never sent or received classified information. Obviously that was an untrue statement. Some of my respect for her has been lost. 

 
It's only "poor judgement" if you know what Republicans would have BENGHAZID if everything had been available.  No doubt she knew exactly what she was doing and had lawyers look at it ahead of time to confirm it wasn't illegal. How you feel about that decision sure seems like it aligns pretty well with how you felt about her to begin with.

 
Big takeaway here, other than her recklessness, is that -- yet again -- she was completely dishonest about this, especially in classified docs.

 
wdcrob said:
It's only "poor judgement" if you know what Republicans would have BENGHAZID if everything had been available.  No doubt she knew exactly what she was doing and had lawyers look at it ahead of time to confirm it wasn't illegal. How you feel about that decision sure seems like it aligns pretty well with how you felt about her to begin with.
Click to expand...
Isn't it supposed to be available?

 
timschochet said:
Personally, I'm not relieved by this; I'm disappointed. I honestly never thought this story was as big a deal as other people, like Saints did. Hillary said on several occasions that she never sent or received classified information. Obviously that was an untrue statement. Some of my respect for her has been lost. 
Click to expand...
Why can't you say LIE?

 
timschochet said:
Personally, I'm not relieved by this; I'm disappointed. I honestly never thought this story was as big a deal as other people, like Saints did. Hillary said on several occasions that she never sent or received classified information. Obviously that was an untrue statement. Some of my respect for her has been lost. 
Click to expand...
You're disappointed that a Clinton lied?  Did you expect anything less?

 
Is there a claim by Comey that something is missing?  I don't think that's really the heart of it. But I haven't seen anything outside this thread yet.

 
wdcrob said:
It's only "poor judgement" if you know what Republicans would have BENGHAZID if everything had been available.  No doubt she knew exactly what she was doing and had lawyers look at it ahead of time to confirm it wasn't illegal. How you feel about that decision sure seems like it aligns pretty well with how you felt about her to begin with.
Click to expand...
I don't think Comey said she did not do anything illegal, as I understood it from Comey the DOJ just doesn't bring the negligence charge as a matter of practice.

Normals lose their federal careers for this.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
MaxThreshold said:
I don't know what you're crowing about here.  I think most of us knew she would NOT be indicted, but this conference did her no favors and made her look very bad.
Click to expand...
Comey could have declared her entirely innocent and you'd have thought it all made her look bad.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ArbyMelt said:
I think this is good news for Trump. He has a chance against Hillary. If she was indicted and Joe Biden runs, he loses in a landslide.
Click to expand...
lol, really shows how ####ty both Hilldog and Trump are to have Biden crushing them.  Biden's been nothing but the butt of jokes for his gaffs the last eight years.

 
dparker713 said:
Comey could have decalred her entirely innocent and you'd have thought it all made her look bad.
Click to expand...
That's not true at all. I have said on numerous occasions that I respect Comey and would abide by what he says.  What he said today was that while indictments aren't normally brought up in these cases, HRC was extremely careless in her handling of classified info.  He also confirmed that HRC did, indeed, lie about this whole thing.

So, he has confirmed what we've all been saying about Hillary, just that charges won't be brought.  And, tbh, I've always said I doubt she won't be indicted.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No matter how wrong Hilary was,  everyone knew no charges would be brought against her.  Nothing can stick to the Clintons.  Even if FBI recommended discipline,  the DOJ,  who Obama controls,  would not have brought charges against her.  The politicians control everything.

 
Ironically what Comey said was true: if Clinton were still in government, they could do something administratively - she would lose her security clearance, she could be suspended, fired, banned from future federal work, and fined. All these things would be awaiting someone in Hillary's position in federal government.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i bet the GOP wishes low energy Jeb! Was running right about now. 

Or even that weird religious Doctor... 

Anyone but trump this would be an issue that's hard to overcome 

 
flapgreen said:
No matter how wrong Hilary was,  everyone knew no charges would be brought against her.  Nothing can stick to the Clintons.  Even if FBI recommended discipline,  the DOJ,  who Obama controls,  would not have brought charges against her.  The politicians control everything.
Click to expand...
Yeah but the FBI didn't recommend charges, so there's that. 

 
flapgreen said:
No matter how wrong Hilary was,  everyone knew no charges would be brought against her.  Nothing can stick to the Clintons.  Even if FBI recommended discipline,  the DOJ,  who Obama controls,  would not have brought charges against her.  The politicians control everything.
Click to expand...
So you believe Comey lied when he said charges in these situations usually are not brought?

 
timschochet said:
Personally, I'm not relieved by this; I'm disappointed. I honestly never thought this story was as big a deal as other people, like Saints did. Hillary said on several occasions that she never sent or received classified information. Obviously that was an untrue statement. Some of my respect for her has been lost. 
Click to expand...
:shock:  

Some truth is now clear.  It is known she set up a system to obscure open records, and probably should have security clearances pulled. 

Given who she is up against, I will vote for her.  I would vote, however, with good reason for any viable alternative.  Any.  

But given I don't have a choice of a viable candidate...  Congrats on installation of a candidate whose judgment was just indicted, and who would have been fired from her SoS job if she still held it.

But what choice do I have?  What choice do any of us?

 
Smack Tripper said:
i bet the GOP wishes low energy Jeb! Was running right about now. 

Or even that weird religious Doctor... 

Anyone but trump this would be an issue that's hard to overcome 
Click to expand...
Trump's capacity to explain this is near nil.

I do think that 2015-16 the people have been in a 'fix is in' mood though, and this will only exacerbate things. If Trump can mouth anything it's those words over and over again.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Smack Tripper said:
i bet the GOP wishes low energy Jeb! Was running right about now. 

Or even that weird religious Doctor... 

Anyone but trump this would be an issue that's hard to overcome 
Click to expand...
I wonder if Paul Ryan regrets not running. Then again, Trump may have beaten him in the primary. And I reckon if Hillary wins, Ryan will be the frontrunner in 2020.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

mr. furley
Long Island serial killer suspect in custody
Replies
34
Views
2K
Dezbelief
Dezbelief
krista4
In this thread I rank my favorite Beatles songs: 204-1.
138 139 140
Replies
7K
Views
259K
rockaction
rockaction
HellToupee
***Official*** Joe Biden 2016 Presidential Thread
Replies
35
Views
2K
That one guy
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Back
Top