This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
So you believe Comey overreacted when he said this:
Nope. He had no problem with not looking at previous testimony that Hillary made under oath? He doesn't know if Hillary was sophisticated enough to know what a (c) means on a document? A few other comments showed some leniency on his part to me.
The DNC needs to select a different candidate. What we know now is more than enough to justify it.
What a dumb thing for Comey to say. He just gave the Republicans exactly what they were hoping to find today.
You know what, same thing could have been said about her vs Bernie Sanders. Bernie is an honest man who can do his damned job properly like the rest of America.
He said 3 emails had (C) in the side body of emails. Not in titles or headers. That made up the some 100+ being sent back and forth amongst those CC'd/ in the discussion. In 30,000+.
It is total partiansion BS. The right is looking for every sliver to nail Hillary. It is so sadNo, he said he needed congress to give the ok. He didnt have it and Chaffertz said he would now. You misrepresented... very Gowdy like.
It's the only sane solution at this point. Going forward with these two clowns as candidates is literal insanity.
She is about to become the leader of the free world.
You are impugning him with your question.
Nobody's saying otherwise. It's the ridiculous overreactions to that truth that we're ripping on here.
Then you better be ready to hold a hearing on FBI director Comey. Anything less and you prove this is political theater. As his position is too important.
Yeah, this is what I thought I remembered...thanks.
It has gotten so absurd and the posters on the right are so deep into their parsing of every statement that they have lost sight of everything. It is amazing that the Speaker of the House (2nd in line for the Presidency in case something happens to the President) would make this statement. It is so unreal
And posters here have completely ignored the fact that Comey has disregarded one of their (and my) main objections to Clinton's email: that she set it up to avoid FOIA requests. He says that their investigation supporters her claim that she did it for convenience reasons. No bother, there's some other statement about classified markings that they don't really understand to get outraged about!
The lmao-smilie-emoticon subset doesnt think he is very good at his presentation and discussion though.
I'm not concerned with her or any of her predecessors using private servers to conduct department business. It's the message traffic that traversed those unaccredited servers that concern me. Yes, it was a mistake in judgment. It happens to all of us. But there are consequences when discussing classified information.
That is a big deal. Really there is something in this for everyone.
If she set it up to avoid FOIA, then that would push the situation she created into the criminal realm. If it was just for convenience reasons, then it's probably not criminal. BUT, and this seems to be what you have issue with, despite her actions not being criminal, they ARE often subject to security and administrative sanctions. This isn't my opinion. It's Comey's:
