IC FBGCav
Footballguy
Hillary and Trump could be the next Tanya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan. Just picture Trumpdoubled over holding his balls cryingholding his toupee in his tiny hands saying "why?.... why?...."
Hillary and Trump could be the next Tanya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan. Just picture Trumpdoubled over holding his balls cryingholding his toupee in his tiny hands saying "why?.... why?...."
Oh lord. Does it depend on what the definition of that "is" is, too?No, they look at the number of statements which they judged to be untrue, which is different. I am sure Trump probably lies often. But that does not drive me to vote for a different liar.
There's still time to pressure her to step down and put in another candidate for an easy win...She's going to lose this thing. Unbelievable. #### you DNC.
What? I hate Hillary, and I've got facts and numbers and analysis and stuff.Oh lord. Does it depend on what the definition of that "is" is, too?
Whatever floats your boat. You guys go off on your anti-Hillary rants. I'll be over here with my pesky facts and numbers and analysis and stuff.
You are interchanging liar with telling falsehoods and they are different. Sorry, but words have meanings. You are promoting a falsehood, but are not lying.Oh lord. Does it depend on what the definition of that "is" is, too?
Whatever floats your boat. You guys go off on your anti-Hillary rants. I'll be over here with my pesky facts and numbers and analysis and stuff.
Wait, you're voting Trump?All politicians lie, in fact all people lie. But there's only two politicians/people left with any chance to win the 2016 election. One clearly lies a lot more than the other and clearly feels no accountability to explain or apologize for the lies. I consider a vote for the other to be a pretty clear vote against lying.
Exactly. Hillary is the bigger liar and bigger scumbag and it's not even close.Wait, you're voting Trump?
It really is kind of close.Exactly. Hillary is the bigger liar and bigger scumbag and it's not even close.
not even a little bit.It really is kind of close.
My favorite part of this is that you're doing exactly what you claim to despise about the Clintons by squirming and playing lawyer in an effort to defend Trump.You are interchanging liar with telling falsehoods and they are different. Sorry, but words have meanings. You are promoting a falsehood, but are not lying.
Anyways, More than 2/3rds of Americans consider Hillary a liar, so it is far more widely accepted than just the anti-Hillary crowd.
You might not like it but at least Trump tells what he perceives as the truth.
waitYou might not like it but at least Trump tells what he perceives as the truth.
Rumor has it, that Pfizer is backing Johnson. This could change things significantly.Johnson may be on the rise now but he'll hit his peak way too early. Anyone expecting him to go the distance will be disappointed.
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -George Costanza.You might not like it but at least Trump tells what he perceives as the truth. It may not be truthful to you but it may absolutely be the truth in his mind.
Hillary is more knowledgeable on the terrorism aspect too, it's all a fear factor and instability - like in Turkey - causes more fear and concern, which helps Trump.If incidents like the attack in Nice help Trump (because he is perceived as "tough" on terrorism, then incidents such as this Turkey coup will help Hillary IMO, because she is likely to be much more knowledgeable about the circumstances and what our position should be.
He'll probably lose, but not because he hit a peak to early. If his numbers go down, it will be because Trump and Hillary stop pissing people off. His only shot is they keep being who they both are.Johnson may be on the rise now but he'll hit his peak way too early. Anyone expecting him to go the distance will be disappointed.
I think Johnson is pretty good at pissing.He'll probably lose, but not because he hit a peak to early. If his numbers go down, it will be because Trump and Hillary stop pissing people off. His only shot is they keep being who they both are.
"If you're committed enough, you can make any story work. I once told a woman I was Kevin Costner, and it worked because I believed it.""It's not a lie if you believe it." -George Costanza.
Anyway, if he continues to "perceive something as the truth" even after the entire country knows it to be false and the media points that out to him over and over and over, he's even more dangerous than a liar. He's a delusional madman.
Is that what you're arguing here? That having a delusional madman as president is better than having someon who lies about sniper fire in Bosnia 12 years after the fact but owns up to it when they're called on it as president? Yeah, good luck with that argument.
If incidents like the attack in Nice help Trump (because he is perceived as "tough" on terrorism, then incidents such as this Turkey coup will help Hillary IMO, because she is likely to be much more knowledgeable about the circumstances and what our position should be.
Atleast part of Johnson's support is from never Trump people. They'd presumably go back to voting Republican if a normal politician is nominated in his place.Not true in general, and especially not true in a heads-up race against Trump.
Wow, Trump has completely conned you. I mean, that's what he does. That's what he's always done. But you're buying it hook line and sinker.You might not like it but at least Trump tells what he perceives as the truth. It may not be truthful to you but it may absolutely be the truth in his mind.
Hillary just lies and spins until she's left with nothing and then attacks your character. We've had two decades of her nonsense. Enough is enough.
If you think she lies less than Trump, you need to check yourself into Concussion Protocol (preferably with more rigorous testing than determining if you can still play in a NFL game).
Agreed - and I think both IFs are the case imo.If incidents like the attack in Nice help Trump (because he is perceived as "tough" on terrorism, then incidents such as this Turkey coup will help Hillary IMO, because she is likely to be much more knowledgeable about the circumstances and what our position should be.
Is this really an HRC supporter talking about others being conned? Your whole post is absolutely dripping with irony.Wow, Trump has completely conned you. I mean, that's what he does. That's what he's always done. But you're buying it hook line and sinker.
That's hilarious. That old bag has the patent on conning people.Is this really an HRC supporter talking about others being conned? Your whole post is absolutely dripping with irony.
![]()
Quality post here folks. QualityRumor has it, that Pfizer is backing Johnson. This could change things significantly.
Johnson is growingAll politicians lie, in fact all people lie. But there's only two politicians/people left with any chance to win the 2016 election. One clearly lies a lot more than the other and clearly feels no accountability to explain or apologize for the lies. I consider a vote for the other to be a pretty clear vote against lying.
Ahh, I'm rubber and you're glue. I have been summarily defeated. There is no recovery from such a burn. I must commit seppuku.Is this really an HRC supporter talking about others being conned? Your whole post is absolutely dripping with irony.
![]()
Actually I'm not sure if she said that or if one of her supporters said that. It's true either way.Hillary: it's not a time for beginners.
Care to address the point? Or is this your lame attempt at dodging it?Ahh, I'm rubber and you're glue. I have been summarily defeated. There is no recovery from such a burn. I must commit seppuku.
You had no point.Care to address the point? Or is this your lame attempt at dodging it?
Patrick J Graham Jr No response by Trump.
I think in terms of ethically and in truth telling this is how I break it down:
- Current Scandals - Hillary and Trump are close: she has a foundation, he has a foundation; school controversy, school controversy; Wall Street connections, Wall Street connections; sexism/sexism; criminal investigation vs fraud lawsuit; transcripts vs tax returns. Etc.
- Lying: I'm going to give quantity to Hillary, but magnitude to Trump (that is he tells huge whoppers about really important stuff). Now Hillary definitely does lie about "big" stuff - as I count the email controversy as a serious substantive matter as part of this, and she lied constantly and almost entirely about that (and still does) - however, with Trump there's Iran, terrorism, NATO, JFK's dad plotting to assassinate, antisemitic tweets, pseudonyms, fraudulent developments and his school... these are very big things. I will concede he might just be ignorant about half the stuff he lies about but then he makes it worse by doubling down even when there is sheer evidence he's lying.
- Ethics: And with Hillary I think the problem is she really is missing the gland that tells her when she is getting into bad, grey unethical territory. The private and public intermix freely. However I think that would be a huge problem for Trump too if he gets in, I don't think he will ever understand the firewall that must exist between what is his and what is the people's.
I think they both have huge problems in terms of getting the American people to trust them on matters great and small. That's really the problem.
That's an opinion only. That does not make it true.Actually I'm not sure if she said that or if one of her supporters said that. It's true either way.
Not surprisingly, he thinks it is Hillary's fault.No response by Trump.