This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I'd be happy knowing what meds they both take and which doctors they both see. The letter from Trump's physician is as ridiculous as his letter from his accountant about his taxes, actually more ridiculous. And considering Trump lied about his medical condition in the 70s why wouldn't he be lying now? Just hold them to the same standard. Personally I'd like to see Trump get an independent psych exam.
This is bizarre.
Hillary has the support of the father of the Orlando shooter her murdered 49 gay people in the name of Islam, he was even center stage at her rally.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=9GvCeEpnXxA
Her campaigning gets better each day.
Could you imagine the outrage if Dylan Roof's family showed up at a Trump rally?
Totally agree, 41% of American voters supporting Trump is ridiculous. We're better than this, people. Let's get it together.
TBH if Hillary got >50 & Donald <40 when all is said and done it would not surprise me. Actually the Indy/3rd party vote should be quite large and IMO Hillary's challenge right now is to get to 50 herself.
The debates will likely widen the gap further too. If Trump shows up that is. This is unfolding as a beatdown of epic proportions.
It'd be interesting to do analysis of the "vote FOR Trump" part of that number and the "vote AGAINST Hillary" part of that number. I'm as pessimistic as the next guy when it comes to the electorate, but couple this factor with the way they do polls (yes been reading a little bit about the methodology and I really have no idea why they even do the polls this way anymore) and I'm skeptical all around that we can begin to take any of these numbers at face value. I'm not sure they are telling us what we think they are.
92% supporting either of these candidates is an indictment of our educational system. Oof.
8% throwing their votes away because their conscience is a top national priority is worse.
The CNN polls do this (4th paragraph). I think some others do too.It'd be interesting to do analysis of the "vote FOR Trump" part of that number and the "vote AGAINST Hillary" part of that number. I'm as pessimistic as the next guy when it comes to the electorate, but couple this factor with the way they do polls (yes been reading a little bit about the methodology and I really have no idea why they even do the polls this way anymore) and I'm skeptical all around that we can begin to take any of these numbers at face value. I'm not sure they are telling us what we think they are.
So, the father is guilty also? Guilt by association? It is surprising that he was in that position. The Clinton campaign had to know who he was, because I think those are assigned seats.
Hillary has the support of the father of the Orlando shooter her murdered 49 gay people in the name of Islam, he was even center stage at her rally.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=9GvCeEpnXxA
Her campaigning gets better each day.
Could you imagine the outrage if Dylan Roof's family showed up at a Trump rally?
ouchThe CNN polls do this (4th paragraph). I think some others do too.It'd be interesting to do analysis of the "vote FOR Trump" part of that number and the "vote AGAINST Hillary" part of that number. I'm as pessimistic as the next guy when it comes to the electorate, but couple this factor with the way they do polls (yes been reading a little bit about the methodology and I really have no idea why they even do the polls this way anymore) and I'm skeptical all around that we can begin to take any of these numbers at face value. I'm not sure they are telling us what we think they are.
'Rare dumb inexplicable move by usually professional campaign staff' will suffice.
Well, 3rd/4th/5th party vote should give us an indication. If they track higher in this election there could be a correllation, at least to "Against both"It'd be interesting to do analysis of the "vote FOR Trump" part of that number and the "vote AGAINST Hillary" part of that number. I'm as pessimistic as the next guy when it comes to the electorate, but couple this factor with the way they do polls (yes been reading a little bit about the methodology and I really have no idea why they even do the polls this way anymore) and I'm skeptical all around that we can begin to take any of these numbers at face value. I'm not sure they are telling us what we think they are.
at Trumpettes making health an issue. Trump looks like they slapped some orange paint on a bloated corpse that floated on shore. Pretty certain he's wearing a girdle and a manziere under that suit. The hair, the expanding waddle and jowls. Not good.I dunno. Back in the day he was a pretty fit and athletic guy: link
good point.
I'm not sure how much historical comparisons would really tell us anyway. Lots of other variables might change this kind of secondary question, for example whether there's an incumbent or someone closely linked to the incumbent (say a VP) in the race. I think it's probably safe to assume these are pretty high numbers of "against" voters, though.
Yeah, well, where else can they possibly go? Policy, experience, temperament, knowledge, intelligence, etc are all yuuuuuge losers for Cheeto Jesus...
Look at how young Jon Stewart is...Must have been from the 1st few years of the show
Given the "wasting your vote" and "lesser of two evils" being ingrained in us by the establishment types, I'd think we'd have to get to 10ish %, or more to make this a sign. People still believe those philosophies.
Love those old Moment of Zen spots. Miller did not originate that bit but it was great when he did it.
I think this goes with her Fav/Unfav number which improved sharply in the two weeks after the conventions. Trump basically acts as a foil for her, which is best for her. She gets to be the 'good guy'.
Desperate. And sad. That lawsuit is obviously going nowhere. Whoever convinced them to do this should be ashamed of himself.
"The suit was filed on behalf of the parents by the conservative group Freedom Watch."
Many people are saying that the Republican party is a safe haven for NAMBLA supporters.
He also doesn't have a real campaign. This is the sort of thing that campaigns jump on to make noise and make the other campaign spin their wheels. But Trump has no campaign, so he may make a crack about it or try to make people think there's something wrong with her, but it's nothing substantive like making a demand she release her medical records, if he mentions it he might just forget it the next day.
This is a contradictory claim, it makes no sense. The attackers were militia. You can't say 'oh there should have been more security because the risks were known' at the same time you say the mission was a secret. The whole thing is senseless, I do feel for Woods' parents.
Yes, because they had soooo much to gain by having him seated prominently behind her, it obviously was planned in advance for maximum exposure.
I'm with your overall snooty reply here, seriously I doubt they would want him anywhere near there and I also offer up the horror story of just imaging had he been there with let's just say other motives than cheering her on. Could have been a total disaster.
I believe a lot of folks have a false sense of security when they are out and about, like someone is either watching from a magic eye in the sky and will intervene.They don't know the people sitting that close to her?
In today's day and age that seems impossible. Should note, that I don't really care one way or the other (if they knew or not) but what's happened to security? For the town halls they had here in SC, they had hand picked, identity verified people sitting close to the candidates. That was just a town hall.
But the sad thing is someone in her campaign screwed up royally . He needed to supply his name , drivers license # to be vetted . Guy doesn't walk in from the street and ends up behind her
His candidacy has to be a cooperative effort with the Clintons, right? This is the handing it over on a silver platter moment here.
