IvanKaramazov
Footballguy
Any way somebody in the military could swap the football for something like this? Maybe he wouldn't notice.It's not fear mongering to suggest Trump has no business having the nuclear codes.
Any way somebody in the military could swap the football for something like this? Maybe he wouldn't notice.It's not fear mongering to suggest Trump has no business having the nuclear codes.
God performed a miracle on Hillary! If her recovery from near death isn't proof that she's God's Chosen One I don't know what is.Suddenly there's no more talk about pneumonia. What happened to Hillary being too sick to continue? Where is the body double?
I wrote that this story would disappear in a week's time, and I was called crazy.
Have much you want to bet Trump asks if he can do this once he's elected?Oh c'mon, just stop it. It's not like he would be holding them under his pillow at night.
Do you think Obama pulls out his Nuke App at night and ensures their safety?
She's a woman so obviously she's too frail to campaign, right?it shifted over to her crazy left eye, parkinsons and cancelling events because she's too frail to campaign.
You must not have been in the military circa 2003.Well...basically that's true isn't it? I've never once spent a single second of my life "fearing" any president, and neither Trump nor Hilary would change that.
Hilary's camp released that information to the public...factso I paid no attention to this pneumonia thing....did she have pneumonia or was that something one of her "haters" made up?
Looks like she might have the Strigoi virus. There is a show on FX about it. Most of NYC is infected.To be fair and balanced let's have a listen to her speech in Philadelphia a couple night's ago. She really is inspiring.
So the campaign released this....does she really have pneumonia? Walking pneumonia even?Hilary's camp released that information to the public...factso I paid no attention to this pneumonia thing....did she have pneumonia or was that something one of her "haters" made up?
They did that to cover up she is dying...opinion
Her camp says a doctor diagnosed the problem and was treating it/her. We have to believe what they say.So the campaign released this....does she really have pneumonia? Walking pneumonia even?
Kind of weird that Hillary might have associated with a guy who preys on women. Never saw something like that coming.How well does Hilary Clinton know Sir Anthony because it looks like Huma's soon to be ex might just be another Jared Fogle.
Not a good look for Clinton to be so closely associated with him. Child Sexual Predator, where does she stand on this issue?
What was so bad about Obama. Other than him being African American of course.how could it possibly be worse than the last 2 presidents? besides, Dems and the media (but i repeat myself) have been fearmongering Republican nominees since Eisenhower, that tactic is quite transparent.
sarcasm is your strong suitKind of weird that Hillary might have associated with a guy who preys on women. Never saw something like that coming.
Would this be fair to say?That's exactly my argument. The system was setup by people who never wanted to be ruled by one person ever again.
here's a small list:What was so bad about Obama. Other than him being African American of course.
linkAmong Granite State voters likely to participate in November's presidential election, 47% support Clinton and 38% back Trump. Another 10% intend to vote for Libertarian Gary Johnson, 1% support Green Party candidate Jill Stein, and 3% are currently undecided.
Thanks for posting this. In that poll, it looks like Trump's Sweeping Declaration on the birther issue didn't help him, and might have hurt him a little. That's comforting. Also looks like Trump has dragged the Senate race there from what should have been an easy R win down to a real race.Great poll here for Clinton from an A rated pollster (Monmouth) in a state that is rapidly becoming very important:
link
They also had a poll yesterday showing Clinton with a 5 point lead in Florida, and one the day before showing Trump leading by just 3 in Georgia. If you're thinking maybe they lean Dem, six days ago they had one showing Trump up 8 in Iowa. How stupid are the people of Iowa, right?
Anyway, there's a national WSJ/NBC poll coming out this afternoon. If that one shows Clinton back up 4-5 points (I have a weird feeling they might) I think those models that have been showing Trump with momentum might start to go back the other way.
I'm from there and there are a lot of Republicans but I'll believe Trump winning there when it happens. Republicans have won the state once since 1984 and the was Bush's re-election in 2004. Clinton, Gore, and Obama all won there.Great poll here for Clinton from an A rated pollster (Monmouth) in a state that is rapidly becoming very important:
link
They also had a poll yesterday showing Clinton with a 5 point lead in Florida, and one the day before showing Trump leading by just 3 in Georgia. If you're thinking maybe they lean Dem, six days ago they had one showing Trump up 8 in Iowa. How stupid are the people of Iowa, right?
Anyway, there's a national WSJ/NBC poll coming out this afternoon. If that one shows Clinton back up 4-5 points (I have a weird feeling they might) I think those models that have been showing Trump with momentum might start to go back the other way.
Improving health care. Check.here's a small list:
ramming Obamacare down our throats
sucking up to Iran then the entire Iran nuclear boondoggle
Syria
Libya
ISIS the jv team
letting a bunch of terrorists go back to terroristing from Gitmo
lack of border enforcement
fast and furious gun running to mexican cartels
IRS scandal
Veterans admin ongoing scandal
leaving Iraq too soon
In order to win she needs to win Pennsylvania, Virginia, New Hampshire and either two of Wisconsin + Michigan + North Carolina or Florida. Those are the easiest paths to 270 for her. I'm pretty comfortable with Clinton wins in Pennsylvania and Virginia, but if she's vulnerable in both the Great Lakes states and Florida she's a long way from the point where we can exhale a bit.New Marquette Law School Poll finds Clinton leading Trump among likely voters in WI 44% to 42%
In 4-candidate race, among likely voters, it’s Clinton 41%, Trump 38%, Libertarian Gary Johnson 11%, Green Party’s Jill Stein 2%.
Nonsense, I'll go into later.here's a small list:
ramming Obamacare down our throats
sucking up to Iran then the entire Iran nuclear boondoggle
Syria
Libya
ISIS the jv team
letting a bunch of terrorists go back to terroristing from Gitmo
lack of border enforcement
fast and furious gun running to mexican cartels
IRS scandal
Veterans admin ongoing scandal
leaving Iraq too soon
How we feeling about Trump using charity money to pay off debts, buy paintings, and sports memorabilia for his office?It doesn't matter if I or anyone else could imagine Trump in that situation....my opinion is HE wouldn't have been IN that situation
Great poll here for Clinton from an A rated pollster (Monmouth) in a state that is rapidly becoming very important:
link
They also had a poll yesterday showing Clinton with a 5 point lead in Florida, and one the day before showing Trump leading by just 3 in Georgia. If you're thinking maybe they lean Dem, six days ago they had one showing Trump up 8 in Iowa. How stupid are the people of Iowa, right?
Anyway, there's a national WSJ/NBC poll coming out this afternoon. If that one shows Clinton back up 4-5 points (I have a weird feeling they might) I think those models that have been showing Trump with momentum might start to go back the other way.
The key demographic for Clinton at this point is getting the under 30 crowd on board. They hate Trump but a ton of them are voting third party. Gotta get out there with Bernie and sell herself to them as someone sympathetic to their concerns. Explain to them how they'll care a lot about family and medical leave sooner than they think, promise to give Sanders people and ideas a voice in her administration, etc. History shows that people saying they support third party candidates can be won over late in campaigns, if she can go up a few points with that crowd she'll be in much better shape."Among Granite State voters likely to participate in November's presidential election, 47% support Clinton and 38% back Trump. Another 10% intend to vote for Libertarian Gary Johnson, 1% support Green Party candidate Jill Stein, and 3% are currently undecided.
Clinton has the support of 94% of self-identified Democrats while Trump gets the backing of 85% of Republicans. Clinton edges Trump among the state's sizable bloc of independents by 42% to 35%.
Clinton has the advantage among voters under 50 years old (45% to 35%) as well as those age 50 and older (49% to 41%). Clinton leads among women (56% to 30%) and voters with a college degree (54% to 31%). Trump leads among men (47% to 37%) and voters without a college education (47% to 40%)."
These demographics seem to hold consistent with national trends. I hope the fine, reasonable people of New Hampshire serve as a national example in the upcoming election. It would be nice to get the undeducated white guys and their wives on board, but I've taken to just arguing with them. They're not voting Clinton, they didn't vote Obama, so trying to change those ideologies in 7 weeks, it ain't happening, there's no "convincing argument" where they will suddenly switch to voting Hillary.
Of course. Just like the staffer who ultimately wiped Hillary's emails asked Reddit for advice the day after emails were subpoenaed on how to destroy metadata. Then when he learned he couldn't, he just wiped it all. Think he did that on his own, or did someone maybe ask him to do that?How we feeling about Trump using charity money to pay off debts, buy paintings, and sports memorabilia for his office?
Think that's behavior that somebody would want to take a look at?
Completely agree. Obama dominated this demographic and Hillary has tepid support there. Bernie and Michelle are probably Hillary's best surrogates with that demo (and perhaps Barack).The key demographic for Clinton at this point is getting the under 30 crowd on board. They hate Trump but a ton of them are voting third party. Gotta get out there with Bernie and sell herself to them as someone sympathetic to their concerns. Explain to them how they'll care a lot about family and medical leave sooner than they think, promise to give Sanders people and ideas a voice in her administration, etc. History shows that people saying they support third party candidates can be won over late in campaigns, if she can go up a few points with that crowd she'll be in much better shape.
Where is the Scott Baio version?Save The Day and VOTE on November 8
And if you do, Mark Ruffalo will... well, just watch the video and find out.
- "clash for clunkers"/closing dealershipshere's a small list:
ramming Obamacare down our throats
sucking up to Iran then the entire Iran nuclear boondoggle
Syria
Libya
ISIS the jv team
letting a bunch of terrorists go back to terroristing from Gitmo
lack of border enforcement
fast and furious gun running to mexican cartels
IRS scandal
Veterans admin ongoing scandal
leaving Iraq too soon
Ah, I see we have differing points of view. None of that had anything to do with skin color.Improving health care. Check.
Don't like going into foreign countries but also don't like leaving them too early, continuation of Republican Bush policies. Check.
Releasing illegally held people per our constitution. Check.
Continuation of Republican War on Drugs. Agree with you there.
IRS and VA should be better. VA is due to lack of Republcan funding as you like small government so that's what you get.
Dealing with terrorists...killed Osama bin Laden. Check.
Seems you should be pretty stoked. Oh but that's right. He's black.
Debunked.Victurus Libertas1 day ago (edited)
UPDATE - I will say this one more time - Many say they have been to this NC rally. That's fine. I am not going to debate that. ALL i am saying at this point is that I am convinced that this video was altered. That is my opinion. I don't know the exact reason why it was done but clearly it was. You can have your opinion and I can have mine. Thank you
"He's not perfect, therefore, Trump!"- "clash for clunkers"/closing dealerships![]()
- picking solar panel company "winners" that would quickly go bankrupt![]()
- shovel ready jobs![]()
- and always leading from behind unless there is an opportunity to jump into an issue and pass judgement without knowing the facts.![]()
Actually he has been almost perfectly wrong. That doesn't mean Trump is the answer."He's not perfect, therefore, Trump!"
I just chose your movie, Phil!Actually he has been almost perfectly wrong. That doesn't mean Trump is the answer.
I don't know, let's ask this Bloomberg reporter:Paranoid Trump supporters believe Hillary faked a campaign event.
Debunked.
Trump voters - how's it feel to be a part of such an ignorant, paranoid movement?
“Are you concerned that this weekend’s attacks or potential incidents in the coming weeks might be an attempt by ISIS or ISIS sympathizers, or really any other group, maybe the Russians, to influence the presidential race in some way, and presumably try to drive votes to Donald Trump, who is, as you’ve said before, widely seen as perhaps being somebody who they would be more willing to—or see as an easier person to be against?” she asked.
Dammit, GB. Take that back!Great poll here for Clinton from an A rated pollster (Monmouth) in a state that is rapidly becoming very important:
link
They also had a poll yesterday showing Clinton with a 5 point lead in Florida, and one the day before showing Trump leading by just 3 in Georgia. If you're thinking maybe they lean Dem, six days ago they had one showing Trump up 8 in Iowa. How stupid are the people of Iowa, right?
Anyway, there's a national WSJ/NBC poll coming out this afternoon. If that one shows Clinton back up 4-5 points (I have a weird feeling they might) I think those models that have been showing Trump with momentum might start to go back the other way.
Both aren't ideal but Trump is simply a joke.Of course. Just like the staffer who ultimately wiped Hillary's emails asked Reddit for advice the day after emails were subpoenaed on how to destroy metadata. Then when he learned he couldn't, he just wiped it all. Think he did that on his own, or did someone maybe ask him to do that?
Oh, by the way--Reddit community told him that modifying or deleting metadata could be illegal.
There was clear intent to destroy evidence here. And it didn't fall in this rube's shoulders.
So let's look at both of these things and throw both candidates out.
Hey, I love every state in this already great country of ours, GB.Dammit, GB. Take that back!
Wait...we elected Steve King.![]()
I see what you did hereTrump voters - how's it feel to be a part of such an ignorant, paranoid movement?
Why must they? I don't get this argument. Why should the actual officials in a political party have no influence over who represents their brand in a national election and leave it to the masses who may or may not even be a part of their brand or their organization decide for them?I prefer Hillary over Sanders. but its was not a level field. the DNC must be neutral and let the people pick.
Nah, just excuses to hide your hatred of an AFRICAN AMERICAN.here's a small list:
ramming Obamacare down our throats
sucking up to Iran then the entire Iran nuclear boondoggle
Syria
Libya
ISIS the jv team
letting a bunch of terrorists go back to terroristing from Gitmo
lack of border enforcement
fast and furious gun running to mexican cartels
IRS scandal
Veterans admin ongoing scandal
leaving Iraq too soon
I disagree with the second half. If evidence of felonies is present (as it is with both, but specific with Clinton) PROSECUTE.Both aren't ideal but Trump is simply a joke.
The problem I see with replacing is the next person up will just be under investigation. That's what DC does.
OMGNah, just excuses to hide your hatred of an AFRICAN AMERICAN.
They can do what they want IMO. Just don't sell it as something it isn't and don't force me to fund the goat rodeo if I don't want to.Why must they? I don't get this argument. Why should the actual officials in a political party have no influence over who represents their brand in a national election and leave it to the masses who may or may not even be a part of their brand or their organization decide for them?
My understanding is that its a violation of their own charter.Why must they? I don't get this argument. Why should the actual officials in a political party have no influence over who represents their brand in a national election and leave it to the masses who may or may not even be a part of their brand or their organization decide for them?