TobiasFunke
Footballguy
Fine, drop the messenger angle, and for that matter the veracity of the story itself ... what does this have to do with that nonsense conspiracy theory about AP and Clinton working together on a delegate count announcement in June? Is your argument that because the NY Times checked with the Clinton camp about quotes in a profile, AP worked with Clinton on the timing of their announcement about her delegate count in June (even though their announcement actually kind of stole Clinton's thunder from the rally planned the next night)? That's what you're going with?TypicalIt's in the wikileaks dump, I linked to the original source, just because I know you like to attack the messenger rather than deal with the truth.
Like I said- let it go, man.
Also FWIW I wasn't attacking the messenger from a "this can't possibly be true because it comes from Lifegazette" angle. It was more of a "why in God's name would you read Lifegazette?" angle.
Last edited by a moderator:
It's in the wikileaks dump, I linked to the original source, just because I know you like to attack the messenger rather than deal with the truth.