This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
You might want to read up on the Black Laws. You might also read up on the effect of his pardons on whom was in charge. What he allowed to happen ensured the African Americans in the South would be oppressed for another hundred years. Whatever financial harm he prevented was minimal. It took the South a long time to come back. So no I don't think I do agree.
They bought the media and brought in Google's Eric Schmidt. The media went after the moderate GOP candidates to stir up issues that were too moderate knowing the GOP voters would turn on them. With a crowded field, they took out Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, etc. I agree it's semi-brilliant. But the fact that it required $1.5 Billion to do is a tad alarming. But I guess it takes a lot of money to buy off the media.
The planting of fake sourcing aside (yak) I'm kind of curious who got hacked as the last string is off hillaryclinton.com, not Podesta.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
Don't forget that Trump was the primary attacker of both Bush and Rubio. None of the other candidates attacked them, and the media was very friendly to them until Trump spoke up.
Come on man some context. Roughly 30% of Oprahs followers are fake. Same with Obama. Same with pretty much every huge twitter account.
You act like history started when Palestine had an election. There are many factors contributing to them having a radical bent, not the least of which being Hillary's mass murder of brown people and military backing of Israel. In any case it isn't her place to decide how another country's election goes.
No that was the subject at hand. If you want to make this a sweeping condemnation of US policy in the Middle East over the last half century or so right there with you. But when we are getting specific this was handled arrogantly and yes it is in everyone's interest for there to have been a more moderate candidate in the election with a chance of winning.
How was I owned? I have a higher percentage by a big margin.
In and of itself, that's not a crime Comey will prosecute. So, it adds to the degree of recklessness, but not by any measure criminality.
This pains you so much. It's like the 12th time you've written some version of this sentence.She's immune to hysteria because she's a lesbian per squiz man's own words
Well it's no fun if you don't play his little semantics games when squis is in meltdown mode. This is the third or fourth of the thread.
True.... however, if Weiner's laptop has a lot of the deleted emails, and the deleted emails have significantly more classified material than then ones she turned over, then the large amount of classified emails could be seen as her motivation for deleting emails under subpoena, and thus criminal intent.
WASHINGTON – The FBI on Monday began loading a trove of e-mails belonging to a top aide to Hillary Clinton into a special computer program that would allow bureau analysts to determine whether they contain classified information, law enforcement officials said.
Did you really expect anything to come out before the election?
It's odd that the dems made Romney look crazy when he played the Russia fear mongering card in 2012, yet playing the Russia fear mongering card is one Hillary's most important cards to play this year.
Gotta put the full context out - thee Hispanic / Latino numbers, for example, are up in FL. That helps the Dems. And I don't see it surprising in the least that a shire woman is going to get less turnout from the AA community as opposed to Obama.
Really? Because we've lot the ability to use any context? You have a candidate in Trump for whom you almost have to ask this question and not at all in a baiting manner, but quite seriously.
OK, let's talk about context.
This whole anti Russia narrative is pretty reckless. The reality is that Putin gave to the Clinton Foundation and got the Uranium One and Skolkovo deals done and Podesta has financial ties to Putin, as well.
Or....he's doing his job. Either way the guy was screwed from a political perspective. This is the textbook definition of "no win situation".
It's not odd when one realizes Hillary is essentially a republican who has thrown a bone to democrats by voting "liberal" on things like same sex marriage (after first being against it of course).
Why do people keep saying this when it's been debunked, over and over again?
That was the overly cautious part - certainly pursuing the investigation is part of his job - sending the letter to congress, informing the world is really the issue here. Why did he send the letter? Was he simply being cautious and wanting to correct his testimony - as he stated - or was he sending a message?The Commish said:
This is your take away? Do you not even bother countering the actual examples that I gave of why Trump? I mean, these are the exact frustrating tactics I'm talking about... the point of discussion I made, quite clearly (so I thought) is in relation to the legit fear of Trump considering his known and potential other ties/conflicts regarding Russian leadership and I should add, business interests, coupled with his own words regarding use of Nukes compounded by his decades of retaliatory, vengeful and erratic behavior most recently demonstrated almost daily on the campaign trail.Politician Spock said:
in this thread. 
