What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're stalking me. Why?
No offense but we are both high volume posters in this and the Trump thread. I am 100% positive I have not been stalking you in any other thread which means that I am in fact not stalking you. The weird thing is you were always nice and pretty cool, now this election has soured you on what used to be good natured ribbing and banter.

 
The same can be said that Trump supporters can't conceive a HRC supporter. I've discussed this election at great lengths with my hard core Trump loving brother and we were (and remain) very far apart on politics. It's as if we live on separate planets. In fact, we do. I realized a lot when I went back to western PA for Thanksgiving. Everything (I.e. Infrastructure) is falling apart. Homes are aging, as not many have the resources to maintain them. Roads are in poor shape. Small towns are impacted by heroin, including where I grew up. It amazes me just how much things have changed. I live in the second highest home value / avg income area in central Ohio. Kid is in private school, and my career is financially lucrative with many options. It's a different planet, for sure. 

With that being said, I can understand how folks who are desperate, believe in someone like Trump. He spoke to them, where as Hillary spoke to me. Trump understood them, Hillary understood me. He had a few more voters show up for him in key states. It's the economy stupid, and he appealed to those in greatest need (and even tho it's all based on fake news and false promises, he understood what they wanted to hear and fed it to them like a fat kid eating cake).  
:lmao:

 
No offense but we are both high volume posters in this and the Trump thread. I am 100% positive I have not been stalking you in any other thread which means that I am in fact not stalking you. The weird thing is you were always nice and pretty cool, now this election has soured you on what used to be good natured ribbing and banter.
My apologies if you no longer feel I am not nice or cool. I'm actually still upset at the results, especially since my individual rights as a non traditional family could be at risk. Fear doesn't sit well with me I guess. I'm sure I'll be back to being nice and fun at some point, but for now, I'm trying to gauge the impact of this election. 

And, on a personal note, I found out two days after the election, that there was an error in my divorce and I'm still legally married to my twatbag ex wife that I thought I divorced in 2013 (separated in 2011). Grrr

 
My apologies if you no longer feel I am not nice or cool. I'm actually still upset at the results, especially since my individual rights as a non traditional family could be at risk. Fear doesn't sit well with me I guess. I'm sure I'll be back to being nice and fun at some point, but for now, I'm trying to gauge the impact of this election. 

And, on a personal note, I found out two days after the election, that there was an error in my divorce and I'm still legally married to my twatbag ex wife that I thought I divorced in 2013 (separated in 2011). Grrr
I suggest chilling out and relax, You, your family and your rights are going to be just fine. Your fear is making you come across as not very stable here. 

 
I suggest chilling out and relax, You, your family and your rights are going to be just fine. Your fear is making you come across as not very stable here. 
I suggest unless you're in a similar situation, to refrain from passing judgement. I spoke to an attorney and she has an increased # of people accelerating adoptions, weddings etc. We considered this, but decided 1. I'm not a polygamist so I need to get my #### resolved first and 2. The chances of appointing a scotus judge, and having them hear a SS marriage case and overturn the ruling is not going to happen in the next two years. With that being said, there are other rights that are at risk. I don't trust Trump, Pence or any of them. Who really knows what he will do.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suggest unless you're in a similar situation, to refrain from passing judgement. I spoke to an attorney and she has an increased # of people accelerating adoptions, weddings etc. We considered this, but decided 1. I'm not a polygamist so I need to get my #### resolved first and 2. The chances of appointing a scotus judge, and having them hear a SS marriage case and overturn the ruling is not going to happen in the next two years. With that being said, there are other rights that are at risk. I don't trust Trump, Pence or any of them. Who really knows what he will do.
You seriously need to chill out. 

 
I still blame you for us ending up with Trump. All those people you listed as "crazy" warned you what would happen if Hillary was nominated. I'm impressed you posted the above, but I'm fairly certain you haven't fully realized the damage you did to this country with your overly zealous and completely blind support of Hillary. 
I suppose you're welcome to blame who you like. I sent money to Hillary but only AFTER she won the nomination. Other than that, I provided one vote in a conpletlely blue state. But if you feel that did damage then I apologize. 

 
My apologies if you no longer feel I am not nice or cool. I'm actually still upset at the results, especially since my individual rights as a non traditional family could be at risk. Fear doesn't sit well with me I guess. I'm sure I'll be back to being nice and fun at some point, but for now, I'm trying to gauge the impact of this election. 

And, on a personal note, I found out two days after the election, that there was an error in my divorce and I'm still legally married to my twatbag ex wife that I thought I divorced in 2013 (separated in 2011). Grrr
No problem sorry to hear you are having some personal stress. I truly hope things get straightened out for you. I would fight for your right to be married and I am a big Trump fan. If I could imagine marriage equality being turned back I would not have voted for him. Relax it is ok. Take this for what it is worth. Pre election you and I had some fun interchanges and my impression of the little beaver with Ohio avatar was a cool person. Post election everything bugs you. For better or worse this is a football site filled with boys. This is the locker room talk that people say does not exist. We treat you as an equal and that means giving you crap just like the rest of us. 

Will try to be nicer to you.  :suds:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lots of people did the same thing, not just Tim.  Many of them in California.  They just had no idea that anyone thought differently than they did about Clinton - having never encountered a Trump supporter, they couldn't conceive of what one was.  Or is.  Those of us who are blue voters in red states desperately tried to explain what was going on, but of course we're idiots who don't know what we're talking about.  As usual.
This doesn't apply to me. I live in Orange County and I know plenty of Trump supporters. But almost all of them were people who hated Obama and Hillary and voted for Romney 4 years ago. I didn't think enough of them would vote for Trump to make the difference. Just one of my many errors. 

 
Beavers IMO doesn't have much to fear (I hope). The ones who should be afraid are undocumented,families of undocumented, and Muslim Americans. And that's wrong. Nobody should be afraid of the future in the United States. 

 
This doesn't apply to me. I live in Orange County and I know plenty of Trump supporters. But almost all of them were people who hated Obama and Hillary and voted for Romney 4 years ago. I didn't think enough of them would vote for Trump to make the difference. Just one of my many errors. 
You're still equating voting against Clinton or Obama with supporting Trump.  That has been the problem all along. There are a lot of people who actually actively support Trump.

 
Beavers IMO doesn't have much to fear (I hope). The ones who should be afraid are undocumented,families of undocumented, and Muslim Americans. And that's wrong. Nobody should be afraid of the future in the United States. 
The Vice President is actively anti-LGBTQ, the secretary of education is actively anti-LGBTQ, the AG is actively anti-LGBTQ.  The entire LGBTQ community is going to be in a world of trouble for the next four years. 

 
No problem sorry to hear you are having some personal stress. I truly hope things get straightened out for you. I would fight for your right to be married and I am a big Trump fan. If I could imagine marriage equality being turned back I would not have voted for him. Relax it is ok. Take this for what it is worth. Pre election you and I had some fun interchanges and my impression of the little beaver with Ohio avatar was a cool person. Post election everything bugs you. For better or worse this is the a football site filled with boys. This is the locker room talk that people say does not exist. We treat you as an equal and that means giving you crap just like the rest of us. 

Will try to be nicer to you.  :suds:
Fair enough and I'll try to calm down my #####iness ?

On the bright side, that UM OSU game was absolutely amazing this weekend!

 
As a Hillary supporter I was wrong on what Americans want.  They don't want more social programs, the environment is not that  big of a deal, not everyone needs a college education.  People want lower taxes, not distribution of wealth, they want more money spent on the military, and they want jobs in america not overseas.  I had so many friends and family tell me that they voted for Trump because of his stand on taxes,military, jobs, immigration, they felt that no one cares about the middle class.  A. Good friend of mine told me that the Trump stock market rally has taken six months off of his retirement.

I don't believe that Hillary lost because of the emails etc., but the middle class said enough of the DNC platform of social programs, something for nothing approach.  The minority vote did't show up or doesn't care as much as we think.  I Agee Hillary was not a perfect candidate, but Trump had his past history also.

 
I suppose you're welcome to blame who you like. I sent money to Hillary but only AFTER she won the nomination. Other than that, I provided one vote in a conpletlely blue state. But if you feel that did damage then I apologize. 
At some point you may realize that you helped spread the same kind of misinformation about Clinton's position and history that Trump supporters spread about his.  And that you and the other Clinton supporters went half-###ed with it, while Trump went whole hog, and that's why he won this unbelievably awful election.  Welcome to the Ministry of Truth.

 
Beavers IMO doesn't have much to fear (I hope). The ones who should be afraid are undocumented,families of undocumented, and Muslim Americans. And that's wrong. Nobody should be afraid of the future in the United States. 
Change is always scary for some and hopeful for others.  

Nobody really knows what Trump is going to be like.

 
No problem sorry to hear you are having some personal stress. I truly hope things get straightened out for you. I would fight for your right to be married and I am a big Trump fan. If I could imagine marriage equality being turned back I would not have voted for him. Relax it is ok. Take this for what it is worth. Pre election you and I had some fun interchanges and my impression of the little beaver with Ohio avatar was a cool person. Post election everything bugs you. For better or worse this is a football site filled with boys. This is the locker room talk that people say does not exist. We treat you as an equal and that means giving you crap just like the rest of us. 

Will try to be nicer to you.  :suds:
I hope you're right on this, but I think it's very unlikely that any judge would be in favor of overturning Roe v. Wade but against overturning Obergefell. 

 
You're still equating voting against Clinton or Obama with supporting Trump.  That has been the problem all along. There are a lot of people who actually actively support Trump.
I still remember the USC/UCLA poll question where Trump supporters were more vocal socially, but less inclined to voice Trump support in a telephone poll.  That seemed bizarre to me living in an area that would have been the polar opposite.  Trump was a name you just didn't mention unless you wanted to get ridiculed.

I know a lot of people who have gone complete conspiracy theory and dumped money into the Stein fiasco.  They are still in denial.

 
The Vice President is actively anti-LGBTQ, the secretary of education is actively anti-LGBTQ, the AG is actively anti-LGBTQ.  The entire LGBTQ community is going to be in a world of trouble for the next four years. 
Really don't see this being a huge issue.  Only the religious freaks are against it.  Trump has already said he wasn't going to do anything.

Glad you are ok after today Beavers.

 
The Vice President is actively anti-LGBTQ, the secretary of education is actively anti-LGBTQ, the AG is actively anti-LGBTQ.  The entire LGBTQ community is going to be in a world of trouble for the next four years. 
Hysteria.  Trump has said that this is settled.  I don't see the clock being wound back here, at all.  In the end this is just baseless fear mongering.

 
;) I won't take that personally.

But anyhow, why? Please explain how I'm hurting anyone by stating my views.
Lot's a people state their view here. You however bombard the board with your views hundreds of times a day. Which would be fine if you were right. But you're not. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lot's a people state their view here. You however bombard the board with your views hundreds of times a day. Which would be fine if you were right. But you're not. 
I post a lot. But I don't post my views in a vacuum. It's usually in the context of a back and forth discussion. And I'm still not clear how it's hurting anybody. You have the option to not read my posts, or put me on ignore.

 
I post a lot. But I don't post my views in a vacuum. It's usually in the context of a back and forth discussion. And I'm still not clear how it's hurting anybody. You have the option to not read my posts, or put me on ignore.
99% of the country is in the echo chamber, disconcerned from opposing views. Good on you for being in the fray.  I like the mayhem of this election because it reminds us if we want positive change we can't phone it in from our couches.  This is a sober wake up to the fact that freedom is earned and maintained through difficult action and discomfort.  Yes, you drew out a degree of discomfort.  It's part of an ongoing process, and for that you have my thanks...  You rigid, stubborn *******.  

 
Beavers IMO doesn't have much to fear (I hope). The ones who should be afraid are undocumented,families of undocumented, and Muslim Americans. And that's wrong. Nobody should be afraid of the future in the United States. 
Muslim Americans have nothing to fear - that's ridiculous.  

As far as immigrants those that commit crimes will be the nervous ones.  We don't have the will as a nation to deport the rest - the situation will be put under control by stopping the demand to come over the border by making it much, much harder to do so.

 
99% of the country is in the echo chamber, disconcerned from opposing views. Good on you for being in the fray.  I like the mayhem of this election because it reminds us if we want positive change we can't phone it in from our couches.  This is a sober wake up to the fact that freedom is earned and maintained through difficult action and discomfort.  Yes, you drew out a degree of discomfort.  It's part of an ongoing process, and for that you have my thanks...  You rigid, stubborn *******.  
Agreed when you look at a map the Democrats are tightly packed into small areas. I can see why they parrot each other.

 
In the aftermath of a political catastrophe as devastating of the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States, you've got two choices. You can blame the elites or blame the people. I'm gonna go with the elites.

Many liberal journalists, however have taken the opposite view. To paraphrase Bertolt Brecht, in the aftermath of Hillary Clinton’s stunning loss, they have demanded that we dissolve the people and elect another. The Clintonistas have attempted to pin the blame for this fiasco on the voter groups they detest the most: the white working class, the millennials, and the Left. Clinton supporter Jill Filipovic opined that Hillary was too good for us: “Sorry America, you didn't deserve her,” she tweeted. Many other Clintonites in the media concurred. To Virginia Heffernan, Hillary Clinton was not just a candidate. Instead, she “is an idea, a world-historical heroine, light itself” who “did everything right in this campaign… She cannot be faulted, criticized, or analyzed for even one more second.”

But outside the pro-Clinton media bubble, ordinary Americans had a far less rosy view of Dear Leader Hillary.

...

What we saw instead was gross political malpractice on the part of Democratic Party elites generally and Team Clinton specifically. Yes, factors outside of the campaign's control, ranging from the Comey letter to racism, sexism, and more, surely contributed to her defeat. But it's also become clear that a series of fatal miscalculations and spectacular strategic blunders by the party and the Clinton campaign is what ultimately sealed their candidate's fate.

Here are some of them:

1. This one isn't so much why-Hillary-lost but why-the-Democrats-lost: the Clintons did the most thorough job of clearing the Democratic primary field of any candidate in modern history.  ...

2. Clinton also shot herself in the foot by her own arrogant behavior. Setting up the private email server at the State Department, making those buckraking Wall Street speeches, refusing to cut her ties to the Clinton Foundation (and thus avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest)–all of those were Clinton's freely made choices, and as such they were completely avoidable. ...

3. Relatedly, when Hillary made these foolish decisions, why didn't the people around her stop her? And that points to another reason why she lost: the mediocrity of her advisers and campaign staff. The Clintons, who seem to prize loyalty over competence, have a long and troubling history of surrounding themselves with extraordinarily unsavory people–sleazeballs and hacks like Mark Penn, Lanny Davis, and **** Morris, to name just a few. This time around, there weren’t any members of Team Clinton who seemed quite that clownish, so I assumed the personnel decisions were wiser. From the outside, the campaign look professional and competent. But as we’ve been discovering, that perception belied the reality.

4. There is also abundant evidence that Clinton’s campaign royally screwed up its strategy and badly misallocated resources. Clinton won the popular vote by over 2 million votes yet lost key Rust Belt states by razor-thin margins. Clinton’s much-hyped, data-driven get-out-the-vote operation was a shocking failure. Working with outdated voter lists, it mistakenly targeted large numbers of Trump voters. In Michigan, state and local officials “were running at roughly one-tenth the paid canvasser capacity that Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) had when he ran for president in 2004.” In states like Ohio, Team Clinton’s efforts neglected traditional Democratic constituencies like African-Americans in favor of targeting far less favorable demographics like upscale Republican women. Clinton did not appear in Wisconsin, a state that she lost, after the primary in April, and neither did Barack or Michelle Obama. One Clinton official admitted that the campaign didn’t do more in some states where they knew were vulnerable because they were too busy playing mind games with Trump: they believed they “could keep Trump away—by acting overly confident about their chances.” Heckuva job, Team Clinton!

5. Theda Skocpol has cited another factor in Clinton’s loss: the Democrats' lack of organizational infrastructure in non-urban areas.  ...

6. Finally, perhaps most consequential of all was the campaign's failure to advance a strong economic message. Team Clinton’s central strategy was not to mobilize the base, but to appeal to crossover voters. That irrepressible Clinton instinct to triangulate reared its ugly head one more time, and the result has been a world-historic catastrophe. Clinton’s ads and messaging stressed the Trump’s déclassé boorishness rather than a populist economic message that would have resonated with working class voters of all races. But the votes of Republican college-educated women they were chasing never materialized, while turnout and Clinton's vote shares among African-Americans, Latinos, millennials, and working class whites were significantly down from Obama's in 2012. In stroke of bitter poetic justice, the fruits of Clintons' own long-ago policies came back to haunt them. NAFTA and other Clinton “free” trade deals devastated the Rust Belt and created the ravaged communities and the despair that compelled many working class voters in those areas pull the lever for the despicable Trump.  ...

A post-election report by the pollster Stanley Greenberg confirms that Clinton's decision to shun a progressive economic appeal was a fatal error. Greenberg found that “polls showed fairly resilient support with white working class women, until the Clinton campaign stopped talking about economic change.” When the Greenberg team tested a Democratic message attacking Trump for his character vs. a message “demanding big economic changes” and attacking Trump for “supporting for trickle-down and protecting corporate special interests,” they found that the economic message “performed dramatically better,” particularly among key voter groups like millennials, white unmarried women and white working class women.

The election is over, and with it, so it is the Clinton’s quarter-century long domination of Democratic politics. And so lately I've been thinking about the Clintons' historical legacy. It’s not a pretty picture. The neoliberal economic policies of Bill Clinton, which Hillary strongly supported–free trade, deregulation, the obsession with deficit reduction–led to soaring levels of economic inequality, flat or declining wages for most Americans, and record low rates of labor participation. The Clinton crime bill ruined countless lives, especially black lives. Welfare “reform” immiserated poor families and led to a dramatic upswing in rates of extreme poverty. Under the watch of Presidents Clinton and Obama, the Democratic party at the state and local level was allowed to slowly die away. Today, the Democratic party as an institution is probably weaker than it's ever been at any time in its long history. The Democrats now control none of the three branches of government and only 18 governorships and 13 state legislatures.  In the weeks leading up to the election, many political observers were confidently predicting an historic Trump defeat followed by a meltdown of the GOP. But–plot twist!–it’s the Democratic party that has collapsed into a smoking heap of rubble.

Team Clinton repeatedly reassured us that Hillary was the most highly qualified and most hyper-competent person evah! to run for president. They possessed the unshakeable conviction that they, the best and the brightest, could not possibly fail–so much so that on election day, her aides prematurely uncorked the celebratory champagne. So extreme was their recklessness that they actually wanted to run against Trump. Out of the outrageous hubris, complacency, and incompetence of Hillary's presidential campaign came the Clintons' horrifying parting gift to America: President Donald Trump. This is where the Clintons led us. Trump's election, and the nightmare to which America is awakening, is on them. And it is unforgivable.

I suspect that history is not going to look kindly at Bill and Hillary Clinton. No, not very kindly at all.
http://inthesetimes.com/article/19674/hillary-clinton-democratic-party-neoliberal-trump

- This sure seems like the best post-mortum I've read.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hysteria.  Trump has said that this is settled.  I don't see the clock being wound back here, at all.  In the end this is just baseless fear mongering.
It is settled as much as Roe v Wade is settled. You can't threaten to overturn one and say the other is settled which is what Henry Ford alluded to earlier. Now the numbers likely don't change with next justice  replacing Scalia but if Ginsburg needs to be replaced, could easily overturn both decisions and Congress seems in no hurry to change the law. And with the people he is surrounding himself with, it is certainly cause for concern. What you call hysteria is justifiable to some. It's amazing how many Trump defenders ignore his comments and just say he won't do half the things he said as if that's enough reassurance. 

 
Hysteria.  Trump has said that this is settled.  I don't see the clock being wound back here, at all.  In the end this is just baseless fear mongering.
What is settled? LGBTQ rights in general, or marriage equality? Because good luck finding a qualified judge who wants to overturn Roe but not Obergefell.

 
It is settled as much as Roe v Wade is settled. You can't threaten to overturn one and say the other is settled which is what Henry Ford alluded to earlier. Now the numbers likely don't change with next justice  replacing Scalia but if Ginsburg needs to be replaced, could easily overturn both decisions and Congress seems in no hurry to change the law. And with the people he is surrounding himself with, it is certainly cause for concern. What you call hysteria is justifiable to some. It's amazing how many Trump defenders ignore his comments and just say he won't do half the things he said as if that's enough reassurance. 
No one has lost anything and there is no worry.  I saw a on TV a pundit (on CNN or MSNBC, I think) say something like, "you women better get your abortions now".  C'mon, really?  It's simply RIDICULOUS the mass hysteria that is going on with the left.  You would think it's War of the Worlds all over again.

 
No one has lost anything and there is no worry.  I saw a on TV a pundit (on CNN or MSNBC, I think) say something like, "you women better get your abortions now".  C'mon, really?  It's simply RIDICULOUS the mass hysteria that is going on with the left.  You would think it's War of the Worlds all over again.
So folks on the left are crazy for believing that Conservatives are going to try to do all the stuff they say they want to do?  

 
So folks on the left are crazy for believing that Conservatives are going to try to do all the stuff they say they want to do?  
No, they very well should believe that a duly elected government of Conservatives will push their agenda, just like the Democrats did (remember the whole "back of the bus" crapola?).  However, the mass hysteria from the left over this is simply and utterly ridiculous and uncalled for.  Now it is just a bunch of fear-mongering, something you guys not too long ago were accusing the GOP of doing.

Stop being such a bunch of babies and man up already.  For ####'s sakes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, they very well should believe that a duly elected government of Conservatives will push their agenda, just like the Democrats did (remember the whole "back of the bus" crapola?).  However, the mass hysteria from the left over this is simply and utterly ridiculous and uncalled for.  Now it is just a bunch of fear-mongering, something you guys not too long ago were accusing the GOP of doing.

Stop being such a bunch of babies and man up already.  For ####'s sakes.
I think you may need to get a grip on what "being a baby" means.  It's not fear mongering to actually believe that a politician will do exactly what he has said he will do.  And it certainly isn't fear mongering to believe that an AG who is against LGBTQ rights will not push for civil rights enforcement, that a VP who is Vehemently against abortion would use any influence he has to have a justice appointed who would agree with him, that a President who has stated that he intends to appoint justices who will overturn Roe v Wade will do so.  That's the agenda they intend to push.  This is the party of DOMA, which was only struck down (in part) by Windsor a few years ago.  The party of the Indiana law Pence signed requiring that funeral services be sought for any fetus.  It's not a ridiculous position to be prepared for those positions to be pushed, however ridiculous those positions they've taken are.

 
Hysteria.  Trump has said that this is settled.  I don't see the clock being wound back here, at all.  In the end this is just baseless fear mongering.
This is exactly right. But I'm not surprised. My brother is gay and so is my aunt and if you'd read their Facebook...... Unreal.

 
Hysteria.  Trump has said that this is settled.  I don't see the clock being wound back here, at all.  In the end this is just baseless fear mongering.
And if there's one thing we know for certain, it's that once Trump has stated his position on an issue he'll never waver from it.  And he surely won't scapegoat any minority in order to curry favor from his mostly white southern/midwestern base or distract the media from an unflattering story.

Integrity, consistency, opposing discrimination in all its forms- these are the hallmarks of President-Elect Donald J Trump.

 
And if there's one thing we know for certain, it's that once Trump has stated his position on an issue he'll never waver from it.  And he surely won't scapegoat any minority in order to curry favor from his mostly white southern/midwestern base or distract the media from an unflattering story.

Integrity, consistency, opposing discrimination in all its forms- these are the hallmarks of President-Elect Donald J Trump.
Exactly.

 
What is settled? LGBTQ rights in general, or marriage equality? Because good luck finding a qualified judge who wants to overturn Roe but not Obergefell.
I disagree.  Judges are people.  They have clerks, who also happen to be people.  They have families, also people.  Judges like to project an image that they're above it all and are focused only on the meaning of the Constitution or the statutes they review, but that's a lie.  Just like everyone else they're influenced by the world around them.

With respect to abortion, the world hasn't really changed much in the past 40 years.  The number of pro-life people has remained fairly constant.  The arguments have stayed the same. The information has stayed largely the same.  The exposure to the issues has remained largely the same. It's reasonable to believe Roe could get overturned just by substituting in a justice or two with a different opinion.  Virtually every abortion case since Roe has been a 5-4 decision.

With respect to same-sex marriage, the world has changed dramatically in just the past 15 years or so.  Younger people support it by overwhelming margins.  Millions of people have attended same-sex weddings of family, friends, and co-workers.  It's all over the media in a way that abortion never has been.  I just don't see any way Obergefell gets overturned.  If Obergefell had reached the Court 15 years ago, it would have been decided 9-0 against same-sex marriage.   If it got reheard 15 years from now, I believe it would be decided 9-0 in favor of same-sex marriage. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top