Chi-Mo
Footballguy
We tried. You followed us.if you don't like my postings, feel free to go elsewhere.
We tried. You followed us.if you don't like my postings, feel free to go elsewhere.
I am going to go out on a limb and say that the majority of people who post here would rather you not post here. And I don't think those feelings extend to the other Duke fans that post in this thread.I was invited. Thanks.
And this isn't middle school, i don't care that most people here hate Duke, or me. This is a forum for people to post their opinions. This thread is about basketball. So I'll continue to post here. Perhaps you should ask yourself, why do i care, why do i get so upset that someone posts on a internet forum, especially when that person's posts aren't about me or my family, just basketball. Get a grip.I am going to go out on a limb and say that the majority of people who post here would rather you not post here. And I don't think those feelings extend to the other Duke fans that post in this thread.I was invited. Thanks.
Although I'm a new knitter, please count me in on this. I haven't played fantasy college b-ball in about 15 years and would really like to do it again. Thanks.FYI from U-Sports:From Kickoffs to Tipoffs09.15.09While we are just getting started with the heart of the college football season some of us are eagerly looking forward to the college basketball season. We will be tipping off the fantasy college basketball season in late October, with the fantasy season starting with the games on Monday, December 14 through Sunday, March 7. Sign up for our mailing list to be notified when registration for the 2009-2010 fantasy college basketball season begins.
Already have you penciled in.Although I'm a new knitter, please count me in on this. I haven't played fantasy college b-ball in about 15 years and would really like to do it again. Thanks.FYI from U-Sports:From Kickoffs to Tipoffs09.15.09While we are just getting started with the heart of the college football season some of us are eagerly looking forward to the college basketball season. We will be tipping off the fantasy college basketball season in late October, with the fantasy season starting with the games on Monday, December 14 through Sunday, March 7. Sign up for our mailing list to be notified when registration for the 2009-2010 fantasy college basketball season begins.![]()
Nice!Already have you penciled in.Although I'm a new knitter, please count me in on this. I haven't played fantasy college b-ball in about 15 years and would really like to do it again. Thanks.FYI from U-Sports:From Kickoffs to Tipoffs09.15.09While we are just getting started with the heart of the college football season some of us are eagerly looking forward to the college basketball season. We will be tipping off the fantasy college basketball season in late October, with the fantasy season starting with the games on Monday, December 14 through Sunday, March 7. Sign up for our mailing list to be notified when registration for the 2009-2010 fantasy college basketball season begins.![]()
![]()
At this point, I think there is no doubt he will go to Duke. What time is the coverage?Well, tonight is the night. Whether he picks Duke or not (and at this point, i think he does and pray that he does) its good to see the first PG domino fall. It seems like all these kids (Knight, Irving, Selby, McCallum, Joseph) were all just waiting for the first person to pick. I think that all of them (with the exception of Knight) will end their recruitments in the next few weeks. official prediction.....Irving- DukeKnight- UkSelby- KUMcCallum- UCLAJoseph- UCONNon another note....anyone with any Memphis insight? I read some comments (could just be sour grapes) that the Barton brothers are going to have major trouble qualifying.
i think 5:30 on ESPNU.At this point, I think there is no doubt he will go to Duke. What time is the coverage?Well, tonight is the night. Whether he picks Duke or not (and at this point, i think he does and pray that he does) its good to see the first PG domino fall. It seems like all these kids (Knight, Irving, Selby, McCallum, Joseph) were all just waiting for the first person to pick. I think that all of them (with the exception of Knight) will end their recruitments in the next few weeks. official prediction.....Irving- DukeKnight- UkSelby- KUMcCallum- UCLAJoseph- UCONNon another note....anyone with any Memphis insight? I read some comments (could just be sour grapes) that the Barton brothers are going to have major trouble qualifying.
No, Ramblin Wreck made a pact last season to ignore you and not respond to your suspended alias that you aren't using but you spent all season posting one shot after another at GT. Look, I don't like Duke. Big deal. I think Coach K is a two-faced rat that pisses on as many people that helps. I think he abuses his power over people too. I don't expect you to agree. Agree to disagree and move on instead of throwing a temper tantrum every time someone criticizes Duke. Someone in this thread posted last night that they don't like Hewitt. Big Deal... that's their opinion. You don't see me with 25 responses trashing that guy do you? Just look at this thread. Very civil and informative until you showed up. There probably aren't five posters on this board that want to even interact with you at all and it has nothing to do with Duke. Figure it out.I see why you said that, but Rambling Wreck has trashed Duke in about 20 different threads here over the last 2 years. So let's just say there is a history. I can get the talk from UNC fans, Kentucky fans, they have elite programs too. They can make logical arguments why they think their teams might be better. But GT?Good point; why don't you both cut it out?Although I will say that the joke about Ga Tech seemed out of line (if pretty much accurate - - I detest Paul Hewitt). Still out of line.
'nuff Said!
![]()
It also would help if people would not quote his posts in their posts. It defeats the purpose of having him on ignore.But it is shaping up to be a nice few days for Duke with Irving's all-but-done announcement and Barnes' visiting. (And while this is a knitting thread, Duke football is favored in a game against a D-1 opponent this weekend. When's the last time that happened? If Cutcliffe gets them to a bowl, what are the odds he's at Duke next year? I think of Spurrier at Duke and Mack Brown at UNC - demonstrate success and go to a football school.)Now, back to knitting and a question from someone who doesn't follow recruiting to the level of others: I've heard Barnes said he would announce after all of his visits but then switched the UCLA visit to the final one instead of Duke. Does that have an effect on an announcement for Duke this weekend or shortly after?Can we keep this focused on hoops please? What has Ripleys done, in this thread, that is such an issue? Be proud of his team? Correctly let us know that Irving will commit to Duke weeks before it happened? So many of you are proud to have him on ignore status, if he bothers you so much, just ignore him.
they claim the change in visit schedule was due to a scheduling conflict with his mom. At this point, i'm not reading into it all that much. He isnt going to UCLA. I do think he'll take the visit though. If Barnes is still up in the air (as he claims to be) he'll make both visits and then decide right after. I think he's coming to Duke and think Irving's visit this weekend (again, if it happens) will seal the deal. Honestly, i wouldnt be surprised if Hairston and/or Thorton swing by for a visit as well. And i think Cutcliffe hangs around at Duke for a little while longer.It also would help if people would not quote his posts in their posts. It defeats the purpose of having him on ignore.But it is shaping up to be a nice few days for Duke with Irving's all-but-done announcement and Barnes' visiting. (And while this is a knitting thread, Duke football is favored in a game against a D-1 opponent this weekend. When's the last time that happened? If Cutcliffe gets them to a bowl, what are the odds he's at Duke next year? I think of Spurrier at Duke and Mack Brown at UNC - demonstrate success and go to a football school.)Now, back to knitting and a question from someone who doesn't follow recruiting to the level of others: I've heard Barnes said he would announce after all of his visits but then switched the UCLA visit to the final one instead of Duke. Does that have an effect on an announcement for Duke this weekend or shortly after?Can we keep this focused on hoops please? What has Ripleys done, in this thread, that is such an issue? Be proud of his team? Correctly let us know that Irving will commit to Duke weeks before it happened? So many of you are proud to have him on ignore status, if he bothers you so much, just ignore him.
There hasn't been any doubt about Irving for weeks, maybe even months.Man, I'm glad I wasn't here yesterday afternoon. Maybe it's time for a thread on crocheting?At this point, I think there is no doubt he will go to Duke. What time is the coverage?Well, tonight is the night. Whether he picks Duke or not (and at this point, i think he does and pray that he does) its good to see the first PG domino fall. It seems like all these kids (Knight, Irving, Selby, McCallum, Joseph) were all just waiting for the first person to pick. I think that all of them (with the exception of Knight) will end their recruitments in the next few weeks. official prediction.....Irving- DukeKnight- UkSelby- KUMcCallum- UCLAJoseph- UCONNon another note....anyone with any Memphis insight? I read some comments (could just be sour grapes) that the Barton brothers are going to have major trouble qualifying.
I was spending a little bit of time at an Iowa State board, and the fans there are still under the impression that they are very much still in the running for Barnes, and think that they rank second just behind Duke. I don't know if this is simply homer fan optimism or if there is something to it, but it would be very cool to see him head to Ames.Now, back to knitting and a question from someone who doesn't follow recruiting to the level of others: I've heard Barnes said he would announce after all of his visits but then switched the UCLA visit to the final one instead of Duke. Does that have an effect on an announcement for Duke this weekend or shortly after?
I would find that hard to believe. At one point about a month ago UNC was considered the leader even among many Duke fans. That's changed a bit now as I understand it, but I still think UNC and Duke are the clear leaders.Barnes has said that he plans to decide around November 12. Nothing has changed there. It is kind of funny that Duke fans have been bragging for months about having the last in-home and the last official visit with Barnes and now they will have neither. And there are some people who have theorized that Barnes rescheduled the UCLA visit to give him a convenient excuse to defer when Duke lays a guilt trip on him this weekend. But ultimately I think the official visit scheduling is meaningless. Kid seems to have a good head on his shoulders and is doing the right thing by keeping the process as close to the vest as possible.I was spending a little bit of time at an Iowa State board, and the fans there are still under the impression that they are very much still in the running for Barnes, and think that they rank second just behind Duke. I don't know if this is simply homer fan optimism or if there is something to it, but it would be very cool to see him head to Ames.Now, back to knitting and a question from someone who doesn't follow recruiting to the level of others: I've heard Barnes said he would announce after all of his visits but then switched the UCLA visit to the final one instead of Duke. Does that have an effect on an announcement for Duke this weekend or shortly after?
I had a major issue with this as a UK fan. First, we had almost no shot at Irving, and even if coming to MM wowed him enough to pick UK, we would be taking him at the likely expense of the #1 PG in the nation. It never made sense to me at all, and Selby canceling as a result just made it worse. I think UK gets Knight or Selby with a very small chance they get both.Honestly, now that i think about it all this waiting and worrying about Irving is totally worth it if his presence at UKs midnight madness in any way encourages Josh Selby to look elsewhere.Of course, they're probably getting Knight anyway![]()
their only shot of getting both (IMO of course) is if Eric Bledsoe fails out after 1 semester. He's very good, but not 1 and done good. If he can stay eligible, he'll be back for year # 2 to run the team with Wall gone. IMO, this means they get Knight, play him as a combo guard along side bledsoe (which he is more than capable of) and Selby goes elsewhere. (probably KU)I had a major issue with this as a UK fan. First, we had almost no shot at Irving, and even if coming to MM wowed him enough to pick UK, we would be taking him at the likely expense of the #1 PG in the nation. It never made sense to me at all, and Selby canceling as a result just made it worse. I think UK gets Knight or Selby with a very small chance they get both.Honestly, now that i think about it all this waiting and worrying about Irving is totally worth it if his presence at UKs midnight madness in any way encourages Josh Selby to look elsewhere.Of course, they're probably getting Knight anyway![]()
We agree that this is the likely scenario.their only shot of getting both (IMO of course) is if Eric Bledsoe fails out after 1 semester. He's very good, but not 1 and done good. If he can stay eligible, he'll be back for year # 2 to run the team with Wall gone. IMO, this means they get Knight, play him as a combo guard along side bledsoe (which he is more than capable of) and Selby goes elsewhere. (probably KU)I had a major issue with this as a UK fan. First, we had almost no shot at Irving, and even if coming to MM wowed him enough to pick UK, we would be taking him at the likely expense of the #1 PG in the nation. It never made sense to me at all, and Selby canceling as a result just made it worse. I think UK gets Knight or Selby with a very small chance they get both.Honestly, now that i think about it all this waiting and worrying about Irving is totally worth it if his presence at UKs midnight madness in any way encourages Josh Selby to look elsewhere.Of course, they're probably getting Knight anyway![]()
What Cut has done at Duke is nothing short of a miracle. This program was beyond horrible for so many years, and he's got them playing competitive ball every week. He has said he's unpacked his bags and will be at Duke long term. I sure hope so. He is recruiting better than anyone since Spurrier, and as well all know, it starts and ends with recruiting. Barnes still won't commit until after all his visits are over. But Duke has never been out of first place. Lots of speculation about UNC passing them, but it was just that, speculation. Barnes absolutely loves K. That's the main reason he's coming to Duke. And he and Irving talk all the time, and call each other brothers. They will help Duke go from a 30 win team to a 36+ win team IMO.NMYMND said:But it is shaping up to be a nice few days for Duke with Irving's all-but-done announcement and Barnes' visiting. (And while this is a knitting thread, Duke football is favored in a game against a D-1 opponent this weekend. When's the last time that happened? If Cutcliffe gets them to a bowl, what are the odds he's at Duke next year? I think of Spurrier at Duke and Mack Brown at UNC - demonstrate success and go to a football school.)Now, back to knitting and a question from someone who doesn't follow recruiting to the level of others: I've heard Barnes said he would announce after all of his visits but then switched the UCLA visit to the final one instead of Duke. Does that have an effect on an announcement for Duke this weekend or shortly after?
what are the favorites listed at? I dont bet sports, just trying to get a comparison.but yeah, those seem to be good numbers. worth puting a few bucks on each for sure.Sportsbook has Nova at 18-1 and WVU at 25-1 to win NCAAB. Those two stuck out as the best values IMO.
Agreed on Texas, but I think UNC-CH is still ahead of Duke with 15/2 odds as opposed to Duke's 10/1, unless I misread.Obviously i'm a duke fan, but them getting better odds than Texas doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. same with UNC. those are sucker bets.
Even more confusing is why the money line odds differ from the futures odds for many of those teams.Agreed on Texas, but I think UNC-CH is still ahead of Duke with 15/2 odds as opposed to Duke's 10/1, unless I misread.Obviously i'm a duke fan, but them getting better odds than Texas doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. same with UNC. those are sucker bets.
Right; I didn't get that either. Oh, wait, the sources are different, Bodog and Pinnacle. Maybe that explains it. I'm not the foremost expert when it comes to sports betting.Even more confusing is why the money line odds differ from the futures odds for many of those teams.Agreed on Texas, but I think UNC-CH is still ahead of Duke with 15/2 odds as opposed to Duke's 10/1, unless I misread.Obviously i'm a duke fan, but them getting better odds than Texas doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. same with UNC. those are sucker bets.
I believe TLEF was saying he couldn't believe the Heels were also ahead of Texas... not that Duke was ahead of UNC.Agreed on Texas, but I think UNC-CH is still ahead of Duke with 15/2 odds as opposed to Duke's 10/1, unless I misread.Obviously i'm a duke fan, but them getting better odds than Texas doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. same with UNC. those are sucker bets.
Official![]()
I love this on his twitter page:
Uh, not really.Announcement tmrw on espnu...let's get this stuff over with...alot of you may be surprised and disappointed..so
Well . . . I think there were some Kentucky partisans who really thought they'd still land him.I love this on his twitter page:Uh, not really.Announcement tmrw on espnu...let's get this stuff over with...alot of you may be surprised and disappointed..so
No, not really. Again, I am not sure why UK fans wanted him when it looks like we will get Knight. Irving is a great PG, but I think Knight is better. Congrats Blue Devils!Well . . . I think there were some Kentucky partisans who really thought they'd still land him.I love this on his twitter page:Uh, not really.Announcement tmrw on espnu...let's get this stuff over with...alot of you may be surprised and disappointed..so
Thanks. Maybe you didn't think so, but plenty of less-knowledgable online Kentucky fans certainly thought they had a real shot after he attended their MM event.No, not really. Again, I am not sure why UK fans wanted him when it looks like we will get Knight. Irving is a great PG, but I think Knight is better. Congrats Blue Devils!
As for the Wall stuff, I do not know any more that the rest of you. This was the most recent post on the blog of a UK "insider""I will have more on this later tonight in a post at 9 pm, but for now its suffice to say this. Dont panic or worry about the Forde/O Neill story. The issue of Wall’s eligibility has been one that UK has known about for some time and is not anything new. I will go into some detail later as the exact issue it is kind of interesting, but for fan purposes, there is little to worry about. UK is confident that the matter will be taken care of soon. This will either be a matter of either (a) no problem or (b) the payment back of some money used to front expenses for college visits by an AAU coach that was also registered as an agent. Either way, everyone I have spoken with believes he will be able to play."
Yep. Nothing wrong and no shame being the 2nd best PG in the nation behind Knight. But I do believe Irving will be a more valuable college PG, just because I think he's got a good chance to play 2 or 3 years, where Knight, like Wall, is 1 and done. Both will be lottery picks for sure.Again, I am not sure why UK fans wanted him when it looks like we will get Knight. Irving is a great PG, but I think Knight is better. Congrats Blue Devils!