What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official NFC Championship Thread: Seahawks v 49ers*** (3 Viewers)

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    176
And the coaster continues.

As I said, earlier this past week, Seattle.isn't going to drop the interceptions that Green Bay did.

 
Seattle has passed on field goals twice in this game. The 53 yarder and the goal line one. They come away with 1 TD so overall they are ahead +1 on those decisions.
This isn't how evaluating decisions works.

If they go for it on 4th and 50 from their on 1-yd line and then score a TD, was it therefore a good decision?

 
These arbitrary rules on what is and is not reviewable are ridiculous. Reviewable in the endzone or on the sideline but not in the field of play? What the heck? Why does the NFL only look back at these things AFTER they happen instead of being forward thinking for once.

They need an overriding rule that "if anything is patently obvious, let it be reviewed".

Poor Bowman holds on through his knee exploding and doesn't get the ball.

Luckily as I type this it all works out in the end.
Get rid of replay....and live with the calls.

Now we debate whats reviewable.....LOL. The whole game can be reviewable if we want it to be.
I would rather hire refs with eyes. That would solve a lot of problems.

 
This game is turning into one for the ages.

Why go for it on 4th down there? I'd Pete Carroll trying to lose this game for his team?
Brutal coaching. YOu kick that FG and force SF to score a TD.
:no:

a few issues:

1. scoring a TD from the 1 is something like, statistically, a better than 50/50 proposition.

2. If I remember right, San Francisco is actually more likely to score a winning TD off of the kickoff (and drive after the kickoff) than they are to score anything startnig from the 1 yard line.

Thus, they should have (and ALWAYS should) go for it from the 1 yard line no matter what.

 
Seattle has passed on field goals twice in this game. The 53 yarder and the goal line one. They come away with 1 TD so overall they are ahead +1 on those decisions.
This isn't how evaluating decisions works.

If they go for it on 4th and 50 from their on 1-yd line and then score a TD, was it therefore a good decision?
I didn't call them good or bad decisions. It just is what it is.

 
Brock shoves every WR whether they can catch it or not, many have been off target but he shoves them into the sidelines every time regardless of weather it is a catchable ball or not. he may have discovered something he can do within the rules, he got called earlier because of the down marker or sideline yard marker which made it worse but he has continued to push guys after the play seems over.

Just my observation.

 
Seattle has passed on field goals twice in this game. The 53 yarder and the goal line one. They come away with 1 TD so overall they are ahead +1 on those decisions.
This isn't how evaluating decisions works.

If they go for it on 4th and 50 from their on 1-yd line and then score a TD, was it therefore a good decision?
Exactly. Lousy decision to pass on a sure fire 3 points in a game like this.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top