NajehHejan
Footballguy
Luck is not putting up the QB1 numbers anticipated. Who cares if the real life Colts are winning games? Magic football owners everywhere are the real losers here.
This.Luck = Aikman
A fine QB who may never need the fantasy numbers to win in real football.
Let's hope so. I like the Colts but watching them the last couple of years has beenColts OC: Less 'run-1st' & more 'score-1st' O
Colts OC Pep Hamilton said he's taken a "score-first" mindset heading into his second season on the job.
Hamilton unsuccessfully preached and practiced a run-first, physical style of offense as a rookie NFL coordinator. He's come to realize he can't jam a square peg into a round hole. Hamilton has one of the game's better quarterbacks in Andrew Luck and a loaded arsenal of pass catchers. "We’re going to do whatever we need to do to score one more point than our opponent," Hamilton said. Luck won't drop back 700 times, but he could flirt with 600 attempts and remains in the bottom half of the QB1 mix, with upside for more. The Colts have personnel to play spread offense if they can't kick start Trent Richardson.
Rotoworld
http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/288302/colts-oc-less-run-1st--and--more-score-1st-o
Interesting. I think I posted something about all the WRs, especially if Wayne comes back, in a TRich thread, but I can't recall. If the coaching staff is smart, they should feature Luck, not a terrible running game with TRich. Wayne (if healthy), Hilton, Nicks, Rogers, Fleener, Allen, Moncrief and Brazil is not a bad receiving corps.Colts OC: Less 'run-1st' & more 'score-1st' O
Colts OC Pep Hamilton said he's taken a "score-first" mindset heading into his second season on the job.
Hamilton unsuccessfully preached and practiced a run-first, physical style of offense as a rookie NFL coordinator. He's come to realize he can't jam a square peg into a round hole. Hamilton has one of the game's better quarterbacks in Andrew Luck and a loaded arsenal of pass catchers. "We’re going to do whatever we need to do to score one more point than our opponent," Hamilton said. Luck won't drop back 700 times, but he could flirt with 600 attempts and remains in the bottom half of the QB1 mix, with upside for more. The Colts have personnel to play spread offense if they can't kick start Trent Richardson.
Rotoworld
http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/288302/colts-oc-less-run-1st--and--more-score-1st-o
...as they say here in Minnesota, you got that right.Interesting. I think I posted something about all the WRs, especially if Wayne comes back, in a TRich thread, but I can't recall. If the coaching staff is smart, they should feature Luck, not a terrible running game with TRich. Wayne (if healthy), Hilton, Nicks, Rogers, Fleener, Allen, Moncrief and Brazil is not a bad receiving corps.Colts OC: Less 'run-1st' & more 'score-1st' O
Colts OC Pep Hamilton said he's taken a "score-first" mindset heading into his second season on the job.
Hamilton unsuccessfully preached and practiced a run-first, physical style of offense as a rookie NFL coordinator. He's come to realize he can't jam a square peg into a round hole. Hamilton has one of the game's better quarterbacks in Andrew Luck and a loaded arsenal of pass catchers. "We’re going to do whatever we need to do to score one more point than our opponent," Hamilton said. Luck won't drop back 700 times, but he could flirt with 600 attempts and remains in the bottom half of the QB1 mix, with upside for more. The Colts have personnel to play spread offense if they can't kick start Trent Richardson.
Rotoworld
http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/288302/colts-oc-less-run-1st--and--more-score-1st-o
Luck is great for fantasy but the Colts are 0-2 for a reason and that reason is Pep.Well, Pep sucks but Luck is the #1 QB in fantasy right now so he isn't killing my fantasy team.
Yeah but that's kind of the opposite of the OP.Luck is great for fantasy but the Colts are 0-2 for a reason and that reason is Pep.Well, Pep sucks but Luck is the #1 QB in fantasy right now so he isn't killing my fantasy team.
In the OP's defense he posted this last September when the Colts were winning.Yeah but that's kind of the opposite of the OP.Luck is great for fantasy but the Colts are 0-2 for a reason and that reason is Pep.Well, Pep sucks but Luck is the #1 QB in fantasy right now so he isn't killing my fantasy team.
Not working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
Could not disagree more. The problem that Indy has run into with Pep as a coordinator is balance and creativity. Luck can run any play book in the NFL. Yet with the game on the line and one of the best players in the NFL you don't turn to Luck? That is ludicrous and you should be called out for that as a coordinator. I don't know if Luck has the ability to do so but he should have audibled into a pass.Not working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
No, he's not. Luck is a great young QB, and it certainly looks like he's got a good shot to get there some day, but he's not in the elite tier with Manning / Rodgers / Brees yet.Could not disagree more. The problem that Indy has run into with Pep as a coordinator is balance and creativity. Luck can run any play book in the NFL. Yet with the game on the line and one of the best players in the NFL you don't turn to Luck? That is ludicrous and you should be called out for that as a coordinator. I don't know if Luck has the ability to do so but he should have audibled into a pass. Luck is as elite as they come but watch the formations and game plan from last night. It was awful and looked like a high school run team for much of the game. Luck admittedly was not as sharp as he has been last night, but part of that is on him and part of that is that very brutal game plan. Then with game on the line you pound it on 1st and 2nd down deep in your own territory with one of the least creative and skilled offensive players on your team. Recipe for losing, which they did.Not working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
I think Luck is as close to Manning, Rodgers and Brees as there is right now.No, he's not. Luck is a great young QB, and it certainly looks like he's got a good shot to get there some day, but he's not in the elite tier with Manning / Rodgers / Brees yet.Could not disagree more. The problem that Indy has run into with Pep as a coordinator is balance and creativity. Luck can run any play book in the NFL. Yet with the game on the line and one of the best players in the NFL you don't turn to Luck? That is ludicrous and you should be called out for that as a coordinator. I don't know if Luck has the ability to do so but he should have audibled into a pass. Luck is as elite as they come but watch the formations and game plan from last night. It was awful and looked like a high school run team for much of the game. Luck admittedly was not as sharp as he has been last night, but part of that is on him and part of that is that very brutal game plan. Then with game on the line you pound it on 1st and 2nd down deep in your own territory with one of the least creative and skilled offensive players on your team. Recipe for losing, which they did.Not working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
If you want to say using Richardson over Bradshaw on that last drive was dumb, then have at it -- but let's not act like the run calls were awful in and of themselves. The Colts ran for 169 yards last night. That's a great way to win most of your games.
0-2 ... I'd be hating it if I was a Colts fan.As a Colts fan, I love it.
So essentially you're blasting Hamilton over a single play call on 2nd down on Indy's last possession of the game? Personally, it takes a bit more than one iffy play for me to pin a loss entirely on the OC, but YMMV. I'd also guess that Luck has the ability to audible to a pass there if the Eagles come out with 7 or 8 in the box -- he didn't because the Eagles weren't in a base defense.I think Luck is as close to Manning, Rodgers and Brees as there is right now.The run calls were not good even had Bradshaw been in the game. The Colts ran the ball quite effectively last night. The rb's racked up 149 yards on 34 carries which for them might be good but that still is only a 4.3 ypc.No, he's not. Luck is a great young QB, and it certainly looks like he's got a good shot to get there some day, but he's not in the elite tier with Manning / Rodgers / Brees yet.If you want to say using Richardson over Bradshaw on that last drive was dumb, then have at it -- but let's not act like the run calls were awful in and of themselves. The Colts ran for 169 yards last night. That's a great way to win most of your games.Could not disagree more. The problem that Indy has run into with Pep as a coordinator is balance and creativity. Luck can run any play book in the NFL. Yet with the game on the line and one of the best players in the NFL you don't turn to Luck? That is ludicrous and you should be called out for that as a coordinator. I don't know if Luck has the ability to do so but he should have audibled into a pass. Luck is as elite as they come but watch the formations and game plan from last night. It was awful and looked like a high school run team for much of the game. Luck admittedly was not as sharp as he has been last night, but part of that is on him and part of that is that very brutal game plan. Then with game on the line you pound it on 1st and 2nd down deep in your own territory with one of the least creative and skilled offensive players on your team. Recipe for losing, which they did.Not working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
Call me crazy but with the game on the line and after getting stuffed on 1st down, I automatically pass there on 2nd down with my best player. Seems pretty clear.
I am not trying to be mean, but did you even watch the game? The 1st down carry by Trent got 6 yards, since when is that being stuffed? I think Pep was horrible last night as well, but averaging 4.3 a carry as a team is good. Like that would put them right around top 10 for the year and as bad as the Eagles defense is they are actually pretty good against the run.I think Luck is as close to Manning, Rodgers and Brees as there is right now.No, he's not. Luck is a great young QB, and it certainly looks like he's got a good shot to get there some day, but he's not in the elite tier with Manning / Rodgers / Brees yet.Could not disagree more. The problem that Indy has run into with Pep as a coordinator is balance and creativity. Luck can run any play book in the NFL. Yet with the game on the line and one of the best players in the NFL you don't turn to Luck? That is ludicrous and you should be called out for that as a coordinator. I don't know if Luck has the ability to do so but he should have audibled into a pass. Luck is as elite as they come but watch the formations and game plan from last night. It was awful and looked like a high school run team for much of the game. Luck admittedly was not as sharp as he has been last night, but part of that is on him and part of that is that very brutal game plan. Then with game on the line you pound it on 1st and 2nd down deep in your own territory with one of the least creative and skilled offensive players on your team. Recipe for losing, which they did.Not working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
If you want to say using Richardson over Bradshaw on that last drive was dumb, then have at it -- but let's not act like the run calls were awful in and of themselves. The Colts ran for 169 yards last night. That's a great way to win most of your games.
The run calls were not good even had Bradshaw been in the game. The Colts ran the ball quite effectively last night. The rb's racked up 149 yards on 34 carries which for them might be good but that still is only a 4.3 ypc.
Call me crazy but with the game on the line and after getting stuffed on 1st down, I automatically pass there on 2nd down with my best player. Seems pretty clear.
My point wasn't really focused on just last night, but more so over the last year. The offense they run seems very bland. So much talent seems to go to waste on this team. Seems like they usually run on first down, never run a reverse, just old school football. I just think they have the talent to do more and it's frustrating to not see it. But who knows who is really making the calls. I know when Paul Hackett was calling the Jets plays 10 years ago, it was run run pass punt 90% of the time. So did the defenses. FrustratingNot working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
Agree the first carry was fine. Got 6 yards, and with three minutes left needed to burn some clock. However, if you choose to run on second down and don't get the first down, you are in a real tough spot. And if you're really set on running on second down probably better to not have your RB on the field who already fumbled twice and is probably only focused on holding onto the ball. But like you said, maybe it was left up to Luck to call the play and he didn't see anything in the passing game.I am not trying to be mean, but did you even watch the game? The 1st down carry by Trent got 6 yards, since when is that being stuffed? I think Pep was horrible last night as well, but averaging 4.3 a carry as a team is good. Like that would put them right around top 10 for the year and as bad as the Eagles defense is they are actually pretty good against the run.I think Luck is as close to Manning, Rodgers and Brees as there is right now.No, he's not. Luck is a great young QB, and it certainly looks like he's got a good shot to get there some day, but he's not in the elite tier with Manning / Rodgers / Brees yet.Could not disagree more. The problem that Indy has run into with Pep as a coordinator is balance and creativity. Luck can run any play book in the NFL. Yet with the game on the line and one of the best players in the NFL you don't turn to Luck? That is ludicrous and you should be called out for that as a coordinator. I don't know if Luck has the ability to do so but he should have audibled into a pass. Luck is as elite as they come but watch the formations and game plan from last night. It was awful and looked like a high school run team for much of the game. Luck admittedly was not as sharp as he has been last night, but part of that is on him and part of that is that very brutal game plan. Then with game on the line you pound it on 1st and 2nd down deep in your own territory with one of the least creative and skilled offensive players on your team. Recipe for losing, which they did.Not working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
If you want to say using Richardson over Bradshaw on that last drive was dumb, then have at it -- but let's not act like the run calls were awful in and of themselves. The Colts ran for 169 yards last night. That's a great way to win most of your games.
The run calls were not good even had Bradshaw been in the game. The Colts ran the ball quite effectively last night. The rb's racked up 149 yards on 34 carries which for them might be good but that still is only a 4.3 ypc.
Call me crazy but with the game on the line and after getting stuffed on 1st down, I automatically pass there on 2nd down with my best player. Seems pretty clear.
I honestly believe with the game on the line you put the ball in your best players hand. Let Luck decide whether to audible out of a pass or run.
Don't worry I am not easily offended.I am not trying to be mean, but did you even watch the game? The 1st down carry by Trent got 6 yards, since when is that being stuffed? I think Pep was horrible last night as well, but averaging 4.3 a carry as a team is good. Like that would put them right around top 10 for the year and as bad as the Eagles defense is they are actually pretty good against the run.I think Luck is as close to Manning, Rodgers and Brees as there is right now.No, he's not. Luck is a great young QB, and it certainly looks like he's got a good shot to get there some day, but he's not in the elite tier with Manning / Rodgers / Brees yet.Could not disagree more. The problem that Indy has run into with Pep as a coordinator is balance and creativity. Luck can run any play book in the NFL. Yet with the game on the line and one of the best players in the NFL you don't turn to Luck? That is ludicrous and you should be called out for that as a coordinator. I don't know if Luck has the ability to do so but he should have audibled into a pass. Luck is as elite as they come but watch the formations and game plan from last night. It was awful and looked like a high school run team for much of the game. Luck admittedly was not as sharp as he has been last night, but part of that is on him and part of that is that very brutal game plan. Then with game on the line you pound it on 1st and 2nd down deep in your own territory with one of the least creative and skilled offensive players on your team. Recipe for losing, which they did.Not working? Richardson and Bradshaw combined for 34 - 149, guy. I'd agree that the split should be more in favor of Bradshaw, obviously, but the Indy ground game was just fine last night. The offense as a whole put up 27 points and controlled most of the game. That loss is on the defense not being able to tackle Darren Sproles far more than on Hamilton for sticking with a ground game that had been gashing the Philly defense all night.Reminds me of the days when Paul Hackett was running the Jets offense. Absolutely maddening to see such lack of creativity. Use the run game to wear down the defense, but if it's not working by the 4th quarter make an adjustment.
If you want to say using Richardson over Bradshaw on that last drive was dumb, then have at it -- but let's not act like the run calls were awful in and of themselves. The Colts ran for 169 yards last night. That's a great way to win most of your games.
The run calls were not good even had Bradshaw been in the game. The Colts ran the ball quite effectively last night. The rb's racked up 149 yards on 34 carries which for them might be good but that still is only a 4.3 ypc.
Call me crazy but with the game on the line and after getting stuffed on 1st down, I automatically pass there on 2nd down with my best player. Seems pretty clear.
I honestly believe with the game on the line you put the ball in your best players hand. Let Luck decide whether to audible out of a pass or run.
Agree,the game plan was working,my only thought was that a few times during the game The Colts could have used play action and taken some deep shots looking for a big play. The way the running game was dominating they could have hit something downfield a few times. imop.Pat\rt of it is the contrast to Philly's offense was stark. Philly's plays looked creative and looked like they could break any play for a TD. Indy's O looked like a college team.
The game plan was good, but the play calling on the last two drives was bad. The play that led to the INT should have been a run call. They are in FG range and could have potentially put the game away. The last series...calling two runs...terrible.
I disagree with just one thing you said and it is Bradshaw. If they give Bradshaw that many touches he won't be around by week 8. Then it will be the TRich and random unproven guys show (Herron and whoever else they have)pizzatyme said:As a Colts fan who's watched games for so many years here are my thoughts:
I truly believe that Irsay has mandated the Colts be a balanced run-oriented team with a run-stopping defense. I think he's clearly stated he's tired of Star Wars offense without Super Bowls. I think this is incredibly short-sighted and a losing proposition until you have all of the pieces in place to do this. Maybe in 2 more years through the draft.
Luck is NOT Manning. He's a great QB, but Manning masked many faults of the team over the years. Again, Luck is very good at overcoming but not there (yet).
Pep Hamilton is not an NFL-caliber OC. He lacks imagination.
Pagano is a rah rah guy and a yes-man. He's using Irsay's playbook but with the wrong pieces.
Maybe, just maybe Hamilton will be gone if/when the Colts miss the playoffs this year. The Colts will NOT have a better set of WRs/TEs than they do right now. They are wasting the opportunity.
Side bar: I foresee Moncrief starting to eat into Nicks' targets. I was a big believer in Nicks in the preseason. However, now that they're full speed, he cannot get separation. Moncrief will not have that issue.
Side bar II: Bradshaw should be getting 75% of the touches. WTF was TRich in there on the final series after fumbling twice and knowing you're going to do 2 running plays? EFF that!
Ok, 50%.I disagree with just one thing you said and it is Bradshaw. If they give Bradshaw that many touches he won't be around by week 8. Then it will be the TRich and random unproven guys show (Herron and whoever else they have)pizzatyme said:As a Colts fan who's watched games for so many years here are my thoughts:
I truly believe that Irsay has mandated the Colts be a balanced run-oriented team with a run-stopping defense. I think he's clearly stated he's tired of Star Wars offense without Super Bowls. I think this is incredibly short-sighted and a losing proposition until you have all of the pieces in place to do this. Maybe in 2 more years through the draft.
Luck is NOT Manning. He's a great QB, but Manning masked many faults of the team over the years. Again, Luck is very good at overcoming but not there (yet).
Pep Hamilton is not an NFL-caliber OC. He lacks imagination.
Pagano is a rah rah guy and a yes-man. He's using Irsay's playbook but with the wrong pieces.
Maybe, just maybe Hamilton will be gone if/when the Colts miss the playoffs this year. The Colts will NOT have a better set of WRs/TEs than they do right now. They are wasting the opportunity.
Side bar: I foresee Moncrief starting to eat into Nicks' targets. I was a big believer in Nicks in the preseason. However, now that they're full speed, he cannot get separation. Moncrief will not have that issue.
Side bar II: Bradshaw should be getting 75% of the touches. WTF was TRich in there on the final series after fumbling twice and knowing you're going to do 2 running plays? EFF that!
This! Crazy that TRich was the RB under those conditions that you pointed out on that last drive and the fact that Bradshaw gives them their best chance to producepizzatyme said:As a Colts fan who's watched games for so many years here are my thoughts:
I truly believe that Irsay has mandated the Colts be a balanced run-oriented team with a run-stopping defense. I think he's clearly stated he's tired of Star Wars offense without Super Bowls. I think this is incredibly short-sighted and a losing proposition until you have all of the pieces in place to do this. Maybe in 2 more years through the draft.
Luck is NOT Manning. He's a great QB, but Manning masked many faults of the team over the years. Again, Luck is very good at overcoming but not there (yet).
Pep Hamilton is not an NFL-caliber OC. He lacks imagination.
Pagano is a rah rah guy and a yes-man. He's using Irsay's playbook but with the wrong pieces.
Maybe, just maybe Hamilton will be gone if/when the Colts miss the playoffs this year. The Colts will NOT have a better set of WRs/TEs than they do right now. They are wasting the opportunity.
Side bar: I foresee Moncrief starting to eat into Nicks' targets. I was a big believer in Nicks in the preseason. However, now that they're full speed, he cannot get separation. Moncrief will not have that issue.
Side bar II: Bradshaw should be getting 75% of the touches. WTF was TRich in there on the final series after fumbling twice and knowing you're going to do 2 running plays? EFF that!
sig-worthy imoMagic football owners everywhere are the real losers here.
The likelihood that he would lose his job should he waste the obvious resources available to him. Andrew Luck is one, if not THE best young player in the league right now. You would have to be an idiot to have reigns on this teams and somehow actually believe that running the ball is the ticket to success.Anyone want to venture a guess at what the catalyst was that led to Pep calling more aggressive plays?
Luck was very good last year but was still only in his second year. I think it's just letting him roll with things - he still does some odd things (throwing away the ball into the middle of the field last night), but he's pretty elite.Anyone want to venture a guess at what the catalyst was that led to Pep calling more aggressive plays?
I was going to say, this thread, but your answer works tooThe likelihood that he would lose his job should he waste the obvious resources available to him. Andrew Luck is one, if not THE best young player in the league right now. You would have to be an idiot to have reigns on this teams and somehow actually believe that running the ball is the ticket to success.Anyone want to venture a guess at what the catalyst was that led to Pep calling more aggressive plays?
This is a passing league where franchise QBs are the Alpha option and stats and rules support the notion of passing. Maybe he just realized.
Luck is not putting up the QB1 numbers anticipated. Who cares if the real life Colts are winning games? Magic football owners everywhere are the real losers here.
Adam Schefter , ESPN, NFL Insider
Andrew Luck is 1st player in NFL history with at least 350 passing yards in 5 straight road games, per Elias SB.
The Colts hired Chud.Anyone want to venture a guess at what the catalyst was that led to Pep calling more aggressive plays?