What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Pro Wrestling Thread*** (7 Viewers)

Raw's impossible to watch nowadays but just saw Sting ending tonight on Youtube. Pretty cool ending.

I've never been less excited about a Mania than this one. I still watch old PPVs time to time. The only reason I keep the Network.

 
I guess I'm in the minority...I thought it was a pretty solid RAW, and I don't even like Orton.

  • Very good divas match. Paige taking a ring post bump was wicked.
  • K-Swiss clapping
  • Rusev in a suit
  • IC title six man madness
  • Brock Lesnar video package (I am going to F Roman Reigns up. The End.)
  • Sting
 
Top 3 how?

He's not as wildly popular or iconic as Hogan, Austin, Flair or Rock.

He's not as good in the ring as Flair, Michaels, Hart or many others.

The only thing he's got going for him is being in so many big matches, which, let's face it, is largely because he married the boss' daughter.
Oh bull####. Triple H gets the crowd to its feet in any arena in the world and that's going on like 17 years now. Austin had him beat in maybe 3 of those.In the ring? Total package. As good as any of those guys.
Sure.
It's true. It's DAMN true.
:KurtAngle:

 
I've pretty much lost interest in wrestling other than leaving it on sometimes in the background while I muck around on the computer.

They should combine the Orton/Rollins and Sting/HHH matches and make it a tag match. HHH and Sting are too old to have a good match on their own.

 
I've pretty much lost interest in wrestling other than leaving it on sometimes in the background while I muck around on the computer.

They should combine the Orton/Rollins and Sting/HHH matches and make it a tag match. HHH and Sting are too old to have a good match on their own.
Agree a tag match would be better.

 
I've pretty much lost interest in wrestling other than leaving it on sometimes in the background while I muck around on the computer.

They should combine the Orton/Rollins and Sting/HHH matches and make it a tag match. HHH and Sting are too old to have a good match on their own.
after last night, I agree totally... Let Seth bump around for Sting, have that always present intrigue of Orton turning heel and sting being prone to get turned on... probably too late to do it at this point

That was the early 90's Sting last night.... fire, energy, so much better than this crow squawk crap they've done.And

And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
I saw those guys on Reddit, the Jake and Macho Man guys were standouts... I don't see how they could rightly have them change or be removed... hopefully this inspired thousands of more "glory days" costumes that they have to deal with.

And then they'll take credit with some crap like WE HAVE THE GREATEST FANS IN THE WORLD! THE WWE UNIVERSE LOVES THEIR SUPERSTARS AND LEGENDS!

 
I've pretty much lost interest in wrestling other than leaving it on sometimes in the background while I muck around on the computer.

They should combine the Orton/Rollins and Sting/HHH matches and make it a tag match. HHH and Sting are too old to have a good match on their own.
after last night, I agree totally... Let Seth bump around for Sting, have that always present intrigue of Orton turning heel and sting being prone to get turned on... probably too late to do it at this point

That was the early 90's Sting last night.... fire, energy, so much better than this crow squawk crap they've done.And

And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
The tag team play was to put Sting and Ziggler together...with Dolph coming out in a flat top, face paint, and pants.

 
I've pretty much lost interest in wrestling other than leaving it on sometimes in the background while I muck around on the computer.

They should combine the Orton/Rollins and Sting/HHH matches and make it a tag match. HHH and Sting are too old to have a good match on their own.
after last night, I agree totally... Let Seth bump around for Sting, have that always present intrigue of Orton turning heel and sting being prone to get turned on... probably too late to do it at this point

That was the early 90's Sting last night.... fire, energy, so much better than this crow squawk crap they've done.And

And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
The tag team play was to put Sting and Ziggler together...with Dolph coming out in a flat top, face paint, and pants.
Damn man.. .now I'm just MAD.... that would have been amazing

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
Yeah that's bull####.

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
Yeah that's bull####.
Did you know Lucha Underground doesn't allow any trademarks of any kind in their audience? If you wear a Nike shirt in, they make you take it off.

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
Yeah that's bull####.
Did you know Lucha Underground doesn't allow any trademarks of any kind in their audience? If you wear a Nike shirt in, they make you take it off.
And that is relevant...how?

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
Yeah that's bull####.
Did you know Lucha Underground doesn't allow any trademarks of any kind in their audience? If you wear a Nike shirt in, they make you take it off.
And that is relevant...how?
Being in the crowd of a televised product does not give you unlimited rights to do whatever you want. If you want to sit in a heavy televised area, you have to respect the rules. It isn't just big bad WWE being mean to select fans - it happens all of the way down to the independent darlings.

 
Ghost Rider said:
I'm not saying he hasn't been very good. He has been. Even without Stephanie, he was still a top guy for a while, but he's not a top 3, top 5, or even top 10 guy all-time.
I agree with this... without trying to list everyone else out, I wouldn't mind saying he belongs in the top 50... maybe top 25 given his longevity, work rate and mic work.

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
Yeah that's bull####.
Did you know Lucha Underground doesn't allow any trademarks of any kind in their audience? If you wear a Nike shirt in, they make you take it off.
And that is relevant...how?
Being in the crowd of a televised product does not give you unlimited rights to do whatever you want. If you want to sit in a heavy televised area, you have to respect the rules. It isn't just big bad WWE being mean to select fans - it happens all of the way down to the independent darlings.
This is true, but this was just a dumb decision by WWE. These fans' costumes weren't obscene, hindering any of their current story lines or pushing any competing product. Rather, they added to what should be a festive atmosphere... the kind that WWE and its competitors used to encourage during pro wrestling's biggest heyday. Given how bad the current product is at times, they should look for any reason for viewers to stay tuned in.

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
Yeah that's bull####.
Did you know Lucha Underground doesn't allow any trademarks of any kind in their audience? If you wear a Nike shirt in, they make you take it off.
I see a lot of the LU mask shirts in the crowd. I wonder if that might be the reason...that and to sell some T-shirts.

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
Yeah that's bull####.
Did you know Lucha Underground doesn't allow any trademarks of any kind in their audience? If you wear a Nike shirt in, they make you take it off.
And that is relevant...how?
:goodposting: Sorry I think Nike/Lucha is just an absolute terrible example (when comparing to this). One point I agree with is fans can't just do what they want.

Just amazing they don't think those costumes wouldn't help promote the Network. The last thing WWE right now needs is bad pub. This is absolutely beyond ridiculous. Too ridiculous for words almost.

Freaking awesome :lmao: https://twitter.com/Laufered/status/577694547704066048

 
Ghost Rider said:
I'm not saying he hasn't been very good. He has been. Even without Stephanie, he was still a top guy for a while, but he's not a top 3, top 5, or even top 10 guy all-time.
I agree with this... without trying to list everyone else out, I wouldn't mind saying he belongs in the top 50... maybe top 25 given his longevity, work rate and mic work.
He loses points for me when it comes to mic work, considering most of his "here's the thing..." promos are long-winded and a chore to get through as a viewer.

 
And I hope Lions Gate sues the WWE for copyright infringement for the Crow character given that the WWE will sue people for a HAND GESTURE.
Oh, WWE can #### up anything nowadays. (from PWInsider)

A group of front row fans at last night's Raw taping were asked to remove costumes after they appeared in the opening segment dressed up as a number of 1980s-1990s era WWE characters. One of the group wrote on Twitter that they were told to take the costumes off or be removed from their seats. The group were walked out and given new WWE shirts before returning. The live crowd in Des Moines booed them when they returned. WWE policy is to not dissuade fans from dressing up if they want, but to not have them sitting across from the hard camera due to potential distractions to the viewer. I understand that but I think WWE had a strategic error here. In a lot of ways, this was akin to penalizing a football fan who shows up all painted up to support his team because he's paid to sit in the best seats in the house. Anything that shows passion for your product is a good thing. If fans are showing up dressed as characters (something WWE has showcased for years in videos they've produced and aired) and showing how excited they are for WWE, this is a bad thing or distracting, how? Heck, call an audible and have Michael Cole talk about the WWE Hall of Fame while standing in front of the fans and talk about the ravenous nature of the audience for WWE's grand history and how you can see it all on the WWE Network, or something, but don't stamp out fans' passion. The top ticket price is over $100 for Raw. Do you think those fans are going to want to pay that again?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2015/03/17/wwe-tells-fans-to-remove-their-vintage-wrestler-costumes-or-forfeit-their-ringside-seats-on-raw/

PIC IS AWESOME

Edit: My bad I didn't see the twitter pic posted.

:bag: :lmao:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was letting my mind wander a bit this morning. I started giggling imagining if Stephanie tries to get Vince to do something by using the same pouty face and boo-boo lip she did when she was 9 and wanted a new doll.

[Vince admires himself in a picture with him and X Bowl MVP Tommy Maddox]

STEPH: Dad?

VINCE: Yeah, babe...

STEPH: I was wondering...would you let Brock continue to be the champion?

VINCE: Baby, we've been over this before. Roman Reigns is going to be the next best thing in wrestling and I am not getting my money's worth from Lesnar. I can't have a part-time guy as champ. You know this.

STEPH: But daaaaaadddd...

VINCE: But, nothing Steph! We agreed that it was best for business.

[stephanie begins to get all doe-eyed, a tear beginning to show out of her right eye.]

VINCE: Stephanie, I know Hunter put you up to this...

[stephanie produces boo-boo lip and eyes get even more doe-like]

STEPH: Pleeeeeeeassseee daddy....

[Vince feels heartstrings tighten]

VINCE: DAMMIT STEPH! DON'T YOU DO THAT!!! STOP IT!!! DAMMIT I SAID STOP THAT!!!!

STEPH: YOU DON'T LOVE ME!!!!! [begins to cry]

[Linda hears Stephanie cry and enters the room]

LINDA: Why is our baby crying?

VINCE: She's trying to...

LINDA: I'm sure what she wants isn't all that bad. Let her have what she wants; it can't be that bad.

VINCE: [sighs deeply]

STEPH: [tears magically disappear] OH THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU DADDY!!!! I LOVE YOU!! [kisses Vince on cheek]

[stephanie and Linda leave]

[Vince bangs head repeatedly on desk]

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was on Youtube and looking at top ten lists and came across on for Wrestling. Amazingly they left out Bruno Samartino and Andre the Giant.

 
If the best gimmicks are extensions of reality, they're missing the boat with Reigns as a cocky, arrogant heel.
One theory is that Heyman will turn on Lesnar in favor of newest Heyman guy Reigns.

I'm more hopeful of Brock retaining, which is a rumor circulating today.

Of course, all these theories and rumors are practically worthless.

 
I was on Youtube and looking at top ten lists and came across on for Wrestling. Amazingly they left out Bruno Samartino and Andre the Giant.
:link:

I understand the argument against including Bruno... he was the beneficiary of being a champion in the biggest market largely in part based on his ethnic background. Moreover, his style of wrestling and character didn't translate at all to any later generation of wrestling (as witnessed during his comebacks in the 1980s). You couldn't say the same about guys like Austin, Flair, Rock, Hogan, Dusty, etc.

Andre is a tougher case to make in excluding him from the top 10 unless you are minimizing drawing power and emphasizing ring and mic work.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was on Youtube and looking at top ten lists and came across on for Wrestling. Amazingly they left out Bruno Samartino and Andre the Giant.
:link:

I understand the argument against including Bruno... he was the beneficiary of being a champion in the biggest market largely in part based on his ethnic background. Moreover, his style of wrestling and character didn't translate at all to any later generation of wrestling (as witnessed during his comebacks in the 1980s). You couldn't say the same about guys like Austin, Flair, Rock, Hogan, Dusty, etc.

Andre is a tougher case to make in excluding him from the top 10 unless you are minimizing drawing power and emphasizing ring and mic work.
It's not like Bruno wrestled against scrubs. He wrestled pretty much all the stars of the era.

 
I was on Youtube and looking at top ten lists and came across on for Wrestling. Amazingly they left out Bruno Samartino and Andre the Giant.
:link:

I understand the argument against including Bruno... he was the beneficiary of being a champion in the biggest market largely in part based on his ethnic background. Moreover, his style of wrestling and character didn't translate at all to any later generation of wrestling (as witnessed during his comebacks in the 1980s). You couldn't say the same about guys like Austin, Flair, Rock, Hogan, Dusty, etc.

Andre is a tougher case to make in excluding him from the top 10 unless you are minimizing drawing power and emphasizing ring and mic work.
The list is supposed to be those sports entertainers who define, popularize or re-define the face of professional wrestling. To me, Bruno Samartino had more of an impact on wrestling than most on the list. The guy was in the industry for like four decades.

According to the list (link below) the top 10 are:

10. Sting

9. The Macho Man Randy Savage (oh yea. I want me some Elizabeth)

8. The Ultimate Warrior

7. "Rowdy" Roddy Piper

6. Ric Flair

5. Bret Hart

4. The Rock

3. Shawn Michaels

2. "Stone Cold" Steve Austin

1. Hulk Hogan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFYRoMMtRFE

 
According to the list (link below) the top 10 are:

10. Sting

9. The Macho Man Randy Savage (oh yea. I want me some Elizabeth)

8. The Ultimate Warrior

7. "Rowdy" Roddy Piper

6. Ric Flair

5. Bret Hart

4. The Rock

3. Shawn Michaels

2. "Stone Cold" Steve Austin

1. Hulk Hogan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFYRoMMtRFE
The Ultimate Warrior? Shawn Michaels? Yeah, there's room for Bruno to boot out one of these two.

P.S. What about the Undertaker? Dusty Rhodes?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That list is awful. No Billy Graham, no Rhodes. And Bruno was the top draw for two decades. Sting? :lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to the list (link below) the top 10 are:

10. Sting

9. The Macho Man Randy Savage (oh yea. I want me some Elizabeth)

8. The Ultimate Warrior

7. "Rowdy" Roddy Piper

6. Ric Flair

5. Bret Hart

4. The Rock

3. Shawn Michaels

2. "Stone Cold" Steve Austin

1. Hulk Hogan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFYRoMMtRFE
The Ultimate Warrior? Shawn Michaels? Yeah, there's room for Bruno to boot out one of these two.

P.S. What about the Undertaker? Dusty Rhodes?
If you read the comments, most people were upset that the Undertaker wasn't on the list.

 
I was on Youtube and looking at top ten lists and came across on for Wrestling. Amazingly they left out Bruno Samartino and Andre the Giant.
:link:

I understand the argument against including Bruno... he was the beneficiary of being a champion in the biggest market largely in part based on his ethnic background. Moreover, his style of wrestling and character didn't translate at all to any later generation of wrestling (as witnessed during his comebacks in the 1980s). You couldn't say the same about guys like Austin, Flair, Rock, Hogan, Dusty, etc.

Andre is a tougher case to make in excluding him from the top 10 unless you are minimizing drawing power and emphasizing ring and mic work.
The list is supposed to be those sports entertainers who define, popularize or re-define the face of professional wrestling. To me, Bruno Samartino had more of an impact on wrestling than most on the list. The guy was in the industry for like four decades. According to the list (link below) the top 10 are:

10. Sting

9. The Macho Man Randy Savage (oh yea. I want me some Elizabeth)

8. The Ultimate Warrior

7. "Rowdy" Roddy Piper

6. Ric Flair

5. Bret Hart

4. The Rock

3. Shawn Michaels

2. "Stone Cold" Steve Austin

1. Hulk Hogan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFYRoMMtRFE
Flair at #6 is criminal. As much of a mark as I am, Flair and Hogan are 1 and 1a. However you rank them is really personal opinion at that point.
 
I was seriously marking out last night for the Grave Consequences match between Mil Muertes and Fenix on Lucha Underground. That match was all over the place. Fenix had his mask torn and I thought he was a loser. The match went all over the building, Catrina got hit by Muertes, blood and flowers everywhere.

The build-up was great because they didn't tease an ending by continually opening and closing the casket. It was opened once at the end by Catrina (Stryker: "Who's she opening it for?") and when the loser was dropped into it, she slammed it shut and the match was over.

Wrestling twitter (that I saw) pretty much blew up over the match.

Next week, Alberto Petron defends the AAA title against Texano Jr and Prince Puma puts the LU title up against Cage. These guys definitely know how to pack 60 minutes with wrestling.

 
I was on Youtube and looking at top ten lists and came across on for Wrestling. Amazingly they left out Bruno Samartino and Andre the Giant.
No Bruno is crazy. He has to be top-5. He's the longest running champion in history and I believe 3 of the 5 longest runs belong to him.

Andre is tough, it depends on what we are basing our ratings on. Success? Draw? In-ring ability? Ability to tell a story? Andre was a huge draw, but was almost never a champion, and had very little in-ring ability. In theory, Big Show beats Andre in 2 of those categories.

I was on Youtube and looking at top ten lists and came across on for Wrestling. Amazingly they left out Bruno Samartino and Andre the Giant.
:link:

I understand the argument against including Bruno... he was the beneficiary of being a champion in the biggest market largely in part based on his ethnic background. Moreover, his style of wrestling and character didn't translate at all to any later generation of wrestling (as witnessed during his comebacks in the 1980s). You couldn't say the same about guys like Austin, Flair, Rock, Hogan, Dusty, etc.

Andre is a tougher case to make in excluding him from the top 10 unless you are minimizing drawing power and emphasizing ring and mic work.
The list is supposed to be those sports entertainers who define, popularize or re-define the face of professional wrestling. To me, Bruno Samartino had more of an impact on wrestling than most on the list. The guy was in the industry for like four decades. According to the list (link below) the top 10 are:

10. Sting

9. The Macho Man Randy Savage (oh yea. I want me some Elizabeth)

8. The Ultimate Warrior

7. "Rowdy" Roddy Piper

6. Ric Flair

5. Bret Hart

4. The Rock

3. Shawn Michaels

2. "Stone Cold" Steve Austin

1. Hulk Hogan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFYRoMMtRFE
Flair at #6 is criminal. As much of a mark as I am, Flair and Hogan are 1 and 1a. However you rank them is really personal opinion at that point.
Warrior being on that list is a joke, he had 3-4 years of relevancy. No matter what you are grading by, Warrior is tough to rank top-25 let alone top-10. Someone brought up HHH maybe being top-25 earlier, but I think he's WAY ahead of Warrior.

As much as I pretty much loathe seeing the guy, John Cena has to be in the top-10 doesn't he? I mean, he's been the face of wrestling for a decade, and has what, 15 world titles? In all honesty, he's basically a less mainstream successful Hogan.

The Rock being 4th is a stretch to me. At this point, he's been an actor FAR longer than he was a wrestler. He's kind of a MUCH more mainstream successful version of Warrior in a way. I mean, Rock was really only relevant from 98-04, with several hiatus in there. Crazy that he is 4th and Undertaker isn't on the list.

Piper is probably the toughest guy in the top-10 to omit, but I think he's more in the 10-15 range with guys like Dusty.

I'd change the list to something like:

1. Hogan

2. Austin

3. Sammartino

4. Flair

5. Michaels

6. Hart

7. Savage

8. Cena

9. Undertaker

10.Sting

I'd say that is based on a combo of drawing power, success and ability to tell a story. I personally care a lot about in ring ability, but most don't. so I didn't factor that in as much as the other 3 factors. On my personal favorite list, only Flair, Michaels, Hart and Savage would stay in the top-10.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would base a wrestling top 10 on, somewhat in order, overness, drawing ability, mainstream appeal, work rate, influence, longevity, mic work, diversity of character or heel face

With that:

1. Hogan

2. Austin

3. Flair

4. Savage

5. Piper

6. Rock

7. Andre

8. Dusty Rhodes

9. Cena

10. Sammartino

Honorable mentions: the road warriors, hart, michaels, gorgeous George, billy graham,

 
I was seriously marking out last night for the Grave Consequences match between Mil Muertes and Fenix on Lucha Underground. That match was all over the place. Fenix had his mask torn and I thought he was a loser. The match went all over the building, Catrina got hit by Muertes, blood and flowers everywhere.

The build-up was great because they didn't tease an ending by continually opening and closing the casket. It was opened once at the end by Catrina (Stryker: "Who's she opening it for?") and when the loser was dropped into it, she slammed it shut and the match was over.

Wrestling twitter (that I saw) pretty much blew up over the match.

Next week, Alberto Petron defends the AAA title against Texano Jr and Prince Puma puts the LU title up against Cage. These guys definitely know how to pack 60 minutes with wrestling.
Muertes/Fenix was easily the best thing that Lucha Underground has put out since it started, and they've put out a lot of good (and some not so good) stuff. The match told the story of how Muertes is this possessed monster and Fenix is this poor, yet talented guy who got had the misfortunte of getting mixed up with the stupidly hot Catrina. Awesome match that told an awesome story and even had a satisfying finish. Loved it.

 
I would base a wrestling top 10 on, somewhat in order, overness, drawing ability, mainstream appeal, work rate, influence, longevity, mic work, diversity of character or heel face

With that:

1. Hogan

2. Austin

3. Flair

4. Savage

5. Piper

6. Rock

7. Andre

8. Dusty Rhodes

9. Cena

10. Sammartino

Honorable mentions: the road warriors, hart, michaels, gorgeous George, billy graham,
I just can't get on board with any top ten list without HBK and Undertaker.

 
I would base a wrestling top 10 on, somewhat in order, overness, drawing ability, mainstream appeal, work rate, influence, longevity, mic work, diversity of character or heel face

With that:

1. Hogan

2. Austin

3. Flair

4. Savage

5. Piper

6. Rock

7. Andre

8. Dusty Rhodes

9. Cena

10. Sammartino

Honorable mentions: the road warriors, hart, michaels, gorgeous George, billy graham,
I just can't get on board with any top ten list without HBK and Undertaker.
Hbk never drew. They almost went out if business with him as champion.

I should have taker in my honorable mentions.

I don't see who in would take out of my top 10. Do you want to argue Rhodes? The guy was more over than anyone before hogan. Drew insane money in lots of territories.

Andre was also a draw and also made heels that got ready for champions. A huge element of storytelling. Then drew the biggest house as a heel in us wrestling history. Still a ubiquitous piece of pop culture.

Hbk and taker never hit those levels.

 
Tier 1:

1a. Ric Flair

1b. Hulk Hogan

There simply can't be any dispute here.

Tier 2:

3. Steve Austin

Drew a TON of money and brought the WWF back from the brink of bankruptcy.

Tier 3:

4. Bruno Sammartino

5. Randy Savage

6. Andre

7. The Rock

8. Dusty Rhodes

You can argue whatever order you wish, these guys drew money everywhere they went. It didn't matter if they were the champ or the challenger, it was a sell-out.

Tier 4:

9. John Cena

10. Roddy Piper

These two were tough, but Cena is the face of the WWE, like it or not. EVERYONE knows who he is, wrestling fan or not. Number 10 was tough, but I went with Piper for two reasons: he drew mad money everywhere he went and he's another guy EVERYONE knows.

Missing the cut:

Michaels and Bret

Neither drew money as champ and were the face of the WWF when it almost died. Man, they were awesome though.

Sting, Undertaker and Warrior

Just couldn't justify them at all.

VonErichs, Road Warriors, Steamboat, Superstar Graham, Backlund

All very solid, but all were left lacking somewhere.

 
Undertaker not only should be on top 10 lists, but he should be on the Mount Rushmore of wrestling.

Think about it: He is given what would be an abomination of a gimmick to anyone else, literally becomes it, survives the New Generation era to be one of the pillars of the Attitude AND post-Attitude Eras and is generally considered a leader among the locker room the entire time. For a quarter century, he was the backbone of the WWE.

I'd even give him consideration for GOAT.

 
Undertaker not only should be on top 10 lists, but he should be on the Mount Rushmore of wrestling.

Think about it: He is given what would be an abomination of a gimmick to anyone else, literally becomes it, survives the New Generation era to be one of the pillars of the Attitude AND post-Attitude Eras and is generally considered a leader among the locker room the entire time. For a quarter century, he was the backbone of the WWE.

I'd even give him consideration for GOAT.
Eh, you could say the same thing about Kane.

I like Taker, he was in my top 3 faves as a kid, but GOAT? Not even close IMO.

 
Undertaker not only should be on top 10 lists, but he should be on the Mount Rushmore of wrestling.

Think about it: He is given what would be an abomination of a gimmick to anyone else, literally becomes it, survives the New Generation era to be one of the pillars of the Attitude AND post-Attitude Eras and is generally considered a leader among the locker room the entire time. For a quarter century, he was the backbone of the WWE.

I'd even give him consideration for GOAT.
Eh, you could say the same thing about Kane.
Um, no. Kane never had a top run nor was he ever really considered a top guy like Taker. Plus, while Taker was Taker, Kane was an evil dentist and fake Diesel. So no, you can't say the same about Kane. Not even close.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top