For whatever reason WM41 was supposed to be announced at this years event. The video package to announce it and everything was done weeks before Mania. It was delayed for some reason till after Mania with talk being RAW after mania or within this month but we’re almost in May. Original it was possible Minneapolis MN would get it. Now speculation and rumors it’s not being there.
Very very strange for WWE to withhold this as they love to build hype for next mania right away. Very out of character of them. Something is going on. What I do tl
WWE is known for watering down talent. For yrs they did this with Cena as their top guy more recently Reigns. They didn’t want better in ring talent or promo guys outshining who they wanted to push. WWE just wanted these other talents to say they have them and hope destroy wrestling elsewhere to be the only show in town.The more things change the more they stay the same. WWE too worried and outside company guy they signed will be too good to what they want to push. Fatu is imho the best skilled talent in the Samoan Dynasty today.
According to WrestleVotes on twitter, WWE is worried about the possibility of Jacob Fatu outshining Solo Sikoa since WWE is trying to portray Sikoa as the "main force" of The Bloodline.
==========
I mean, unless they absolutely nerf Fatu, which they shouldn't, then there's no way Fatu doesn't outshine Sikoa.
Yeah we get it man WWE sucks. What a ****ty product these daysWWE is known for watering down talent. For yrs they did this with Cena as their top guy more recently Reigns. They didn’t want better in ring talent or promo guys outshining who they wanted to push. WWE just wanted these other talents to say they have them and hope destroy wrestling elsewhere to be the only show in town.The more things change the more they stay the same. WWE too worried and outside company guy they signed will be too good to what they want to push. Fatu is imho the best skilled talent in the Samoan Dynasty today.
According to WrestleVotes on twitter, WWE is worried about the possibility of Jacob Fatu outshining Solo Sikoa since WWE is trying to portray Sikoa as the "main force" of The Bloodline.
==========
I mean, unless they absolutely nerf Fatu, which they shouldn't, then there's no way Fatu doesn't outshine Sikoa.
They tried to water down Punk, Danielson but they outshined. Ricochet, Mox, mia Yim, Balor, Claudio, ReDragon, Kenta, Sami Callahan to name a few they watered down.
Sounds like things haven’t changed on this front of we want WWE people more over then people from other companies
I’ve watched a few Sandman was personal as he lives like 5 mins from me and see him shop in my store constantly. Watched the Ohita, Gage, Pillman and North Korea show ones. About to watch Beniot tonight.I have been watching the season five Dark Side of the Ring eps this week. Decent little show. I loved Earthquake fwiw. Carry on.
AJ Styles was trying so hard not to crack a smile during that.I just watched Backlash today, man that crowd was ELECTRIC! Cole and Corey did a good job of just being quiet a lot and letting the fans tell the story. The phenomenal song was, well, phenomenal. The crowd made that a better card than what it was.
That's a bummer man. I'm not at all a fan of TK's fantasy booking and general style of wrestling that AEW offers, but a strong AEW is good for wrestling, so I still hope it succeeds.
This has me thinking a few people high up at WWE are looking for ways to keep this quiet.WWE as a company is now disputing the claims of Janel Grant against Vince McMahon. To summarize;
"WWE argues that Grant's claims against them should be resolved through arbitration rather than in court. Grant had previously agreed to settle disputes through arbitration when she signed a separation and non-disclosure agreement with WWE.
WWE's lawyers say Grant cannot bring her claims to court because of this agreement. They argue that the arbitration clause in the agreement covers any disputes related to it, including Grant's current claims. WWE also believes that the question of which parts of the dispute should be handled in arbitration should be decided by an arbitrator, not the court.
Grant is claiming that certain laws, like the Speak Out Act and the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protecting Act, make the non-disclosure agreement unenforceable. However, WWE argues that these laws do not apply to arbitration agreements, so the agreement should still be upheld."
Oh they are. Just from people I’ve talked to who either work there or have they wouldn’t be surprised if Hunter and Steph’s names pop up in this. It’s been also said Shane wanted nothing to do with WWE because of the mess his father made or he’d be in the company on the board and some other good stuff. They also said this might open up a whole bunch of other skeletons WWE especially Vince hid for yrs. This was only the tip of the iceberg.This has me thinking a few people high up at WWE are looking for ways to keep this quiet.WWE as a company is now disputing the claims of Janel Grant against Vince McMahon. To summarize;
"WWE argues that Grant's claims against them should be resolved through arbitration rather than in court. Grant had previously agreed to settle disputes through arbitration when she signed a separation and non-disclosure agreement with WWE.
WWE's lawyers say Grant cannot bring her claims to court because of this agreement. They argue that the arbitration clause in the agreement covers any disputes related to it, including Grant's current claims. WWE also believes that the question of which parts of the dispute should be handled in arbitration should be decided by an arbitrator, not the court.
Grant is claiming that certain laws, like the Speak Out Act and the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protecting Act, make the non-disclosure agreement unenforceable. However, WWE argues that these laws do not apply to arbitration agreements, so the agreement should still be upheld."