joey
Footballguy
In terms of the CGI, was Red Leader also CGIed? He looked almost identical to his character in IV.
Yes. Gold leader as well I believe.
They were not CG. Must've been from archival footage, I assume.
In terms of the CGI, was Red Leader also CGIed? He looked almost identical to his character in IV.
Yes. Gold leader as well I believe.
This pretty much sums it up for me too. Took me a while to get into it. Something seemed off with the visual nature of the movie. The characters were kind of blah. The storyline was good, just don't think they did a very good job fleshing out the major characters. All the nods to original movie were great but it also somehow seemed a bit like fanfic. The facial CGI was weird. I guess it worked but also distracting. The last 30 minutes or so were done pretty well. I found myself nitpicking too much during the movie instead of just enjoying it. Probably reflective of all the reshoots we heard that had to do.FinHead said:I've always been a big Star Wars fan since I saw the first movie in the theater when I was 6. As a fan I enjoyed the movie, but I wouldn't recommend a non-fan to run out and see this.
Being back immersed into the visual universe during the events of the original trilogy was great. I loved seeing the original Storm Troopers, the original Death Star, AT-ATs, Star Destroyers, X-Wings, Yavin-4, and all the little inclusions and nods towards A New Hope. I enjoyed the scenes with the CGI-'d Tarkin, but felt it was a little off.
The fight scene with Donnie Yen's character on Jeddah and the closing battle and space fights were fun and well done. Of course, the Vader cameos and the last epic scene were my favorite parts of the entire movie. This last scene was what we should have gotten at the end of Revenge of the Sith, instead of the epic let down of, "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO".
I've always wanted an adult Star Wars "war movie", and that's what this is. Of course, being Star Wars and Disney this can't be a full on R-rated gritty war drama. It tries but comes up short. Taking out the Star Wars of it, the movie feels very run of the mill and by the numbers, with nothing really surprising or special about the story or characters.
A war movie like this needs to have compelling and interesting characters that make you care about them and their involvement and motivations. Donnie Yen was good (notice I can't remember his character's name), but none of the other characters were memorable and the acting was very average.
Jyn's character is nice to have a female lead to balance out the all-male group of Rogue One, but I never really cared about her as much as I loved Rey in last year's The Force Awakens. Her and Cassian never really came off as having good chemistry and he was just another forgettable character to me.
K-2SO was good, but I wondered if he was just included to add a little bit of Star Wars fun to the movie. I would have liked to seen it, before all the reshoots and wondering what was added or removed. Was this a darker and grittier war movie, or was K-2SO added to bring some fun & levity, or was it just not up to par to what we got... I had EXTREMELY high expectations for Rogue One, but I'm really feeling disappointed.
I want to see it again, but honestly I just want to fast forward through the story and watch several scenes again. This may change, but right now I'd rank them:
1) The Empire Strikes Back
2) A New Hope
3) The Force Awakens
4/5) Revenge of the Sith/Return of the Jedi
6) Rogue One
7) Attack of the Clones
8) The Phantom Menance
Thus theI don't understand your question here. Leia does not say those words in IV. Those words are specific to Rogue One.Agree with others that cgi has come a long way.. Tarkin was well done and afterwards I told my Dad I need to re-watch IV for the 50+ time as I don't remember Leia saying "they brought hope"![]()
http://www.imsdb.com/scripts/Star-Wars-A-New-Hope.html
... as in.... it was done so well I thought for sure I had some how missed it in IV.Not even close to top 3.And though I respect your right to think it, I can't fathom ranking TFA outside of top 3.
Unless it's just my imagination I found it odd that I noticed a lot of hints of prequel music in this movie.
Thought it was good. For whatever reason was a little underwhelmed at Vader's introduction but pretty cool seeing him in the bacta tank. A whole lot of nice tie ins, but not forced, throughout the movie. Tarkin CGI was done very well, Leia on the other hand I thought she looked terrible. Cool ending nonetheless.
![]()
Eta: they had to kill off K-2?!? He had an easy out to fit back in as an imperial droid but they lit him up anyway.![]()
Sorry brain fart. I meant Cushing.who is Peter Finch?
Peter Cushing played the original role and Guy Henry played the role in Rogue 1.
Biggest plot hole and my only gripe. They just wanted to set up A New Hope to the letter. It could have been left open a bit there. They didn't need to be so literal."I'm on a diplomatic mission to Alderaan!"
"Uhhhh....what the hell are you talking about? We've been chasing your ship for the past hour! We know exactly where you just came from!"
They executed it all wrong.That was one of the 3 best parts of the movie mang
Eh, it was awesome. I don't need that level of continuity in my life to be happy. Movie was made 40 years later.They executed it all wrong.
I rolled my eyes when it turned out to be the Tantive. Vader was right there mowing dudes down and it escaped? So how does it make sense now in 4 when Leia says they were on a diplomatic mission to Alderaan. Like others have said in here, "No you weren't. I just saw you fly away from a rebel assault on a secret imperial base and I personally watched one of your men hand the plans to someone in your ship."
Like I said though, minor plot hole but otherwise fantastic movie.
Little bit of a stretch to tie into ANH, but it actually gives more credence to Vader saying "you're part of the rebel alliance and a traitor... take her away" when they capture Tantive IV. I do agree it doesn't make sense for her to be even in that battle though.They executed it all wrong.
I rolled my eyes when it turned out to be the Tantive. Vader was right there mowing dudes down and it escaped? So how does it make sense now in 4 when Leia says they were on a diplomatic mission to Alderaan. Like others have said in here, "No you weren't. I just saw you fly away from a rebel assault on a secret imperial base and I personally watched one of your men hand the plans to someone in your ship."
Like I said though, minor plot hole but otherwise fantastic movie.
It's not that hard. They had the right idea. They just skipped a step.Eh, it was awesome. I don't need that level of continuity in my life to be happy. Movie was made 40 years later.
Not when she was 17. She was the legitimate front for the Rebels. A voice inside the Senate.Was Leia only ever a senator though? Didn't she command some battles and/or active on the military side of the Alliance? I thought she was a bit of both.
Idk I couldn't hear it because dumbasses in the theater kept clapping every time the saw something they recognized.Nobody has mentioned the fact that R2-D2 and C3PO keep their status as the only characters to be in every movie. That cameo was golden, no pun intended.
I dont't know, their cameo seemed a little forced (no pun intended either).Nobody has mentioned the fact that R2-D2 and C3PO keep their status as the only characters to be in every movie. That cameo was golden, no pun intended.
Ever thought "maybe I should take a self imposed vacation"?Rogue One: A Parking Lot Story
Disney ruined sports thru ESPN and now they bought up Star Wars and ruining that next.
Is there an even number of race in the cast for each demographic and market that Disney wants to launch in?
Enjoy!
He was from the Clone wars show. So it was another way to tie it together. I felt they captured him pretty well even though he doesn't do much here. He is pretty old at this point.I thought the movie was fantastic. Great action.
I am old school so I was pretty disappointed there wasnt a scroll at the beginning after the "Lucasfilms" . Just a minor caveat for me
Also maybe I was a bit too high or whatnot but I didnt really get the Forest Whitaker character. That entire storyline just seemed out of place and just basically made up to get him in the movie. Not sure how it was detrimental to the story.
Mon Mothma was the same actress too from the prequels.Also, this was the first time they acknowledged that the prequels existed. Jimmy Smits making an appearance.
yeah, this was a bit of a stretch. This would have worked better for me if they made it clear the data could not be broadcast (expected massive jamming etc) and needed to give hard copy. But the movie's entire plot showed they could transmit with out interference.This movie was a 9/10 for me. It would have been perfect 10 if
they didn't have Leia and her ship at the end there at the battle. Seriously why would an IMPERIAL senator be at a major battle over a secret military facility. They could have shown her ship receiving the transmission in another sector or something.
Otherwise the best I could have hoped for. I want to see this one again instead of feeling obligated out of loyalty to see ep 7 again.
They executed it all wrong.
I rolled my eyes when it turned out to be the Tantive. Vader was right there mowing dudes down and it escaped? So how does it make sense now in 4 when Leia says they were on a diplomatic mission to Alderaan. Like others have said in here, "No you weren't. I just saw you fly away from a rebel assault on a secret imperial base and I personally watched one of your men hand the plans to someone in your ship."
Like I said though, minor plot hole but otherwise fantastic movie.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JQH2rmQ5-vkit also messes with a bunch of dialogue throughout ANH. Like when Vader says "Where are the transmissions that you intercepted?" (he knows damn well that the transmissions weren't "intercepted"), or when he says "Several transmissions were beamed to this ship by rebel spies" (it was ONE transmission, it was beamed to a DIFFERENT ship, and it wasn't done by SPIES), or when Tagge says "If the rebels have obtained a complete technical readout of this station" (he should know that there's no "if" -- the plans were definitely obtained by the rebels)
That's not what I read. I'll see if I can find it.They were not CG. Must've been from archival footage, I assume.
I agree but on the other hand out was a side story, so some things needed to be less epic to make it stand apart from the saga. No crawl, restrained score, no large star wars open...I love the people in here mentioning reshoots like you're some kind of hollywood insider. Nobody knows what those were for.
I do agree though on the score. That was the one thing that underwhelmed me.
She was there to collect the plans.Biggest plot hole and my only gripe. They just wanted to set up A New Hope to the letter. It could have been left open a bit there. They didn't need to be so literal.
It doesn't help that they started off by showing Diego Luna's character as a cold-blooded murderer.At the end I could care less what happened to any of the characters. There was absolutely zero emotional connection to anyone.
She was there to collect the plans.Biggest plot hole and my only gripe. They just wanted to set up A New Hope to the letter. It could have been left open a bit there. They didn't need to be so literal.
Yep. Her foster father Bail mentioned that he knew someone he could trust and that was Leia.She was there to collect the plans.
At the ground level it was at least better than all three prequels.One of the worse Star Wars movies of the series. I went with my 13 year old daughter and her friend. I'm an enthusiast that really likes the series (not to the extent of some people), and they both loved TFA. All of us couldn't wait for it to end.
I really think you need to have character development in a movie. At the end I could care less what happened to any of the characters. There was absolutely zero emotional connection to anyone.
I thought that was fantastic. This was the type of stuff Lucas was always afraid of showing for fear of hurting his toy sales. You can't have a rebellion with out hands getting really dirty.It doesn't help that they started off by showing Diego Luna's character as a cold-blooded murderer.
You also can't have rebels murdering their (innocent) sources, otherwise the sources may stop helping. (Not to mention the decreased sympathy for the rebellion that would inevitably happen if the galaxy knew how deplorable the rebels really were.)I thought that was fantastic. This was the type of stuff Lucas was always afraid of showing for fear of hurting his toy sales. You can't have a rebellion with out hands getting really dirty.It doesn't help that they started off by showing Diego Luna's character as a cold-blooded murderer.
A guy in my group basically said the same thing last night. We felt they had to up Vadars ability based on how strong Kilo ren was in the last one. Showed Vadars true strength and Lucas never really opened him up like thatThe fantastic end fight scene with Vadar continues to make me wonder why Lucas decided to make Vader and Obi have a patty cake fight in IV when they met.
Lucas had a chance in #3 to do this. It would be have been a mind blowing scene to watch Anikin obliterate the younglings and everyone else at the Jedi temple but Lucas could not bring himself to film this so we are only left with our imagination.A guy in my group basically said the same thing last night. We felt they had to up Vadars ability based on how strong Kilo ren was in the last one. Showed Vadars true strength and Lucas never really opened him up like that