What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Seattle NBA NHL teams placeholder*** (1 Viewer)

This is totally off topic, but the idea of the thread reminded me that last night, I saw that Don King is offering to move the Miami Dolphins to Palm Beach (about 90 minutes north) since the Dolphins aren't getting public funding to put a canopy over their stadium. It probably won't go through, but it was interesting, to say the least.

 
My understanding is Sac is having a difficult time to put together the money as it is.
The NBA asked the Sacramento group to put 20% into an escro account, instead they put 50%.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My understanding is Sac is having a difficult time to put together the money as it is.
The NBA asked the Sacramento group to put 20% into an escro account, instead they put 50%.
Ok, I didn't know that. 50% of what purchase price?

I wonder why they have to put money in escrow if there is no deal to sell them the team. How does that work?

 
http://www.king5.com/sports/sonics/Chris-Hansen-75-million-to-Kings-offer-206957551.html

The Seattle group increased their bid by another $75 million. My understanding is Sac is having a difficult time to put together the money as it is. Is the NBA going to try to force the Maloofs to sell the Kings for $100 - $150 million less than they would to Seattle? Can they even do that?

Whatever happens the NBA owners are thrilled, this greatly increases the value of their franchises. I heard on the local sports talk station that the Kings valuation was like $230 million just a year ago.
This was really the only play Hansen had left. And I'm glad he did it, but I'm upset that the NBA and the Maloofs are the ones who will benefit.
It is certainly worth a shot if has the money to spare. Who knows, it might be just enough to make them rethink the relocation vote. Is this now $100 million he has raised his initial bid from? (25 earlier in the process). Smart that he did it late too giving Sacremento little time to react.

 
The Seattle group increased their bid by another $75 million. My understanding is Sac is having a difficult time to put together the money as it is. Is the NBA going to try to force the Maloofs to sell the Kings for $100 - $150 million less than they would to Seattle? Can they even do that?
It seems like all the NBA cares about is public funding for new stadiums.
 
Sorry Hansen you lost. Move on to plan B.
Lol. Good one. It's unlikely it works at this point, but it's silly of him to not try if he's got another bullet to fire
Seems like he would have been better off squashing the Sacramento effort out of the gates if he was really willing to bid whatever it takes. If he put the team at, say, a $650m valuation two months ago, maybe Johnson isn't able to rally another ownership group interested in competing. Now, you have an overwhelmingly negative committee recommendation and Stern's comments that the NBA wont let this become a bidding war to overcome
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maloofs won't sell to the Sacramento group. They have a backup offer from Hansen's group to buy a minority share that will give them the cash they need to run the team.

Then Sacramento needs to negotiate a new arena with the maloofs or else seattle is ready and waiting. Your move, KJ. Pretty obvious why he wanted Seattle to give up. Hansen and ballmer have bigger guns and more bullets.

http://espn.go.com/espn/sportscenter/feed/#1-9265605

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Amazing theater.

I don't have a huge horse in this race but I would prefer the Sacramento team remain in Sacramento for reasons outside of the NBA.

That being said, the money that is being thrown around is amazing. Hansen seems to have a bottomless pit.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would have to think the NBA would rather Sacremento keeps to team, so they can continue to extort cities for publicly funded arenas and let the owners get richer without investing much in the building they use.

 
I feel bad for the people of Seattle 'cause the local media keeps on feeding them only what they want to hear. Yet Seattle media's 'sources' have been wrong every step of the way and keep on re-kindling false hopes.

This was never Seattle's team to win, it's Sacramento's team to lose. Sac and the NBA are on cruise control to finish the deal, meanwhile Seattle is looking like they've fired their final desperation shot. NBA's already said it isn't going to end in a bidding war and people stopped caring about what the Maloofs say years ago.

 
Why would the Maloofs (or anyone, for that matter) agree to leave ~$75 million dollars on the table?? The NBA can't force them to sell the team for a lower price, right?

 
I would have to think the NBA would rather Sacremento keeps to team, so they can continue to extort cities for publicly funded arenas and let the owners get richer without investing much in the building they use.
I agree with this, and I think it's the main reason Seattle is the underdog in this fight

 
Amazing theater.
:goodposting: x1000

I don't have a huge horse in this race but I would prefer the Sacramento team remain in Sacramento for reasons outside of the NBA.
I would have preferred the same thing before 41 years of history got wrestled out of Seattle. Now, I want a team back, and if the team Sacramento stole from Kansas City is the casualty, then, well, that sucks for the good people of Sacramento, and they don't deserve to be the casualty of the NBA business model any more than those of us from Seattle deserved it.

#gosonics

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This whole fiasco makes me feel a bit guilty for liking pro sports so much.

In the middle you have Stern. Who is a world class creep, lying, petty little flaming dogturd of a person yet what he is doing is arguably beneficial for the league in the long run. The Maloofs from what I have read are border line scam artists with few redeeming qualities. Hansen is some mysterious hedge fund billionaire, who by willing to overpay by a few hundred million, is beginning to look ridiculous.

In the end people will gladly race back, myself included probably, in brand new Sonics (or Kings) apparel to shell out hundreds of dollars for crap seats and $12 beers, all to watch at best mediocre product.

 
This whole fiasco makes me feel a bit guilty for liking pro sports so much. In the middle you have Stern. Who is a world class creep, lying, petty little flaming dogturd of a person yet what he is doing is arguably beneficial for the league in the long run. The Maloofs from what I have read are border line scam artists with few redeeming qualities. Hansen is some mysterious hedge fund billionaire, who by willing to overpay by a few hundred million, is beginning to look ridiculous. In the end people will gladly race back, myself included probably, in brand new Sonics (or Kings) apparel to shell out hundreds of dollars for crap seats and $12 beers, all to watch at best mediocre product.
Sums it up perfectly.
 
Oh, and it looks like the relocation committee is re-visiting the issue.
And the wheel keeps turning in this fascinating story
A committee of NBA owners who have been studying the future of the Sacramento Kings met Monday but did not change their position to recommend the team be kept in Sacramento and not moved to Seattle, a source told ESPN.com.
 
Oh, and it looks like the relocation committee is re-visiting the issue.
And the wheel keeps turning in this fascinating story
>A committee of NBA owners who have been studying the future of the Sacramento Kings met Monday but did not change their position to recommend the team be kept in Sacramento and not moved to Seattle, a source told ESPN.com.
Yeah - anybody who tells you what's going to happen is just guessing.

 
Yeah - anybody who tells you what's going to happen is just guessing.
There are members of the Sacramento media who have been spot-on over the last month. Problem is, it's not what you want to hear. One person is Carmichael Dave (@CarmichaelDave on Twitter). Not sure if I'd call him media, but he's well-connected and spot on, of late.
 
Yeah - anybody who tells you what's going to happen is just guessing.
There are members of the Sacramento media who have been spot-on over the last month. Problem is, it's not what you want to hear. One person is Carmichael Dave (@CarmichaelDave on Twitter). Not sure if I'd call him media, but he's well-connected and spot on, of late.
I follow him on Twitter. He's an annoying windbag. Sort of like one of our radio hosts, @softykjr.

Not really sure what this "you want to hear" thing is. You think after reading everything I've written in this thread that I'm some unrealistic homer who hates Sacramento fans?

 
Yeah - anybody who tells you what's going to happen is just guessing.
There are members of the Sacramento media who have been spot-on over the last month. Problem is, it's not what you want to hear. One person is Carmichael Dave (@CarmichaelDave on Twitter). Not sure if I'd call him media, but he's well-connected and spot on, of late.
Carmichael Dave‏@CarmichaelDave22h

The relocation committee will reaffirm their position. Much of the finance members are also on relo, which voted 7-0.
oops

 
Yeah - anybody who tells you what's going to happen is just guessing.
There are members of the Sacramento media who have been spot-on over the last month. Problem is, it's not what you want to hear. One person is Carmichael Dave (@CarmichaelDave on Twitter). Not sure if I'd call him media, but he's well-connected and spot on, of late.
Carmichael Dave‏@CarmichaelDave22h

The relocation committee will reaffirm their position. Much of the finance members are also on relo, which voted 7-0.
oops
Why the "oops"? That tweet appears to match the latest ESPN article from which I quoted above.
 
Yeah - anybody who tells you what's going to happen is just guessing.
There are members of the Sacramento media who have been spot-on over the last month. Problem is, it's not what you want to hear. One person is Carmichael Dave (@CarmichaelDave on Twitter). Not sure if I'd call him media, but he's well-connected and spot on, of late.
Carmichael Dave‏@CarmichaelDave22h

The relocation committee will reaffirm their position. Much of the finance members are also on relo, which voted 7-0.

ockquote>

oops
Why the "oops"? That tweet appears to match the latest ESPN article from which I quoted above.They didnt reaffirm (or reverse) their position. they did nothing.

The NBA’s joint finance and relocation committee, which held a conference call Monday to discuss the weekend’s developments in Chris Hansen’s quest to buy the Sacramento Kings and move them to Seattle, has reportedly finished the meeting without making a new recommendation.

The Sacramento Bee’s Dale Kasler reported Monday that the 12 NBA team owners did not reaffirm or reverse the seven-member relocation committee’s April 29 recommendation that the Kings’ move be denied when the league’s full Board of Governors meets Wednesday as planned in Dallas.
Dale Kasler@dakasler


Am told the relo/finance committee conf call is over but no recommendations made on #NBAKings
about 10 hours ago
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://blog.seattlepi.com/sonics/page/2/

Longtime P-I sports columnist Art Thiel, now at SportspressNW.com, reported in a column filed Friday evening that the NBA relocation committee’s vote on April 29 to deny the Kings’ move to Seattle was actually 4-3, not 7-0 as widely reported. Thiel says his source told him “the dissenters were asked to throw in their votes for the sake of unanimity.”

– Tom Ziller, who created a Kings fan blog and is also the lead NBA writer at SBNation.com (how does that work, exactly?) tweeted Saturday that the 4-3 vote report is false. Ziller quotes Tim Frank, who is the NBA’s senior VP for basketball communications, as saying “”It’s a total fabrication.”

 
I've said it before, and I'll say it again.

There is no good reason for Sacramento and Seattle fans to get upset with each other. We don't matter. We aren't involved, and both cities have done a perfectly adequate job of supporting their team over plenty of years. So let's not fight in here, even while the people who do matter fight bitterly.

 
Right no reason for fans to go at it. I also follow and listen to the radio show of Charmichel Dave. He is pro Sac of course but does seem to be plugged in.

I'm about 85% sure as of now the Kings stay in Sac. Kevin Johnson will be on Dan Patrick Tuesaday thopefully he will have some new information.

 
Not really sure what this "you want to hear" thing is.
It's pro-Sac, I wouldn't want to hear anything pro-Sac if I were a Seattle homer.
You think after reading everything I've written in this thread that I'm some unrealistic homer who hates Sacramento fans?
Not at all. ...is it too late to work out a Kings for Seahawks trade?
I want to hear what's happening. Regardless of if it's good for my side or not. I've got little use for the cheerleaders on both sides. Seahawks are untouchable, but you can have the mariners.
 
Not really sure what this "you want to hear" thing is.
It's pro-Sac, I wouldn't want to hear anything pro-Sac if I were a Seattle homer.
You think after reading everything I've written in this thread that I'm some unrealistic homer who hates Sacramento fans?ockquote>Not at all....is it too late to work out a Kings for Seahawks tr

ade?
I want to hear what's happening. Regardless of if it's good for my side or not. I've got little use for the cheerleaders on both sides.Seahawks are untouchable, but you can have the mariners.
Are the Sounders more popular up there than the Mariners now? The crowds I see on TV at their games look amazing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. There is no good reason for Sacramento and Seattle fans to get upset with each other. We don't matter. We aren't involved, and both cities have done a perfectly adequate job of supporting their team over plenty of years. So let's not fight in here, even while the people who do matter fight bitterly.
This is hilarious. You've been trolling Sacramento fans with "it's over" posts and comments about the city's viability as a pro sports market since January.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RT @KBergCBS Asked an owner today if Hansen backup plan with Maloofs is a game-changer. ”It doesn't make any sense to me,” he said.
RT @KBergCBS With opposition to relocation unwavering, owner reiterated stance on tomorrow's Dallas meeting: ”It's not about Seattle.”
 
NewlyRetired said:
proninja said:
One said:
proninja said:
Not really sure what this "you want to hear" thing is.
It's pro-Sac, I wouldn't want to hear anything pro-Sac if I were a Seattle homer.
proninja said:
> You think after reading everything I've written in this thread that I'm some unrealistic homer who hates Sacramento fans?ockquote>Not at all....is it too late to work out a Kings for Seahawks tr

ade?lockquote>I want to hear what's happening. Regardless of if it's good for my side or not. I've got little use for the cheerleaders on both sides.Seahawks are untouchable, but you can have the mariners.
Are the Sounders more popular up there than the Mariners now? The crowds I see on TV at their games look amazing.
They outdraw the Mariners. Many of the people I know care more about the Sounders than the Mariners, but Sports Talk shows have way more Mariners talk.
 
Wooderson said:
Right no reason for fans to go at it. I also follow and listen to the radio show of Charmichel Dave. He is pro Sac of course but does seem to be plugged in.I'm about 85% sure as of now the Kings stay in Sac. Kevin Johnson will be on Dan Patrick Tuesaday thopefully he will have some new information.
I think its higher. But what do I know, I thought it was very likely that Seattle would get them to begin with.

 
thecatch said:
proninja said:
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. There is no good reason for Sacramento and Seattle fans to get upset with each other. We don't matter. We aren't involved, and both cities have done a perfectly adequate job of supporting their team over plenty of years. So let's not fight in here, even while the people who do matter fight bitterly.
This is hilarious. You've been trolling Sacramento fans with "it's over" posts and comments about the city's viability as a pro sports market since January.
I thought it was over. I didn't at all think Sacramento would have been able to salvage it. I was wrong. This is trolling fans somehow in your world?

 
Wooderson said:
Right no reason for fans to go at it. I also follow and listen to the radio show of Charmichel Dave. He is pro Sac of course but does seem to be plugged in.I'm about 85% sure as of now the Kings stay in Sac. Kevin Johnson will be on Dan Patrick Tuesaday thopefully he will have some new information.
I think its higher. But what do I know, I thought it was very likely that Seattle would get them to begin with.
:goodposting:

There's a part of me that hopes Hansen just goes nuclear. Sue the league, drag it out, and make this as ugly as possible. Mostly because I hate David Stern and want his last year to be as awful as possible in the bed he made.

 
NewlyRetired said:
proninja said:
One said:
proninja said:
Not really sure what this "you want to hear" thing is.
It's pro-Sac, I wouldn't want to hear anything pro-Sac if I were a Seattle homer.
proninja said:
> You think after reading everything I've written in this thread that I'm some unrealistic homer who hates Sacramento fans?ockquote>Not at all....is it too late to work out a Kings for Seahawks tr

ade?lockquote>I want to hear what's happening. Regardless of if it's good for my side or not. I've got little use for the cheerleaders on both sides.Seahawks are untouchable, but you can have the mariners.
Are the Sounders more popular up there than the Mariners now? The crowds I see on TV at their games look amazing.
The Sounders fans seem to usually not be fans of other sports so much. Their fans are usually more educated, more female, and more genteel. The games are a ton of fun to go to, the front office seems to have a clue, and the team is pretty competitive. It's awesome how much the city supports them, the team almost doubled the average attendance of the #2 drawing team in MLS last year (43,144 average compared to 23,136 for LA), and while I'm not much of a soccer fan, I'll absolutely sit down and watch a game with some friends.

I've been a Mariners fan since I was born basically, and they've all but lost me with how hard they worked to block the Sonics arena. I haven't been to a game this year, and don't plan on letting them have a dime of mine. It's sad.
 
NewlyRetired said:
proninja said:
One said:
proninja said:
Not really sure what this "you want to hear" thing is.
It's pro-Sac, I wouldn't want to hear anything pro-Sac if I were a Seattle homer.
proninja said:
>> You think after reading everything I've written in this thread that I'm some unrealistic homer who hates Sacramento fans?ockquote>Not at all....is it too late to work out a Kings for Seahawks tr

ade?lockquote> I want to hear what's happening. Regardless of if it's good for my side or not. I've got little use for the cheerleaders on both sides.Seahawks are untouchable, but you can have the mariners.lockquote>
Are the Sounders more popular up there than the Mariners now? The crowds I see on TV at their games look amazing.
The Sounders fans seem to usually not be fans of other sports so much. Their fans are usually more educated, more female, and more genteel. The games are a ton of fun to go to, the front office seems to have a clue, and the team is pretty competitive. It's awesome how much the city supports them, the team almost doubled the average attendance of the #2 drawing team in MLS last year (43,144 average compared to 23,136 for LA), and while I'm not much of a soccer fan, I'll absolutely sit down and watch a game with some friends.

I've been a Mariners fan since I was born basically, and they've all but lost me with how hard they worked to block the Sonics arena. I haven't been to a game this year, and don't plan on letting them have a dime of mine. It's sad.
There seems to be something in the water in the Pacific Northwest and soccer. The team over in Portland I know is extremely popular as well. They have sold out every game in their 3+ years in MLS. Must make for a fun rivalry with the Sounders.

Seattle is playing host to a US World Cup Qualifying game this summer. That is going to be a ton of fun to watch.
 
I thought it was over.
I did too.

After Anaheim, then Virginia Beach (WTH?) I canceled my season tickets after 16 years, but hung in there as a fan. Then when Hansen/Ballmer/Seattle jumped in, I figured we were toast and mentally jumped ship. It didn't make sense and still doesn't, why the NBA wouldn't want to move a team to Seattle so I could see why you, the media and the city were so confident.

Turns out, it's not looking like it was ever SEA v. SAC, but rather SAC v. SAC and the Seattle served as a catalyst to show the Kings actually were for sale and drove KJ and the Sacramento group to pull it together and get something done without the Maloof's BS.

I think Hansen/Ballmer would be smart not to go nuclear if they want another shot at a team. The NBA sounds like a Country Club and has it's own say on who gets in. I wouldn't be surprised to see H/B get another shot at another team in the next year or two. Heck, who knows, you'll likely end up with one that's actually close to being a playoff team or better.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
hey catch - good delete. I took mine down too. :hifive:

(I think you have me confused with someone else)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
NewlyRetired said:
proninja said:
One said:
proninja said:
Not really sure what this "you want to hear" thing is.
It's pro-Sac, I wouldn't want to hear anything pro-Sac if I were a Seattle homer.
proninja said:
> You think after reading everything I've written in this thread that I'm some unrealistic homer who hates Sacramento fans?ockquote>Not at all....is it too late to work out a Kings for Seahawks trade?lockquote>I want to hear what's happening. Regardless of if it's good for my side or not. I've got little use for the cheerleaders on both sides.Seahawks are untouchable, but you can have the mariners.
Are the Sounders more popular up there than the Mariners now? The crowds I see on TV at their games look amazing.
They outdraw the Mariners. Many of the people I know care more about the Sounders than the Mariners, but Sports Talk shows have way more Mariners talk.
Love the Sounders but if the Mariners only played 20 or so home games a year they would outdraw a soccer team.
 
Fair point. However, that's not the case and the Mariners barely average 20,000 people a game, the Sounders are almost double that.

(quoting function sucks)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fair point. However, that's not the case and the Mariners barely average 20,000 people a game, the Sounders are almost double that.
The growth in Sounders audience size is impressive since they entered MLS. Seattle is a very good sports town. 2009: 30,9432010: 36,1742011: 38,4962012: 43,144Do you guys in Seattle think the Sounders will take a step back in popularity if/when they city gets an NBA and NHL or are they starting to ingrain themselves?
 
Fair point. However, that's not the case and the Mariners barely average 20,000 people a game, the Sounders are almost double that.
The growth in Sounders audience size is impressive since they entered MLS. Seattle is a very good sports town.2009: 30,9432010: 36,1742011: 38,4962012: 43,144Do you guys in Seattle think the Sounders will take a step back in popularity if/when they city gets an NBA and NHL or are they starting to ingrain themselves?
I don't think they'll blink. Sounders fans are militant about it. There's always been a huge soccer following around here, there's a ton of it played, and I don't think any of those people are going to ditch the Sounders for the NBA. Fairly different markets imo.

Also, this is going to be a good hockey town too.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top