Might as well give a nice elbow to the head while they're down. Apparently that's cool now.Here come the cramps and the injuries....
What, wha?Nice to see our Army guys in Tikrit rooting for Mexico.
Justin.tv cut to a shot of the US Army guys in Tikrit waving a Mexican flag. Diversity.. gotta hate it.. Just kidding.What, wha?Nice to see our Army guys in Tikrit rooting for Mexico.
On the American mun2 feed, they had some Army guys overseas watching the game....they showed them smiling and waving earlier. Then Mexico scored and they all pulled out Mexican flags and shirts and started celebrating...What, wha?Nice to see our Army guys in Tikrit rooting for Mexico.
What, wha?Nice to see our Army guys in Tikrit rooting for Mexico.
If that's true somebody needs to ship them a tape of the very same fans at Azteca chanting Osama Osama after they beat us there in a WC Qualifier in '01.Boca is the goat of this match. What a horrible game by him today.What in the #### was Bocanegra doing??????
Mexico deserves to never win a game.See my last post.-QGMexico deserved to win this game.
I agree.But a draw would have been nice...Mexico deserved to win this game.
Cuz that would wipe out their whole team.How are cards not given for time wasting?
Not a satisfactory result
-QGHoward had to chase one guy down and hit him in the back before he gave up the ball.End of games like that are always full of players pushing a fine line, but there was definitely some excess there.How are cards not given for time wasting?
Right... DeMerit. Good catch. You really don't think they dominated the US? I'll give you that Mexico didn't create a ton of true scoring chances that would be the normal hallmark of a "dominant" performance, but they shut down the US almost entirely (barring that fantastic LD to Davies combo).good work Floppo, although I think you mean DeMerit rather than Specter. Otherwise, I don't necessarily agree Mexico's game was "dominant", but no question they earned the three points.
Really? I thought Dolo was out second best defender out there?TLEF316 said:the back line crapped itself on every clearance attempt. simply awful.Not that it mattered, but Dolo contributed basically nothing. He shouldn't have been in there.
prefontaine said:Ok, here's my thoughts on the gameavies - really provides an extra spark. His burst of speed provided our only real chances of the game and he plays with very high energy. Shame he started cramping late as it meant we had to use our last sub on him. Ching - meh. I understand the role we are intending for him but I think we are better off with a more dangerous, if less possession oriented player, like Jozy is on the pitch. His complete lack of pace just doesn't fit a counterattacking style. Donovan - he was okay. The pass to Davies was well weighted and he had a couple of other spots where I thought he was okay but was not his best game. Given his form, I sort of expected to see a more dominant performance out of him. That said, we didn't lose this game because of LD.
Here are my thoughts, and I'm quoting Pre and Floppo as they are two of my favored posters in terms of soccer threads....Ching - I'm a huge fan, as I get to see him play a lot of Dynamo games. He is a very good player, especially at the club level. That being said, I don't think he should have started this game. Ching is good when we can build an attack through the midfield and we need someone to get the ball to the right player at the right position. He actually had a brilliant pass to Davies (or LD) on the left wing. But, other than that he was largely absent in this game. The Mexican's dominated play, as I expected, and I think we would have been better suited to have started Jozy who has a ton of speed and could have helped out on the counter attack. If the US had Davis and Altidore left at top, I think the Mexican's wouldn't have been able to press so many into the attack, as they would have had to had respected the US speed, especially after the first US goal.Also, Davies is overrated, imo. Yes, he scored a nice goal. But on how many occasions did he try to go 1 v 3 and get easily dispossessed. He cannot create for himself...oh, did he also miss that header that was on a plate in the penalty area in the game? All in all, the US defense was terrible. They did tighten up a bit after the first Mexican goal, but couldn't clear worth a crap. All this #####ing about the reffing is just #####ing too. You have to expect that on the road, it's the same all the time. The ref did an alright job, imho, my only complaint is that he was too quick to grab the yellow. The US effort was to blame here.One last thing...wtf happened to injury time? Davies, and the conflict there after was way over three minutes alone, yet we didn't even get to three minutes in the second half injury time.El Floppo said:Ching... OMFG. I'm a long-time... wouldn't say "fan" but I get why he's been in thelineup all these years: holds the ball fairly well, decent in the air, capable ofplaying a quick ball to a slashing runner, works his ### off, has a good understanding of where to make positive runs to get himself into position to get his teammates involved (I haven't seen Jozy do the same yet). Those are all good things- but he's never been a guy who's going to win a game for you without a lot of help. The help was nowhere today and neither was Ching's skills. I've seen him play in person a few times, and he's a guy that just can't buy a call from the ref... they'll usually go against him when itlooks certain that it's him being fouled. I used to think it was maybe a respect thing, but I'm starting to wonder if he just fouls a lot. completely useless today.Davies... wow. Theonly US player where you could feel the stadium buzzing whenever he touched the ball. Such great balance, anticipation, and of course speed and ball-skills. This game carved his place on the rosterin stone. Imagine him playing along side BrianMcBride...
that doesnt really say all that much. The defense sucked in general.I'm pretty confident that Spector is the better player and should have been on the field.Really? I thought Dolo was out second best defender out there?TLEF316 said:the back line crapped itself on every clearance attempt. simply awful.Not that it mattered, but Dolo contributed basically nothing. He shouldn't have been in there.
I think you're wrong on that part. I don't think Spector for Dolo would have made any difference.that doesnt really say all that much. The defense sucked in general.I'm pretty confident that Spector is the better player and should have been on the field.Really? I thought Dolo was out second best defender out there?TLEF316 said:the back line crapped itself on every clearance attempt. simply awful.Not that it mattered, but Dolo contributed basically nothing. He shouldn't have been in there.
would we have gotten a result, probobably not. But he is the better player with the higher ceiling.I think you're wrong on that part. I don't think Spector for Dolo would have made any difference.that doesnt really say all that much. The defense sucked in general.I'm pretty confident that Spector is the better player and should have been on the field.Really? I thought Dolo was out second best defender out there?TLEF316 said:the back line crapped itself on every clearance attempt. simply awful.Not that it mattered, but Dolo contributed basically nothing. He shouldn't have been in there.
One thing I have frequently noticed in American soccer is that we, at almost all levels, really lack imagination both with and without the ball. Too much standing around, not enough runs off the ball; too many passes to feet, not enough passes to space; We rarely handle the ball well on a first touch anyways - so that compounds the problem. Watching simple things like throw ins and watching all the players standing around brought back memories of youth soccer. Heck even our set pieces lack imagination/creativity.We have spent so many years perfecting the pack the defense and rely on counter-attacks style of play, that I don't know how we get over the hump against comparable teams.Pre and Floppo pretty much summed it up.
Howard has been so good lately I expected him to save that second goal.
It looks like when the US plays against teams with fast wingers Boca should be moved back to the middle and someone else should get LB duties (Spector? Hejduk?).
Clark was awful. Bradley seemed to play a lot better when Clark was taken out.
Ching looked bad too, but Donovan and Dempsey never seemed to push forward.
The US just couldn't posses the ball and it really hurt them.
I would disagree that right now Spector is the better player than Cherundolo. Dolo had some pretty decent attacking moves and flew by some Mexican players yesterday. I do think Spector will be a better player in time.would we have gotten a result, probobably not. But he is the better player with the higher ceiling.I think you're wrong on that part. I don't think Spector for Dolo would have made any difference.that doesnt really say all that much. The defense sucked in general.I'm pretty confident that Spector is the better player and should have been on the field.Really? I thought Dolo was out second best defender out there?TLEF316 said:the back line crapped itself on every clearance attempt. simply awful.Not that it mattered, but Dolo contributed basically nothing. He shouldn't have been in there.
There are a lot of excuses for yesterday but the fact is, we just didn't get it done. Dempsey was just one of many and frankly it is pretty normal for us at Azteca. Anyway, Demps signed a 4-year extension with Fulham today. Good for him.wrt Dempsey, there was an article on premierleague.com where they interviewed Hodgson, he talked about how impressive Dempsey has been and how much he has improved since he took over, but he also said that he hasn't really done much since the Confed Cup. He didn't even go to Australia with Fulham. He did play in the first leg of their Europa League qualifier but I'm sure he was pretty rusty yesterday. Not really an excuse but after all the games he played last season and then the Confed Cup it shouldn't be too surprising.
I find it interesting that on several other boards there is a lot of vitriol towards Michael Bradley for yesterday. As I said above, I didn't think it was his best game by any means but I notice Floppo didn't single him out much and that no one else here has come down with pure hatred. Why is there so much hate for this guy?El Floppo said:Some general thoughts:Shape:- Bradley and Clark, and even LD and Dempsey, were too deep leaving huge gaps between the MF and Ching/Davies. Yeah- they were under pressure, but you could see the difference in the shape the US used on both sides of the ball as soon as Clark went out. Any time one of the non-forwards got the ball, there was nowehre for them to go other than up the field to nobody; the flanks with LD and Dempsey were non-existent offensively as a result. And how many second balls just bounced and bounced with nothing but green shirts nearby?Players:Bradley... he usually does a better job playing more advanced when paired with Clark, but couldn't get himself unstuck today. Better than Clarkwith the ball, but had nowhere to go with it other than long to space.
Coach's son. You see it a lot in other sports too. People just want to assume the coach is playing favorites and picking his kid to play and overlooking the fact that the Coach's kid can play.I find it interesting that on several other boards there is a lot of vitriol towards Michael Bradley for yesterday. As I said above, I didn't think it was his best game by any means but I notice Floppo didn't single him out much and that no one else here has come down with pure hatred. Why is there so much hate for this guy?El Floppo said:Some general thoughts:
Shape:
- Bradley and Clark, and even LD and Dempsey, were too deep leaving huge gaps between the MF and Ching/Davies. Yeah- they were under pressure, but you could see the difference in the shape the US used on both sides of the ball as soon as Clark went out. Any time one of the non-forwards got the ball, there was nowehre for them to go other than up the field to nobody; the flanks with LD and Dempsey were non-existent offensively as a result. And how many second balls just bounced and bounced with nothing but green shirts nearby?
Players:
Bradley... he usually does a better job playing more advanced when paired with Clark, but couldn't get himself unstuck today. Better than Clarkwith the ball, but had nowhere to go with it other than long to space.
He definitely mistimed the header. I have the same problem running onto headers though I'm very accurate and when not having to sprint I think I'm pretty good in the air. I missed one just like that this week so I laughed about it but it is a bit disconcerting for a young speedy professional forward to do that as opposed to an old slow duffer of a midfielder. I'm not sure overrated is fair. He is actually a great complement to the game we play. His speed alone creates opportunities that would otherwise not exist and we don't possess the ball enough against quality opponents to go for a guy with great technique (nor do we have one anyway). Yes, he puts his head down too much and charges forward at times, but the alternative is to pass it back and watch us lose possession further up the field (kidding, but it sure seems that way at times).Also, Davies is overrated, imo. Yes, he scored a nice goal. But on how many occasions did he try to go 1 v 3 and get easily dispossessed. He cannot create for himself...oh, did he also miss that header that was on a plate in the penalty area in the game?
Still no confirmation as far as I can tell that ESPN is showing EPL football this Saturday. As of right now, I'm planning to listen to Chelsea's opener on Sirius radio in my garage. Will record Everton - Arsenal, which looks like the most interesting game on FSC from the opening weekend.Maybe old news but I haven't seen it in this thread. Starting next Saturday, ESPN2 will be airing two EPL games per week, one Saturday morning and one Monday afternoon. First up potentially Jozy's first game - Hull City v Chelsea. The link has a partial schedule of what will be showed. Curious if we will get HD.
Sorry, but a recreational player missing a header is one thing. A striker on a national team....not even getting his head on the ball....is another.I agree that his speed definitely creates opportunities, similarly to Altidore, but again, far too often I see him trying to take on 2 & 3 defenders, when a pass to another player is the obvious play. I still like Davies just fine, just don't want to see him out there 90 minutes (or until cramps set in).He definitely mistimed the header. I have the same problem running onto headers though I'm very accurate and when not having to sprint I think I'm pretty good in the air. I missed one just like that this week so I laughed about it but it is a bit disconcerting for a young speedy professional forward to do that as opposed to an old slow duffer of a midfielder. I'm not sure overrated is fair. He is actually a great complement to the game we play. His speed alone creates opportunities that would otherwise not exist and we don't possess the ball enough against quality opponents to go for a guy with great technique (nor do we have one anyway). Yes, he puts his head down too much and charges forward at times, but the alternative is to pass it back and watch us lose possession further up the field (kidding, but it sure seems that way at times).Also, Davies is overrated, imo. Yes, he scored a nice goal. But on how many occasions did he try to go 1 v 3 and get easily dispossessed. He cannot create for himself...oh, did he also miss that header that was on a plate in the penalty area in the game?
Skrtel is a little banged up right now, so Agger is going to see the field more at first. I'm not sure about Carew or Agbonlahor, I like Carew more personally, but I see them getting about equal time.who is gonna play more Skertl or AggerCarew or Agabonalor
Agbonlahor had 34 apps last year, Carew had 27.I'd expect similar this year...Agbonlahor is the "future"...Carew's just a productive vet.Skrtel is a little banged up right now, so Agger is going to see the field more at first. I'm not sure about Carew or Agbonlahor, I like Carew more personally, but I see them getting about equal time.who is gonna play more Skertl or AggerCarew or Agabonalor
You mean, all season, or this weekend? If you're talking about all season........Skrtel is a mainstay, but has an injury at the moment. Agger is looking to be a regular starter for the first time. If I had to choose between the two, I would go Skrtel, but be aware of the injury.who is gonna play more Skertl or Agger