NewlyRetired
Footballguy
Well the Chandler turn down of the call up might have come into play big time tonight.
He's played a lot of games in the last 18+ monthsI still believe he is slowing down as a player. Others believe he is hurt. Guess we will know certainly when qualifying starts next year.Agreed...I think there's something wrong with Landon from a cardio perspective. He has not been the same player.I didn't think Landon or Dempsey played well in the second half.
Like everyone else I believe it would not have mattered but I would have liked to see Spector on as a straight change for Cher as Moe suggested. It is obvious that Spector does not have Bradley's faith in him yet.ugh, that hurts.Horrible night for Timmy. Flat footed on 2 goals, late to react on the other 2. I know we probably would have lost anyway, but Bornstein was partially responsible for the first 2 goals. He's absolutely useless. I actually uttered the phrase "I wish Bornestein would die" at one point tonight.Not proud of that one![]()
Yes and no. For the first time in a long time, Landon took the entire winter off. It was his first major break from the game in years he said in a recent interview. But ever since the break, he has played slower. Still affective in scoring but almost never turning and taking on players with pace any more, even in MLS.He's played a lot of games in the last 18+ monthsI still believe he is slowing down as a player. Others believe he is hurt. Guess we will know certainly when qualifying starts next year.Agreed...I think there's something wrong with Landon from a cardio perspective. He has not been the same player.I didn't think Landon or Dempsey played well in the second half.
Not the way Howard played tonight.Seriously, thought Soccernomics quotes a higher percentage than the 70's but it's been awhile since I read that book so I don't rememberPk's I don't think are that high a %. I think it is more in the 70-75% range. Can't find it online though.Agree - PK is like a 95-99% certain goal, the odds were far less on the Gio shot. It was just perfect placement, what can you do?'OC Zed said:I think he had to assume that the shot would not have been placed as perfectly as it was. There was no room for error based on how high Lichaj got up.Trying hard not to think of the result of the play, should Lichai have taken the red card on the 4th goal?
Good point. Although as many penalties are missed as saved I think. If you find the % anywhere let me know. Probably more likely to find in league play I bet.Not the way Howard played tonight.Pk's I don't think are that high a %. I think it is more in the 70-75% range. Can't find it online though.Agree - PK is like a 95-99% certain goal, the odds were far less on the Gio shot. It was just perfect placement, what can you do?'OC Zed said:I think he had to assume that the shot would not have been placed as perfectly as it was. There was no room for error based on how high Lichaj got up.Trying hard not to think of the result of the play, should Lichai have taken the red card on the 4th goal?
South America only has ten teams so almost every Copa they invite 2 teams so that they get to 12 teams which makes for easy groupings. The US has been invited in the past. Mexico chose to send a younger team to Copa because they wanted the A side to play in the Gold Cup due to Confed Cup contingency. US did something similar a few years ago. I continue to believe a 16 team combined Cocacaf/South America would be an enormous tournament. Imagine 4 groups of 4 with the US, Mexico, Argie and Brazil heading the 4 groups. The tickets would fly and tv ratings would be excellent.So what's the deal with them being invited to Copa America? They can only use 5 players that are over 23?
That was awesome. What a fantastic winner. The great goals in MLS keep coming this year. Looked like a fun game to be at. I continue to really like him. I said it before and I will continue to say it, I will happily trade him for Najar.BTW Andy, go punch up the highlight of Danny Mwanga's goal tonight at PPL and let's start a petition to get his citizenship pushed through. Hell of a strike!
I thought about this too... but no way Spector keeps up with any of those players up front for Mexico. Bornstein was the best bet for pace. Funny (not really ha-ha funny) that Bornstein was... well... Bornstein in that first half- you have to look squarely at him for those two goals. But 2nd half, he actually looked *ok*. Got forward well, hit some quality crosses in, and actually defended fairly well.I would not have minded that with thinking that Lichai stays on the left so it is not as disruptive.Or he could have put Spector in. Probably not that much better of an option.Bob had one other choice in back but it was likely worse than the one he used.
He could have subbed in Ream for Cher and pushed Boca out wide again.
I'm sure it will be said later in the thread- but Hejduk retired this or last year.You're probably right. I always had a soft spot for the guy, though.No. He rarely if ever plays in MLS anymore. Way too old.Serious question - I know he's at the very tail-end of his career and plays right back, but would you rather have Frankie Hejduk on the roster than Bornstein? I think I might.
Unless he loses a team... again... I'd think his performance the last two games puts him at least in camp at the next training cycle.I think it's a given he's on the WC Qualifying roster.I'm wondering where he fits in if/when everybody is healthy from a playing time and strategic perspective.It will depend on what he does at club level. If he playing he is likely going to be on the roster.So where does Adu fit in with a completely healthy roster...super-sub??
I can't think of a worse performance by him.tough night in the office for Howard
No, no no- they give the goal, and a fancy dandy-esque hat out too. And suspenders.no. scratch that. reverse it. red card and pk, same as it's always been.Oh didn't know that. They must have tweaked a rule some where along the way. I know in the past it was a red and a PK.I think they can still award the goal in that situation, and the red card.Trying hard not to think of the result of the play, should Lichai have taken the red card on the 4th goal?
The one comment you made was pretty uncalled for, IMO- I saw nothing malicious or fishy in any of the GC Finals larger crowd here- but certainly it wasn't deserving of nasty pms either. just ignore it please, andy- I need my fellow old-timer around. pretty please? and this?Geez. Got a couple of really nasty pm's.
Think maybe I am posting too much. Going to sign off for a while I think.
Enjoy the rest of the summer everyone!
ugh. butI made it back alive. Will give a full report later.
Hopefully!(yes- 2nd... she had me at WHAAAAAAAAAA)'OC Zed said:Wow... congratulations! This is your second child, right? Name?
####!!!!'OC Zed said:HUGEHopefully!(yes- 2nd... she had me at WHAAAAAAAAAA)'OC Zed said:Wow... congratulations! This is your second child, right? Name?I hope Mom is doing well also. I know you already know the drill, but get some sleep while you can.
I've also been wishing for this. Besides what you mentioned we would also all get more Bolivia!South America only has ten teams so almost every Copa they invite 2 teams so that they get to 12 teams which makes for easy groupings. The US has been invited in the past.So what's the deal with them being invited to Copa America? They can only use 5 players that are over 23?
Mexico chose to send a younger team to Copa because they wanted the A side to play in the Gold Cup due to Confed Cup contingency. US did something similar a few years ago.
I continue to believe a 16 team combined Cocacaf/South America would be an enormous tournament.
Imagine 4 groups of 4 with the US, Mexico, Argie and Brazil heading the 4 groups. The tickets would fly and tv ratings would be excellent.
I forget- Copa America... is it held in a host country, or do teams just travel to opposition's countries, ala WCQ? If the latter, a pan-American Cup would be a LOT of travel. What is it, something like 12+ hours to Argentina?I've also been wishing for this. Besides what you mentioned we would also all get more Bolivia!South America only has ten teams so almost every Copa they invite 2 teams so that they get to 12 teams which makes for easy groupings. The US has been invited in the past.So what's the deal with them being invited to Copa America? They can only use 5 players that are over 23?
Mexico chose to send a younger team to Copa because they wanted the A side to play in the Gold Cup due to Confed Cup contingency. US did something similar a few years ago.
I continue to believe a 16 team combined Cocacaf/South America would be an enormous tournament.
Imagine 4 groups of 4 with the US, Mexico, Argie and Brazil heading the 4 groups. The tickets would fly and tv ratings would be excellent.
Went to South America last year, the flight is long, but the transition isn't too bad because the time zone is the same.It's much worse traveling to Europe or Asia IMHO.I forget- Copa America... is it held in a host country, or do teams just travel to opposition's countries, ala WCQ? If the latter, a pan-American Cup would be a LOT of travel. What is it, something like 12+ hours to Argentina?I've also been wishing for this. Besides what you mentioned we would also all get more Bolivia!South America only has ten teams so almost every Copa they invite 2 teams so that they get to 12 teams which makes for easy groupings. The US has been invited in the past.So what's the deal with them being invited to Copa America? They can only use 5 players that are over 23?
Mexico chose to send a younger team to Copa because they wanted the A side to play in the Gold Cup due to Confed Cup contingency. US did something similar a few years ago.
I continue to believe a 16 team combined Cocacaf/South America would be an enormous tournament.
Imagine 4 groups of 4 with the US, Mexico, Argie and Brazil heading the 4 groups. The tickets would fly and tv ratings would be excellent.
GOod point about the time difference- that would be the worst of the hurdles.But playing after flying a long time sucks balls, even after a couple of days recovery.Went to South America last year, the flight is long, but the transition isn't too bad because the time zone is the same.It's much worse traveling to Europe or Asia IMHO.I forget- Copa America... is it held in a host country, or do teams just travel to opposition's countries, ala WCQ? If the latter, a pan-American Cup would be a LOT of travel. What is it, something like 12+ hours to Argentina?I've also been wishing for this. Besides what you mentioned we would also all get more Bolivia!South America only has ten teams so almost every Copa they invite 2 teams so that they get to 12 teams which makes for easy groupings. The US has been invited in the past.So what's the deal with them being invited to Copa America? They can only use 5 players that are over 23?
Mexico chose to send a younger team to Copa because they wanted the A side to play in the Gold Cup due to Confed Cup contingency. US did something similar a few years ago.
I continue to believe a 16 team combined Cocacaf/South America would be an enormous tournament.
Imagine 4 groups of 4 with the US, Mexico, Argie and Brazil heading the 4 groups. The tickets would fly and tv ratings would be excellent.
Host country - the matches this year are held in Argentina.I forget- Copa America... is it held in a host country, or do teams just travel to opposition's countries, ala WCQ? If the latter, a pan-American Cup would be a LOT of travel. What is it, something like 12+ hours to Argentina?I've also been wishing for this. Besides what you mentioned we would also all get more Bolivia!South America only has ten teams so almost every Copa they invite 2 teams so that they get to 12 teams which makes for easy groupings. The US has been invited in the past.So what's the deal with them being invited to Copa America? They can only use 5 players that are over 23?
Mexico chose to send a younger team to Copa because they wanted the A side to play in the Gold Cup due to Confed Cup contingency. US did something similar a few years ago.
I continue to believe a 16 team combined Cocacaf/South America would be an enormous tournament.
Imagine 4 groups of 4 with the US, Mexico, Argie and Brazil heading the 4 groups. The tickets would fly and tv ratings would be excellent.
Congratulations Floppo - wonderful news!
It'll be announced when it gets closer to the season. The big name European leagues are in their midsummer break right now. The EPL will pick up play in late August and play until mid-May. Traditionally Fox Soccer Channel will have games at 7:30 AM, 9 AM, 10 AM, 11 AM, or 12:30 PM (depending on when the games start). Usually FSC will show 4-5 of the weekend's games live, and occasionally shows 1 tape-delayed later on.ESPN2 usually plays 1 game per weekend, usually at 7:30 AM on Saturdays (but occasionally a later start). ESPN2 usually does a good job of covering the occasional Monday game as well, which would be a mid-afternoon start (usually 2:30 PM). There's usually 10 games per weekend (20 teams total), and you can see usually 5-6 here in the US.FSC also covers Italian Serie A. They usually play a bit later in the day, FSC will show the games live around 2:30 PM. From an MLS standpoint, FSC has "soccer night in America" and usually show a live game on Friday nights.Where can I find when and what teams play on scheduled TV? (EPL matches?) I just got fox's soccer channel today. Tia
MLS is currently in mid-season. ESPN will show a game maybe every other week, usually on Thursday nights. Fox Soccer has "soccer night in America", as I said above, which is usually a Friday night game. I get occasional games on CBC (Toronto FC) and MSG (NY Red Bulls)....you may have access to some other games on channels that I don't get.Something else to keep in mind for you, there is a decent following in the NC/SC area for NASL and USL games. The NASL is the new "2nd best" league in America and has the Carolina Railhawks...which probably isn't far from you. It's basically the soccer equivalent of AAA baseball, although the players aren't affiliated with MLS teams. Charleston Battery has a pretty strong tradition and now plays in the USL (3rd best league in the US). Mjolnirs in this thread is a fan. The Wilmington Hammerheads and Charlotte Eagles also play in the USL.I really would love to follow the game more than World Cup and associated tourneys, but having no team/no rooting interest makes it tough to follow the Euro leagues. I'd give MLS a try if I ever had any idea when and where they were playing, it was on TV, when the season ran, etc. I see highlights of the Pacific NW and rhe crowds are impressive.
If the MLS doesnt speak to you, try picking an English team - you can watch them in the Priemer League (in English) and possibly the Champions League if theyre in this years tournament. Thats what did it for me when I first got into the game. Following the Champions league is the best way to learn about world soccer IMO.I really would love to follow the game more than World Cup and associated tourneys, but having no team/no rooting interest makes it tough to follow the Euro leagues. I'd give MLS a try if I ever had any idea when and where they were playing, it was on TV, when the season ran, etc. I see highlights of the Pacific NW and rhe crowds are impressive.
You can join us watching the EPL Saturday and Sunday mornings starting 8/13. Pick any team except for ManU, Chelsea, Liverpool or Arsenal.I really would love to follow the game more than World Cup and associated tourneys, but having no team/no rooting interest makes it tough to follow the Euro leagues. I'd give MLS a try if I ever had any idea when and where they were playing, it was on TV, when the season ran, etc. I see highlights of the Pacific NW and rhe crowds are impressive.
Fixed.You can join us watching the EPL Saturday and Sunday mornings starting 8/13. Pick any one of ManU, Chelsea, Liverpool or Arsenal.I really would love to follow the game more than World Cup and associated tourneys, but having no team/no rooting interest makes it tough to follow the Euro leagues. I'd give MLS a try if I ever had any idea when and where they were playing, it was on TV, when the season ran, etc. I see highlights of the Pacific NW and rhe crowds are impressive.
You can join us watching the EPL Saturday and Sunday mornings starting 8/13. Pick any team except for ManU, Chelsea, Man CityI really would love to follow the game more than World Cup and associated tourneys, but having no team/no rooting interest makes it tough to follow the Euro leagues. I'd give MLS a try if I ever had any idea when and where they were playing, it was on TV, when the season ran, etc. I see highlights of the Pacific NW and rhe crowds are impressive.
Sure, if he has no soul.Fixed.You can join us watching the EPL Saturday and Sunday mornings starting 8/13. Pick any one of ManU, Chelsea, Liverpool or Arsenal.I really would love to follow the game more than World Cup and associated tourneys, but having no team/no rooting interest makes it tough to follow the Euro leagues. I'd give MLS a try if I ever had any idea when and where they were playing, it was on TV, when the season ran, etc. I see highlights of the Pacific NW and rhe crowds are impressive.
I think Christo left out Everton. And possibly Spurs. But I think everybody laughs at Spurs, so there's no reason to even mention them.You can join us watching the EPL Saturday and Sunday mornings starting 8/13. Pick any team except for ManU, Chelsea, Man CityI really would love to follow the game more than World Cup and associated tourneys, but having no team/no rooting interest makes it tough to follow the Euro leagues. I'd give MLS a try if I ever had any idea when and where they were playing, it was on TV, when the season ran, etc. I see highlights of the Pacific NW and rhe crowds are impressive.![]()
Hipster, please. Let the poor guy have a good time.Sure, if he has no soul.Fixed.You can join us watching the EPL Saturday and Sunday mornings starting 8/13. Pick any one of ManU, Chelsea, Liverpool or Arsenal.I really would love to follow the game more than World Cup and associated tourneys, but having no team/no rooting interest makes it tough to follow the Euro leagues. I'd give MLS a try if I ever had any idea when and where they were playing, it was on TV, when the season ran, etc. I see highlights of the Pacific NW and rhe crowds are impressive.
ThanksHost country - the matches this year are held in Argentina.I forget- Copa America... is it held in a host country, or do teams just travel to opposition's countries, ala WCQ? If the latter, a pan-American Cup would be a LOT of travel. What is it, something like 12+ hours to Argentina?I've also been wishing for this. Besides what you mentioned we would also all get more Bolivia!South America only has ten teams so almost every Copa they invite 2 teams so that they get to 12 teams which makes for easy groupings. The US has been invited in the past.So what's the deal with them being invited to Copa America? They can only use 5 players that are over 23?
Mexico chose to send a younger team to Copa because they wanted the A side to play in the Gold Cup due to Confed Cup contingency. US did something similar a few years ago.
I continue to believe a 16 team combined Cocacaf/South America would be an enormous tournament.
Imagine 4 groups of 4 with the US, Mexico, Argie and Brazil heading the 4 groups. The tickets would fly and tv ratings would be excellent.
I had a bunch of friends go over and play in Germany, at various levels. Mostly 2nd and 3rd Divisions, but one guy ended up playing for Hamburg.They all said the same thing about Germans (caveat- this was back in the late 80s, early 90s)- every guy could do the basics perfectly, both with the ball and tactically. It was like they were just drilled over and over and over and over (imagine Drago's training, or the movie Ants). But that was practically the extent of what they could do; they were automatons without any real thought or creativity. And the German national team and league definitely stagnated, IMO, during and after those years. Things have obviously changed in the last decade, as there a bunch of talented, creative young players coming out of th Bundesliga- I figure they, like so many other countries (ours included, if I'm hearing right from parents of youth players), have been trying to incorporate more creativity along with the rote exercises of trapping, kicking, running, etc.Watching Germany/Canada Women's World Cup. It's not just the German men - the German women have sublime touch. Absolutely subime. I realize how much bigger/faster/stronger the men are compared to the women, but if you could normalize for that, this German women's team looks more skilled than the US men's team. They just always seem to hit teammates in perfect stride with every...single...pass. They just manage to create space with passing relentlessly.
Finding individual talents like Pele or Kaka or Ronaldihno is a crap shoot, obviously. And the greatest athletes in those countries gravitate towards soccer. But appears from watching Germany, men and women alike, that you can teach touch. How do they do it?
I was kind of feeling this way too. Seemed like the US was just beat by a better team, and a team that was playing better on the day. US wasn't so bad, even if some of the players didn't necessarily rise to the occasion.And for the record, I thought that was one of the more exciting games the US has played in recent memory (and we had some great games in the last few years). Lots of scoring opportunities, some deft passing and enough new blood (Lichaj, Freddy, Goodson, Jones) to make it feel like were not simply churning our wheels with the same players.
We may have lost, but Im happy with the performance. We lost something on defense when Dolo limped off, and we all knew Bornstein would not suffice. No regrets though - injuries are part of the game.