What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (3 Viewers)

So after the obvious fix that was in for Miami vs Orlando I have lost all faith in MLS. I have really enjoyed getting to know the game since I started following Orlando. So I thought I might start following one of the Premier teams. Do you guys have any suggestions. I don't want to be a band wagon jumper so I thought maybe the Wanderers.
I don't want to be that guy but I think I have to warn you if you are looking for a league that does not, in various way, favor the "bigger" clubs, the sport may not be for you.
 
So after the obvious fix that was in for Miami vs Orlando I have lost all faith in MLS. I have really enjoyed getting to know the game since I started following Orlando. So I thought I might start following one of the Premier teams. Do you guys have any suggestions. I don't want to be a band wagon jumper so I thought maybe the Wanderers.
I don't want to be that guy but I think I have to warn you if you are looking for a league that does not, in various way, favor the "bigger" clubs, the sport may not be for you.
Maybe so but I bet the favoritism isn't as obvious as it is towards Miami when they are in a big game.
Two bogus fouls on Breckalo which led to them scoring and putting us down a man. Also the non call on a obvious penalty that would have put us up by 2 but MLS was having none of that.
 
Last edited:
130 million pounds. 150 million euros.
Seeing that it's 125 from LFC to NUFC, with Isak forgoing his 5MM loyalty bonus (he never handed in a request, or something) to make it worth 130 to Newcastle.

I know the club spent virtually nothing a year ago, won the league, sold a fortune in players, expanded the stadium revenue and have been on a tear with ancillary revenue, but I'm still shocked at the spend levels this offseason. Even knowing this is basically a one year makeover and they'll dial back again next year, I didn't really think they had this in them.
 
Thanks for the team-changing money, scousers.
No joke, but selling Coutinho really did do that for Liverpool. Obviously FSG and Klopp mattered a lot too but if they hadn't gotten whatever it was for Coutinho I'm not sure any of it happens. VvD and Alisson were more or less paid for with that sale. Might end up being the best thing that could have happened.
 
Thanks for the team-changing money, scousers.
No joke, but selling Coutinho really did do that for Liverpool. Obviously FSG and Klopp mattered a lot too but if they hadn't gotten whatever it was for Coutinho I'm not sure any of it happens. VvD and Alisson were more or less paid for with that sale.
Yeah, the hope is this is Coutinho-like. I'm obviously salty because Isak is ****ing prick, but objectively, he's not worth this. He's really good. But not THIS good. I just hope we reinvest wisely. The window has actually been pretty decent so far if you remove this thing.
 
Garnacho to Chelsea gets a "Here we go"
Hojlund to Inter is on the verge of "Here we go"

Up next a loss to Burnley on Saturday. Manager is sacked or steps down over the int break. United goes back to the 4-2-3-1 and yoyo'ing between 4-8th place in the table, inmates run the asylum, glazers and ineos continue gutting everything and the toxic fan bases rages at who knows what.

Of all the guys they’ve had move on, Garnacho is one I would have done what they could to keep. I don’t read all the team drama so no clue what happened but the kid has talent.
He is skillful, has pace for days. Terrible in front of goal, poor on 1v1s, tends to overrun the ball while dribbling and easily stripped of the ball, selfish in front of goal.... Yes he is young, but with the amount of games he has played, you should see improvement in these areas and its not there.

Add in the poor attitude, entitlement and worse social media presence along with not fitting into the new formation and he was gone.

I would have liked to keep Hojlund for competition with Sesko but understand them moving him on.

Now stop starting Mount over Mainoo and we are getting somewhere.
Heck, even Bruno should be sat after a couple stinkers.
 
Liverpool have now spent £415M this summer window, making it the second most expensive transfer window in EPL history behind Chelsea's 2023 summer window.
They will likely pass Chelsea if they sign Guehi.

Gonna be hard for Liverpool fans to continue shouting that oil clubs are ruining football at this rate.
 
It's dead easy: teams should spend what they earn and owners shouldn't be allowed to plow billions into a team that isn't earning it legit.

And Liverpool are around a net spend of around 240MM (with Guehi and Elliott offsetting each other, assuming). Over the last two years. Arsenal are at around 250MM this year alone.

But more power to them -- if you earn it, spend it. Same with United. Even Newcastle, oddly, seem to be living within their means. It's City, Chelsea under Abramovic, PSG, etc that I (and I think most people) object to.

I don't even mind Wrexham -- the owners bought a moribund asset, spruced it up with some smart spending and outstanding extra revenue streams and are potentially building something sustainable.

I'd much prefer a salary cap, but Europe doesn't roll like that so all you can hope for is rules that don't let a handful of corrupt owners governments run riot thru the sport.
 
Wissa for 55 million is a lot but he’s proven. Getting 30 million for Osula is insane and takes the sting out of it quite a bit. Good bit of business. ETA: There’s a buyback clause, too??? :lmao:

It really seemed like we had no idea what we were doing but the window has been good. The international break came at the perfect time, too.
 
Last edited:
United's day:
Sign GK Lammens from Royal Antwerp. Don't know how good he is, but if he can catch he's already better than the 2 they have. Plus no need for the overrated Emi Martinez.

Antony sold to Betis
Sancho season loan to AV

Previously Garnacho to Chelsea, Rashford to Barca, Hojlund to Napoli.

Now to move on Onana, Malacia, maybe Casemiro and hopefully bring in a CDM. 3 hours to go.
 
Ten Hag sacked already.
I saw this and laughed why also asking WTH? 2 games in and he's gone?
Whoa whoa whoa... THREE games in there, hoss. Ample time.
Sorry, missed a game. But still, wow and WTF?
There had to have been something else here.

I assume there was a massive personality conflict with some one above him that came to fruition during the preseason. Getting off to a bad start was probably the excuse needed to move on from him.

Note, his record over the 3 games was 1-1-1, although the draw in here, which is the most recent result was really bad (up 2 goals AND up a man with only 15 minutes left and only managed a draw).
 
Looks like Newcastle changed their mind on Osula. I suspect we’ll hear something else happened rather than them changing their minds.

Guehi to Liverpool off. Maybe he should have thrown a tantrum, it worked for Isak and Wissa.
 
“Newcastle United can announce the sale of striker Alexander Isak to Liverpool for a significant British record transfer fee. The Sweden international joined the Magpies from Real Sociedad in 2022 and made 109 appearances in all competitions.”

That’s the whole club message. Just the facts.
 
Guehi to Liverpool off. Maybe he should have thrown a tantrum
Does seem to be the moral of the story.

Deal sheet was submitted and everything when they backed out. Glasner, who's almost certainly gone in any event, seems to have blocked the deal by threatening to quit.
He may well be gone after the season but his point is pretty valid. You can't sell one of your best players without a replacement on deadline day. He's been there a year and a half and has won the FA Cup and Community Shield (first ever major trophies for Palace). And he is being forced to play Conference League because his ownership screwed him.

Over the last two off-seasons the club has sold starting CB Joachim Anderson and Wing Michael Olise, followed by Eze this year. And after qualifying for Europe, they acquired two backups and Pino while selling Eze (and Eduord). They are one injury (at any position) away from playing kids. It's not sustainable and a top level manager shouldn't have to put up with it.
 
Agree with all of that -- and if I were Glasner (or a Palace supporter) I'd be pissed.

Just saying that the ire of a coach you're not going to hang onto anyway might not be a good reason to give up 35MM for a smaller club (sorry Cletius). Especially once you've (reportedly) completed a deal. Guehi is out of contract next year, and that's a lot of money for any team, but especially a ~mid-table side.

FWIW, Liverpool seem awfully confident they'll still get him in January (if CP is out of the cups maybe?) or next summer. Time will tell.
 

"If we play this game 10x more, in the same fashion, then I think it is 8 times a draw, we (Liverpool) win it 1 time, and Arsenal win it 1 time." - An interesting quote from Slot when assessing how Sunday's game against Arsenal played out...

I love it when managers are sane about the result they just got. That there were fortunate not to lose by more, that they played terrible but won, or played really well but the result didn't show it (Klopp at 0-3 vs Barca for example) or that they were pretty lucky to get a win, like above. It seems like it's a lot more common than it used to be for whatever reason.
 
Ten Hag sacked already.
I saw this and laughed why also asking WTH? 2 games in and he's gone?
Whoa whoa whoa... THREE games in there, hoss. Ample time.
Sorry, missed a game. But still, wow and WTF?
There had to have been something else here.

I assume there was a massive personality conflict with some one above him that came to fruition during the preseason. Getting off to a bad start was probably the excuse needed to move on from him.

Note, his record over the 3 games was 1-1-1, although the draw in here, which is the most recent result was really bad (up 2 goals AND up a man with only 15 minutes left and only managed a draw).
Agreed there has to be more to it, esp with how many players were let leave, esp their better players. Was that ETH's doing or the board/DoF? Just a strange situation.


Ole, Jose, ETH all sacked within 4 days of each other. :lmao:
 
Evidently Grimsby Town broke the rules and fielded an ineligible player in the League Cup vs United.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_...void-carabao-cup-banishment-ineligible-player
The EFL said the breach related to Clarke Oduor, who came on as a 73rd-minute substitute. The player's registration was submitted at 12.01pm on the day before the match, shortly after the 12pm deadline required in accordance with this season's competition rules. They are getting fined but not kicked out of the cup. United can appeal but doesn't sound like they will.

And no, United should be out, I am ok with the fine. But could you imagine the outrage if they advanced United and kicked out Grimsby over this? HAHAHAHAHAHHA
 
Looks like Newcastle changed their mind on Osula. I suspect we’ll hear something else happened rather than them changing their minds.

It is almost as if me saying to Blades fans we should tell you guys to **** off, watch him crush the Championship, and then if we get an offer way above what we actually sold him to you for, think about selling then, might have been correct after all
 
The Athletic has ranked all 155 Premier League transfers.

Good article for the ctrl F move. Cool to see a take on each deal. Here's top 3 deals:

3. Rayan Cherki, Lyon to Manchester City​

The Athletic’s reported transfer fee: £36.3m (with add-ons)

Contract length: Five years

He’s 22 years old, gifted, two-footed, versatile and can win any match on his own. Not at the top level yet and needs to improve his work ethic, but he’s at the right club to do that. A potential steal at an initial £30.3m — he could be worth five times that amount in three years.


2. Estevao, Palmeiras to Chelsea​

The Athletic’s reported transfer fee: £49m (with add-ons)

Reported contract length: Eight years

Not 19 until next April, but with 83 first-team appearances under his belt for Palmeiras, plus five senior appearances for Brazil. Expect all-action, full-throttle wing-play, outrageous ability and an adventurous, fearless attitude, trying things that many wouldn’t even think of. Just a kid… but the hype feels justified.

1. Joao Palhinha, Bayern Munich to Tottenham Hotspur​

Transfer fee: Loan

Contract length: One year

For two years with Fulham, Palhinha was arguably the Premier League’s best hairy-a***d ball-winning anchorman, and possibly one of Europe’s best, too. For Spurs to bring him back to England for peanuts adds a layer of steel to their midfield that has been missing for some time. Palhinha will not only shore up their defence, but will also help allow their creative talents to shine.
 
Lots going on at Spurs.

Obviously Ange out, Frank is expected to be named as early as today. Also sacked the Women's head coach.

Spurs have a new CEO who just started last week.

One of Spurs long-time board members stepped down last week - she was considered the right-hand woman for Levy.

Spurs had a new non-executive board member appointed in March - Peter Charrington - who also happens to be the recently appointed Trustee of the Lewis Family Trust, which is the entity that ultimately owns Spurs. This is the first time that a trustee has been named to the board - suggesting that Lewis family wanted another look at how the club is run.

There is currently a lot of rumors swirling that Levy himself could stand down by the end of the summer (or sooner), with new investors coming in. The speculation is that the Lewis family wants to sell, and believe that Levy has been hampering those efforts.




As a fan - I think it was the right call to sack Ange, and I am looking forward to the Thomas Frank era. It think he will be a surprisingly good fit at Spurs, and can get them competing back near the top of the table this season.
👆
 
Lots going on at Spurs.

Obviously Ange out, Frank is expected to be named as early as today. Also sacked the Women's head coach.

Spurs have a new CEO who just started last week.

One of Spurs long-time board members stepped down last week - she was considered the right-hand woman for Levy.

Spurs had a new non-executive board member appointed in March - Peter Charrington - who also happens to be the recently appointed Trustee of the Lewis Family Trust, which is the entity that ultimately owns Spurs. This is the first time that a trustee has been named to the board - suggesting that Lewis family wanted another look at how the club is run.

There is currently a lot of rumors swirling that Levy himself could stand down by the end of the summer (or sooner), with new investors coming in. The speculation is that the Lewis family wants to sell, and believe that Levy has been hampering those efforts.




As a fan - I think it was the right call to sack Ange, and I am looking forward to the Thomas Frank era. It think he will be a surprisingly good fit at Spurs, and can get them competing back near the top of the table this season.
👆
Thats pretty big news. Congrats?
 
Lots going on at Spurs.

Obviously Ange out, Frank is expected to be named as early as today. Also sacked the Women's head coach.

Spurs have a new CEO who just started last week.

One of Spurs long-time board members stepped down last week - she was considered the right-hand woman for Levy.

Spurs had a new non-executive board member appointed in March - Peter Charrington - who also happens to be the recently appointed Trustee of the Lewis Family Trust, which is the entity that ultimately owns Spurs. This is the first time that a trustee has been named to the board - suggesting that Lewis family wanted another look at how the club is run.

There is currently a lot of rumors swirling that Levy himself could stand down by the end of the summer (or sooner), with new investors coming in. The speculation is that the Lewis family wants to sell, and believe that Levy has been hampering those efforts.




As a fan - I think it was the right call to sack Ange, and I am looking forward to the Thomas Frank era. It think he will be a surprisingly good fit at Spurs, and can get them competing back near the top of the table this season.
👆
Thats pretty big news. Congrats?
Time will tell.

I am of the opinion that the Lewis Family were a bigger roadblock to success than Levy. But, let's see how it all settles out.

BBC reporting that it was the Lewis kids (They are in their 60's so a little odd calling them kids) who forced Levy out, so now its time to put up or shut up.
 
Lots going on at Spurs.

Obviously Ange out, Frank is expected to be named as early as today. Also sacked the Women's head coach.

Spurs have a new CEO who just started last week.

One of Spurs long-time board members stepped down last week - she was considered the right-hand woman for Levy.

Spurs had a new non-executive board member appointed in March - Peter Charrington - who also happens to be the recently appointed Trustee of the Lewis Family Trust, which is the entity that ultimately owns Spurs. This is the first time that a trustee has been named to the board - suggesting that Lewis family wanted another look at how the club is run.

There is currently a lot of rumors swirling that Levy himself could stand down by the end of the summer (or sooner), with new investors coming in. The speculation is that the Lewis family wants to sell, and believe that Levy has been hampering those efforts.




As a fan - I think it was the right call to sack Ange, and I am looking forward to the Thomas Frank era. It think he will be a surprisingly good fit at Spurs, and can get them competing back near the top of the table this season.
👆
Thats pretty big news. Congrats?
Time will tell.

I am of the opinion that the Lewis Family were a bigger roadblock to success than Levy. But, let's see how it all settles out.

BBC reporting that it was the Lewis kids (They are in their 60's so a little odd calling them kids) who forced Levy out, so now its time to put up or shut up.
The leitmotif has always been about how frugal/cheap hes been. Saw an article on espn today showing how much theyve spent each year. Not small.
 
Lots going on at Spurs.

Obviously Ange out, Frank is expected to be named as early as today. Also sacked the Women's head coach.

Spurs have a new CEO who just started last week.

One of Spurs long-time board members stepped down last week - she was considered the right-hand woman for Levy.

Spurs had a new non-executive board member appointed in March - Peter Charrington - who also happens to be the recently appointed Trustee of the Lewis Family Trust, which is the entity that ultimately owns Spurs. This is the first time that a trustee has been named to the board - suggesting that Lewis family wanted another look at how the club is run.

There is currently a lot of rumors swirling that Levy himself could stand down by the end of the summer (or sooner), with new investors coming in. The speculation is that the Lewis family wants to sell, and believe that Levy has been hampering those efforts.




As a fan - I think it was the right call to sack Ange, and I am looking forward to the Thomas Frank era. It think he will be a surprisingly good fit at Spurs, and can get them competing back near the top of the table this season.
👆
Thats pretty big news. Congrats?
Time will tell.

I am of the opinion that the Lewis Family were a bigger roadblock to success than Levy. But, let's see how it all settles out.

BBC reporting that it was the Lewis kids (They are in their 60's so a little odd calling them kids) who forced Levy out, so now its time to put up or shut up.
The leitmotif has always been about how frugal/cheap hes been. Saw an article on espn today showing how much theyve spent each year. Not small.
If I had to pin a specific fault on Levy it would be similar, but not exactly being "cheap" though that plays into it.

Levy is very conservative, and for many years - pre-Poch, but also beyond, Spurs payed very low wages. It was Levy's heartfelt belief that Wages were growing out of hand for years, and he refused to go along. I think he really thought he alone could control wage inflation. I also think he did not anticipate the revenue growth keeping pace with the wage growth - and so Spurs were always left behind. Even today, I think they have one of the lowest wages/turnover ratio in the league.

So, low wages, combined with low transfer fees (until recently), and a refusal to pay agent fees - meant Spurs were never attracting the top players. They lucked into Harry Kane, and to a lesser extent Sonny - and that led to the heights of the Poch era.

But Levy's real fault was not knowing when to take risks - in a sporting sense. He never understood the need to push on at various points, and really invest in the playing squad. That was always too risky, and too expensive for him. But, he spared no expenses on the stadium and training grounds - because he felt those were safer investments.

He leaves a complicated legacy at Spurs - transformed them really into a consistent "top-5" side, but never had the wherewithal to push for the top tier, like Arsenal, or Chelsea, or Liverpool, or City, or United have done with varying degrees of success. And. only winning 2 trophies in the Levy era will always leave a stain.

But, overall, I think he did more good than harm, and really if I were to lay fault at the lack of investment, its at Joe Lewis's feet - he was the money man, and it rarely ever went to Spurs.
 
Jesus :lmao::lmao:

======


A full breakdown has been released by @BILD on why Erik ten Hag got sacked!

• He did not get along with ANYONE at the club, not even his own staff that he brought to Germany himself.
• He interfered with the planning and only proposed players from his own agency.
• The players did NOT understand why doing push ups was just as important as ball work.
• The atmosphere within the club was extremely cold.
• The players had no idea what they had to do during matches.
• The club wanted to sack him much earlier and believe they took too long.
• He is now considered the worst coach in their club history
 
Jesus :lmao::lmao:

======


A full breakdown has been released by @BILD on why Erik ten Hag got sacked!

He did not get along with ANYONE at the club, not even his own staff that he brought to Germany himself.
• He interfered with the planning and only proposed players from his own agency.
• The players did NOT understand why doing push ups was just as important as ball work.
• The atmosphere within the club was extremely cold.
• The players had no idea what they had to do during matches.
• The club wanted to sack him much earlier and believe they took too long.
• He is now considered the worst coach in their club history
The bolded makes me laugh most.

After watching him bring players to United that had played for him before, I am not surprised he was only bringing in players he shared an agent with.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top