Lots going on at Spurs.
Obviously Ange out, Frank is expected to be named as early as today. Also sacked the Women's head coach.
Spurs have a new CEO who just started last week.
One of Spurs long-time board members stepped down last week - she was considered the right-hand woman for Levy.
Spurs had a new non-executive board member appointed in March - Peter Charrington - who also happens to be the recently appointed Trustee of the Lewis Family Trust, which is the entity that ultimately owns Spurs. This is the first time that a trustee has been named to the board - suggesting that Lewis family wanted another look at how the club is run.
There is currently a lot of rumors swirling that Levy himself could stand down by the end of the summer (or sooner), with new investors coming in. The speculation is that the Lewis family wants to sell, and believe that Levy has been hampering those efforts.
As a fan - I think it was the right call to sack Ange, and I am looking forward to the Thomas Frank era. It think he will be a surprisingly good fit at Spurs, and can get them competing back near the top of the table this season.
Thats pretty big news. Congrats?
Time will tell.
I am of the opinion that the Lewis Family were a bigger roadblock to success than Levy. But, let's see how it all settles out.
BBC reporting that it was the Lewis kids (They are in their 60's so a little odd calling them kids) who forced Levy out, so now its time to put up or shut up.
The leitmotif has always been about how frugal/cheap hes been. Saw an article on espn today showing how much theyve spent each year. Not small.
If I had to pin a specific fault on Levy it would be similar, but not exactly being "cheap" though that plays into it.
Levy is very conservative, and for many years - pre-Poch, but also beyond, Spurs payed very low wages. It was Levy's heartfelt belief that Wages were growing out of hand for years, and he refused to go along. I think he really thought he alone could control wage inflation. I also think he did not anticipate the revenue growth keeping pace with the wage growth - and so Spurs were always left behind. Even today, I think they have one of the lowest wages/turnover ratio in the league.
So, low wages, combined with low transfer fees (until recently), and a refusal to pay agent fees - meant Spurs were never attracting the top players. They lucked into Harry Kane, and to a lesser extent Sonny - and that led to the heights of the Poch era.
But Levy's real fault was not knowing when to take risks - in a sporting sense. He never understood the need to push on at various points, and really invest in the playing squad. That was always too risky, and too expensive for him. But, he spared no expenses on the stadium and training grounds - because he felt those were safer investments.
He leaves a complicated legacy at Spurs - transformed them really into a consistent "top-5" side, but never had the wherewithal to push for the top tier, like Arsenal, or Chelsea, or Liverpool, or City, or United have done with varying degrees of success. And. only winning 2 trophies in the Levy era will always leave a stain.
But, overall, I think he did more good than harm, and really if I were to lay fault at the lack of investment, its at Joe Lewis's feet - he was the money man, and it rarely ever went to Spurs.