((Morpheus))
Footballguy
The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...I'll do the same.Oh, I'll just go ahead and black dot this for future reference.Madrid will embarrass United, with or without Vidic.

The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...I'll do the same.Oh, I'll just go ahead and black dot this for future reference.Madrid will embarrass United, with or without Vidic.

Yeah, I don't think it's heresy. I think Bradley is better than Reyna, but it's not as if they really play the same position even if they're both center mids. Reyna was best as deep lying playmaker and Bradley is a classic box-to-box Number 8. Reyna is a better decision maker but Bradley is a much more dynamic player. Bradley can stamp his authority on more different types of games than Reyna could. Of course, Reyna might have been more dominant for another country where his skills weren't so unique. You can put Xavi on the USMNT and it will only get you so far if everyone else is giving the ball away.Agreed. MBradley has a better motor than Reyna ever did. I would agree about flair and creativity edge to Reyna though. Bradley is better in the air and a better physical defensive presence. Plus, I think MB gets the edge in the "steel" category.
Madrid's looking pretty mediocre by Madrid standards as of late. Maybe things will start to click and they'll get some guys back from injury, but right now, they're certainly beatable. Either way, it should be a great matchup. I really like Barca's draw. This ACM team doesn't scare me much, especially with the prospect of them having to sell off more players this January. I doubt they're even going to face much of a hostile environment in Milan.Oh, I'll just go ahead and black dot this for future reference.Madrid will embarrass United, with or without Vidic.
Bring on Podolski!The DFB Pokal quarterfinals were drawn as well and there will not be a repeat of last year's final as Bayern and Dortmund meet this round.Arsenal v Bayern Munich
Pretty funny to think back to the folks who were convinced he was in the side because his dad was the coach.![]()

Let's take this to the bookie. What's your bet?Good luck with that.Sterling signs new 5yr contractThe Sturridge rumors picking up, so much so that talk shows are saying a deal is done in principle for £12M
![]()
Fair enough.Can you kindly remind me again who won the CL last year? My memory has failed me in my advanced age (and truth be told, I tend to block out some results from some hated clubs). Just curious.The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...![]()
NY Giants.Fair enough.Can you kindly remind me again who won the CL last year? My memory has failed me in my advanced age (and truth be told, I tend to block out some results from some hated clubs). Just curious.The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...![]()
I can't remember either.But it sure as hell wasn't the best team.Fair enough.Can you kindly remind me again who won the CL last year? My memory has failed me in my advanced age (and truth be told, I tend to block out some results from some hated clubs). Just curious.The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...![]()
Not saying he won't sign. Saying he sucks. How do you want to quantify that?Let's take this to the bookie. What's your bet?Good luck with that.Sterling signs new 5yr contractThe Sturridge rumors picking up, so much so that talk shows are saying a deal is done in principle for £12M
![]()
GoalsNot saying he won't sign. Saying he sucks. How do you want to quantify that?
"Never" is pretty strong here. EPL didn't do very well in Europe from '85 to' 90.The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...I'll do the same.Oh, I'll just go ahead and black dot this for future reference.Madrid will embarrass United, with or without Vidic.![]()
I can't remember either.But it sure as hell wasn't the best team.Fair enough.Can you kindly remind me again who won the CL last year? My memory has failed me in my advanced age (and truth be told, I tend to block out some results from some hated clubs). Just curious.The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...![]()

Sterling or Sturridge? We've not yet seen the best from Sturridge. I think there's a decent chance he'll do very well paired with Suarez.Not saying he won't sign. Saying he sucks. How do you want to quantify that?Let's take this to the bookie. What's your bet?Good luck with that.Sterling signs new 5yr contractThe Sturridge rumors picking up, so much so that talk shows are saying a deal is done in principle for £12M
![]()
2012: The Year That Fernando Torres almost Won Everything, yet didn't score one meaningful goal.
The EPL as we know it was founded in 92. That's a convenient cutoff for me because I'm not old enough to remember anything before then."Never" is pretty strong here. EPL didn't do very well in Europe from '85 to' 90.The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...I'll do the same.Oh, I'll just go ahead and black dot this for future reference.Madrid will embarrass United, with or without Vidic.![]()
It won't be starting out with a call to the January camp it appears as he will still be in rehab for his surgery to remove a bone in his foot. Won't be back until preseason for MLS.It's sad to see how far Brek Shea has fallen. He entered 2012 with great expectations and had an awful year. I'm hoping 2013 is a much better year for him.
Yeah, I don't think it's heresy. I think Bradley is better than Reyna, but it's not as if they really play the same position even if they're both center mids. Reyna was best as deep lying playmaker and Bradley is a classic box-to-box Number 8. Reyna is a better decision maker but Bradley is a much more dynamic player. Bradley can stamp his authority on more different types of games than Reyna could. Of course, Reyna might have been more dominant for another country where his skills weren't so unique. You can put Xavi on the USMNT and it will only get you so far if everyone else is giving the ball away.Agreed. MBradley has a better motor than Reyna ever did. I would agree about flair and creativity edge to Reyna though. Bradley is better in the air and a better physical defensive presence. Plus, I think MB gets the edge in the "steel" category.
Very well said and analyzed, Scoob.And to be fair to Bradley in my original post- I haven't seen him live enough to figure how many of his passes and touches are as directly useful as Reyna's were. Reyna triggered attacks with the slightest moves- and also with "how the hell did he see that" passes. IMO, he was better able to figure out how to use the guys around him to spark something going forward than Bradley is... which isn't to say that Bradley doesn't do this. Reyna's ability to unlock tricky opposition just seems a bit ahead of Bradley. And even though Bradley's growth has been amazing- that ability, IMO, is something innate. And IMO, Reyna is behind two US players in that regard- but they weren't and aren't anywhere near as complete players as Bradley or Reyna. Wanna guess who I'm thinking of?too soon"Never" is pretty strong here. EPL didn't do very well in Europe from '85 to' 90.The gap between the top 4-5 of UEFA and the top 4-5 of the EPL has never been wider...I'll do the same.Oh, I'll just go ahead and black dot this for future reference.Madrid will embarrass United, with or without Vidic.![]()
I'll take a shot at one of them and say John O'Brien. He didn't play in the middle but he could pass.And IMO, Reyna is behind two US players in that regard- but they weren't and aren't anywhere near as complete players as Bradley or Reyna. Wanna guess who I'm thinking of?
Xbut with health, damn- he might have made it. and IIRC, he did play in the middle- no?I'll take a shot at one of them and say John O'Brien. He didn't play in the middle but he could pass.And IMO, Reyna is behind two US players in that regard- but they weren't and aren't anywhere near as complete players as Bradley or Reyna. Wanna guess who I'm thinking of?
yes. my man-love of Ramos is long.Tab Ramos gotta be one of them
In. Talking Sturridge, Cletius.GoalsNot saying he won't sign. Saying he sucks. How do you want to quantify that?
Obie did play in the middle occasionally for the US the few times he was not shattered like glass.I'll take a shot at one of them and say John O'Brien. He didn't play in the middle but he could pass.And IMO, Reyna is behind two US players in that regard- but they weren't and aren't anywhere near as complete players as Bradley or Reyna. Wanna guess who I'm thinking of?
12/19/2012 - 11:46 PM +00:00Z-Man is City's unsung heroSimon Curtis

You may be right, of course. As Scooby noted earlier, he has a reputation for playing very selfishly, even for a striker, and taking lots of bad shots. I don't think he got a fair shake at Chelsea though. I think its probably a good buy for Liverpool, assuming they have a plan to deal with his contract situation, which I believe expires in 6 months.In. Talking Sturridge, Cletius.GoalsNot saying he won't sign. Saying he sucks. How do you want to quantify that?
You're not thinking LHucksy enough.'NewlyRetired said:I can't guess who the other player is in terms of unlocking opponents. Cletus, Dempsey and Donovan all had/have this skill but I would not have put any of them above Reyna. If it was not Obie, who am I forgetting?
Oh of course, Buddle. How did I forget him.You're not thinking LHucksy enough.'NewlyRetired said:I can't guess who the other player is in terms of unlocking opponents. Cletus, Dempsey and Donovan all had/have this skill but I would not have put any of them above Reyna. If it was not Obie, who am I forgetting?
Yes I know you mean Freddy, I mentioned him above in a late edit.That's the one. Of course- it's only come in moments, and against youngsters. But still...I can't guess who the other player is in terms of unlocking opponents. Cletus, Dempsey and Donovan all had/have this skill but I would not have put any of them above Reyna.
If it was not Obie, who am I forgetting? Young Mr Adu should have been the next in the legacy line but that did not work out.
What time frame did this player play in?
Fantastic if you have Direct TV. On game day you can get anywhere from 5 to 7 games live for free. They are just the raw feeds, no pre game or half time. Other than that you get one game live I believe on FSC.How's the television coverage for Europa League games here? I like the draw for both UEFA tournaments - looks like some good Euro footy for us in 2013.
I know he was a pain in the ### but I loved his Gun Slinger personality. We have really only had three of those players, Waldo, Clint, and Dempsey but much of Dempsey's edge has been removed (for his betterment) in England.I always lol @ "Cletus".
As someone who's been banging the Sturridge drum for years now, I think he would be fine in Liverpool.I respect Ramseybang's opinions, but I think he's incorrect in this regard. In my eyes, you put the talent together and try to make it work, if it doesn't work, you try adjusting to see what does work. I seem to recall a number of posters saying that RvP and Rooney would have a difficult time gelling too - and it seems they've worked together quite fantastically (biased opinion).Sturridge to me passes the eye test in that he has world class talent. It just seems to me that it's been a matter of circumstance that he hasn't shown how good he can be. He came up with City at a time where the stars there were Ireland, Micah Richards, amongst others, and was poised to be their next big thing...and then, whammo, team is bought by richest owners in the world and they decide it would be quicker and easier to just buy Tevez, Arguero, Balotteli, Dzeko, Adebayor, and so on and so on. Well, obviously these guys would favor first team treatment so he is bought by Chelsea. Too young probably to play on a CL level, he is then buried by coaching turmoil/rollover, and of course more big name stars brought in Torres, Hazard, types. So he has a hard time getting a sniff, and when he is thrown on the field, he's pretty much asked to be the danger man, the scorer, so he does what he can.Now, Liverpool is in dire straits in the attack, it's evident. They have a world class talent in Suarez and then nothing. Teams can scheme against this, and no matter how good Suarez is, he needs an attack partner in some fashion, be it someone who plays up top with him, or attacking wingers that can break down defenses, etc.. And, as much as I dislike Suarez, he is a polished enough player that I think he could play fine with another 'selfish' striker such as Sturridge - and to be honest, I don't necessarily think defining Sturridge as selfish is necessarily fair, as he is only 22 years old and can certainly change his play to the team/situation he is around. It just seems to me in the appearances I have seen him play at Chelsea, that he's been under a great deal of pressure to perform (read, score) as it may have been AVB's job/#### on the line for starting him, or he gets subbed in late for a usually ineffective Torres. In my eyes, Sturridge is a nice player and I think he can fit in very well with another striker in a 4-4-2 type lineup.Chelsea also made a very nice signing on a guy I was crossing my fingers that United would get in Daniel Sturridge. He may not be an impact player next year, but at only 19 years old, he is extremely talented.
Who wants to set the O/U on goals in 2013? GPJ?In. Talking Sturridge, Cletius.GoalsNot saying he won't sign. Saying he sucks. How do you want to quantify that?
All fair points, but I think his conversion rate would still be best on the team .You may be right, of course. As Scooby noted earlier, he has a reputation for playing very selfishly, even for a striker, and taking lots of bad shots. I don't think he got a fair shake at Chelsea though. I think its probably a good buy for Liverpool, assuming they have a plan to deal with his contract situation, which I believe expires in 6 months.

In:headexplode:
Rodgers has worked pretty hard to move Liverpool out of the 4-4-2. The idea that he would backtrack on that to try and fit one player in really doesn't make sense.I suspect Sturridge will slot in on the right (as he did at Chelsea) in place of Sterling in the 4-3-3. The problem with Sturridge in that position at Chelsea wasn't a lack of goals, but his entire disregard for his defensive responsibilities.I don't think his work rate will actually fit well with the way Rodgers plays. As much as I dislike Suarez, he does bring a high work rate in addition to his other attributes.As someone who's been banging the Sturridge drum for years now, I think he would be fine in Liverpool.I respect Ramseybang's opinions, but I think he's incorrect in this regard. In my eyes, you put the talent together and try to make it work, if it doesn't work, you try adjusting to see what does work. I seem to recall a number of posters saying that RvP and Rooney would have a difficult time gelling too - and it seems they've worked together quite fantastically (biased opinion).Sturridge to me passes the eye test in that he has world class talent. It just seems to me that it's been a matter of circumstance that he hasn't shown how good he can be. He came up with City at a time where the stars there were Ireland, Micah Richards, amongst others, and was poised to be their next big thing...and then, whammo, team is bought by richest owners in the world and they decide it would be quicker and easier to just buy Tevez, Arguero, Balotteli, Dzeko, Adebayor, and so on and so on. Well, obviously these guys would favor first team treatment so he is bought by Chelsea. Too young probably to play on a CL level, he is then buried by coaching turmoil/rollover, and of course more big name stars brought in Torres, Hazard, types. So he has a hard time getting a sniff, and when he is thrown on the field, he's pretty much asked to be the danger man, the scorer, so he does what he can.Now, Liverpool is in dire straits in the attack, it's evident. They have a world class talent in Suarez and then nothing. Teams can scheme against this, and no matter how good Suarez is, he needs an attack partner in some fashion, be it someone who plays up top with him, or attacking wingers that can break down defenses, etc.. And, as much as I dislike Suarez, he is a polished enough player that I think he could play fine with another 'selfish' striker such as Sturridge - and to be honest, I don't necessarily think defining Sturridge as selfish is necessarily fair, as he is only 22 years old and can certainly change his play to the team/situation he is around. It just seems to me in the appearances I have seen him play at Chelsea, that he's been under a great deal of pressure to perform (read, score) as it may have been AVB's job/#### on the line for starting him, or he gets subbed in late for a usually ineffective Torres. In my eyes, Sturridge is a nice player and I think he can fit in very well with another striker in a 4-4-2 type lineup.Chelsea also made a very nice signing on a guy I was crossing my fingers that United would get in Daniel Sturridge. He may not be an impact player next year, but at only 19 years old, he is extremely talented.
He's an upgrade over BoriniRodgers has worked pretty hard to move Liverpool out of the 4-4-2. The idea that he would backtrack on that to try and fit one player in really doesn't make sense.I suspect Sturridge will slot in on the right (as he did at Chelsea) in place of Sterling in the 4-3-3. The problem with Sturridge in that position at Chelsea wasn't a lack of goals, but his entire disregard for his defensive responsibilities.I don't think his work rate will actually fit well with the way Rodgers plays. As much as I dislike Suarez, he does bring a high work rate in addition to his other attributes.As someone who's been banging the Sturridge drum for years now, I think he would be fine in Liverpool.I respect Ramseybang's opinions, but I think he's incorrect in this regard. In my eyes, you put the talent together and try to make it work, if it doesn't work, you try adjusting to see what does work. I seem to recall a number of posters saying that RvP and Rooney would have a difficult time gelling too - and it seems they've worked together quite fantastically (biased opinion).Sturridge to me passes the eye test in that he has world class talent. It just seems to me that it's been a matter of circumstance that he hasn't shown how good he can be. He came up with City at a time where the stars there were Ireland, Micah Richards, amongst others, and was poised to be their next big thing...and then, whammo, team is bought by richest owners in the world and they decide it would be quicker and easier to just buy Tevez, Arguero, Balotteli, Dzeko, Adebayor, and so on and so on. Well, obviously these guys would favor first team treatment so he is bought by Chelsea. Too young probably to play on a CL level, he is then buried by coaching turmoil/rollover, and of course more big name stars brought in Torres, Hazard, types. So he has a hard time getting a sniff, and when he is thrown on the field, he's pretty much asked to be the danger man, the scorer, so he does what he can.Now, Liverpool is in dire straits in the attack, it's evident. They have a world class talent in Suarez and then nothing. Teams can scheme against this, and no matter how good Suarez is, he needs an attack partner in some fashion, be it someone who plays up top with him, or attacking wingers that can break down defenses, etc.. And, as much as I dislike Suarez, he is a polished enough player that I think he could play fine with another 'selfish' striker such as Sturridge - and to be honest, I don't necessarily think defining Sturridge as selfish is necessarily fair, as he is only 22 years old and can certainly change his play to the team/situation he is around. It just seems to me in the appearances I have seen him play at Chelsea, that he's been under a great deal of pressure to perform (read, score) as it may have been AVB's job/#### on the line for starting him, or he gets subbed in late for a usually ineffective Torres. In my eyes, Sturridge is a nice player and I think he can fit in very well with another striker in a 4-4-2 type lineup.Chelsea also made a very nice signing on a guy I was crossing my fingers that United would get in Daniel Sturridge. He may not be an impact player next year, but at only 19 years old, he is extremely talented.

I'm not sure that's saying much. Liverpool has spent a small fortune to buy a lot of mediocre talent. This really just seems like a step in that same direction.He's an upgrade over BoriniRodgers has worked pretty hard to move Liverpool out of the 4-4-2. The idea that he would backtrack on that to try and fit one player in really doesn't make sense.I suspect Sturridge will slot in on the right (as he did at Chelsea) in place of Sterling in the 4-3-3. The problem with Sturridge in that position at Chelsea wasn't a lack of goals, but his entire disregard for his defensive responsibilities.I don't think his work rate will actually fit well with the way Rodgers plays. As much as I dislike Suarez, he does bring a high work rate in addition to his other attributes.As someone who's been banging the Sturridge drum for years now, I think he would be fine in Liverpool.I respect Ramseybang's opinions, but I think he's incorrect in this regard. In my eyes, you put the talent together and try to make it work, if it doesn't work, you try adjusting to see what does work. I seem to recall a number of posters saying that RvP and Rooney would have a difficult time gelling too - and it seems they've worked together quite fantastically (biased opinion).Sturridge to me passes the eye test in that he has world class talent. It just seems to me that it's been a matter of circumstance that he hasn't shown how good he can be. He came up with City at a time where the stars there were Ireland, Micah Richards, amongst others, and was poised to be their next big thing...and then, whammo, team is bought by richest owners in the world and they decide it would be quicker and easier to just buy Tevez, Arguero, Balotteli, Dzeko, Adebayor, and so on and so on. Well, obviously these guys would favor first team treatment so he is bought by Chelsea. Too young probably to play on a CL level, he is then buried by coaching turmoil/rollover, and of course more big name stars brought in Torres, Hazard, types. So he has a hard time getting a sniff, and when he is thrown on the field, he's pretty much asked to be the danger man, the scorer, so he does what he can.Now, Liverpool is in dire straits in the attack, it's evident. They have a world class talent in Suarez and then nothing. Teams can scheme against this, and no matter how good Suarez is, he needs an attack partner in some fashion, be it someone who plays up top with him, or attacking wingers that can break down defenses, etc.. And, as much as I dislike Suarez, he is a polished enough player that I think he could play fine with another 'selfish' striker such as Sturridge - and to be honest, I don't necessarily think defining Sturridge as selfish is necessarily fair, as he is only 22 years old and can certainly change his play to the team/situation he is around. It just seems to me in the appearances I have seen him play at Chelsea, that he's been under a great deal of pressure to perform (read, score) as it may have been AVB's job/#### on the line for starting him, or he gets subbed in late for a usually ineffective Torres. In my eyes, Sturridge is a nice player and I think he can fit in very well with another striker in a 4-4-2 type lineup.Chelsea also made a very nice signing on a guy I was crossing my fingers that United would get in Daniel Sturridge. He may not be an impact player next year, but at only 19 years old, he is extremely talented.![]()
John Doyle?You're not thinking LHucksy enough.'NewlyRetired said:I can't guess who the other player is in terms of unlocking opponents. Cletus, Dempsey and Donovan all had/have this skill but I would not have put any of them above Reyna. If it was not Obie, who am I forgetting?
You're right about the 4-3-3, but this is where I think we differ: I don't think he'll be out wide, but in the middle up top. The very fluid wingers Rodgers uses means playing left and right wings during the game. Sturridge making runs with Suarez and Steriling behind him makes a lot of sense to me. The last time Suarez had a decent forward in front of him was when he had Hunelaar at Ajax. He put up 22 goals and 15 assists that year in league play and 28/19 overall.Rodgers has worked pretty hard to move Liverpool out of the 4-4-2. The idea that he would backtrack on that to try and fit one player in really doesn't make sense.
I suspect Sturridge will slot in on the right (as he did at Chelsea) in place of Sterling in the 4-3-3. The problem with Sturridge in that position at Chelsea wasn't a lack of goals, but his entire disregard for his defensive responsibilities.
I don't think his work rate will actually fit well with the way Rodgers plays. As much as I dislike Suarez, he does bring a high work rate in addition to his other attributes.
It's relatively difficult to play an effective 4-4-2 when you have only one strikerFurther, Liverpool has about 15 midfielders on their roster.And again, you're judging Sturridge's workrate from a few games you've seen him play at Chelsea? Players can change, young players can certainly adjust their game. And sure Sturridge probably lacks defensively - as do most younger players, you don't often see Chicharito or Welbeck tracking back defensively. With Liverpool having Lucas back in the fold, they have a lot of flexibility in my eyes. Gerrard has looked like a fish out of water. And they have young options that can play attacking wingers.I'm not going to say Sturridge is a world beater, I just think the guy has a lot of untapped talent and lots of people are making sweeping generalizations against him in a very small sample size.Rodgers has worked pretty hard to move Liverpool out of the 4-4-2. The idea that he would backtrack on that to try and fit one player in really doesn't make sense.I suspect Sturridge will slot in on the right (as he did at Chelsea) in place of Sterling in the 4-3-3. The problem with Sturridge in that position at Chelsea wasn't a lack of goals, but his entire disregard for his defensive responsibilities.I don't think his work rate will actually fit well with the way Rodgers plays. As much as I dislike Suarez, he does bring a high work rate in addition to his other attributes.