NFL taking note of growing soccer popularity....Philadelphia Eagles @Eagles
Hey, @PhilaUnion: You take care of Seattle tonight, we'll return the favor in December. #USOC2014 #BrotherlyLove
NFL taking note of growing soccer popularity....Philadelphia Eagles @Eagles
Hey, @PhilaUnion: You take care of Seattle tonight, we'll return the favor in December. #USOC2014 #BrotherlyLove
Make sure you teach him not to light fire works in the house...
Seriously.your conversion to the dark side is almost complete.
Seattle gets the first jewel in their possible treble this year, which has never been done.Martins gets on the end of a deep ball and squeezes one between a defender and the keeper. 3-1 with 5 minutes remaining.
I don't even want to think what that game would have looked like if Reus was healthy.Ugly today. Hoped for more but the quick goals from Dortmund were too much. They were clearly the better team today. Sucks to start with a loss in the group stage, but this is the toughest game of the group stage.
Score could've been much worse.
Mkhitaryan (I'm not even gonna try to look up how to spell that) could've have 3-4 if he could've finished.
Dortmund were missing five startersI don't even want to think what that game would have looked like if Reus was healthy.Ugly today. Hoped for more but the quick goals from Dortmund were too much. They were clearly the better team today. Sucks to start with a loss in the group stage, but this is the toughest game of the group stage.
Score could've been much worse.
Mkhitaryan (I'm not even gonna try to look up how to spell that) could've have 3-4 if he could've finished.
Portland is in pretty good shape too, after beating Olympia 4-2 at home. Assuming they take care of business against possibly the worst team in the tournament next week, they'll advance with a one goal loss or better in their last game.Nice win by DC tonight down in Jamaica and the 3 points almost assures them of advancing to the CCL quarter finals.
They need 1 point in their last 2 games and both games are against the worst team in the group.
Yeah, Portland is in a nice spot. If they can pound Alpha by 4 at home (Olimpia beat them by 6), I think Portland could lose by 2 in Honduras and still advance.Portland is in pretty good shape too, after beating Olympia 4-2 at home. Assuming they take care of business against possibly the worst team in the tournament next week, they'll advance with a one goal loss or better in their last game.Nice win by DC tonight down in Jamaica and the 3 points almost assures them of advancing to the CCL quarter finals.
They need 1 point in their last 2 games and both games are against the worst team in the group.
The catch? That game is in Honduras on the Tuesday before the final week of the MLS regular season. If the Timbers are still fighting for that fifth playoff spot, I have to wonder what kind of team Porter brings to that one.
Well, they're in 4th place in the Eastern ConferenceI honestly can't make heads or tails of the BullStars.
They'll play the ball around for 20 minutes with some class like they're Arsenal, not score and then give up a cheapish goal... well... like they're Arsenal.
They're Arsenal. Minus qualifying for things.
Wouldn't a treble have to include a CCL title?Seattle gets the first jewel in their possible treble this year, which has never been done.Martins gets on the end of a deep ball and squeezes one between a defender and the keeper. 3-1 with 5 minutes remaining.
The already have the US Open Cup trophy now and they are well out in front of the Supporters Shield race. They have always had problems in the playoffs though so MLS Cup will be the hardest of the 3.
At worst now, they are assured of the CCL spot and now second place in the Supporters Shield becomes much more important as if Seattle wins the shield, I believe second place gets the CCL spot.
domestic trebleWouldn't a treble have to include a CCL title?Seattle gets the first jewel in their possible treble this year, which has never been done.Martins gets on the end of a deep ball and squeezes one between a defender and the keeper. 3-1 with 5 minutes remaining.
The already have the US Open Cup trophy now and they are well out in front of the Supporters Shield race. They have always had problems in the playoffs though so MLS Cup will be the hardest of the 3.
At worst now, they are assured of the CCL spot and now second place in the Supporters Shield becomes much more important as if Seattle wins the shield, I believe second place gets the CCL spot.
Right.domestic trebleWouldn't a treble have to include a CCL title?Seattle gets the first jewel in their possible treble this year, which has never been done.The already have the US Open Cup trophy now and they are well out in front of the Supporters Shield race. They have always had problems in the playoffs though so MLS Cup will be the hardest of the 3.Martins gets on the end of a deep ball and squeezes one between a defender and the keeper. 3-1 with 5 minutes remaining.
At worst now, they are assured of the CCL spot and now second place in the Supporters Shield becomes much more important as if Seattle wins the shield, I believe second place gets the CCL spot.
Just doesn't have the same sense of accomplishment as Euro Trebles that include CL. Supporters shield even matter? It's just a glorified #1 seed for the playoffs, right?Right.domestic trebleWouldn't a treble have to include a CCL title?Seattle gets the first jewel in their possible treble this year, which has never been done.The already have the US Open Cup trophy now and they are well out in front of the Supporters Shield race. They have always had problems in the playoffs though so MLS Cup will be the hardest of the 3.Martins gets on the end of a deep ball and squeezes one between a defender and the keeper. 3-1 with 5 minutes remaining.
At worst now, they are assured of the CCL spot and now second place in the Supporters Shield becomes much more important as if Seattle wins the shield, I believe second place gets the CCL spot.
I am unsure what to call a 4 trophy year but seeing as that is likely never to happen in MLS in my lifetime I am not too worried about it![]()
Other than Bayern last year, does anyone else play a 4-1-4-1 regularly? I'd like to see what it looks like when it works.God Arsenal look feeble right now. I really don't understand what Wenger is trying to do with this 4-1-4-1 scheme, but it seems very ill-suited to his players. Frustrating.
I don't know, but what it seems to do is utterly expose the weakest parts of the squad right now, especially our DM's who aren't exactly athletic dynamos at this point in their careers, not to mention watering down the central midfield play. Only Wilshere is doing well in this system. I just don't get it.Other than Bayern last year, does anyone else play a 4-1-4-1 regularly? I'd like to see what it looks like when it works.God Arsenal look feeble right now. I really don't understand what Wenger is trying to do with this 4-1-4-1 scheme, but it seems very ill-suited to his players. Frustrating.
Even Pep took some criticism for it last year and he had Schweinsteiger, Kroos and Lahm instead of Arteta and Flamini.
The Supporters Shield winner gets a CCL spot as well as the #1 seed to the playoffs.Just doesn't have the same sense of accomplishment as Euro Trebles that include CL. Supporters shield even matter? It's just a glorified #1 seed for the playoffs, right?Right.domestic trebleWouldn't a treble have to include a CCL title?Seattle gets the first jewel in their possible treble this year, which has never been done.The already have the US Open Cup trophy now and they are well out in front of the Supporters Shield race. They have always had problems in the playoffs though so MLS Cup will be the hardest of the 3.Martins gets on the end of a deep ball and squeezes one between a defender and the keeper. 3-1 with 5 minutes remaining.
At worst now, they are assured of the CCL spot and now second place in the Supporters Shield becomes much more important as if Seattle wins the shield, I believe second place gets the CCL spot.
I am unsure what to call a 4 trophy year but seeing as that is likely never to happen in MLS in my lifetime I am not too worried about it![]()
I think an MLS team can win the CCL in the next 5-10yrs. And if they're good enough to do that...
Those things were horribleAlso :X at those Arsenal uniforms today.
Youse guys against them just because they're a different color than normal, or what? I thought they looked pretty sharp.Those things were horribleAlso :X at those Arsenal uniforms today.
It was the diagonal stripe things that soured me on them.Youse guys against them just because they're a different color than normal, or what? I thought they looked pretty sharp.Those things were horribleAlso :X at those Arsenal uniforms today.![]()
I thought they looked pretty good. Now, Puma's decision to fit them around the body type of an 8 year old boy, well that's something altogether different. Holy nipples, Batman!It was the diagonal stripe things that soured me on them.Youse guys against them just because they're a different color than normal, or what? I thought they looked pretty sharp.Those things were horribleAlso :X at those Arsenal uniforms today.![]()
Future Bayern players?Dortmunds fast break is incredible. Multiple players with incredible speed on the dribble.
If you asked all the MLS coaches if they'd rather win the shield or the open cup, at least 18 of them would probably pick the shield.Just doesn't have the same sense of accomplishment as Euro Trebles that include CL. Supporters shield even matter? It's just a glorified #1 seed for the playoffs, right?Right.I am unsure what to call a 4 trophy year but seeing as that is likely never to happen in MLS in my lifetime I am not too worried about itdomestic trebleWouldn't a treble have to include a CCL title?Seattle gets the first jewel in their possible treble this year, which has never been done.The already have the US Open Cup trophy now and they are well out in front of the Supporters Shield race. They have always had problems in the playoffs though so MLS Cup will be the hardest of the 3.Martins gets on the end of a deep ball and squeezes one between a defender and the keeper. 3-1 with 5 minutes remaining.
At worst now, they are assured of the CCL spot and now second place in the Supporters Shield becomes much more important as if Seattle wins the shield, I believe second place gets the CCL spot.![]()
I think an MLS team can win the CCL in the next 5-10yrs. And if they're good enough to do that...
yup. The Supporters Shield is a fantastic accomplishment and carries a lot of weight in the league.If you asked all the MLS coaches if they'd rather win the shield or the open cup, at least 18 of them would probably pick the shield.Just doesn't have the same sense of accomplishment as Euro Trebles that include CL. Supporters shield even matter? It's just a glorified #1 seed for the playoffs, right?Right.I am unsure what to call a 4 trophy year but seeing as that is likely never to happen in MLS in my lifetime I am not too worried about itdomestic trebleWouldn't a treble have to include a CCL title?Seattle gets the first jewel in their possible treble this year, which has never been done.The already have the US Open Cup trophy now and they are well out in front of the Supporters Shield race. They have always had problems in the playoffs though so MLS Cup will be the hardest of the 3.Martins gets on the end of a deep ball and squeezes one between a defender and the keeper. 3-1 with 5 minutes remaining.
At worst now, they are assured of the CCL spot and now second place in the Supporters Shield becomes much more important as if Seattle wins the shield, I believe second place gets the CCL spot.![]()
I think an MLS team can win the CCL in the next 5-10yrs. And if they're good enough to do that...
What's more important to England...the strength of the Premier League, or the strength of the National team? Restricting the available players for the EPL just seems short-sighted.I guess we knew this was coming but this is the first I have seen with some details. This will likely lead to less opportunities in the EPL for American players
====================================
A report in The Times has revealed that English FA chairman Greg Dyke plans to completely redo the rules on work permits for players from non-European Union countries.
The plans, the report states, would slash the amount of players in the Premier League from non-EU countries by a massive 50%, and would eliminate them from the lower leagues entirely.
Dyke would plan to, among other things, restrict visa applicants to those in the top 70 FIFA-ranked countries, and institute a minimum transfer fee (thought to be between $16-24 million) that would enable a player from any country to bypass the system and come through to a team.
He believes that the number of “mediocre” players from abroad is restricting young English talent from being developed properly, a potential cause of the downturn the country’s national team has taken.
Dyke revealed in May that of the 122 non-EU players who had come to England since 2009, 79% were denied upon first entry but were allowed in on the appeals process.
These new rules would seriously hinder the ability of a player from the United States to make his way over to the Premier League without dual citizenship of an EU country. With the current rules, we saw Stoke City fail in their attempts to bring young Juan Agudelo to England’s top flight, as the club believed he fit the criteria but they were unable to secure a work permit for him.
The report states Dyke is hopeful his new rules would be streamlined through to be implemented at the start of next season. It’s unclear whether current players would be grandfathered in, or if they would have to reapply for a work permit.
This is a common knee-jerk that happens every time a national team disappoints in a tournament, and there's no right answer or known solution. When a team underperforms, there will be a faction that says more young players need to get out of the country and play abroad, and there will be an equal faction that says the national league has too many foreigners stunting the growth of the nation's youth. If England wants better English players, they need to invest money and resources in youth development, like Germany did 10-15 years ago and Belgium has done more recently.What's more important to England...the strength of the Premier League, or the strength of the National team? Restricting the available players for the EPL just seems short-sighted.I guess we knew this was coming but this is the first I have seen with some details. This will likely lead to less opportunities in the EPL for American players
====================================
A report in The Times has revealed that English FA chairman Greg Dyke plans to completely redo the rules on work permits for players from non-European Union countries.
The plans, the report states, would slash the amount of players in the Premier League from non-EU countries by a massive 50%, and would eliminate them from the lower leagues entirely.
Dyke would plan to, among other things, restrict visa applicants to those in the top 70 FIFA-ranked countries, and institute a minimum transfer fee (thought to be between $16-24 million) that would enable a player from any country to bypass the system and come through to a team.
He believes that the number of “mediocre” players from abroad is restricting young English talent from being developed properly, a potential cause of the downturn the country’s national team has taken.
Dyke revealed in May that of the 122 non-EU players who had come to England since 2009, 79% were denied upon first entry but were allowed in on the appeals process.
These new rules would seriously hinder the ability of a player from the United States to make his way over to the Premier League without dual citizenship of an EU country. With the current rules, we saw Stoke City fail in their attempts to bring young Juan Agudelo to England’s top flight, as the club believed he fit the criteria but they were unable to secure a work permit for him.
The report states Dyke is hopeful his new rules would be streamlined through to be implemented at the start of next season. It’s unclear whether current players would be grandfathered in, or if they would have to reapply for a work permit.
The FA and the Premier League are not one and the same. They've had numerous commercial disputes in the past. I doubt Dyke's proposal will go through unchallenged.What's more important to England...the strength of the Premier League, or the strength of the National team? Restricting the available players for the EPL just seems short-sighted.I guess we knew this was coming but this is the first I have seen with some details. This will likely lead to less opportunities in the EPL for American players
====================================
A report in The Times has revealed that English FA chairman Greg Dyke plans to completely redo the rules on work permits for players from non-European Union countries.
The plans, the report states, would slash the amount of players in the Premier League from non-EU countries by a massive 50%, and would eliminate them from the lower leagues entirely.
Dyke would plan to, among other things, restrict visa applicants to those in the top 70 FIFA-ranked countries, and institute a minimum transfer fee (thought to be between $16-24 million) that would enable a player from any country to bypass the system and come through to a team.
He believes that the number of “mediocre” players from abroad is restricting young English talent from being developed properly, a potential cause of the downturn the country’s national team has taken.
Dyke revealed in May that of the 122 non-EU players who had come to England since 2009, 79% were denied upon first entry but were allowed in on the appeals process.
These new rules would seriously hinder the ability of a player from the United States to make his way over to the Premier League without dual citizenship of an EU country. With the current rules, we saw Stoke City fail in their attempts to bring young Juan Agudelo to England’s top flight, as the club believed he fit the criteria but they were unable to secure a work permit for him.
The report states Dyke is hopeful his new rules would be streamlined through to be implemented at the start of next season. It’s unclear whether current players would be grandfathered in, or if they would have to reapply for a work permit.
They are not really restricting many players from the PL - really only Americans. Europeans get a pass, and this may make it easier for South Americans who could not meet the 75% threshold who can now be bought for enough money to get in. Probably hurts a few African nationals too - not sure where they rank, but I imagine a number of African nations will be below the top-70.What's more important to England...the strength of the Premier League, or the strength of the National team? Restricting the available players for the EPL just seems short-sighted.I guess we knew this was coming but this is the first I have seen with some details. This will likely lead to less opportunities in the EPL for American players
====================================
A report in The Times has revealed that English FA chairman Greg Dyke plans to completely redo the rules on work permits for players from non-European Union countries.
The plans, the report states, would slash the amount of players in the Premier League from non-EU countries by a massive 50%, and would eliminate them from the lower leagues entirely.
Dyke would plan to, among other things, restrict visa applicants to those in the top 70 FIFA-ranked countries, and institute a minimum transfer fee (thought to be between $16-24 million) that would enable a player from any country to bypass the system and come through to a team.
He believes that the number of “mediocre” players from abroad is restricting young English talent from being developed properly, a potential cause of the downturn the country’s national team has taken.
Dyke revealed in May that of the 122 non-EU players who had come to England since 2009, 79% were denied upon first entry but were allowed in on the appeals process.
These new rules would seriously hinder the ability of a player from the United States to make his way over to the Premier League without dual citizenship of an EU country. With the current rules, we saw Stoke City fail in their attempts to bring young Juan Agudelo to England’s top flight, as the club believed he fit the criteria but they were unable to secure a work permit for him.
The report states Dyke is hopeful his new rules would be streamlined through to be implemented at the start of next season. It’s unclear whether current players would be grandfathered in, or if they would have to reapply for a work permit.
This would hurt CONCACAF, Africa and Asian opportunities mostly since those regions EPL teams are much less likely to dump $20m on for a transfer fee for a speculation.They are not really restricting many players from the PL - really only Americans. Europeans get a pass, and this may make it easier for South Americans who could not meet the 75% threshold who can now be bought for enough money to get in. Probably hurts a few African nationals too - not sure where they rank, but I imagine a number of African nations will be below the top-70.What's more important to England...the strength of the Premier League, or the strength of the National team? Restricting the available players for the EPL just seems short-sighted.I guess we knew this was coming but this is the first I have seen with some details. This will likely lead to less opportunities in the EPL for American players
====================================
A report in The Times has revealed that English FA chairman Greg Dyke plans to completely redo the rules on work permits for players from non-European Union countries.
The plans, the report states, would slash the amount of players in the Premier League from non-EU countries by a massive 50%, and would eliminate them from the lower leagues entirely.
Dyke would plan to, among other things, restrict visa applicants to those in the top 70 FIFA-ranked countries, and institute a minimum transfer fee (thought to be between $16-24 million) that would enable a player from any country to bypass the system and come through to a team.
He believes that the number of “mediocre” players from abroad is restricting young English talent from being developed properly, a potential cause of the downturn the country’s national team has taken.
Dyke revealed in May that of the 122 non-EU players who had come to England since 2009, 79% were denied upon first entry but were allowed in on the appeals process.
These new rules would seriously hinder the ability of a player from the United States to make his way over to the Premier League without dual citizenship of an EU country. With the current rules, we saw Stoke City fail in their attempts to bring young Juan Agudelo to England’s top flight, as the club believed he fit the criteria but they were unable to secure a work permit for him.
The report states Dyke is hopeful his new rules would be streamlined through to be implemented at the start of next season. It’s unclear whether current players would be grandfathered in, or if they would have to reapply for a work permit.
Top-70 has no impact on the US - a $16-24M price tag has a significant impact...particularly since one of the brightest young stars just sold for $5M.I don't think the FIFA top 70 restriction has any relevance to US players but it would certainly affect the odd talent from African, Asian and Central American minnow country. The threat to eliminate non-EU players from the lower divisions is a far bigger change to the balance of power.
It would also really increase the degree of difficulty in Football Manager.