The Gator
Footballguy
Yah, it looked really bad live..but anytime the defender gets the ball first...it's tough to giveNot a pk to meWhere does Sterling's shout rate?Yeah- that Kane PK was less deserved than the 2nd PK call for the Saints today.
Yah, it looked really bad live..but anytime the defender gets the ball first...it's tough to giveNot a pk to meWhere does Sterling's shout rate?Yeah- that Kane PK was less deserved than the 2nd PK call for the Saints today.
How dare you call into question the Robbies...............The Mignolet no-call was analyzed poorly by the nbc crew. There simply wasn't a good angle to see where Migs was when the ball hit him. The camera was behind the line, not looking directly down the line. It's like a goal line cam in football 5 yards away from the goal line being used to make a decision.
Bad idea. I had no idea that was even a rule when the play happened.I didn't see it, but I trust shader
The players remain unified, at least publicly, that they won't be "bought" with salary to compromise free agency, which is what I always hoped would be the compromise.A league source who asked not to be identified indicated that MLS and its owners remain staunchly opposed to any kind of internal free agency. In addition to controlling costs, there is a desire on the part of MLS to protect the single entity system upon which it is based. Instead, the source highlighted that MLS intends to offer the union significant increases in both the salary cap and minimum salaries.
I don't know what camera angle you were looking at, but he was over the line by at least a yard.The Mignolet thing... too bang-bang and too close to call without a better angle.
First glance from live tv view sure as #### looked like he was outside the box though.
WTF is that all about? Color me confused.Looks like Asia is trying to figure out how to kick Australia out of the AFC.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/01/30/uk-soccer-asia-president-australia-idUKKBN0L308I20150130
A yard isn't much when you are on the other side of the field and the penalty is a redcard. I'm sure one day soccer will go to instant replay, but for now judgment calls seem to be a big part of it, and that just wasn't clear enough to warrant that big of a penalty, imo.jonessed said:I don't know what camera angle you were looking at, but he was over the line by at least a yard.El Floppo said:The Mignolet thing... too bang-bang and too close to call without a better angle.
First glance from live tv view sure as #### looked like he was outside the box though.
ooofChelsea appealed in the 43rd minute when Costa collapsed in the box following contact from Jason Shackell. Mourinho, who claims his striker gets a raw deal from officials, threw his arms to the skies in supposed disbelief when the referee waved play on, but the decision seemed fair – Shackell’s hands did touch Costa but it was hardly the sort of shove that would, for example, prevent a commuter from boarding a train.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$WTF is that all about? Color me confused.Looks like Asia is trying to figure out how to kick Australia out of the AFC.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/01/30/uk-soccer-asia-president-australia-idUKKBN0L308I20150130
I think he meant the angle for the linesman. When I saw the replay, it looks like the linesman is running down the sideline to get inline with the 18yard box, but he's about 5 yards off. Tough for him to make the call that he was definitely outside, especially since Mignolet was running, jumping, and was in the air when the ball struck his arm.jonessed said:I don't know what camera angle you were looking at, but he was over the line by at least a yard.El Floppo said:The Mignolet thing... too bang-bang and too close to call without a better angle.
First glance from live tv view sure as #### looked like he was outside the box though.
PhotoI think he meant the angle for the linesman. When I saw the replay, it looks like the linesman is running down the sideline to get inline with the 18yard box, but he's about 5 yards off. Tough for him to make the call that he was definitely outside, especially since Mignolet was running, jumping, and was in the air when the ball struck his arm.jonessed said:I don't know what camera angle you were looking at, but he was over the line by at least a yard.El Floppo said:The Mignolet thing... too bang-bang and too close to call without a better angle.
First glance from live tv view sure as #### looked like he was outside the box though.
Arsenal 76.2%United 53.4%Liverpool 32.7%Soton 21.8%Tottenham 14.0%West Ham 1.2%Swansea 0.3%Stoke 0.2%Newcastle 0.1%Everton 0.1%
yeah- that was my point.A yard isn't much when you are on the other side of the field and the penalty is a redcard. I'm sure one day soccer will go to instant replay, but for now judgment calls seem to be a big part of it, and that just wasn't clear enough to warrant that big of a penalty, imo.jonessed said:I don't know what camera angle you were looking at, but he was over the line by at least a yard.El Floppo said:The Mignolet thing... too bang-bang and too close to call without a better angle.
First glance from live tv view sure as #### looked like he was outside the box though.
that's even closer than I imagined.PhotoI think he meant the angle for the linesman. When I saw the replay, it looks like the linesman is running down the sideline to get inline with the 18yard box, but he's about 5 yards off. Tough for him to make the call that he was definitely outside, especially since Mignolet was running, jumping, and was in the air when the ball struck his arm.jonessed said:I don't know what camera angle you were looking at, but he was over the line by at least a yard.El Floppo said:The Mignolet thing... too bang-bang and too close to call without a better angle.
First glance from live tv view sure as #### looked like he was outside the box though.
I don't follow the "letter of the law" with my interpretation of handball... I use what seems right to me. IMO, if your arms are out and in an unnatural position- handball. I don't buy the hand to ball or intent nonsense. it is a fine line between "out" and close to your body though... so it's often a tough/subjective call. but the amount of times a guy will actually reach their hand to ball are next to none- unless it's u8 or it's Henry.I don't think he knew anything about the handle either way. The ball bounced at a sharp angle and came off his chest in a hurry. His arm was out as part of the jump, but IMO he never made a move to play it. YMMV
Europe most likely - assuming CONCACAF (USA) went with Europe.Wonder who South America would side with if there was a meaningful Europe vs Africa/Asia split in FIFA?
Yeah, that's what I thought. Tough for the lines man to know with 100% certainty that he was outside.PhotoI think he meant the angle for the linesman. When I saw the replay, it looks like the linesman is running down the sideline to get inline with the 18yard box, but he's about 5 yards off. Tough for him to make the call that he was definitely outside, especially since Mignolet was running, jumping, and was in the air when the ball struck his arm.jonessed said:I don't know what camera angle you were looking at, but he was over the line by at least a yard.El Floppo said:The Mignolet thing... too bang-bang and too close to call without a better angle.
First glance from live tv view sure as #### looked like he was outside the box though.
I wouldn't be so sure on that...if memory serves Brazil and Argentina were two of the FAs behind the whole Russia/Qatar nonsense and much of CONCACAF was as well (we seem to forget how many minnows our region really has). I think the breakdown is something like Western Europe, Canada, US, Jordan, Aussie, Japan, and maybe China versus everyone else.Europe most likely - assuming CONCACAF (USA) went with Europe.Wonder who South America would side with if there was a meaningful Europe vs Africa/Asia split in FIFA?
I know Asia is a growing market, but I have to think the money is far better in a European/American confederation.
lol @ the Guardian:
ooofChelsea appealed in the 43rd minute when Costa collapsed in the box following contact from Jason Shackell. Mourinho, who claims his striker gets a raw deal from officials, threw his arms to the skies in supposed disbelief when the referee waved play on, but the decision seemed fair – Shackell’s hands did touch Costa but it was hardly the sort of shove that would, for example, prevent a commuter from boarding a train.
lol @ the Guardian:
ooofChelsea appealed in the 43rd minute when Costa collapsed in the box following contact from Jason Shackell. Mourinho, who claims his striker gets a raw deal from officials, threw his arms to the skies in supposed disbelief when the referee waved play on, but the decision seemed fair – Shackell’s hands did touch Costa but it was hardly the sort of shove that would, for example, prevent a commuter from boarding a train.![]()
![]()
![]()

West Ham supporters getting in on the fun.lol @ the Guardian:
ooofChelsea appealed in the 43rd minute when Costa collapsed in the box following contact from Jason Shackell. Mourinho, who claims his striker gets a raw deal from officials, threw his arms to the skies in supposed disbelief when the referee waved play on, but the decision seemed fair – Shackell’s hands did touch Costa but it was hardly the sort of shove that would, for example, prevent a commuter from boarding a train.
They'll start clicking about the same time as last season, December
lol @ the Guardian:
ooofChelsea appealed in the 43rd minute when Costa collapsed in the box following contact from Jason Shackell. Mourinho, who claims his striker gets a raw deal from officials, threw his arms to the skies in supposed disbelief when the referee waved play on, but the decision seemed fair – Shackell’s hands did touch Costa but it was hardly the sort of shove that would, for example, prevent a commuter from boarding a train.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8627/16615040032_44f276f61e_o.gifdidn't mention it earlier... that Coutinho goal was pretty amazing. the real difference between the two teams- you make a tiny mistake in your marking and Liverpool have enough guys with the quality to destroy you at least once. Saints had some similar chances but flubbed their last ball every time.
I agree with this completely. Most handballs are not intentional. If your arm is out then its a handball. Also, if you are a keeper and making yourself bigger to cut down the angle to the goal and your arms are outstretched the "did not intend" goes out the window for me as well. You actually intended to by making yourself bigger. Just my thought really.I don't follow the "letter of the law" with my interpretation of handball... I use what seems right to me. IMO, if your arms are out and in an unnatural position- handball. I don't buy the hand to ball or intent nonsense. it is a fine line between "out" and close to your body though... so it's often a tough/subjective call. but the amount of times a guy will actually reach their hand to ball are next to none- unless it's u8 or it's Henry.I don't think he knew anything about the handle either way. The ball bounced at a sharp angle and came off his chest in a hurry. His arm was out as part of the jump, but IMO he never made a move to play it. YMMV
eta: so with that Mignolet play- he had his arms extended to catch at first, and they were still there when the bounce happens off his chest. to me, hand ball.
Happy to see Herrera back on and Rooney up top. RVP and Falaco play the same role, Rooney at least changes it up. All Fellaini does is foul people and play a tree. He cant win a header against smaller people and his movement is less then everyone else.
I don't think there's an issue in this case whether or not it was a handball. The ball hits his hand. The issue with this instance was that the linesman wasn't in a position where he could with certainty say Migs was inside his 18yd box, or a foot or so outside.I agree with this completely. Most handballs are not intentional. If your arm is out then its a handball. Also, if you are a keeper and making yourself bigger to cut down the angle to the goal and your arms are outstretched the "did not intend" goes out the window for me as well. You actually intended to by making yourself bigger. Just my thought really.I don't follow the "letter of the law" with my interpretation of handball... I use what seems right to me. IMO, if your arms are out and in an unnatural position- handball. I don't buy the hand to ball or intent nonsense. it is a fine line between "out" and close to your body though... so it's often a tough/subjective call. but the amount of times a guy will actually reach their hand to ball are next to none- unless it's u8 or it's Henry.I don't think he knew anything about the handle either way. The ball bounced at a sharp angle and came off his chest in a hurry. His arm was out as part of the jump, but IMO he never made a move to play it. YMMV
eta: so with that Mignolet play- he had his arms extended to catch at first, and they were still there when the bounce happens off his chest. to me, hand ball.
And in the replays I saw last night I do not see where it hit mignolet's chest. I saw his arm come down and the ball hit his hand. Did I miss the chest part (not that it matters, he stopped a goal scoring opp with his had out of the box).
I think what bothers me most about handballs are they have become like a catch in the NFL. Noone really seems to know what the rule is anymore. And each ref calls it different. There is no consistency from Ref to ref. Handball should be the easiest to call. Did it hit the hand or arm? Was the hand/arm away from his body? For Keepers is he out of his box? If any of them are a no, its not a handball.
I was referencing the blowed up bit above.I don't think there's an issue in this case whether or not it was a handball. The ball hits his hand. The issue with this instance was that the linesman wasn't in a position where he could with certainty say Migs was inside his 18yd box, or a foot or so outside.I agree with this completely. Most handballs are not intentional. If your arm is out then its a handball. Also, if you are a keeper and making yourself bigger to cut down the angle to the goal and your arms are outstretched the "did not intend" goes out the window for me as well. You actually intended to by making yourself bigger. Just my thought really.I don't follow the "letter of the law" with my interpretation of handball... I use what seems right to me. IMO, if your arms are out and in an unnatural position- handball. I don't buy the hand to ball or intent nonsense. it is a fine line between "out" and close to your body though... so it's often a tough/subjective call. but the amount of times a guy will actually reach their hand to ball are next to none- unless it's u8 or it's Henry.I don't think he knew anything about the handle either way. The ball bounced at a sharp angle and came off his chest in a hurry. His arm was out as part of the jump, but IMO he never made a move to play it. YMMV
eta: so with that Mignolet play- he had his arms extended to catch at first, and they were still there when the bounce happens off his chest. to me, hand ball.
And in the replays I saw last night I do not see where it hit mignolet's chest. I saw his arm come down and the ball hit his hand. Did I miss the chest part (not that it matters, he stopped a goal scoring opp with his had out of the box).
I think what bothers me most about handballs are they have become like a catch in the NFL. Noone really seems to know what the rule is anymore. And each ref calls it different. There is no consistency from Ref to ref. Handball should be the easiest to call. Did it hit the hand or arm? Was the hand/arm away from his body? For Keepers is he out of his box? If any of them are a no, its not a handball.
ETA: Screenshot that jaysus posted up-thread: https://nbcprosoccertalk.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-22-at-6-52-09-pm-e1424649232633.png
gotchaI was referencing the blowed up bit above.I don't think there's an issue in this case whether or not it was a handball. The ball hits his hand. The issue with this instance was that the linesman wasn't in a position where he could with certainty say Migs was inside his 18yd box, or a foot or so outside.I agree with this completely. Most handballs are not intentional. If your arm is out then its a handball. Also, if you are a keeper and making yourself bigger to cut down the angle to the goal and your arms are outstretched the "did not intend" goes out the window for me as well. You actually intended to by making yourself bigger. Just my thought really.I don't follow the "letter of the law" with my interpretation of handball... I use what seems right to me. IMO, if your arms are out and in an unnatural position- handball. I don't buy the hand to ball or intent nonsense. it is a fine line between "out" and close to your body though... so it's often a tough/subjective call. but the amount of times a guy will actually reach their hand to ball are next to none- unless it's u8 or it's Henry.I don't think he knew anything about the handle either way. The ball bounced at a sharp angle and came off his chest in a hurry. His arm was out as part of the jump, but IMO he never made a move to play it. YMMV
eta: so with that Mignolet play- he had his arms extended to catch at first, and they were still there when the bounce happens off his chest. to me, hand ball.
And in the replays I saw last night I do not see where it hit mignolet's chest. I saw his arm come down and the ball hit his hand. Did I miss the chest part (not that it matters, he stopped a goal scoring opp with his had out of the box).
I think what bothers me most about handballs are they have become like a catch in the NFL. Noone really seems to know what the rule is anymore. And each ref calls it different. There is no consistency from Ref to ref. Handball should be the easiest to call. Did it hit the hand or arm? Was the hand/arm away from his body? For Keepers is he out of his box? If any of them are a no, its not a handball.
ETA: Screenshot that jaysus posted up-thread: https://nbcprosoccertalk.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-22-at-6-52-09-pm-e1424649232633.png
certainty from linesman and/or ref is another issue.