So I talked to a few brits about the next eng manager, and they all thought big Sam would be the name called, not JK.
When asked about their impression of JK, they felt he was "a winner, with good history". I asked if they had any sense of his style of play or tactics as a manager, and they thought he'd bring an attack minded, hard working approach. I told them he might bring those things, but he'd also alienate players, play them out of position, have little tactical awareness, and misuse his subs repeatedly in games. They seemed surprised at my criticisms and really knew nothing about how the US had performed.