What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL 'The Walking Dead' TV Series Thread*** (1 Viewer)

'Maik Jeaunz said:
I think I'm done with this show. I'll record it and fast forward to the zombie parts.

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Kill 'em all zombies!

Horrible.
Its obvious that you want this show to be something it was never meant to be. All of the action in the 1st season mislead you, I think.
Well yeah, I would like to see more than one zombie in an episode but I don't need to have a lot of action to be satisfied with a show. Some great writing and acting can overcome that but I'm getting neither with Walking Dead. Mad Men has no action and it's one of my favorite shows. It's a shame. I was really excited to see this show when it was announced. Now, at least two or three times and episode I find myself fast-forwarding. As soon as Daryl said "There's an old story about that flower..." ZIP! Enough with the lame stories and monologues.I want to like it in the worst way because the zombie scenes are really well done but that's all there is for me right now.
I thought that was one of the best scenes in the episode. :shrug:
Me too.

it shows Daryl really caring about the people in the group.
Which could be important to do with Merle coming back.
Pure speculation:
With how much time is being spent on developing Daryl's character it seems like they are going to re-introduce Merle soon, which would mean he is probably running the prison.
I think Merle is coming back this week. He was in the teaser for next week. And I don't think the prison is happening anytime too soon.
My guess is that it's going to be a flashback.
 
Now, at least two or three times and episode I find myself fast-forwarding. As soon as Daryl said "There's an old story about that flower..." ZIP! Enough with the lame stories and monologues.
This is why we can't have nice things. We, being consumers of television shows. There's a reason why there isn't much compelling stuff on TV these days. This is part of it.
If you think there's not much compelling stuff on tv these days that's on you. Maybe you should stop watching the zombie show thinking it's amongst the best shows out there. If you like it, great. But there are numerous shows that build characters much better. There are also numerous shows that move the plot along quickly and have lots of action. Get a taste of shows that do it right and you'll see the flaws with Walking Dead. It's like eating filet mignon for a month then coming back to a McRib minus the sauce. I have no problem with character development (nor do most people I imagine). I also have no problem with action. But is it too much to ask they do one - if not both - well?
I never said that I found Walking Dead to be one of those "compelling shows". I was simply stating that jamny's mindset is part of the problem. He specifically said that he likes plenty of shows that have more story and acting than action--then goes on to pan the latest (and one of the better) episode for not having enough zombie action, and specifically says that he fast-forwarded through Daryl's "boring monologue", which was what he originally wanted. Now, all that's already been addressed by him in this thread, so I'm not trying to extend that conversation again. I'm just explaining my post, which I made before reading the rest of his own posts.
I never said Daryl's monologue was boring since I never saw it. The show had given me enough other boring speeches that as soon as I heard him say "There's an old story about that flower", I was out of there and fast-forwarding. Maybe that one was good, I don't know. It's too late for me...save yourselves. ;) The limited action is usually great so I'll focus on and watch only that and probably enjoy the show much more.Too each his own. No big deal.
 
Now, at least two or three times and episode I find myself fast-forwarding. As soon as Daryl said "There's an old story about that flower..." ZIP! Enough with the lame stories and monologues.
This is why we can't have nice things. We, being consumers of television shows. There's a reason why there isn't much compelling stuff on TV these days. This is part of it.
If you think there's not much compelling stuff on tv these days that's on you. Maybe you should stop watching the zombie show thinking it's amongst the best shows out there. If you like it, great. But there are numerous shows that build characters much better. There are also numerous shows that move the plot along quickly and have lots of action. Get a taste of shows that do it right and you'll see the flaws with Walking Dead. It's like eating filet mignon for a month then coming back to a McRib minus the sauce. I have no problem with character development (nor do most people I imagine). I also have no problem with action. But is it too much to ask they do one - if not both - well?
I never said that I found Walking Dead to be one of those "compelling shows". I was simply stating that jamny's mindset is part of the problem. He specifically said that he likes plenty of shows that have more story and acting than action--then goes on to pan the latest (and one of the better) episode for not having enough zombie action, and specifically says that he fast-forwarded through Daryl's "boring monologue", which was what he originally wanted. Now, all that's already been addressed by him in this thread, so I'm not trying to extend that conversation again. I'm just explaining my post, which I made before reading the rest of his own posts.
I never said Daryl's monologue was boring since I never saw it. The show had given me enough other boring speeches that as soon as I heard him say "There's an old story about that flower", I was out of there and fast-forwarding. Maybe that one was good, I don't know. It's too late for me...save yourselves. ;) The limited action is usually great so I'll focus on and watch only that and probably enjoy the show much more.Too each his own. No big deal.
I have very little interest in the zombies themselves or the action, that's fun and all but the part I find interesting is how humans react to each other after the end of civilization. The writing was horrible last season but it seems to be picking up and they are creating good conflicts between the characters. If show continues to get darker like the comic then this could be a great show.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lots of people bring pretty snobby about a zombie show. Yes, it sometimes tries to be more than that when it shouldn't, but it's still a zombie show, and zombies are cool. Rick's a bad actor, the dialogue is often cheesy, and some of the plot items are absolutely ridiculous (needing human bait down a well because that somehow makes lassoing a zombie easier :lmao: ), but again:The Walking Dead = zombie show, zombies = cool
:goodposting: :goodposting:
 
Pregnant? I don't give a damn about a woman being pregnant when I'm watching a series about zombies. They're doing a total crap job this season. For crying out loud, GET OFF THE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND THAT DAMN FARM! Move along already. No need to spend an entire season doing the same thing every episode. Forget about that stupid little girl and get the hell back out into the real world. :wall: :wall: :wall:
She was pregnant in the comic book and the farm was also a big deal as well. I'm ready for them to move on too but it's part of the story. That said, they should have found Sophia a long time ago since she was only lost to provide a reason for them to find the farm.
I have no problem with them being at the farm or on the side of the road for a couple episodes, but enough is enough. It was fine over the first two episodes. Time to move along.
Where should they go? If i were them, i would be more then happy to stay at a place with electricity and running water, and would be in no hurry to leave. People wanting a realistic zombie show, i think this would be it. Find the most boring place and hide out for awhile.
I'd rather hang out on my couch and watch TV, but I don't want to watch a TV show about it. :loco:
 
I'm liking the show. For those complaining so much about it, go watch House or CSI where they recycle the same story week to week. Anyway, I know they can't do this necessarily on the show, but I swear if there was a zombie Apocalypse I'd be room clearing a whole lot better than most of these guys. Like Daryl was doing in that house last episode. How many times has someone missed a zombie and gotten eaten alive by not properly clearing a room? The pharmacy made me cringe since they just holstered their weapons and just walked past all these rows of shelves where a zombie could just be hanging out.
:goodposting: Exactly, and clear rooms in teams not this rambo lone wolf stuff - it just kills the realism. DO IT IN GROUPS!! First guy in sweeps to the wide side of the room (or to the right if room size is equal) , second guy in sweeps to the opposite direction. Third one in if you have covers all all else. Also you have to keep in mind that a left handed person is going to be more effective guarding one side (especially with melee weapons).
These people weren't trained in the Special Forces. Now they have a strategy on how to clear rooms?
 
so Shorty and Farmer Girl had sex on the floor of the pharmacy, without even locking the door? what if a zombie had wandered in? "hold on walker, just give me 30...more...seconds!"
#1 the zombies probably would have gone for the horses 1st not knowing of fresh humans inside.But more importantly #2, short round probably didn't even last 30 seconds. Had hadn't the secks in how long and some hot farmers daughter comes along. Probably lasted about 7 seconds.
maybe he double-bagged it.
:lmao:
 
'Maik Jeaunz said:
I think I'm done with this show. I'll record it and fast forward to the zombie parts.

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Kill 'em all zombies!

Horrible.
Its obvious that you want this show to be something it was never meant to be. All of the action in the 1st season mislead you, I think.
Well yeah, I would like to see more than one zombie in an episode but I don't need to have a lot of action to be satisfied with a show. Some great writing and acting can overcome that but I'm getting neither with Walking Dead. Mad Men has no action and it's one of my favorite shows. It's a shame. I was really excited to see this show when it was announced. Now, at least two or three times and episode I find myself fast-forwarding. As soon as Daryl said "There's an old story about that flower..." ZIP! Enough with the lame stories and monologues.I want to like it in the worst way because the zombie scenes are really well done but that's all there is for me right now.
I thought that was one of the best scenes in the episode. :shrug:
Me too.

it shows Daryl really caring about the people in the group.
:lmao:
 
Now, at least two or three times and episode I find myself fast-forwarding. As soon as Daryl said "There's an old story about that flower..." ZIP! Enough with the lame stories and monologues.
This is why we can't have nice things. We, being consumers of television shows. There's a reason why there isn't much compelling stuff on TV these days. This is part of it.
Yeah but here is the problem...The Walking Dead does "compelling" like Hee-Haw did comedy. It's overblown, heavy-handed, and repetitive. The characters say way too much and end up not saying a whole hell of a lot. It's not good drama.
This is why Sconch is one of the smartest human beings I've ever watched a movie and ate popcorn with
 
Link

excerpt:

"Who knows what causes a zombie invasion? I don't think we'll ever find out," he says matter-of-factly. "But that's not what the show is about. Our show is about a group of people dealing with the fallout. If a zombie invasion were to really happen, they would be more interested in finding food and staying alive. They would not be busy trying to find out where the zombies came from."

"Like the comic book (with nearly 100 issues published so far), the series focuses not on zombies, but on a tattered group of survivors on the outskirts of Atlanta. Principal among them is Sheriff Rick Grimes (played by series star Andrew Lincoln), who, like the rest of the band, must carry on in a shattered society while defending themselves against the ever-present plague of so-called "walkers," zombies always hungry for something — like a human — to feed on or infect. "The more time you spend on the zombies," Kirkman says, "the more it fits into the realm of science fiction. But we're telling about a completely real world. The disaster could have been a massive earthquake that caused society to crumble. Having zombies instead just makes it more interesting. But they're the only unreal thing about the show."

"I wanted to follow survivors in that world and see what they do and where they go."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
‘Walking Dead’: Michael Rooker on the return of Merle Dixon

Nov. 10, 2011 | 11:29 a.m.

Merle Dixon (Michael Rooker) and Rick Grimes (Andrew Lincoln) face off on "The Walking Dead." (AMC)

At the recent Aliens to Zombie convention in Hollywood, fanboy-favorite actor Michael Rooker turned up carrying a large box of life-sized polyurethane severed hands that he planned to dole out as souvenirs.

“Thirty years honing my craft, and it’s come to this,” he joked.

The unusual keepsakes were designed as a homage to Merle Dixon, the character Rooker plays on the hit AMC zombie series “The Walking Dead.” A despicable drug-addled racist and the nastier of two Southern brothers, Dixon sawed off his own hand to escape becoming zombie food midway through the show’s first season. He’s been missing ever since, though a sizable portion of the show’s audience has been clamoring for his return. Now, it appears the character is poised to come back on the scene this coming Sunday — if Internet buzz and teasers for the next episode are to be believed.

Rooker won’t confirm that he’s about to be reunited with Andrew Lincoln’s Rick Grimes and the other survivors of the zombie apocalypse, but he’s the first to express surprise at the following the character has come to enjoy: the girls-who-love-bad-boys came out of the woodwork with Dixon’s Vixens, Rookerholics and the Mo’ Merle Monday Tumblr feed.

“Nobody expected this level of Merle worship,” said Rooker with a laugh. “He’s such an out-there, crazy, anything goes kind of guy. There’s an uncertainty about Merle – like he’ll come back when you least expect it. He’s the boogeyman, and viewers love that suspense. The number one question I’m asked is, `When is your character coming back?’ I can’t say when, but I promise it’ll be a wild ride.

“The comic, zombie and gaming fans are a hoot – and they’re really into the plot twists,” he added. “They’re constantly throwing out these theories about Merle secretly stalking the group in the woods or luring zombies to their original camp.”

Rooker has enjoyed a decades-long career in genre fare and in mainstream Hollywood feature films — from “Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer” and “Cliffhanger” to “Days of Thunder” and “Slither” — and he’s recently been able to parlay his “Walking Dead” popularity to open up new professional avenues, he said. Specifically, Rooker’s new undead cred enticed Santa Monica gaming company Activision/Treyarch to tap him to appear in their zombie shooter game Call of the Dead, part of the Call of Duty: Black Ops Rezurrection map pack.

“I’ve gotten more heat from the anticipation of my coming back to the show than any other thing I’ve done,” Rooker said. “Because of that, I found a whole new group of fans, and the gaming company would never have contacted me if it wasn’t for that.”

Appropriately, perhaps, Rooker unwinds by spending time at the gun range. He’s a shareholder in the Angeles Shooting Range in Lake View Terrace — and he happens to be a pretty decent shot.

“Every time I was cast in a role, the director put a gun in my hand, so I figured I’d better learn how to use one. Then I found out I really liked it,” Rooker said with a laugh. “I was 16 when I first realized I intimidated people. Maybe it was growing up in a rough Chicago neighborhood, I don’t know. But I remember heading to school one day, and watching people lock their cars as I walked by. I was really [upset] about it when I got to school until I looked in a mirror and was like, ‘Whoa! I really do look scary.’ “
 
Just started going through the comics (thanks Usual21!)

What are people that have read them thinking about the show? I've only read the first 5 but they seem so much darker. They're creepier than the actual show.

 
'jamny said:
Just started going through the comics (thanks Usual21!) What are people that have read them thinking about the show? I've only read the first 5 but they seem so much darker. They're creepier than the actual show.
That's NOTHING. Just you wait. If you think they are creepy now, just wait.Also speaking about the files I put up, for some reason, the files are getting larger per issue. Maybe they are higher quality scans. I might have to put up 10 at a time since dvishare.com has a limit on file size.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'jamny said:
Just started going through the comics (thanks Usual21!) What are people that have read them thinking about the show? I've only read the first 5 but they seem so much darker. They're creepier than the actual show.
That's NOTHING. Just you wait. If you think they are creepy now, just wait.
Hey! No Spoilers!J/k. I haven't gotten to them yet other than the first few pages, but in case I didn't thank you for them, thanks. I think I'll wait til this season ends and then read what you gave me. The show has enough problems, I don't want it to have to compete with the source material too. Love to see Marvel Zombies on the big screen!
 
'jamny said:
Just started going through the comics (thanks Usual21!) What are people that have read them thinking about the show? I've only read the first 5 but they seem so much darker. They're creepier than the actual show.
That's NOTHING. Just you wait. If you think they are creepy now, just wait.Also speaking about the files I put up, for some reason, the files are getting larger per issue. Maybe they are higher quality scans. I might have to put up 10 at a time since dvishare.com has a limit on file size.
I got all mine off of TPB. For reading them on an Android tablet, Droid Comic Viewer is fantastic.The show and the comic are so different and they both have strengths/weaknesses. The way the comic deals with violence is much more realistic but perhaps because of the limitations of the medium the way it handles emotional relationships is very simplistic.
 
I'm losing interest. I hope they step it up this week.
huge fan of the comics, and am reading Kirkman's book "Rise of the Governor", but i do hope they can go a little more with using the source material.ETA: just finished this week's episode, and I think next week's episode will bring it back on track a bit. fingers are crossed because i am in for the long haul either way
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Christ Almighty my 3 year old could write a better series then this. So many plot holes its insane. Its like the writers are not even trying even more. Why make a big deal out of Shane not wanting to find the girl? The Barn is 50 ft away from teh main house but yet nobody has bothered to check it out?

I am officially throwing in the towel. So much potential but so much garbage.

The merle tease last week and what we actually get is criminal. I wish the writers would choose a direction and go with it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought the episode was OK. However, Daryl is the only character I give a crap about, even Glenn is getting on my nerves. I thought for sure Maggie was going to push him off the hayloft into the floor of the barn

 
I was just thinking last night that this show is starting to get a little better. And then they pull the "Horde of zombies in a barn that everybody has walked by a million times already but never noticed before" card. What the hell, people?

 
Christ Almighty my 3 year old could write a better series then this. So many plot holes its insane. Its like the writers are not even trying even more. Why make a big deal out of Shane not wanting to find the girl? The Barn is 50 ft away from teh main house but yet nobody has bothered to check it out? I am officially throwing in the towel. So much potential but so much garbage.The merle tease last week and what we actually get is criminal. I wish the writers would choose a direction and go with it.
Yep, see you next week :thumbup:
 
Christ Almighty my 3 year old could write a better series then this. So many plot holes its insane. Its like the writers are not even trying even more. Why make a big deal out of Shane not wanting to find the girl? The Barn is 50 ft away from teh main house but yet nobody has bothered to check it out? I am officially throwing in the towel. So much potential but so much garbage.The merle tease last week and what we actually get is criminal. I wish the writers would choose a direction and go with it.
Yep, see you next week :thumbup:
I dont know dude, I think its moved from my Sunday night rotation to something I pull up on Tuesday evening. Its no longer a "must see". So sad.
 
Good episode. I'm really enjoying how they're developing Darryl's character and this was his first real in-depth episode and it was a lot of fun. I accidentally read a spoiler about Merle so I knew he wasn't really returning but it was still fun to see him represent Darryl's internal struggle about his place within the group. Good stuff. I thought last week it made sense that there was something walker-related in the barn so I'm very interested to see where that storyline goes. The season keeps getting better and better. :thumbup:

 
Yeah... so WTF do you guys think grandpa is doing with all those walkers? Do you think he sits up in the loft and throws bread crumbs and/or rocks at them?

 
Yeah... so WTF do you guys think grandpa is doing with all those walkers? Do you think he sits up in the loft and throws bread crumbs and/or rocks at them?
I think they're friends and/ or family.A. He's hoping for a cure.B. Can't bring himself to put them down.I'm guessing A.
 
Very good episode. I liked Shane showing the perhaps the looking for the little girl is a waste of time and dangerous for the searchers; I know it is heartless but if survival is the only motivating factor then Shane is right.

The way I see it we have four plots going along:

1. Sophie missing.

2. The dynamics between the farmer the group.

3. Where is Merle?

4. Lori is pregnant? But is it by Shane or Rick. How will Rick react if it is Shane's baby?

 
Very good episode. I liked Shane showing the perhaps the looking for the little girl is a waste of time and dangerous for the searchers; I know it is heartless but if survival is the only motivating factor then Shane is right.
Absolutely. That's one of the things I really like about the show - it's about the difficult choices that you may have to make to find a way to survive. We've already seen how far Shane is willing to go and while his thought about leaving Sophia behind may sound heartless and may be heartless there is plenty of reason for that to be considered an option. As Spock once said, "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one." Shane's just getting his Vulcan mojo on. :D
 
Yeah... so WTF do you guys think grandpa is doing with all those walkers? Do you think he sits up in the loft and throws bread crumbs and/or rocks at them?
I think they're friends and/ or family.A. He's hoping for a cure.B. Can't bring himself to put them down.I'm guessing A.
He's already told Rick he expects there to be some form of cure at some point.
I took that to mean a cure to stop it not bring them back.I think he keeps that to himself. Ie not telling them about walker in the barn.
 
Yeah... so WTF do you guys think grandpa is doing with all those walkers? Do you think he sits up in the loft and throws bread crumbs and/or rocks at them?
I think they're friends and/ or family.A. He's hoping for a cure.B. Can't bring himself to put them down.I'm guessing A.
He's already told Rick he expects there to be some form of cure at some point.
I took that to mean a cure to stop it not bring them back.I think he keeps that to himself. Ie not telling them about walker in the barn.
He believes God is going to cure them and bring them back to life.
 
Very good episode. I liked Shane showing the perhaps the looking for the little girl is a waste of time and dangerous for the searchers; I know it is heartless but if survival is the only motivating factor then Shane is right.
Absolutely. That's one of the things I really like about the show - it's about the difficult choices that you may have to make to find a way to survive. We've already seen how far Shane is willing to go and while his thought about leaving Sophia behind may sound heartless and may be heartless there is plenty of reason for that to be considered an option. As Spock once said, "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one." Shane's just getting his Vulcan mojo on. :D
Shane reasoning might make sense if they weren't all comfortable in this nice, safe house in the middle of nowhere. What's the alternative to looking for Sophia - sitting around on the porch smoking pipes?
 
I was just thinking last night that this show is starting to get a little better. And then they pull the "Horde of zombies in a barn that everybody has walked by a million times already but never noticed before" card. What the hell, people?
You'd think this was based on a comic book or something.
 
Intentional or not, the series has made me question whether morals are optional when survival is on the line with two separate issues:

1) The search for Sophia. Morally, the group should continue to look for her, as you don't abandon a missing child. As Shane points out,

it may jeopardize their overall survival.

2) The walkers in the barn. Maybe the Doc has them in there because morally he believes you should never kill a living thing. From a survival

standpoint, there is no way you should keep those things alive.

Man has morality because he has gotten to a point where day to day survival is not an issue and he has the luxury not only to live, but to

choose how he lives. With man back in the survival mode in this series, he is just like an animal, not being able to always afford making the moral decision.

 
Intentional or not, the series has made me question whether morals are optional when survival is on the line with two separate issues:1) The search for Sophia. Morally, the group should continue to look for her, as you don't abandon a missing child. As Shane points out,it may jeopardize their overall survival.2) The walkers in the barn. Maybe the Doc has them in there because morally he believes you should never kill a living thing. From a survivalstandpoint, there is no way you should keep those things alive.Man has morality because he has gotten to a point where day to day survival is not an issue and he has the luxury not only to live, but tochoose how he lives. With man back in the survival mode in this series, he is just like an animal, not being able to always afford making the moral decision.
It's definitely intentional. The show is in large part about choices and morality and whether the ethics and codes we used before are applicable in this world. I posted awhile back that the show has two distinct viewpoints on this: Rick is clinging to the ways of the past, believing humanity needs them to survive (although we see him questioning himself last night). Shane is on the opposite end of the spectrum. He's about the need to survive only and doing whatever it takes to get from Point A to Point B regardless of the moral implications. I think everyone else falls somewhere in between with Darryl being the most interesting case study. Initially, he appeared to side more with Shane's point of view but the longer he remains with the group the more humanity we see from him so he's starting to inch closer to Rick. He's become aware of this change and he's questioning whether it's part of his nature or whether it will impede his ability to survive. That was a big part of what Merle represented.
 
Very good episode. I liked Shane showing the perhaps the looking for the little girl is a waste of time and dangerous for the searchers; I know it is heartless but if survival is the only motivating factor then Shane is right.
Absolutely. That's one of the things I really like about the show - it's about the difficult choices that you may have to make to find a way to survive. We've already seen how far Shane is willing to go and while his thought about leaving Sophia behind may sound heartless and may be heartless there is plenty of reason for that to be considered an option. As Spock once said, "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one." Shane's just getting his Vulcan mojo on. :D
Shane reasoning might make sense if they weren't all comfortable in this nice, safe house in the middle of nowhere. What's the alternative to looking for Sophia - sitting around on the porch smoking pipes?
Shane wanted to go to Fort Benning after the outbreak.
 
Very good episode. I liked Shane showing the perhaps the looking for the little girl is a waste of time and dangerous for the searchers; I know it is heartless but if survival is the only motivating factor then Shane is right.
Absolutely. That's one of the things I really like about the show - it's about the difficult choices that you may have to make to find a way to survive. We've already seen how far Shane is willing to go and while his thought about leaving Sophia behind may sound heartless and may be heartless there is plenty of reason for that to be considered an option. As Spock once said, "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one." Shane's just getting his Vulcan mojo on. :D
Shane reasoning might make sense if they weren't all comfortable in this nice, safe house in the middle of nowhere. What's the alternative to looking for Sophia - sitting around on the porch smoking pipes?
They can not stay at the farm forever -this has been made clear many times by the farmer.The alternative to looking for Sophia is to head Fort Benning which is where they were headed before.
 
Very good episode. I liked Shane showing the perhaps the looking for the little girl is a waste of time and dangerous for the searchers; I know it is heartless but if survival is the only motivating factor then Shane is right.
Absolutely. That's one of the things I really like about the show - it's about the difficult choices that you may have to make to find a way to survive. We've already seen how far Shane is willing to go and while his thought about leaving Sophia behind may sound heartless and may be heartless there is plenty of reason for that to be considered an option. As Spock once said, "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one." Shane's just getting his Vulcan mojo on. :D
Shane reasoning might make sense if they weren't all comfortable in this nice, safe house in the middle of nowhere. What's the alternative to looking for Sophia - sitting around on the porch smoking pipes?
They can not stay at the farm forever -this has been made clear many times by the farmer.The alternative to looking for Sophia is to head Fort Benning which is where they were headed before.
Haven't these people ever seen movies? You NEVER go to a military base in a post-apocalyptic world.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top