Parrothead
Footballguy
Why don't they ever show them pooping???!!
Zombies can't poop. Most have already been disemboweled.Why don't they ever show them pooping???!!
If you need me to break it down for you...Disco Stu said:"It can't be a great episode when it's nothing but red shirts dying."cstu said:You guys don't get it, I don't want them to die I just didn't want this stupid virus story line.It's almost like cstu would like to see every other season be a new set of characters.. Maybe Rick and his son live, but no one else.... No need to get wrapped up into the lives of the other characters because they will all be dead soon any ways.. .There are only 7 main characters left. How many do you want killed each week?The virus was a false jeopardy situation and it was obvious the main characters weren't going to die from it (except I thought they'd use it as a way for Herschel to make a heroic sacrifice for Glenn). I'll keep watching but this is an awfully cheesy show.snogger said:cstu said:It can't be a great episode when it's nothing but red shirts dying. The first 5 episodes so far have been the worst of the series.flapgreen said:I don't have it anywhere near the best of the series, but it was definitely the best of the season.If you didn't enjoy last nights episode then I think this show has passed you by and it's time to move on..
![]()
Ridiculous declaration that you're hopefully backing away from now.
Where does the stuff they eat go then?Zombies can't poop. Most have already been disemboweled.Why don't they ever show them pooping???!!
I agree. I like how they've further developed the relationship between Rick and Carl this season. Rick watching Carl blow away the walkers was a terrific scene. There's your father-son bonding time in the zombie apocalypse.I think Carl is becoming one of the more interesting characters. I think the kid who plays him does a very good job, especially now that he's getting older. Let's face it, most kids that are his age when the show began suck at acting, as he did his first year or so. But he's getting better, and in turn is making his character more believeable and interesting. I'll be anxious to see where the writers take his character.
It's a transition from the Woodbury residents and their time at the prison. I'm unsure what you want to happen w/ the (incoming Woodbury) characters in reference to the core group. TWD has done a great job moving the story to the point of the group leaving their current location.If you need me to break it down for you...Disco Stu said:"It can't be a great episode when it's nothing but red shirts dying."cstu said:You guys don't get it, I don't want them to die I just didn't want this stupid virus story line.It's almost like cstu would like to see every other season be a new set of characters.. Maybe Rick and his son live, but no one else.... No need to get wrapped up into the lives of the other characters because they will all be dead soon any ways.. .There are only 7 main characters left. How many do you want killed each week?The virus was a false jeopardy situation and it was obvious the main characters weren't going to die from it (except I thought they'd use it as a way for Herschel to make a heroic sacrifice for Glenn). I'll keep watching but this is an awfully cheesy show.snogger said:cstu said:It can't be a great episode when it's nothing but red shirts dying. The first 5 episodes so far have been the worst of the series.flapgreen said:I don't have it anywhere near the best of the series, but it was definitely the best of the season.If you didn't enjoy last nights episode then I think this show has passed you by and it's time to move on..
![]()
Ridiculous declaration that you're hopefully backing away from now.
They brought in a bunch of faceless characters and created the virus as a way of turning them into cool zombie kills to keep viewers happy. It was a cheap way to create some suspense while having nothing really happening at the prison.
If you guys enjoyed these episodes then they did their job, but it felt like filler to me. I'm looking forward to the rest of the season I just haven't found this season very good this year.
Or some nice Bibb Lettuce. So under appreciated!(HULK) said:I agree. A whole hour and they only open 1 peapod! Come on, at least give us a carrot or a potato!TheIronSheik said:I used to love this show but it seems like the last couple episodes have been more about zombies and less about gardening. I think I may be done with this show.![]()
Agreed. I've found the episodes boring but likely necessary for character/story development.It's a transition from the Woodbury residents and their time at the prison. I'm unsure what you want to happen w/ the (incoming Woodbury) characters in reference to the core group. TWD has done a great job moving the story to the point of the group leaving their current location.If you need me to break it down for you...Disco Stu said:"It can't be a great episode when it's nothing but red shirts dying."cstu said:You guys don't get it, I don't want them to die I just didn't want this stupid virus story line.It's almost like cstu would like to see every other season be a new set of characters.. Maybe Rick and his son live, but no one else.... No need to get wrapped up into the lives of the other characters because they will all be dead soon any ways.. .There are only 7 main characters left. How many do you want killed each week?The virus was a false jeopardy situation and it was obvious the main characters weren't going to die from it (except I thought they'd use it as a way for Herschel to make a heroic sacrifice for Glenn). I'll keep watching but this is an awfully cheesy show.snogger said:cstu said:It can't be a great episode when it's nothing but red shirts dying. The first 5 episodes so far have been the worst of the series.flapgreen said:I don't have it anywhere near the best of the series, but it was definitely the best of the season.If you didn't enjoy last nights episode then I think this show has passed you by and it's time to move on..
![]()
Ridiculous declaration that you're hopefully backing away from now.
They brought in a bunch of faceless characters and created the virus as a way of turning them into cool zombie kills to keep viewers happy. It was a cheap way to create some suspense while having nothing really happening at the prison.
If you guys enjoyed these episodes then they did their job, but it felt like filler to me. I'm looking forward to the rest of the season I just haven't found this season very good this year.
The show is about a zombie apocalypse. Rick and really all the characters are incidental.flapgreen said:No Rick. No show
60 minutes of zombie kill of week? Sounds fantastic.The show is about a zombie apocalypse. Rick and really all the characters are incidental.flapgreen said:No Rick. No show
All of them, please.There are only 7 main characters left. How many do you want killed each week?The virus was a false jeopardy situation and it was obvious the main characters weren't going to die from it (except I thought they'd use it as a way for Herschel to make a heroic sacrifice for Glenn). I'll keep watching but this is an awfully cheesy show.snogger said:cstu said:It can't be a great episode when it's nothing but red shirts dying. The first 5 episodes so far have been the worst of the series.flapgreen said:I don't have it anywhere near the best of the series, but it was definitely the best of the season.If you didn't enjoy last nights episode then I think this show has passed you by and it's time to move on..
They should have killed off Rick and kept Shane.Xflapgreen said:No Rick. No show
Not really. The characters are essential. They have to be at least moderately compelling or it wouldn't work. We have to feel something for the characters, whether we like them or can't stand them.The show is about a zombie apocalypse. Rick and really all the characters are incidental.flapgreen said:No Rick. No show
Then the show would have been Shane roaming America by himself as he would have killed all the losers in the groupThey should have killed off Rick and kept Shane.Xflapgreen said:No Rick. No show
Some of this is based on the comic book, which I thought handled it better:It's a transition from the Woodbury residents and their time at the prison. I'm unsure what you want to happen w/ the (incoming Woodbury) characters in reference to the core group. TWD has done a great job moving the story to the point of the group leaving their current location.
They did keep Shane ... he is called the Governor.They should have killed off Rick and kept Shane.Xflapgreen said:No Rick. No show
The best ending of the show would be Carl having to put down zombie Rick and then turning the gun on himself.I think the show could survive without Rick. Not sure how good it would be.
I'm guessing there will come a time when Andrew Lincoln decides its time to move on. In my opinion, that should be the time when the execs give serious consideration to ending the show.
I cheer for the zombies. I might not if there were better actors/characters. Hopefully the new version has some better peeps to cheer for.Not really. The characters are essential. They have to be at least moderately compelling or it wouldn't work. We have to feel something for the characters, whether we like them or can't stand them.The show is about a zombie apocalypse. Rick and really all the characters are incidental.flapgreen said:No Rick. No show
then have about 15 minutes of dialogue-free scenes exploring the (now humanless) world... fade to black- end of seriesThe best ending of the show would be Carl having to put down zombie Rick and then turning the gun on himself.I think the show could survive without Rick. Not sure how good it would be.
I'm guessing there will come a time when Andrew Lincoln decides its time to move on. In my opinion, that should be the time when the execs give serious consideration to ending the show.
then have about 15 minutes of dialogue-free scenes exploring the (now humanless) world... fade to black- end of seriesThe best ending of the show would be Carl having to put down zombie Rick and then turning the gun on himself.I think the show could survive without Rick. Not sure how good it would be.
I'm guessing there will come a time when Andrew Lincoln decides its time to move on. In my opinion, that should be the time when the execs give serious consideration to ending the show.
Walking a thin line because many will complain that they want to see more zombie killings and less boring character development.A good way to present character development (not so much character interaction) would be the use of flashbacks. We could then see more about certain individuals, see what they were like before the apocalypse. I know it has been discussed here before, some for it, some against it. I think small flashbacks, fast enough that it wouldn't cut (too much) into the current story line would suffice. I think the viewer would become closer to the character that way.
Except they show zombies in a Walmart parking lot. And a Starbucks parking lot.then have about 15 minutes of dialogue-free scenes exploring the (now humanless) world... fade to black- end of seriesThe best ending of the show would be Carl having to put down zombie Rick and then turning the gun on himself.I think the show could survive without Rick. Not sure how good it would be.
I'm guessing there will come a time when Andrew Lincoln decides its time to move on. In my opinion, that should be the time when the execs give serious consideration to ending the show.
needs to be way more outside/hot day/sudden thunderstormcriminalMaggie is way too hot to be this underutilized.
Laundry day.needs to be way more outside/hot day/sudden thunderstormcriminalMaggie is way too hot to be this underutilized.
Porn shoot.Laundry day.needs to be way more outside/hot day/sudden thunderstormcriminalMaggie is way too hot to be this underutilized.
I agree that some limited use of flashbacks would be a useful device to develop the characters (which I think is one of The Walking Dead's greatest weaknesses as a show). Kirkman has said that he doesn't want to use flashbacks because The Walking Dead is the story of how people act and who people become during zombie apocalypse, not prior to it, but I personally think that the story of who people were before and during the initial outbreak of the zombie apocalypse would help further Kirkman's overall story-telling goals. Much like the opening scene in one of the final episodes of Breaking Bad where it flashes back to Walt talking to Skyler on the phone after his first cook, the juxtaposition of the flashback with the current state of affairs would show how much characters have changed during the course of their experiences and provide some much-needed character development.A good way to present character development (not so much character interaction) would be the use of flashbacks. We could then see more about certain individuals, see what they were like before the apocalypse. I know it has been discussed here before, some for it, some against it. I think small flashbacks, fast enough that it wouldn't cut (too much) into the current story line would suffice. I think the viewer would become closer to the character that way.
By Glenn? I agree.Maggie is way too hot to be this underutilized.
Sasha.Can anyone even name a single person from the Woodbury group that they took in besides Tyreese? It seems like they could have spent the time to actually develop a character or two from that lot before giving so many of them meaningless deaths.
I think I agree with Kirkman on the flashbacks. For Rick, they made sense because he is the main guy. I think we know enough about who the other main people are. I loved the way Lost used flashbacks to show us the past for the main characters, but those flashbacks were very instrumental to showing us who those people are now. Kirkman makes a great point that the past of these characters doesn't define them now as much as how they dealt with the zombie apocalypse, which we have seen.I agree that some limited use of flashbacks would be a useful device to develop the characters (which I think is one of The Walking Dead's greatest weaknesses as a show). Kirkman has said that he doesn't want to use flashbacks because The Walking Dead is the story of how people act and who people become during zombie apocalypse, not prior to it, but I personally think that the story of who people were before and during the initial outbreak of the zombie apocalypse would help further Kirkman's overall story-telling goals. Much like the opening scene in one of the final episodes of Breaking Bad where it flashes back to Walt talking to Skyler on the phone after his first cook, the juxtaposition of the flashback with the current state of affairs would show how much characters have changed during the course of their experiences and provide some much-needed character development.A good way to present character development (not so much character interaction) would be the use of flashbacks. We could then see more about certain individuals, see what they were like before the apocalypse. I know it has been discussed here before, some for it, some against it. I think small flashbacks, fast enough that it wouldn't cut (too much) into the current story line would suffice. I think the viewer would become closer to the character that way.
I mean they brought an entire new group of Woodbury residents into the prison, yet have really failed to develop even a single character from that group such that the viewer has any investment in whether any of them live or die. Thank goodness that Glenn got the flu virus as well, otherwise I'm pretty sure that most viewers wouldn't care that much if the entire group of sick people perished. Glenn is the only reason any viewer cares about the group getting antibiotics. Can anyone even name a single person from the Woodbury group that they took in besides Tyreese? It seems like they could have spent the time to actually develop a character or two from that lot before giving so many of them meaningless deaths.
That makes no sense at all. Sounds like something Copeman would post.They did keep Shane ... he is called the Governor.They should have killed off Rick and kept Shane.Xflapgreen said:No Rick. No show
I don't even understand what he's trying to say. Maybe he means just an antagonist?That makes no sense at all. Sounds like something Copeman would post.They did keep Shane ... he is called the Governor.They should have killed off Rick and kept Shane.Xflapgreen said:No Rick. No show
Yeah I came here to post the same thing. I am bored to death of the Governor I was hoping he would come back much later there was no suspense at all this soon gotta make it a surprise like Sophia. There has to be some human conflict in the show, but not too much. The reason I watch TWD is because it is about people surviving in a ZOMBIE apocolypse. There are literally tons of shows about conflicted groups of humans to choose from, like that one that the power is out or really any action show. If I want gunfights I can watch those.Homer J Simpson said:Gotta agree on these points. The guy's awful.Ash said:I wasto see the Governor in the closing scenes, although it was obvious he would enter the story again at some point. He's a badly written soap opera villain played by a terrible actor. Single worst piece of casting in the entire show. Let's hope it ends quickly.
Agree with all of the above. He was never interesting and totally unnecessary.Yeah I came here to post the same thing. I am bored to death of the GovernorHomer J Simpson said:Gotta agree on these points. The guy's awful.Ash said:I wasto see the Governor in the closing scenes, although it was obvious he would enter the story again at some point. He's a badly written soap opera villain played by a terrible actor. Single worst piece of casting in the entire show. Let's hope it ends quickly.
Maggie is way too hot to be this underutilized.
I was digging her in the body armor this week
Can't stand the character & actorLizzie kind of gives me the creeps. Just something about how she acts around the walkers and death itself.
assume it's just a plot device to drive them out of the prison and get them moving again.I enjoyed the Governor last season but I was skeptical of not killing him off. Here's hoping they kept him alive because they had something really cool planned for him this season.
I don't really consider Tyreese or Sasha as "Woodbury people" since they encountered Rick's group before Woodbury and were only there for a short period of time, but that was an impressive listing of Woodbury characters that I'd venture 99% of Walking Dead viewers could not name. Then again, I am really bad at remembering names. But I think my point about those Woodbury characters being under-developed at this point in the season still stands.Sasha.Others they added from Woodbury or elsewhere... Caleb (Dr S), Lizzie and her sister (and dead dad), Bob, Karen, David, Zach (Beth's temporary love interest), Patrick.Can anyone even name a single person from the Woodbury group that they took in besides Tyreese? It seems like they could have spent the time to actually develop a character or two from that lot before giving so many of them meaningless deaths.
I thought he was interesting, but his motivations and craziness far too cartoonish.Agree with all of the above. He was never interesting and totally unnecessary.Yeah I came here to post the same thing. I am bored to death of the GovernorHomer J Simpson said:Gotta agree on these points. The guy's awful.Ash said:I wasto see the Governor in the closing scenes, although it was obvious he would enter the story again at some point. He's a badly written soap opera villain played by a terrible actor. Single worst piece of casting in the entire show. Let's hope it ends quickly.