First: we've seen enough of Wentz...he needs to sit not only due to injury but also the rest of the season.
Re: who should start next, I think the answer may be more nuanced, re: Heinicke vs. Howell. Here's how I see it:
1. Even with a horrible 2-4 record, the Commanders are still only 1 game out of the third playoff spot. Is it likely we make the playoffs? No, but it's not like a 1% chance either. If QB play is a significant difference as it often is, then the team could possibly look different with Heinicke or Howell.
2. I'm thinking you need to get to 9-8 to have a realistic shot at that third WC slot. That would mean going 7-4 the rest of the way, or winning about 2 out of every 3 games.
3. If Heinicke is more ready right now, in fairness to the rest of the guys on the team, give him a 3 week window to see what he can do: GB, Indy, Philly. If you win 2 of 3 of those games, you may want to roll the dice and see if he can keep it going.
4. However, if he can't win two of three, let Howell play the rest of the season. You are still giving Howell a full 50% of the season to show whether he is good enough to be a guy you build around.
Normally, I would say, Wentz isn't the answer, play for the future. We need to see what we have in Howell so we know whether to draft a QB next year if we bottom out and get a top 5 pick. But starting Heincke the next 3 games doesn't preclude doing that with Howell after the second Philly game and meanwhile, may be more fair to the rest of the guys who want to make a run for the playoffs right now. I think you have to be strategic for the future but also it's equally important to honor the guys who are playing right now each and every week...
Re: who should start next, I think the answer may be more nuanced, re: Heinicke vs. Howell. Here's how I see it:
1. Even with a horrible 2-4 record, the Commanders are still only 1 game out of the third playoff spot. Is it likely we make the playoffs? No, but it's not like a 1% chance either. If QB play is a significant difference as it often is, then the team could possibly look different with Heinicke or Howell.
2. I'm thinking you need to get to 9-8 to have a realistic shot at that third WC slot. That would mean going 7-4 the rest of the way, or winning about 2 out of every 3 games.
3. If Heinicke is more ready right now, in fairness to the rest of the guys on the team, give him a 3 week window to see what he can do: GB, Indy, Philly. If you win 2 of 3 of those games, you may want to roll the dice and see if he can keep it going.
4. However, if he can't win two of three, let Howell play the rest of the season. You are still giving Howell a full 50% of the season to show whether he is good enough to be a guy you build around.
Normally, I would say, Wentz isn't the answer, play for the future. We need to see what we have in Howell so we know whether to draft a QB next year if we bottom out and get a top 5 pick. But starting Heincke the next 3 games doesn't preclude doing that with Howell after the second Philly game and meanwhile, may be more fair to the rest of the guys who want to make a run for the playoffs right now. I think you have to be strategic for the future but also it's equally important to honor the guys who are playing right now each and every week...