Does that mean Rambo II?Duke Ihenacho to IR. Great Redskins career.
It's not just one game I am talking about. We are talking about a guy with a 1-4 career record as a starter. A career QB rating in the 70s and thanks to yesterday finally got his TD-INT ratio over 50%. But since you want to talk about yesterday, the game was in his hands. Short field, down by 3. Drive the team to tie or win and you show you got the goods. He didn't move the Skins at all. Some great plays by the Eagles secondary didn't help, but you have to get at least a FG attempt on that drive if you're Cousins.When your team scores 34 points, you should win the game. That loss was not on Cousins.Maybe if Cousins actually starts winning games and not having nice fantasy days against the crappy D's this is a real question. At least IMO. Cousins lit up Atlanta last year but the Skins still lost. He then proceeded to suck and lose every game. This could very well repeat itself or he could have turned the corner. If you ask this question to the general population, Cousins will win, probably comfortably. But I think the voting would be different with Redskins fans.I was gonna start a poll, but i really want just Washington fans to answer, so i'll ask in here
right now today who do you think is more likely the choice for the QB of this team going forward? RG3 or Cousins?
Please God no.Does that mean Rambo II?Duke Ihenacho to IR. Great Redskins career.
It's just the facts. People are crowning Cousins like he accomplished something. RG3 had an all time great rookie season, turned around the franchise and helped get them to the playoffs. Cousins has had a much smaller sample size to go with but he hasn't shown the ability to be the difference between a win and a loss. I know RG3 has. Yes he lost a lot last year, but do we honestly think if Cousins was given the same amount of starts on that dumpster fire that was last year's team, his record would have been better? Cousins has done well in spots. He's had statistical success against some of the poorer teams he's faced. He's also struggled mightily in other games as well (Giants game was painful last year). I think both QBs can succeed under Gruden, I would just like to see Cousins actually do it for more games before we start crowning him the savior and better than RG3 like a lot of the media and general public has.this is an interesting point to make here, considering RG3 won 9 outta 15 starts in '12 and 3 out of 13 starts in '13 and was 0-1 in '14.Maybe if Cousins actually starts winning games and not having nice fantasy days against the crappy D's this is a real question. At least IMO. Cousins lit up Atlanta last year but the Skins still lost. He then proceeded to suck and lose every game. This could very well repeat itself or he could have turned the corner. If you ask this question to the general population, Cousins will win, probably comfortably. But I think the voting would be different with Redskins fans.I was gonna start a poll, but i really want just Washington fans to answer, so i'll ask in here
right now today who do you think is more likely the choice for the QB of this team going forward? RG3 or Cousins?
not the best argument against cousins, if were doing a comparison here w/ the samples provided.
Protect himselfOK, I'll just throw this question out there: What CAN Cousins do that Griffin CAN'T?
Notice, right now, I'm just asking CAN vs. CAN'T. Only asking about capability.
I think one reason I really want to stay away from this debate is because I'm growing extremely tired of the trend to label everything as either "great" or "horrible". There's no middle ground anymore. For some reason, we all must reach a conclusion of "great" or "horrible" on every play or every game. Which, of course, leads to opinions swinging from "great" to "horrible" and back to "great" in a matter of minutes. It's annoying and I have no desire to discuss Cousins and Griffin with anyone who wants to use those labels right now.I would just like to see Cousins actually do it for more games before we start crowning him the savior and better than RG3 like a lot of the media and general public has.
Agreed. I also try to avoid this debate when talking with my friends about it because it makes it seem like you have to choose a side. I believe in RG3 if healthy, but it seems like in doing so, it will come out like I am hating on Cousins. In the end I just want the Redskins to win.I think one reason I really want to stay away from this debate is because I'm growing extremely tired of the trend to label everything as either "great" or "horrible". There's no middle ground anymore. For some reason, we all must reach a conclusion of "great" or "horrible" on every play or every game. Which, of course, leads to opinions swinging from "great" to "horrible" and back to "great" in a matter of minutes. It's annoying and I have no desire to discuss Cousins and Griffin with anyone who wants to use those labels right now.I would just like to see Cousins actually do it for more games before we start crowning him the savior and better than RG3 like a lot of the media and general public has.
I'm no QB guru but it just looks like Cousins get backs there, makes quicker reads, and delivers the ball much more quickly than RGIII. I'm not saying that RGIII CAN'T do that...but it's just my very untutored observation based upon the two players.OK, I'll just throw this question out there: What CAN Cousins do that Griffin CAN'T?
Notice, right now, I'm just asking CAN vs. CAN'T. Only asking about capability.
Eagles did the same thing to Andrew Luck the previous week.It's not just one game I am talking about. We are talking about a guy with a 1-4 career record as a starter. A career QB rating in the 70s and thanks to yesterday finally got his TD-INT ratio over 50%. But since you want to talk about yesterday, the game was in his hands. Short field, down by 3. Drive the team to tie or win and you show you got the goods. He didn't move the Skins at all. Some great plays by the Eagles secondary didn't help, but you have to get at least a FG attempt on that drive if you're Cousins.When your team scores 34 points, you should win the game. That loss was not on Cousins.Maybe if Cousins actually starts winning games and not having nice fantasy days against the crappy D's this is a real question. At least IMO. Cousins lit up Atlanta last year but the Skins still lost. He then proceeded to suck and lose every game. This could very well repeat itself or he could have turned the corner. If you ask this question to the general population, Cousins will win, probably comfortably. But I think the voting would be different with Redskins fans.I was gonna start a poll, but i really want just Washington fans to answer, so i'll ask in here
right now today who do you think is more likely the choice for the QB of this team going forward? RG3 or Cousins?
Did you catch the report at the start of the 2nd half that Gruden told Cousins he needs to be more patient? I think Cousins' "quick reads" may sometimes be a negative in that he doesn't take the time to let plays develop. To his credit, he showed some patience and hit Jackson deep for the TD in the second half. I'd like to see Cousins hold the ball longer at times and take more shots down field. Yes, Griffin is probably at the other end of the spectrum in that he looks too often for the big play and misses the simple play.I'm no QB guru but it just looks like Cousins get backs there, makes quicker reads, and delivers the ball much more quickly than RGIII. I'm not saying that RGIII CAN'T do that...but it's just my very untutored observation based upon the two players.OK, I'll just throw this question out there: What CAN Cousins do that Griffin CAN'T?
Notice, right now, I'm just asking CAN vs. CAN'T. Only asking about capability.
And by the way, I'm not saying this makes Cousins some great savior. I'm not saying he's Joe Montana. I really don't know what this kid has beyond the ability to do well in spot starts. But, that's my observation as of right now, he's really going through those progressions faster, standing in there and getting rid of it and to the open man.
I'm sure someone is going to write back and tell me that RGIII can do that. And you know what...you are right...he can, theoretically. I am just going off of what I have seen of the two recently.
That's an interesting observation from Gruden...I did not catch that. But yeah, I'm sure there are a million ways that Cousins can still grow as a QB...I have no problem buying that and perhaps I will start looking for that vs. NYGiants..dgreen said:Did you catch the report at the start of the 2nd half that Gruden told Cousins he needs to be more patient? I think Cousins' "quick reads" may sometimes be a negative in that he doesn't take the time to let plays develop. To his credit, he showed some patience and hit Jackson deep for the TD in the second half. I'd like to see Cousins hold the ball longer at times and take more shots down field. Yes, Griffin is probably at the other end of the spectrum in that he looks too often for the big play and misses the simple play.MikeApf said:I'm no QB guru but it just looks like Cousins get backs there, makes quicker reads, and delivers the ball much more quickly than RGIII. I'm not saying that RGIII CAN'T do that...but it's just my very untutored observation based upon the two players.dgreen said:OK, I'll just throw this question out there: What CAN Cousins do that Griffin CAN'T?
Notice, right now, I'm just asking CAN vs. CAN'T. Only asking about capability.
And by the way, I'm not saying this makes Cousins some great savior. I'm not saying he's Joe Montana. I really don't know what this kid has beyond the ability to do well in spot starts. But, that's my observation as of right now, he's really going through those progressions faster, standing in there and getting rid of it and to the open man.
I'm sure someone is going to write back and tell me that RGIII can do that. And you know what...you are right...he can, theoretically. I am just going off of what I have seen of the two recently.
All hail the mighty Eagles DEagles did the same thing to Andrew Luck the previous week.It's not just one game I am talking about. We are talking about a guy with a 1-4 career record as a starter. A career QB rating in the 70s and thanks to yesterday finally got his TD-INT ratio over 50%. But since you want to talk about yesterday, the game was in his hands. Short field, down by 3. Drive the team to tie or win and you show you got the goods. He didn't move the Skins at all. Some great plays by the Eagles secondary didn't help, but you have to get at least a FG attempt on that drive if you're Cousins.When your team scores 34 points, you should win the game. That loss was not on Cousins.Maybe if Cousins actually starts winning games and not having nice fantasy days against the crappy D's this is a real question. At least IMO. Cousins lit up Atlanta last year but the Skins still lost. He then proceeded to suck and lose every game. This could very well repeat itself or he could have turned the corner. If you ask this question to the general population, Cousins will win, probably comfortably. But I think the voting would be different with Redskins fans.I was gonna start a poll, but i really want just Washington fans to answer, so i'll ask in here
right now today who do you think is more likely the choice for the QB of this team going forward? RG3 or Cousins?
The good ol days when we actually had a kickerMy favorite part about Cousins is that he always makes me think of Chip Lohmiller (#8).
Can't go but good man selling only to Redskins fan!I'm not going to Thursday night's game. PM me if you are interested in tickets. No Giants fans allowed.
Wasn't Chip won of the last straight leg kickers in the NFL? Don't see many any more it seems...We called him Chip Polekiller in his early years because always seemed to hit the upright.
I actually think Forbath is pretty decent but he sure as Heck choked when we needed him to come through. He makes the long ones and missed the short ones. I'm sure it was "a bad hold."The good ol days when we actually had a kickerMy favorite part about Cousins is that he always makes me think of Chip Lohmiller (#8).
It was reported last week that RG3's trade value has not diminished...his unique skill set is what keeps him high and he can be very valuable in the right system. Not making it up, as I read it on twitter and the discussion came up.On the RGIII vs. Cousins debate, I am happy to just let it play out and see where it goes. I mentioned the worst case scenario is that the Redskins end up with no starting QB from the 2012 draft. The best case scenario is that they got two starting QBs.
The one sentiment that I whole heartedly agree with: a tie goes to RGIII. That is clear cut. I think for Cousins to get the edge, he needs to play really well and they need to win games. I don't think it will be that hard to go back to RGIII if Cousins puts up great stats, looks good, and the team is 3-6 and virtually out of the playoffs.
Cousins is also a young QB and is still learning. It is entirely possible that he gets better the more playing time he gets.
Finally, if RGIII gets healthy and does not get the starting job back, I think you lose RGIII permanently. They will probably need to trade him in the off season and his value will be like a damaged goods QB. I think will be difficult for RGIII to be a back up QB here.
I think we need to put the onus on who it really belongs on...Special Teams and Defense. I agree with Snott, 34 points should be more than enough and had Special Teams done the job they were supposed to do, Redskins WIN! The defense also didn't step it up at certain times and they let the Eagles equal or surpass the momentum the offense had gained. Kirk could surely played a bit better, several behind receiver passes, but asking for perfection is unrealistic too. I also don't want to be misunderstood as our defense made many good to great plays, but they also had some significant breakdowns, which seems to be our achilles heel of sorts over the past few years. SPECIAL TEAMS and DEFENSEAll hail the mighty Eagles DEagles did the same thing to Andrew Luck the previous week.It's not just one game I am talking about. We are talking about a guy with a 1-4 career record as a starter. A career QB rating in the 70s and thanks to yesterday finally got his TD-INT ratio over 50%. But since you want to talk about yesterday, the game was in his hands. Short field, down by 3. Drive the team to tie or win and you show you got the goods. He didn't move the Skins at all. Some great plays by the Eagles secondary didn't help, but you have to get at least a FG attempt on that drive if you're Cousins.When your team scores 34 points, you should win the game. That loss was not on Cousins.Maybe if Cousins actually starts winning games and not having nice fantasy days against the crappy D's this is a real question. At least IMO. Cousins lit up Atlanta last year but the Skins still lost. He then proceeded to suck and lose every game. This could very well repeat itself or he could have turned the corner. If you ask this question to the general population, Cousins will win, probably comfortably. But I think the voting would be different with Redskins fans.I was gonna start a poll, but i really want just Washington fans to answer, so i'll ask in here
right now today who do you think is more likely the choice for the QB of this team going forward? RG3 or Cousins?
Yeah, I read an article saying some GMs out there said he could still get a 1st round pick in return. Not nearly what they paid, but it's not like his value has completely tanked. Many teams would gladly take a 24 year old with that skill set.It was reported last week that RG3's trade value has not diminished...his unique skill set is what keeps him high and he can be very valuable in the right system. Not making it up, as I read it on twitter and the discussion came up.On the RGIII vs. Cousins debate, I am happy to just let it play out and see where it goes. I mentioned the worst case scenario is that the Redskins end up with no starting QB from the 2012 draft. The best case scenario is that they got two starting QBs.
The one sentiment that I whole heartedly agree with: a tie goes to RGIII. That is clear cut. I think for Cousins to get the edge, he needs to play really well and they need to win games. I don't think it will be that hard to go back to RGIII if Cousins puts up great stats, looks good, and the team is 3-6 and virtually out of the playoffs.
Cousins is also a young QB and is still learning. It is entirely possible that he gets better the more playing time he gets.
Finally, if RGIII gets healthy and does not get the starting job back, I think you lose RGIII permanently. They will probably need to trade him in the off season and his value will be like a damaged goods QB. I think will be difficult for RGIII to be a back up QB here.
How many years have we been saying this? About 5? It's like a bad nightmare. You gotta hold your breath every time Teams takes the field.had Special Teams done the job they were supposed to do, Redskins WIN!
Sadly, at this point "what they paid" for either RGIII or Kirk Cousins is unimportant at this point. The costs are sunk, and the game is now to get maximum value for the two players currently on our roster.Yeah, I read an article saying some GMs out there said he could still get a 1st round pick in return. Not nearly what they paid, but it's not like his value has completely tanked. Many teams would gladly take a 24 year old with that skill set.It was reported last week that RG3's trade value has not diminished...his unique skill set is what keeps him Whhigh and he can be very valuable in the right system. Not making it up, as I read it on twitter and the discussion came up.On the RGIII vs. Cousins debate, I am happy to just let it play out and see where it goes. I mentioned the worst case scenario is that the Redskins end up with no starting QB from the 2012 draft. The best case scenario is that they got two starting QBs.
The one sentiment that I whole heartedly agree with: a tie goes to RGIII. That is clear cut. I think for Cousins to get the edge, he needs to play really well and they need to win games. I don't think it will be that hard to go back to RGIII if Cousins puts up great stats, looks good, and the team is 3-6 and virtually out of the playoffs.
Cousins is also a young QB and is still learning. It is entirely possible that he gets better the more playing time he gets.
Finally, if RGIII gets healthy and does not get the starting job back, I think you lose RGIII permanently. They will probably need to trade him in the off season and his value will be like a damaged goods QB. I think will be difficult for RGIII to be a back up QB here.
Yep, that was a total choke job on the 33 yard FG. That's one of those misses where you immediately say, "Well, we're definitely going to lose now." We've seen it too many times over the years.I actually think Forbath is pretty decent but he sure as Heck choked when we needed him to come through. He makes the long ones and missed the short ones. I'm sure it was "a bad hold."The good ol days when we actually had a kickerMy favorite part about Cousins is that he always makes me think of Chip Lohmiller (#8).
Hmm...maybe we should just go for it on 4th down. Kick it out of bounds on kick offs, at least starting at their own 40 is not 6/7 spot on the scoreboard.How many years have we been saying this? About 5? It's like a bad nightmare. You gotta hold your breath every time Teams takes the field.had Special Teams done the job they were supposed to do, Redskins WIN!
There was an article in the NY Times about it: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/05/upshot/4th-down-when-to-go-for-it-and-why.html?_r=0there's an idea that might work. I think going for it more often on 4th down is statistically the right call or something. I read that somewhere. Do it!
Cant wait for this. PM a reminder on saturday and i can probably find it for you online.Sean Taylor A Football Life is Friday night at 9. And I don't have the NFL Network. :(
DC Sports Bog has a nice write up on the program, tho some stuff at the following link could be considered a spoiler for the show.Sean Taylor A Football Life is Friday night at 9. And I don't have the NFL Network. :(
Don't think he does get the same trade value. RG3 supposedly could easily fetch a 1st rounder, while I doubt Kirk will fetch that regardless of how well he plays the next few games. RG3 has the intangibles that can't be taught and that is what makes his value stay high.What would it take for Cousins to get the same trade value as RGIII? 2 more solid games? 3?
And what is that value? A 2nd rounder or two?