What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official*** Washington Redskins 2014 Thread (In-Season) (1 Viewer)

Marvelous said:
I heard Chris Russell on the radio last night around 7 to 7:30 pm. He went completely off the deep end.

He basically said that the coaches have absolutely nothing to do with the players executing their assignments. The coaches coach and the players play. And yet, the coaches get all the blame when their teams don't perform well.

So their is no fault for Jim Haslett or Jay Gruden for the teams poor performance. It is all on the players. No mention that the coaches do help shape the roster. No mention that the front office forms the roster. No mention that the Redskins are continually under executing compared to their competition for the past 15 years.

He mentioned **** Lebeau, who is now struggling with Pittsburg's defense. Did he become stupid over the last three years? This part of the rant sounded a lot like Griffin put himself in the same sentence as Peyton Manning and Aaron Rodgers. Jim Haslett hasn't accomplished anything near what Lebeau has.

His next segment was on who the savior of the Redskins will be. Thankfully, I got home and did not hear that segment.
I heard part of that last night and though Russell's head was going to explode. He was screaming at a caller, saying anyone who blamed anyone but the Redskin players was a complete moron. He kept yelling that over and over again.

Russell's weird, it's almost like he's bipolar or something. You read his blog and sometimes it's very calm and well-reasoned and in depth. Then you hear him interact with people, or read him interacting with people on twitter, and he's like some crazy raccoon stuck in a house when people are holding the door open for him to get out but he's so hyper just keeps trying to bite them.

I apologize for insulting raccoons.

 
Mike/Kyle Shanahan were committed to running the ball. I am sure that showed up in practice, in the game plan, and in the play calling. And I am sure they were significantly better at executing the running plays. The Shanahans got a lot of good run blocking out of a very mediocre offensive line, which clearly played to their strength. Jay Gruden wants to throw the ball repeatedly and just sprinkle in the run. That is playing to the OL's weakness. And it makes the OL look really bad.There is a very small difference between winning and losing in the NFL. And coaching makes a huge difference.
The bolded is right on the money. Gruden has made a minor strength of the team into a major weakness.

 
This surprised me. Not that they were bad on the 3rd downs, but that they were this extraordinarily bad. This is almost unbelievable.

Here’s how the Redskins break down on third downs for the season (courtesy of ESPN Stats & Information):

Overall
Washington has faced 151 third-down situations, 25th in the NFL. But the Redskins haven’t done a whole lot on this down, ranking last with only two touchdowns. The league average is eight. They’ve allowed 17 sacks, with only Jacksonville surrendering more (19). The Redskins are 29th with 59 first downs (league average: 73). And their eight turnovers on this down are tied for 28th in the NFL.

Third-and-10-plus
The Redskins have been in this situation 48 times, which is 12th in the league. But they’ve been in this spot 31.8 percent of the time, which is ninth. The Redskins have converted just four of those instances into first downs (last in the NFL). The average number of first downs picked up is 12. The bad numbers don’t end there: They’ve been sacked seven times in these situations -- second most in the NFL -- and average an NFL-worst 3.71 yards per pass attempt.

By comparison, last season they had 64 third-and-10-plus situations -- but they converted 25 percent into first downs, a far greater percentage than this season. Also, they were in this situation only 27.2 percent of the time.

Third-and-6-to-9
Another trouble spot, which speaks to the issues at both quarterback and protection. The Redskins have faced this scenario only 33 times, least in the NFL. They’ve converted 11 into first downs, which is 31st. But they’ve allowed eight sacks here, which is tied for the worst in the NFL. They’ve scored one touchdown.

Third-and-5-or-less
The Redskins are 15th in the NFL with 70 plays run in this down and distance -- that’s 46.3 percent of their third downs. They’ve managed 44 first downs when facing this scenario, 13th best in the NFL. But, again, only one touchdown. They’ve gained a first down on 13 of the 21 times they’ve run the ball and have allowed only two sacks.

Third-and-3-or-less
This is a popular down and distance for Washington, with 46 plays (tied for ninth). But the Redskins haven’t been as successful when facing a shorter distance, converting 26 into first downs (tied for 21st). And this speaks, perhaps, to not having a run game made for short distances, as the Redskins average 2.11 yards per carry -- ranking them 25th -- on 19 runs in this situation.
John Keim

 
This surprised me. Not that they were bad on the 3rd downs, but that they were this extraordinarily bad. This is almost unbelievable.

Here’s how the Redskins break down on third downs for the season (courtesy of ESPN Stats & Information):Overall

Washington has faced 151 third-down situations, 25th in the NFL. But the Redskins haven’t done a whole lot on this down, ranking last with only two touchdowns. The league average is eight. They’ve allowed 17 sacks, with only Jacksonville surrendering more (19). The Redskins are 29th with 59 first downs (league average: 73). And their eight turnovers on this down are tied for 28th in the NFL.Third-and-10-plus

The Redskins have been in this situation 48 times, which is 12th in the league. But they’ve been in this spot 31.8 percent of the time, which is ninth. The Redskins have converted just four of those instances into first downs (last in the NFL). The average number of first downs picked up is 12. The bad numbers don’t end there: They’ve been sacked seven times in these situations -- second most in the NFL -- and average an NFL-worst 3.71 yards per pass attempt.By comparison, last season they had 64 third-and-10-plus situations -- but they converted 25 percent into first downs, a far greater percentage than this season. Also, they were in this situation only 27.2 percent of the time.Third-and-6-to-9

Another trouble spot, which speaks to the issues at both quarterback and protection. The Redskins have faced this scenario only 33 times, least in the NFL. They’ve converted 11 into first downs, which is 31st. But they’ve allowed eight sacks here, which is tied for the worst in the NFL. They’ve scored one touchdown.Third-and-5-or-less

The Redskins are 15th in the NFL with 70 plays run in this down and distance -- that’s 46.3 percent of their third downs. They’ve managed 44 first downs when facing this scenario, 13th best in the NFL. But, again, only one touchdown. They’ve gained a first down on 13 of the 21 times they’ve run the ball and have allowed only two sacks.Third-and-3-or-less

This is a popular down and distance for Washington, with 46 plays (tied for ninth). But the Redskins haven’t been as successful when facing a shorter distance, converting 26 into first downs (tied for 21st). And this speaks, perhaps, to not having a run game made for short distances, as the Redskins average 2.11 yards per carry -- ranking them 25th -- on 19 runs in this situation.
John Keim
But they are 100% on all of those conversions when the players actually execute the plays. /Grunden&Brunell4MVP

 
Sebowski said:
Brunell4MVP said:
Personally I like Gruden. He's not a puppet. He reminds me a lot of Marty S from a personality standpoint, and I think this team badly needs a dictator as the head coach. I do think he abandons the run too early. I think he needs to make better play calls in short yardage and goal line situations. Both of those he can improve on over time. I think he manages the clock OK, has a good passing scheme, and looks in control on the sidelines. There are always minor mistakes, but overall he does decent for a first year HC. He just needs a couple of years to fine tune it, show he's in charge, drop the DC, and get better talent (assuming Allen doesn't screw it up).
This is Gruden's rep, but I don't see it. A lot of sacks this season are because no one is open. These are good WRs and TEs. If no one is open. That is scheme.
They are ranked 10th in passing yards. They are ranked 2nd in yards per pass. How's that bad, especially in year 1 of a system with questionable qbs.
You look at stats. I'll watch the games.
It's been repeatedly cited by credible NFL Analysts, critiquing Robert Griffin, that there's a big difference between 'NFL Open' and 'NCAA Open', and that Griffin has demonstrated having an issue recognizing 'NFL Open', and throwing with confidence to WR who are 'NFL Open'. In conjunction with his seeming reluctance to throw the ball away, this is a large part as to why he's taking so many sacks and failing to move the ball downfield consistently, and getting banged up. QB's who have successfully made the transition to the NFL have, among the weapons in their arsenal, the ability to recognize a receiver who is 'NFL Open', and have the confidence, arm strength and touch to fit the ball into very tight windows consistently.

Division 1 college football is so much different than the NFL. At the QB level, it's almost a completely different game. 'Atheletes', can have enormous success at the college level that just doesn't translate to the NFL, because at the NFL level, that atheletic advantage becomes largely a moot point, as everyone at the NFL level is a pretty decent athelete, and the 'game speed' developed from learning to 'do without thinking' is a tremendous foil to pure athletic speed, when it's compromised by variations in a learning curve. As I've mentioned before, that's why practice is repetition after repetition after repetition, until things become second nature, because only when things become second nature, can an athletic player regain any speed advantage that he might have over his peers. Robert Griffin's successful prep career and college career were defined by his athleticism much more than his football intelligence. This is fact which anyone can see by watching tape and reading articles about his high school and college days. There are so many fundamentals a QB with less athletic ability MUST learn to become successful because he doesn't have the kind of athletic ability that makes him a multidimensional threat to fall back on.

In 2012 when Griffin was shiny and new and presented something unique to NFL Defenses and Defensive Coordinators, largely due to his athleticism and triple-threat potential, he had much bigger windows to throw to. You can see that in the film of the 2012 season. You don't see receivers that open very often in the NFL unless there are blown coverages or the scheme breaks down during the course of a play, which of course, it did, because Griffin at the time was a very dangerous multidimensional athelete - but that glaring speed and tremendous athleticism hid some deficiences and hampered his development in some pretty critical things he needed to learn early on to ensure future and consistent success. Namely, reading defenses, diagnosing blitzes and coverages, and identifying 'hot reads'. Again, to succeed long-term in the NFL as a QB, you have to learn the technical skills of playing the quarterback position, no matter your athletic ability. To do this, a player has to have both the intelligence, and the willingness to do so.

In 2013, not only was Griffin coming off injury, and some, including myself would argue, brought back too soon, but Defensive Coordinators had a chance to review plenty of film, dissect his weaknesses and develop schemes to counter him in the offseason leading up to September 2013. So, not only are they more prepared to properly game plan for him and scheme to limit his effectiveness, when it came time to play against him, they got a less effective, 'reduced' version of Griffin.

Think about it: that's exponential change. Defenses were more prepared to face him, and the Griffin they faced was less effective, largely because of the lingering effects of his injury...

...but also, and this has now been cited by multiple credible sources, Griffin is not necessarily a student of the game in the sense of what the NFL requires of it's elite QB's like Peyton, Rodgers, Brees...or a special example like Brady, or closer to his cohort, Russell Wilson. What separated Griffin from his peers was his athleticism more that anything else. The injury reduced that factor, which meant that to maintain his advantage, he was going to have to improve in other facets of QB play where he had deficits.

Specifically: reading Defenses, recognizing blitzes, diagnosing coverages and making adjustments at the line of scrimmages - praise Griffin all you want, but these have been, and remain, deficiencies with him that started becoming obvious last season, and continue to plague him this year. Again, the only way to improve in these areas is by having football intelligence, and the willingness to put in the work and time to develop them.

At that point, whether it was on the Coaching Staff, or him, or both, it was up to someone(s) to turn him into a multidimensional quarterback, rather than a multidimensional athelete. You can't say Griffin isn't partly, and quite possibly majorly to blame for this, because, again, credible sources agree that he doesn't appear willing to put in the time or work to develop those skills. I don't think anyone has ever questioned his football intelligence or capacity to learn, but plenty have questioned his willingness to work 'Tom Brady hard'.

Here's what I consider to be facts:

Coming out of college, Robert Griffin was recognized as a tremendous athelete. He was a better athelete that he was a quarterback, and came from systems in high school and college that emphasized his athletic ability over his QB IQ. That played to his advantage in his rookie season as DC's were trying to figure him out, and scheming to minimize the damage rather than neutralize him with anything other than brute force. It wasn't about confusing him at the line of scrimmage with different looks, blitzes and coverages, because Griffin wasn't even paying attention to that kind of stuff - that was the hidden brilliance of Kyle's scheme with him - it didn't rely on Griffin to be a cerebral QB, but rather to break down defenses by forcing them to account for him as a runner with lightning quick speed, and coverages breaking down as they worried more about him as a runner than as a passer, leaving receivers wide open.

Athleticism can only get you so far, and when it's reduced or taken away, a Player has to find something else to rely on to succeed - the mental part of the game. Even had he not suffered the injury in the 2012 Playoff game, NFL Defensive coordinators were going to have an offseason to dissect miles of tape and force Griffin into situations where he was going to have to use his head as much, or more, than his feet, to find success.

Post-injury, Griffin's athleticism has been obviously reduced.

He was never considered to be a 'cerebral' QB like Manning, Rodgers, Brees, Luck or Brady or Wilson. With the athleticism reduced/taken away, for Griffin to have continued success at the NFL level, he was going to have to work like Tom Brady to improve his skills as a QB. Tom Brady didn't fall to the 6th Round of the NFL Draft because so many Teams missed something and whiffed on him by not taking him earlier. Tom Brady worked his ### off to get where he is today where a QB drafted in the 6th Round is mentioned in the same breath as some of the modern day all-time greats who were already destined for success in the NFL largely because their QB skills had been developed for years because they didn't have the kind of athletic edge that a QB like Griffin or Wilson did. Brady is a great NFL QB, on a level with his peers Manning, Rodgers, Brees, but his path to greatness was different - at the NFL level he had to work harder than they did to achieve that level of greatness.

Another thing that I've only recently heard as a criticism of Griffin, but has merit, questions his ability to take command of the huddle/be a field general. When a Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers, Brady or Brees type QB takes the field, not only does he know how to play the QB position, he has command of the entire offense. That's not just the routes, the trees, the blocking schemes - he knows not only his own responsibilities, but the responsibilities of every player, on every play, as well or better than every player knows their responsibilites themselves. That means he can correct things he sees that are wrong, and rather than dispute it or second guess it, the other players just do what he says. That includes not only how deep a back lines up in the backfield or how a WR sets up at the line of scrimmage, but even how much space there is between two offensive linemen. In every situation. On every. single. play. Again, this requires a tremendous amount of time, energy and effort. Hard work having nothing to do with athletic ability, but rather intelligence and willingness.

Again, I can't remember anyone questioning Griffin's intelligence, and he seems like a smart enough guy to me...but part of the Griffin story is how much time, energy and effort is dedicated, by both him and his 'people' into developing him as a marketable commodity. His 'brand'. His media savvy and presence across all mediums. That's a big problem for an athelete with aspirations to be an NFL QB whose playing background is marked by an exploitation of his athletic ability at the expense of developing the other aspects of his game.

There may be valid criticisms about the coaching Griffin has received at the NFL level under the Shanahan and Gruden regimes, but at the end of the day, it's a two-way street and Griffen, especially due to his background must be willing to work 'Tom Brady hard' on his NFL IQ to one day be considered very good, much less elite. There's sufficient documentation from credible sources that, thus far, he doesn't appear to be that laser-focused or have that burning desire and drive, that Spartan-like dedication to put everything else in life on hold while developing his craft. That's a much bigger issue than a lot of what we're discussing, and it should be out there front and center in any discussion about the Redskins QB position.

 
Bruce Allen has refused to talk to John Keim, Diana Marie Russini, and others until the end of the season.
LOL, what is he going to say?" Yep, we suck and it starts with me sucking the most. I made a bad situation even worse and have made it a full competition with Vinny on who can be more of Dan's buddy and inept at doing my actual job."

 
Bruce Allen has refused to talk to John Keim, Diana Marie Russini, and others until the end of the season.
LOL, what is he going to say?" Yep, we suck and it starts with me sucking the most. I made a bad situation even worse and have made it a full competition with Vinny on who can be more of Dan's buddy and inept at doing my actual job."
"As a GM, my job is done after the draft and free agency"

At least that's what Gruden would say

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bruce Allen has refused to talk to John Keim, Diana Marie Russini, and others until the end of the season.
LOL, what is he going to say?" Yep, we suck and it starts with me sucking the most. I made a bad situation even worse and have made it a full competition with Vinny on who can be more of Dan's buddy and inept at doing my actual job."
"As a GM, my job is done after the draft and free agency"

At least that's what Gruden would say
:lol:

 
Sebowski said:
Brunell4MVP said:
Personally I like Gruden. He's not a puppet. He reminds me a lot of Marty S from a personality standpoint, and I think this team badly needs a dictator as the head coach. I do think he abandons the run too early. I think he needs to make better play calls in short yardage and goal line situations. Both of those he can improve on over time. I think he manages the clock OK, has a good passing scheme, and looks in control on the sidelines. There are always minor mistakes, but overall he does decent for a first year HC. He just needs a couple of years to fine tune it, show he's in charge, drop the DC, and get better talent (assuming Allen doesn't screw it up).
This is Gruden's rep, but I don't see it. A lot of sacks this season are because no one is open. These are good WRs and TEs. If no one is open. That is scheme.
They are ranked 10th in passing yards. They are ranked 2nd in yards per pass. How's that bad, especially in year 1 of a system with questionable qbs.
You look at stats. I'll watch the games.
It's been repeatedly cited by credible NFL Analysts, critiquing Robert Griffin, that there's a big difference between 'NFL Open' and 'NCAA Open', and that Griffin has demonstrated having an issue recognizing 'NFL Open', and throwing with confidence to WR who are 'NFL Open'. In conjunction with his seeming reluctance to throw the ball away, this is a large part as to why he's taking so many sacks and failing to move the ball downfield consistently, and getting banged up. QB's who have successfully made the transition to the NFL have, among the weapons in their arsenal, the ability to recognize a receiver who is 'NFL Open', and have the confidence, arm strength and touch to fit the ball into very tight windows consistently.

Division 1 college football is so much different than the NFL. At the QB level, it's almost a completely different game. 'Atheletes', can have enormous success at the college level that just doesn't translate to the NFL, because at the NFL level, that atheletic advantage becomes largely a moot point, as everyone at the NFL level is a pretty decent athelete, and the 'game speed' developed from learning to 'do without thinking' is a tremendous foil to pure athletic speed, when it's compromised by variations in a learning curve. As I've mentioned before, that's why practice is repetition after repetition after repetition, until things become second nature, because only when things become second nature, can an athletic player regain any speed advantage that he might have over his peers. Robert Griffin's successful prep career and college career were defined by his athleticism much more than his football intelligence. This is fact which anyone can see by watching tape and reading articles about his high school and college days. There are so many fundamentals a QB with less athletic ability MUST learn to become successful because he doesn't have the kind of athletic ability that makes him a multidimensional threat to fall back on.

In 2012 when Griffin was shiny and new and presented something unique to NFL Defenses and Defensive Coordinators, largely due to his athleticism and triple-threat potential, he had much bigger windows to throw to. You can see that in the film of the 2012 season. You don't see receivers that open very often in the NFL unless there are blown coverages or the scheme breaks down during the course of a play, which of course, it did, because Griffin at the time was a very dangerous multidimensional athelete - but that glaring speed and tremendous athleticism hid some deficiences and hampered his development in some pretty critical things he needed to learn early on to ensure future and consistent success. Namely, reading defenses, diagnosing blitzes and coverages, and identifying 'hot reads'. Again, to succeed long-term in the NFL as a QB, you have to learn the technical skills of playing the quarterback position, no matter your athletic ability. To do this, a player has to have both the intelligence, and the willingness to do so.

In 2013, not only was Griffin coming off injury, and some, including myself would argue, brought back too soon, but Defensive Coordinators had a chance to review plenty of film, dissect his weaknesses and develop schemes to counter him in the offseason leading up to September 2013. So, not only are they more prepared to properly game plan for him and scheme to limit his effectiveness, when it came time to play against him, they got a less effective, 'reduced' version of Griffin.

Think about it: that's exponential change. Defenses were more prepared to face him, and the Griffin they faced was less effective, largely because of the lingering effects of his injury...

...but also, and this has now been cited by multiple credible sources, Griffin is not necessarily a student of the game in the sense of what the NFL requires of it's elite QB's like Peyton, Rodgers, Brees...or a special example like Brady, or closer to his cohort, Russell Wilson. What separated Griffin from his peers was his athleticism more that anything else. The injury reduced that factor, which meant that to maintain his advantage, he was going to have to improve in other facets of QB play where he had deficits.

Specifically: reading Defenses, recognizing blitzes, diagnosing coverages and making adjustments at the line of scrimmages - praise Griffin all you want, but these have been, and remain, deficiencies with him that started becoming obvious last season, and continue to plague him this year. Again, the only way to improve in these areas is by having football intelligence, and the willingness to put in the work and time to develop them.

At that point, whether it was on the Coaching Staff, or him, or both, it was up to someone(s) to turn him into a multidimensional quarterback, rather than a multidimensional athelete. You can't say Griffin isn't partly, and quite possibly majorly to blame for this, because, again, credible sources agree that he doesn't appear willing to put in the time or work to develop those skills. I don't think anyone has ever questioned his football intelligence or capacity to learn, but plenty have questioned his willingness to work 'Tom Brady hard'.

Here's what I consider to be facts:

Coming out of college, Robert Griffin was recognized as a tremendous athelete. He was a better athelete that he was a quarterback, and came from systems in high school and college that emphasized his athletic ability over his QB IQ. That played to his advantage in his rookie season as DC's were trying to figure him out, and scheming to minimize the damage rather than neutralize him with anything other than brute force. It wasn't about confusing him at the line of scrimmage with different looks, blitzes and coverages, because Griffin wasn't even paying attention to that kind of stuff - that was the hidden brilliance of Kyle's scheme with him - it didn't rely on Griffin to be a cerebral QB, but rather to break down defenses by forcing them to account for him as a runner with lightning quick speed, and coverages breaking down as they worried more about him as a runner than as a passer, leaving receivers wide open.

Athleticism can only get you so far, and when it's reduced or taken away, a Player has to find something else to rely on to succeed - the mental part of the game. Even had he not suffered the injury in the 2012 Playoff game, NFL Defensive coordinators were going to have an offseason to dissect miles of tape and force Griffin into situations where he was going to have to use his head as much, or more, than his feet, to find success.

Post-injury, Griffin's athleticism has been obviously reduced.

He was never considered to be a 'cerebral' QB like Manning, Rodgers, Brees, Luck or Brady or Wilson. With the athleticism reduced/taken away, for Griffin to have continued success at the NFL level, he was going to have to work like Tom Brady to improve his skills as a QB. Tom Brady didn't fall to the 6th Round of the NFL Draft because so many Teams missed something and whiffed on him by not taking him earlier. Tom Brady worked his ### off to get where he is today where a QB drafted in the 6th Round is mentioned in the same breath as some of the modern day all-time greats who were already destined for success in the NFL largely because their QB skills had been developed for years because they didn't have the kind of athletic edge that a QB like Griffin or Wilson did. Brady is a great NFL QB, on a level with his peers Manning, Rodgers, Brees, but his path to greatness was different - at the NFL level he had to work harder than they did to achieve that level of greatness.

Another thing that I've only recently heard as a criticism of Griffin, but has merit, questions his ability to take command of the huddle/be a field general. When a Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers, Brady or Brees type QB takes the field, not only does he know how to play the QB position, he has command of the entire offense. That's not just the routes, the trees, the blocking schemes - he knows not only his own responsibilities, but the responsibilities of every player, on every play, as well or better than every player knows their responsibilites themselves. That means he can correct things he sees that are wrong, and rather than dispute it or second guess it, the other players just do what he says. That includes not only how deep a back lines up in the backfield or how a WR sets up at the line of scrimmage, but even how much space there is between two offensive linemen. In every situation. On every. single. play. Again, this requires a tremendous amount of time, energy and effort. Hard work having nothing to do with athletic ability, but rather intelligence and willingness.

Again, I can't remember anyone questioning Griffin's intelligence, and he seems like a smart enough guy to me...but part of the Griffin story is how much time, energy and effort is dedicated, by both him and his 'people' into developing him as a marketable commodity. His 'brand'. His media savvy and presence across all mediums. That's a big problem for an athelete with aspirations to be an NFL QB whose playing background is marked by an exploitation of his athletic ability at the expense of developing the other aspects of his game.

There may be valid criticisms about the coaching Griffin has received at the NFL level under the Shanahan and Gruden regimes, but at the end of the day, it's a two-way street and Griffen, especially due to his background must be willing to work 'Tom Brady hard' on his NFL IQ to one day be considered very good, much less elite. There's sufficient documentation from credible sources that, thus far, he doesn't appear to be that laser-focused or have that burning desire and drive, that Spartan-like dedication to put everything else in life on hold while developing his craft. That's a much bigger issue than a lot of what we're discussing, and it should be out there front and center in any discussion about the Redskins QB position.
:goodposting:

 
Guys, Saturday night at midnight, our work here is done.
I'm trying to figure out other ways to use this:

"As teachers, our jobs are done Sunday nights after lesson planning"

"As parents, our jobs are done once our children turn 18"

"As doctors, our jobs are done once we give you a perscription"

 
A few things...

First, I think it's possible for there to be some legitimacy to what Gruden is saying. It's possible that the players aren't performing as they should. As a manager, I can tell you that I've had employees that simply weren't qualified for the job. I could go to great lengths and it didn't matter; they were going to fail. So, like I said, it's not totally unheard of that that something is a player's fault. I think we all get that. "Execution" is a thing.

Second, regardless of whether there is a legit performance issue or not, there's the obvious issue we've discussed that it's just not good leadership to out the players each and every week in the media. In my position, I don't ever deal with media, but I NEVER once bad-mouthed poor performing employees to anyone other than my supervisor (and others in the hierarchy) or trusted friends/mentors (outside of my team structure) as a way for me to vent and gain some other advice. None of my "team" ever heard me say anything bad about the employee. To this day, they all think she suddenly decided to retire. Maybe some of them suspect I took action, but we don't discuss it. It really just shouldn't happen. The only situations I can think of where it has any amount of success was with an established coach like Parcels with maybe one or two players who he probably had a really good relationship with.

Third, we have the obvious issue that if there is mass under-performing, it's really hard to then just blame the players. If my entire staff was under-performing, then I see that as me under-performing. My boss would see that as me under-performing and discuss that with me. Through discussion, maybe we reach the conclusion that I'm doing enough in my position and the real problem is wide-spread lack of talent. That's possible. In that scenario, I better present a plan of how that's going to change, depending on how talent is acquired in a particular organization. If there is an overall talent issue leading to poor performance (despite acceptable coaching), then that's clearly an issue and needs to be fixed. In the NFL, there really isn't too much you can do in the middle of the season to immediately fix that. But, you can then focus on those bringing in the talent and they better have a really solid plan to improve it. And, hopefully, they'd have some track record of finding talent or else why believe the future will be different? If I hire 10 people who all don't perform, why would my boss continue to let me interview and select employees? Also, if I have people who continue to fail and I keep putting them in position to fail, that's partly on me. Why does Ryan Clark get to go out there every week and try to tackle with a diving shoulder instead of wrapping up? I guess maybe the next guy really is THAT bad that he can't even unseat a bad player. That's a tough spot to be in.

And, again, if the case is that the coaches are doing an acceptable job and there is just a lack of talent, it's still not acceptable to out them in public. That really needs to stop and I'm shocked it continues.

I'll stop before I reach a nittany word count.

 
Bruce Allen has refused to talk to John Keim, Diana Marie Russini, and others until the end of the season.
This is tragic news because now the DC area won't be able to hear about the great Secret Santa celebration they had this week at Redskins Park.

Looking at stubhub for tickets at the game and you can get seats in the 100 sections near the 30 yard line for under $40 and seats in the 200 section for under $20. I mean you can't get that for a pre-season game. And yet the funny thing is that we all know that the Redskins will say that the attendance will be over 69,000 :bs:

 
A few things...

First, I think it's possible for there to be some legitimacy to what Gruden is saying. It's possible that the players aren't performing as they should. As a manager, I can tell you that I've had employees that simply weren't qualified for the job. I could go to great lengths and it didn't matter; they were going to fail. So, like I said, it's not totally unheard of that that something is a player's fault. I think we all get that. "Execution" is a thing.

Second, regardless of whether there is a legit performance issue or not, there's the obvious issue we've discussed that it's just not good leadership to out the players each and every week in the media. In my position, I don't ever deal with media, but I NEVER once bad-mouthed poor performing employees to anyone other than my supervisor (and others in the hierarchy) or trusted friends/mentors (outside of my team structure) as a way for me to vent and gain some other advice. None of my "team" ever heard me say anything bad about the employee. To this day, they all think she suddenly decided to retire. Maybe some of them suspect I took action, but we don't discuss it. It really just shouldn't happen. The only situations I can think of where it has any amount of success was with an established coach like Parcels with maybe one or two players who he probably had a really good relationship with.

Third, we have the obvious issue that if there is mass under-performing, it's really hard to then just blame the players. If my entire staff was under-performing, then I see that as me under-performing. My boss would see that as me under-performing and discuss that with me. Through discussion, maybe we reach the conclusion that I'm doing enough in my position and the real problem is wide-spread lack of talent. That's possible. In that scenario, I better present a plan of how that's going to change, depending on how talent is acquired in a particular organization. If there is an overall talent issue leading to poor performance (despite acceptable coaching), then that's clearly an issue and needs to be fixed. In the NFL, there really isn't too much you can do in the middle of the season to immediately fix that. But, you can then focus on those bringing in the talent and they better have a really solid plan to improve it. And, hopefully, they'd have some track record of finding talent or else why believe the future will be different? If I hire 10 people who all don't perform, why would my boss continue to let me interview and select employees? Also, if I have people who continue to fail and I keep putting them in position to fail, that's partly on me. Why does Ryan Clark get to go out there every week and try to tackle with a diving shoulder instead of wrapping up? I guess maybe the next guy really is THAT bad that he can't even unseat a bad player. That's a tough spot to be in.

And, again, if the case is that the coaches are doing an acceptable job and there is just a lack of talent, it's still not acceptable to out them in public. That really needs to stop and I'm shocked it continues.

I'll stop before I reach a nittany word count.
So do you think, in an indirect way, Gruden is throwing Allen under the bus? If he is saying that he is doing his job during the week coaching them up and then they fail on Sunday, then it has to be that they are not good

enough to succeed, that for Gruden to be successful at coaching up players, he needs better players.

I agree totally, if that is his point, then why publicly criticize the players? Them not being good enough isn't their fault, it is the fault of the Redskins for thinking they were good enough.

 
Bruce Allen has refused to talk to John Keim, Diana Marie Russini, and others until the end of the season.
This is tragic news because now the DC area won't be able to hear about the great Secret Santa celebration they had this week at Redskins Park.

Looking at stubhub for tickets at the game and you can get seats in the 100 sections near the 30 yard line for under $40 and seats in the 200 section for under $20. I mean you can't get that for a pre-season game. And yet the funny thing is that we all know that the Redskins will say that the attendance will be over 69,000 :bs:
If the weather is decent, attendance will be ok. Cheap tickets lead to tons of people who usually wouldn't go to a game making a trip out. I think people tend to over-estimate the number of no-shows based on a couple high-level camera views at a few points during the game. What might hurt attendance is there just aren't a ton of Rams fans. But, whichever ones do exist in the area, they'll be there. The Eagles and Cowboys games are going to be ugly.

Then again, maybe this will finally be the time that people simply don't show up even if the weather is fine. I'll be there with one of my sons.

 
A few things...

First, I think it's possible for there to be some legitimacy to what Gruden is saying. It's possible that the players aren't performing as they should. As a manager, I can tell you that I've had employees that simply weren't qualified for the job. I could go to great lengths and it didn't matter; they were going to fail. So, like I said, it's not totally unheard of that that something is a player's fault. I think we all get that. "Execution" is a thing.

Second, regardless of whether there is a legit performance issue or not, there's the obvious issue we've discussed that it's just not good leadership to out the players each and every week in the media. In my position, I don't ever deal with media, but I NEVER once bad-mouthed poor performing employees to anyone other than my supervisor (and others in the hierarchy) or trusted friends/mentors (outside of my team structure) as a way for me to vent and gain some other advice. None of my "team" ever heard me say anything bad about the employee. To this day, they all think she suddenly decided to retire. Maybe some of them suspect I took action, but we don't discuss it. It really just shouldn't happen. The only situations I can think of where it has any amount of success was with an established coach like Parcels with maybe one or two players who he probably had a really good relationship with.

Third, we have the obvious issue that if there is mass under-performing, it's really hard to then just blame the players. If my entire staff was under-performing, then I see that as me under-performing. My boss would see that as me under-performing and discuss that with me. Through discussion, maybe we reach the conclusion that I'm doing enough in my position and the real problem is wide-spread lack of talent. That's possible. In that scenario, I better present a plan of how that's going to change, depending on how talent is acquired in a particular organization. If there is an overall talent issue leading to poor performance (despite acceptable coaching), then that's clearly an issue and needs to be fixed. In the NFL, there really isn't too much you can do in the middle of the season to immediately fix that. But, you can then focus on those bringing in the talent and they better have a really solid plan to improve it. And, hopefully, they'd have some track record of finding talent or else why believe the future will be different? If I hire 10 people who all don't perform, why would my boss continue to let me interview and select employees? Also, if I have people who continue to fail and I keep putting them in position to fail, that's partly on me. Why does Ryan Clark get to go out there every week and try to tackle with a diving shoulder instead of wrapping up? I guess maybe the next guy really is THAT bad that he can't even unseat a bad player. That's a tough spot to be in.

And, again, if the case is that the coaches are doing an acceptable job and there is just a lack of talent, it's still not acceptable to out them in public. That really needs to stop and I'm shocked it continues.

I'll stop before I reach a nittany word count.
So do you think, in an indirect way, Gruden is throwing Allen under the bus? If he is saying that he is doing his job during the week coaching them up and then they fail on Sunday, then it has to be that they are not good

enough to succeed, that for Gruden to be successful at coaching up players, he needs better players.

I agree totally, if that is his point, then why publicly criticize the players? Them not being good enough isn't their fault, it is the fault of the Redskins for thinking they were good enough.
I think criticizing the players is a separate issue. There's are two questions.

Why aren't they winning?

Even if he's right in his assessment to the first question, then why is the coach publicly saying what he's saying?

He probably just thinks he's doing his job by talking to the media and being honest about things. I hopes it's just a rookie mistake. But, if it is, then I would have expected someone to tell him to stop by now. Why does Allen allow that to continue?

My guess is many of the great coaches would publicly say, "We need to do a better job coaching them up." Then, in the locker room, they're saying, "Player X, you need to do better at X, Y, and Z. We've been over this repeatedly and you keep missing it. I can't do it for you. You need to get it or we'll use Player Y."

 
Say, could one of you fellow braves do me a favor and either post, or post a link, to the 2014 Washington Redskins Opening Day Roster? Thanks!

 
A few things...

First, I think it's possible for there to be some legitimacy to what Gruden is saying. It's possible that the players aren't performing as they should. As a manager, I can tell you that I've had employees that simply weren't qualified for the job. I could go to great lengths and it didn't matter; they were going to fail. So, like I said, it's not totally unheard of that that something is a player's fault. I think we all get that. "Execution" is a thing.

Second, regardless of whether there is a legit performance issue or not, there's the obvious issue we've discussed that it's just not good leadership to out the players each and every week in the media. In my position, I don't ever deal with media, but I NEVER once bad-mouthed poor performing employees to anyone other than my supervisor (and others in the hierarchy) or trusted friends/mentors (outside of my team structure) as a way for me to vent and gain some other advice. None of my "team" ever heard me say anything bad about the employee. To this day, they all think she suddenly decided to retire. Maybe some of them suspect I took action, but we don't discuss it. It really just shouldn't happen. The only situations I can think of where it has any amount of success was with an established coach like Parcels with maybe one or two players who he probably had a really good relationship with.

Third, we have the obvious issue that if there is mass under-performing, it's really hard to then just blame the players. If my entire staff was under-performing, then I see that as me under-performing. My boss would see that as me under-performing and discuss that with me. Through discussion, maybe we reach the conclusion that I'm doing enough in my position and the real problem is wide-spread lack of talent. That's possible. In that scenario, I better present a plan of how that's going to change, depending on how talent is acquired in a particular organization. If there is an overall talent issue leading to poor performance (despite acceptable coaching), then that's clearly an issue and needs to be fixed. In the NFL, there really isn't too much you can do in the middle of the season to immediately fix that. But, you can then focus on those bringing in the talent and they better have a really solid plan to improve it. And, hopefully, they'd have some track record of finding talent or else why believe the future will be different? If I hire 10 people who all don't perform, why would my boss continue to let me interview and select employees? Also, if I have people who continue to fail and I keep putting them in position to fail, that's partly on me. Why does Ryan Clark get to go out there every week and try to tackle with a diving shoulder instead of wrapping up? I guess maybe the next guy really is THAT bad that he can't even unseat a bad player. That's a tough spot to be in.

And, again, if the case is that the coaches are doing an acceptable job and there is just a lack of talent, it's still not acceptable to out them in public. That really needs to stop and I'm shocked it continues.

I'll stop before I reach a nittany word count.
So do you think, in an indirect way, Gruden is throwing Allen under the bus? If he is saying that he is doing his job during the week coaching them up and then they fail on Sunday, then it has to be that they are not good

enough to succeed, that for Gruden to be successful at coaching up players, he needs better players.

I agree totally, if that is his point, then why publicly criticize the players? Them not being good enough isn't their fault, it is the fault of the Redskins for thinking they were good enough.
I think criticizing the players is a separate issue. There's are two questions.

Why aren't they winning?

Even if he's right in his assessment to the first question, then why is the coach publicly saying what he's saying?

He probably just thinks he's doing his job by talking to the media and being honest about things. I hopes it's just a rookie mistake. But, if it is, then I would have expected someone to tell him to stop by now. Why does Allen allow that to continue?

My guess is many of the great coaches would publicly say, "We need to do a better job coaching them up." Then, in the locker room, they're saying, "Player X, you need to do better at X, Y, and Z. We've been over this repeatedly and you keep missing it. I can't do it for you. You need to get it or we'll use Player Y."
My basic point on criticizing players publicly: it does not help the team in anyway. Gruden could have very valid points. But the public critiques aren't helping the players, him, or the team.

Think about the Adam Archuleta debacle. Everyone knew it was not working out. Joe Gibbs never said one bad thing about Archuleta publicly. Even when Archuleta was reduced to being the punter team's up back, Gibbs never criticized Archuleta publicly. I am sure Gibbs talked to Archuleta privately about his performance and what they were looking for.

The most pointed I ever heard Gibbs on player performance was responding to a question about LaVar Arrington. Gibbs said LaVar knows exactly what he needs to do to get more playing time. What those details are were never made public. And they shouldn't be.

 
It's so funny to see all of us in here criticizing Gruden, yet it seems like he's getting a free pass from the media around here. I'm going to guess that's the case because he gives the media what they want. You don't hear other 1st year HC this season bashing their players or their starting QB in the media. It's pretty much unheard of.

I can't remember if I saw it on here or another board, but someone brought up the suggestion that maybe Gruden is trying to get fired. Honestly, it seems plausible. He probably didn't know the mess he was walking into and now has realized it just isn't going to work here. So why not go out guns blazing? He knows if he gets fired, he's getting $16M over the next 4 years. He's in a win-win situation. Snyder/Allen are to blame for that. Who in the world gives a 1st time HC a fully guaranteed 5 year deal?

 
Who in the world gives a 1st time HC a fully guaranteed 5 year deal?
Washington. Because they have to. Gruden and his agent knew they were in the position of power during that negotiation. He was able to demand that length of contract because the team was in the position it was in, and because of the way they've been run for the last 10 years.

Either the contract works out because he builds a team over a few years, or (more likely) get paid handsomely to sit at home because the organization is completely dysfunctional and and simply cannot get out of their own way. They'll fire him after 2015 when they go 4-12, after trading away Griffin, Cousins, and YET ANOTHER 1st round draft pick.

Your 2015 Washington team, lead by Brian Hoyer.

 
Who in the world gives a 1st time HC a fully guaranteed 5 year deal?
Washington. Because they have to. Gruden and his agent knew they were in the position of power during that negotiation. He was able to demand that length of contract because the team was in the position it was in, and because of the way they've been run for the last 10 years.

Either the contract works out because he builds a team over a few years, or (more likely) get paid handsomely to sit at home because the organization is completely dysfunctional and and simply cannot get out of their own way. They'll fire him after 2015 when they go 4-12, after trading away Griffin, Cousins, and YET ANOTHER 1st round draft pick.

Your 2015 Washington team, lead by Brian Hoyer.
The sad thing is, that doesn't seem too far fetched.

 
Sebowski said:
Brunell4MVP said:
Personally I like Gruden. He's not a puppet. He reminds me a lot of Marty S from a personality standpoint, and I think this team badly needs a dictator as the head coach. I do think he abandons the run too early. I think he needs to make better play calls in short yardage and goal line situations. Both of those he can improve on over time. I think he manages the clock OK, has a good passing scheme, and looks in control on the sidelines. There are always minor mistakes, but overall he does decent for a first year HC. He just needs a couple of years to fine tune it, show he's in charge, drop the DC, and get better talent (assuming Allen doesn't screw it up).
This is Gruden's rep, but I don't see it. A lot of sacks this season are because no one is open. These are good WRs and TEs. If no one is open. That is scheme.
A lot of the sacks are also because QBs simply aren't pulling the trigger and trusting those good WRs and TEs. "Open" is a relative term in the NFL. Garcon can have a DB on his hip and still be "open" in that he's a strong WR that can fight for and win balls. Jackson can have a DB within a yard or two of him but can quickly separate with the extra gear he has. Reed has a ridiculously large "catch radius". If balls aren't being delivered to those receivers at the proper time and spots, that is failed player execution.

ETA: And, since the above will almost certainly get read by some as an effort in Gruden apologetics, I don't support any belief that doesn't put a significant amount of blame for the team's problems on Gruden. But, the problems with this team are widespread and shared by all. The mountains of vitriol he seems to be attracting seems over the top, to me. And the players seem to be getting a free pass from many around here. At the moment, there's way too much sloppiness with the basics/fundamentals on the field. This is the NFL. Whether the coach is crappy or not, the players should look like they've played the game before.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
MattFancy said:
It's so funny to see all of us in here criticizing Gruden, yet it seems like he's getting a free pass from the media around here. I'm going to guess that's the case because he gives the media what they want.
Gruden is displaying more interest in making himself likeable to reporters and the public than in how to motivate and correct his players. And perhaps that's a smooth move, one that keeps reporters and others from looking to closely at his coaching.

As a couple other folks here have said, very few successfull coaches go out there week after week and ream their players in public. The do it in private where there's opportunity for back and forth, for "what should I have done?" and "this is why I did it" from the players so the coach can correct them (or whomever needs it). Embarrassing them publicly, when he knows they cannot answer back in any way, is just slapping people around because he can get away with it.

And at the same tim Gruden's wondering why the team's coming out flat and looking unmotivated in games. He doesn't have a clue that that's related to the public thrashings he's giving to players.

 
MattFancy said:
It's so funny to see all of us in here criticizing Gruden, yet it seems like he's getting a free pass from the media around here. I'm going to guess that's the case because he gives the media what they want. You don't hear other 1st year HC this season bashing their players or their starting QB in the media. It's pretty much unheard of.

I can't remember if I saw it on here or another board, but someone brought up the suggestion that maybe Gruden is trying to get fired. Honestly, it seems plausible. He probably didn't know the mess he was walking into and now has realized it just isn't going to work here. So why not go out guns blazing? He knows if he gets fired, he's getting $16M over the next 4 years. He's in a win-win situation. Snyder/Allen are to blame for that. Who in the world gives a 1st time HC a fully guaranteed 5 year deal?
That theory does not seem plausible to me. He's still fairly young and if he succeeded could get an extension and earn that money for several more years. If he goes out guns blazing, he's never going to get another shot at a head coaching job again and is either back to OC or following Jon into the booth.

Plus, he could simplify things by tying the Lombardi trophies to the back of his car, which he has not done yet.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of the sacks are also because QBs simply aren't pulling the trigger and trusting those good WRs and TEs. "Open" is a relative term in the NFL. Garcon can have a DB on his hip and still be "open" in that he's a strong WR that can fight for and win balls. Jackson can have a DB within a yard or two of him but can quickly separate with the extra gear he has. Reed has a ridiculously large "catch radius". If balls aren't being delivered to those receivers at the proper time and spots, that is failed player execution.
Cousins would pull the trigger too quickly because he was afraid -- of getting sacked. Griffin wouldn't pull the trigger because he was afraid --- of throwing to the wrong receiver or spot and getting a turnover.

That's 2 young QB's who have regressed and become afraid under Gruden. It's easy to say they're failing to execute and they are but that's not where coaching ends.

Why are they both failing to execute? Why are they both playing scared? Why have they both regressed since last year? A good coach would ask those questions. A rookie coach on a failing team would just place blame on execution.

 
But, the problems with this team are widespread and shared by all. The mountains of vitriol he seems to be attracting seems over the top, to me. And the players seem to be getting a free pass from many around here. At the moment, there's way too much sloppiness with the basics/fundamentals on the field.
I don't know where you're seeing anyone saying the players are good and the coach is bad. It's not in this thread and it certainly isn't in the Sunday game threads. A lot of the players are bad, and there's plenty of criticism of Bruce Allen here for exactly that -- picking those players. A lot of the players are playing badly and there's plenty of discussion of that, especially of Griffin and Cousins and the secondary and O-line. I don't share your interest in shielding Gruden from blame. There's plenty for Allen, for the players, and for Gruden.

And of course for Snyder too.

 
MattFancy said:
I can't remember if I saw it on here or another board, but someone brought up the suggestion that maybe Gruden is trying to get fired. Honestly, it seems plausible.
I really don't think that's the case. I think it's just the opposite. He's new, his team is doing poorly, and he doesn't know if he's on shaky ground with the owner or not. I think that's a large part of the motivation for blaming the players in public.

"It's their fault, not mine."

I'm pretty sure he wants to keep this job and to do better.

 
Chris Russell @Russellmania980 · 4h 4 hours ago
If u thought #Redskins struggled w/ pass pro/sacks last few weeks - it could get a lot worse vs #Rams. Aaron Donald (beast) + C.Long/RQuinn
 
What I've noticed with Gruden, is he seems to be addressing things now that should have been addressed weeks ago.

His presser on Monday he was talking about he wants the offense to be more uptempo and get in and out of the huddle quicker. Why wasn't this an issue weeks ago? This isn't something new. Part of that is on the players and on the coaches. Whoever his calling the plays into the QB (not sure if Gruden or McVay does this) needs to get them in quicker. But why is this is an issue now?

 
Sebowski said:
Brunell4MVP said:
Personally I like Gruden. He's not a puppet. He reminds me a lot of Marty S from a personality standpoint, and I think this team badly needs a dictator as the head coach. I do think he abandons the run too early. I think he needs to make better play calls in short yardage and goal line situations. Both of those he can improve on over time. I think he manages the clock OK, has a good passing scheme, and looks in control on the sidelines. There are always minor mistakes, but overall he does decent for a first year HC. He just needs a couple of years to fine tune it, show he's in charge, drop the DC, and get better talent (assuming Allen doesn't screw it up).
This is Gruden's rep, but I don't see it. A lot of sacks this season are because no one is open. These are good WRs and TEs. If no one is open. That is scheme.
A lot of the sacks are also because QBs simply aren't pulling the trigger and trusting those good WRs and TEs. "Open" is a relative term in the NFL. Garcon can have a DB on his hip and still be "open" in that he's a strong WR that can fight for and win balls. Jackson can have a DB within a yard or two of him but can quickly separate with the extra gear he has. Reed has a ridiculously large "catch radius". If balls aren't being delivered to those receivers at the proper time and spots, that is failed player execution.ETA: And, since the above will almost certainly get read by some as an effort in Gruden apologetics, I don't support any belief that doesn't put a significant amount of blame for the team's problems on Gruden. But, the problems with this team are widespread and shared by all. The mountains of vitriol he seems to be attracting seems over the top, to me. And the players seem to be getting a free pass from many around here. At the moment, there's way too much sloppiness with the basics/fundamentals on the field. This is the NFL. Whether the coach is crappy or not, the players should look like they've played the game before.
Yes, I noticed the best QBs in the league attempt a lot of throws to covered receivers. They give their teammates a chance. They take chances themselves.Much of the league has the fade and back shoulder throw as aspects of their passing game. If I remember correctly, Griffin threw them fairly well in 2012 but McCoy and cousins have been pretty poor at it. sometimes it looks like McCoy is giving his receiver a chance but really he just under throws the ball a lot.

 
Sebowski said:
Brunell4MVP said:
Personally I like Gruden. He's not a puppet. He reminds me a lot of Marty S from a personality standpoint, and I think this team badly needs a dictator as the head coach. I do think he abandons the run too early. I think he needs to make better play calls in short yardage and goal line situations. Both of those he can improve on over time. I think he manages the clock OK, has a good passing scheme, and looks in control on the sidelines. There are always minor mistakes, but overall he does decent for a first year HC. He just needs a couple of years to fine tune it, show he's in charge, drop the DC, and get better talent (assuming Allen doesn't screw it up).
This is Gruden's rep, but I don't see it. A lot of sacks this season are because no one is open. These are good WRs and TEs. If no one is open. That is scheme.
A lot of the sacks are also because QBs simply aren't pulling the trigger and trusting those good WRs and TEs. "Open" is a relative term in the NFL. Garcon can have a DB on his hip and still be "open" in that he's a strong WR that can fight for and win balls. Jackson can have a DB within a yard or two of him but can quickly separate with the extra gear he has. Reed has a ridiculously large "catch radius". If balls aren't being delivered to those receivers at the proper time and spots, that is failed player execution.

ETA: And, since the above will almost certainly get read by some as an effort in Gruden apologetics, I don't support any belief that doesn't put a significant amount of blame for the team's problems on Gruden. But, the problems with this team are widespread and shared by all. The mountains of vitriol he seems to be attracting seems over the top, to me. And the players seem to be getting a free pass from many around here. At the moment, there's way too much sloppiness with the basics/fundamentals on the field. This is the NFL. Whether the coach is crappy or not, the players should look like they've played the game before.
I think it's because we've run out of players to blame. First if was Griffin. Then it was Cousins. Then it was the secondary. Then it was OL. Then it was Griffin again. Now we're back to the defense. We've pretty much blamed every player we could at this point. Now it's time for the coaches to face the wrath. If you're putting in different players and get similar results, that's a personnel/coaching issue IMO. Allen is just as much to blame, if not moreso, than Gruden. Allen assembled this mess of a roster. Gruden hasn't been able to do anything with it. There's a lack of talent here for sure, especially on defense, but other teams have had some talent issues and still have been respectable. Look at the Cowboys D. They were supposed to be the worst defense in the league.

 
Sebowski said:
Brunell4MVP said:
Personally I like Gruden. He's not a puppet. He reminds me a lot of Marty S from a personality standpoint, and I think this team badly needs a dictator as the head coach. I do think he abandons the run too early. I think he needs to make better play calls in short yardage and goal line situations. Both of those he can improve on over time. I think he manages the clock OK, has a good passing scheme, and looks in control on the sidelines. There are always minor mistakes, but overall he does decent for a first year HC. He just needs a couple of years to fine tune it, show he's in charge, drop the DC, and get better talent (assuming Allen doesn't screw it up).
This is Gruden's rep, but I don't see it. A lot of sacks this season are because no one is open. These are good WRs and TEs. If no one is open. That is scheme.
A lot of the sacks are also because QBs simply aren't pulling the trigger and trusting those good WRs and TEs. "Open" is a relative term in the NFL. Garcon can have a DB on his hip and still be "open" in that he's a strong WR that can fight for and win balls. Jackson can have a DB within a yard or two of him but can quickly separate with the extra gear he has. Reed has a ridiculously large "catch radius". If balls aren't being delivered to those receivers at the proper time and spots, that is failed player execution.ETA: And, since the above will almost certainly get read by some as an effort in Gruden apologetics, I don't support any belief that doesn't put a significant amount of blame for the team's problems on Gruden. But, the problems with this team are widespread and shared by all. The mountains of vitriol he seems to be attracting seems over the top, to me. And the players seem to be getting a free pass from many around here. At the moment, there's way too much sloppiness with the basics/fundamentals on the field. This is the NFL. Whether the coach is crappy or not, the players should look like they've played the game before.
Yes, I noticed the best QBs in the league attempt a lot of throws to covered receivers. They give their teammates a chance. They take chances themselves.Much of the league has the fade and back shoulder throw as aspects of their passing game. If I remember correctly, Griffin threw them fairly well in 2012 but McCoy and cousins have been pretty poor at it. sometimes it looks like McCoy is giving his receiver a chance but really he just under throws the ball a lot.
That TD pass to DJax against the Colts was all DJax. McCoy severly underthrew it and DJax made a nice adjustment to get back to the ball and make the catch.

 
MattFancy said:
It's so funny to see all of us in here criticizing Gruden, yet it seems like he's getting a free pass from the media around here. I'm going to guess that's the case because he gives the media what they want. You don't hear other 1st year HC this season bashing their players or their starting QB in the media. It's pretty much unheard of.

?
I definitely think the media really enjoys a coach who is open and honest. Zorn was praised for that early on. Shanahan was constantly bashed for giving non-answers. Gibbs was made fun of when he spoke positively about his team and "fighting their guts out ".But several in the media were critical of Gruden after the recent Griffin criticisms. So while they liked it at first, I think many in the media will agree that there is a line.

 
Sebowski said:
Brunell4MVP said:
Personally I like Gruden. He's not a puppet. He reminds me a lot of Marty S from a personality standpoint, and I think this team badly needs a dictator as the head coach. I do think he abandons the run too early. I think he needs to make better play calls in short yardage and goal line situations. Both of those he can improve on over time. I think he manages the clock OK, has a good passing scheme, and looks in control on the sidelines. There are always minor mistakes, but overall he does decent for a first year HC. He just needs a couple of years to fine tune it, show he's in charge, drop the DC, and get better talent (assuming Allen doesn't screw it up).
This is Gruden's rep, but I don't see it. A lot of sacks this season are because no one is open. These are good WRs and TEs. If no one is open. That is scheme.
A lot of the sacks are also because QBs simply aren't pulling the trigger and trusting those good WRs and TEs. "Open" is a relative term in the NFL. Garcon can have a DB on his hip and still be "open" in that he's a strong WR that can fight for and win balls. Jackson can have a DB within a yard or two of him but can quickly separate with the extra gear he has. Reed has a ridiculously large "catch radius". If balls aren't being delivered to those receivers at the proper time and spots, that is failed player execution.ETA: And, since the above will almost certainly get read by some as an effort in Gruden apologetics, I don't support any belief that doesn't put a significant amount of blame for the team's problems on Gruden. But, the problems with this team are widespread and shared by all. The mountains of vitriol he seems to be attracting seems over the top, to me. And the players seem to be getting a free pass from many around here. At the moment, there's way too much sloppiness with the basics/fundamentals on the field. This is the NFL. Whether the coach is crappy or not, the players should look like they've played the game before.
Yes, I noticed the best QBs in the league attempt a lot of throws to covered receivers. They give their teammates a chance. They take chances themselves.Much of the league has the fade and back shoulder throw as aspects of their passing game. If I remember correctly, Griffin threw them fairly well in 2012 but McCoy and cousins have been pretty poor at it. sometimes it looks like McCoy is giving his receiver a chance but really he just under throws the ball a lot.
That TD pass to DJax against the Colts was all DJax. McCoy severly underthrew it and DJax made a nice adjustment to get back to the ball and make the catch.
Yes that's an example of what I'm thinking about. It may look like he gave a covered receiver a chance, but really he just under through it and Jackson made a great play. And McCoy he also had an interception that that was underthrown by 5 yards. Luckily for him it was called back because of a penalty.
 
I think it's because we've run out of players to blame. First if was Griffin. Then it was Cousins. Then it was the secondary. Then it was OL. Then it was Griffin again. Now we're back to the defense. We've pretty much blamed every player we could at this point. Now it's time for the coaches to face the wrath. If you're putting in different players and get similar results, that's a personnel/coaching issue IMO. Allen is just as much to blame, if not moreso, than Gruden. Allen assembled this mess of a roster. Gruden hasn't been able to do anything with it. There's a lack of talent here for sure, especially on defense, but other teams have had some talent issues and still have been respectable. Look at the Cowboys D. They were supposed to be the worst defense in the league.
I agree with the bolded, and it holds true on the next level, as well. The statement "If you're putting in different coaches and get similar results, that's a management/ownership issue" is just as true, IMO.

 
I think it's because we've run out of players to blame. First if was Griffin. Then it was Cousins. Then it was the secondary. Then it was OL. Then it was Griffin again. Now we're back to the defense. We've pretty much blamed every player we could at this point. Now it's time for the coaches to face the wrath. If you're putting in different players and get similar results, that's a personnel/coaching issue IMO. Allen is just as much to blame, if not moreso, than Gruden. Allen assembled this mess of a roster. Gruden hasn't been able to do anything with it. There's a lack of talent here for sure, especially on defense, but other teams have had some talent issues and still have been respectable. Look at the Cowboys D. They were supposed to be the worst defense in the league.
I agree with the bolded, and it holds true on the next level, as well. The statement "If you're putting in different coaches and get similar results, that's a management/ownership issue" is just as true, IMO.
Oh I agree. The issues with the Redskins aren't just the players/coaches. It starts from the top.

 
Clearly the best thing that Washington could do would be to let Gruden and Allen go. Hire a new GM and hire Art Briles as the HC (RG3's college coach). Then bring in a gimmick offense and pretend it's 2012 again. Add a couple offensive linemen in rounds 1-2 and all defense after that. Bam. Playoffs.

 
But, the problems with this team are widespread and shared by all. The mountains of vitriol he seems to be attracting seems over the top, to me. And the players seem to be getting a free pass from many around here. At the moment, there's way too much sloppiness with the basics/fundamentals on the field.
I don't know where you're seeing anyone saying the players are good and the coach is bad. It's not in this thread and it certainly isn't in the Sunday game threads. A lot of the players are bad, and there's plenty of criticism of Bruce Allen here for exactly that -- picking those players. A lot of the players are playing badly and there's plenty of discussion of that, especially of Griffin and Cousins and the secondary and O-line. I don't share your interest in shielding Gruden from blame. There's plenty for Allen, for the players, and for Gruden.

And of course for Snyder too.
It's an equal opportunity thread. At 3-8, there is plenty of blame to go around.

 
What I've noticed with Gruden, is he seems to be addressing things now that should have been addressed weeks ago.

His presser on Monday he was talking about he wants the offense to be more uptempo and get in and out of the huddle quicker. Why wasn't this an issue weeks ago? This isn't something new. Part of that is on the players and on the coaches. Whoever his calling the plays into the QB (not sure if Gruden or McVay does this) needs to get them in quicker. But why is this is an issue now?
Why even bring this up with the media? Just implement it in practice. If it doesn't go right initially, you don't need to say anything publicly. Just go back and work on it again.

 
What I've noticed with Gruden, is he seems to be addressing things now that should have been addressed weeks ago.

His presser on Monday he was talking about he wants the offense to be more uptempo and get in and out of the huddle quicker. Why wasn't this an issue weeks ago? This isn't something new. Part of that is on the players and on the coaches. Whoever his calling the plays into the QB (not sure if Gruden or McVay does this) needs to get them in quicker. But why is this is an issue now?
Why even bring this up with the media? Just implement it in practice. If it doesn't go right initially, you don't need to say anything publicly. Just go back and work on it again.
Because Gruden doesn't know how to keep his mouth shut. He doesn't keep anything in house. Everything he thinks, the media knows because he tells them. He also is great at contradicting himself. See this quote from Monday's presser:

On if he is concerned about wide receiver Pierre Garçon’s lack of production:

“I am not really concerned. He had a couple tough looks. You know, he had a couple fade balls, one was underthrown, one was overthrown just a hair. Then we threw a fade to him in the red zone and the corner was outside leverage and Colt [McCoy] misread the coverage. It was a roll, they played Cover 2 to his side basically, so that was a tough down for him. He had a slant route that went through his hands, they called PI but then they picked up the flag for some reason. Just not a lot of great looks for him. But I am concerned. I think he is a big part of our offense moving forward. We’ve got four games left and we have to try to get him the ball out in space where he can run because his whole dynamic is running with the ball in his hands after the catch and we tried to get some shallow crosses to him in the game and we just didn’t get them thrown to him but we are trying the best we can to get him more involved in the offense but for whatever reason we are not getting that done. Quarterbacks are trying to look to him a little bit and we are trying to get him the ball but it’s just not happening for whatever reason. We’ve just got to stick with the plan and read the coverages and when he gets his looks take advantage of them.”
So he starts off by saying he isn't concerned about Garcon getting enough looks. Then about 3 sentences later, he says he's concerned. So which is it Jay?

 
Joseph White Jr. ‏@JGWhiteAP 2 hrs2 hours ago This will get you stoked for Sunday's #Redskins-Rams game: They are the two worst teams in NFL in "miscellaneous touchdowns allowed."

Joseph White Jr. ‏@JGWhiteAP 2 hrs2 hours ago Here's another one I just noticed: QBs have 107.8 passer rating vs. #Redskins defense. Yep, that's worst in the NFL.

Tarik El-Bashir ‏@TarikCSN 34 mins34 minutes ago #Rams have 22 sacks in last five games. #Redskins have allowed a league worst 22 in last four games. What could go wrong?
 
The fake Chris Russell account on twitter is pretty funny. https://twitter.com/fakeC_Russell

Chris Russell @fakeC_Russell · Nov 30

The #Colts players just look wide open because of your TV, in person the #Redskins defenders are all over them! #HAZ4EVER
Chris Russell @fakeC_Russell · Dec 1

TEXT from Bruce Allen: I saw your tweet about the roster being beef scraps. I won't hold it against you b/c Dan doesn't hold it against me
Chris Russell @fakeC_Russell · Dec 3

BREAKING: Bruce Allen tried to deliver pep talk to team this morning ... but was booed off lectern.
Chris Russell @fakeC_Russell · Dec 3

BREAKING (part 2): And then Jim Haslett took to the podium ... STANDING DAMN OVATION, BABY!!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top