Democratic or Republican party? No. Other parties? Absolutely.But the original post said nothing about any party.In the most broadest interpretation of the term. Do you believe either party supports this?Isn't this whole occupation political?You guys make every thread something political. Why?This was Clive Bundy guy that Fox crowd was all pumped about until he dropped his sweet knowledge about "The Negro" right?
What does the Fox crowd imply?Democratic or Republican party? No. Other parties? Absolutely.But the original post said nothing about any party.In the most broadest interpretation of the term. Do you believe either party supports this?Isn't this whole occupation political?You guys make every thread something political. Why?This was Clive Bundy guy that Fox crowd was all pumped about until he dropped his sweet knowledge about "The Negro" right?
My understanding of the event...What is actually happening? Town? Part of Oregon? Where are these militia guys from? What are their demands? Status?
Why do you think they took over the building?You guys make every thread something political. Why?This was Clive Bundy guy that Fox crowd was all pumped about until he dropped his sweet knowledge about "The Negro" right?
maybe the place has sweet-### vending machinesWhy do you think they took over the building?You guys make every thread something political. Why?This was Clive Bundy guy that Fox crowd was all pumped about until he dropped his sweet knowledge about "The Negro" right?
StrawPERSON, sexist!A much better strawmen.I'm trying to imagine the response if it was a group of Swedish bikini model protesters taking over a federal baby oil and whipped cream processing facility.
It honestly isn't hard to quite accurately predict the exact words out of one group's mouths these days. I know now that the talking points Beck, Hannity, Rush, etc hammer into my ears over and over again while I criss cross the state of Texas in rental cars, will be parroted at least a dozen times throughout the week... often verbatim.The GOP has gone off the rails lately, but I think my least favorite thing about liberals these days is the tendency to tell us what everyone else is thinking. This is a new thing, right?
I largely zoned out this topic (don't care)... but I sure recall how hard they were trying to rile up their audience over it.It honestly isn't hard to quite accurately predict the exact words out of one group's mouths these days. I know now that the talking points Beck, Hannity, Rush, etc hammer into my ears over and over again while I criss cross the state of Texas in rental cars, will be parroted at least a dozen times throughout the week... often verbatim.The GOP has gone off the rails lately, but I think my least favorite thing about liberals these days is the tendency to tell us what everyone else is thinking. This is a new thing, right?
Unoccupied most likely because it is the weekend and/or a holiday.They took over an abandoned building or an actively in use building?
Sounds like it is an active building. It was closed and unoccupied for the holiday weekend.They took over an abandoned building or an actively in use building?
good lord you're cluelessI live how resident militia man icon talks down to these redneck militia types. Is there some sort of flow chart that shows hierarchy of you folks?
What difference does it make? It is actively used thats why they announced it would be closed. And would.anyone give a rats ### what the building looked like if these were Muslims? Or Black Lives? No they'd be called terrorists and plenty of people would want a much different much more deadly response than a shrug and a laugh.Is that the building?
Careful. jon mx is about to call you ridiculously stupid.What difference does it make? It is actively used thats why they announced it would be closed. And would.anyone give a rats ### what the building looked like if these were Muslims? Or Black Lives? No they'd be called terrorists and plenty of people would want a much different much more deadly response than a shrug and a laugh.Is that the building?
Its a tiny ####### building in the middle of nowhere Eastern Oregon. We would be GLAD if BLM chose a site like this to occupy. Much more out of the way.It was just getting facts, what kind of building are they occupying? Big one? Downtown Eugene? post office? What? Thanks.
He did take that Oregon loss pretty hard last night....Anyone heard from GM?
Yes.Is that the building?
That's just Portland and select pockets of the I-5 corridor. Everywhere else is pretty rednecky. Maybe not "Alabama level", but "Wyoming level" at least.I thought Oregon was just a bunch of microbrew drinking bearded guys and hot cheerleaders.
The ranchers claimed that the fire was just a backyard burn pile that got out of control.Was the land they burned owned by them?
Washington similar as well.That's just Portland and select pockets of the I-5 corridor. Everywhere else is pretty rednecky. Maybe not "Alabama level", but "Wyoming level" at least.I thought Oregon was just a bunch of microbrew drinking bearded guys and hot cheerleaders.
WOWWWWW, I CAN'T GET OVER HOW CLEVER THIS IS!!!!111!11!!I don't think we should allow any white person from Oregon to travel to the rest of the country until our government can figure out what the hell is going on.
Because the judge ignored the law and imposed an unlawful sentence. The prosecution appealed it from day one.2. How is this NOT double jeopardy?
Thanks. I missed it. Yeah, that was ridiculously stupid too. You fellows love throwing out stupid strawment arguments. I do like the stone work and the roof on that cabin, er I mean highly important federal facility.Careful. jon mx is about to call you ridiculously stupid.What difference does it make? It is actively used thats why they announced it would be closed. And would.anyone give a rats ### what the building looked like if these were Muslims? Or Black Lives? No they'd be called terrorists and plenty of people would want a much different much more deadly response than a shrug and a laugh.Is that the building?
An armed militia took over a building at a national wildlife refuge in Oregon late Saturday and vows to occupy the outpost for years to protest the federal government’s treatment of a pair of ranchers facing prison time.
The occupation of a portion of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge 30 miles southeast of Burns, Ore., followed a peaceful march for ranchers Dwight Hammond, 73, and Steven Hammond, 46, who are scheduled to report to federal prison in San Pedro, Calif., on Monday after being convicted of arson, according to the Oregonian.
Prosecutors said the father and son set the fire, which burned about 130 acres in 2001 on leased federal land, to conceal poaching, according to CNN. The Hammonds argued that they were attempting to reduce the growth of invasive plant species and ward off potential wildfires. The pair was sentenced to five years in prison.
Among the occupiers are several members of the Bundy family, whose patriarch — Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy — was involved in an armed standoff with government agents over grazing rights in 2014.
Ammon Bundy told the Oregonian that he and two of his brothers had joined dozens of people in seizing the refuge’s headquarters.
The federal property, managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, was closed and unoccupied for the holiday weekend, the Oregonian reported.
Ryan Bundy told the Oregonian that the group isn’t holding hostages and doesn’t want to resort to violence but will not rule it out if authorities attempt to remove the occupiers from the property. He said many of the occupiers would be willing to fight — and die — to reclaim constitutionally protected rights for local land management, according to the Associated Press.
The group is calling for the Hammonds’ release and said the militia was planning an occupation that lasted “for years.”
Not sure. I always thought they represented the more fringe elements of the conservatives.What does the Fox crowd imply?Democratic or Republican party? No. Other parties? Absolutely.But the original post said nothing about any party.In the most broadest interpretation of the term. Do you believe either party supports this?Isn't this whole occupation political?You guys make every thread something political. Why?This was Clive Bundy guy that Fox crowd was all pumped about until he dropped his sweet knowledge about "The Negro" right?
The initial judge claimed a 5 year term would be “grossly disproportionate” to the crime. 5 years for a fire that got out of control seems excessive.Because the judge ignored the law and imposed an unlawful sentence. The prosecution appealed it from day one.2. How is this NOT double jeopardy?
An armed militia takes over a building to protest some perceived oppression from the evil government. Turns out it is the kids of the jackass who thought he just didn't have to pay taxes. Guy became a folk hero for select talking head dooshnozzle until he starts saying crazy stuff - besides the part where he doesn't acknowledge the federal government and will shoot any BLM agent, that was ok.You guys make every thread something political. Why?This was Clive Bundy guy that Fox crowd was all pumped about until he dropped his sweet knowledge about "The Negro" right?
Fox in particular Sean Hannity were calling this ingrate a patriot implying he was a fighter of tyranny or some BS. Even after the guy dropped the neat slavery takes Hannity tried to stay on him for a day or so then finally let it go.Not sure. I always thought they represented the more fringe elements of the conservatives.What does the Fox crowd imply?Democratic or Republican party? No. Other parties? Absolutely.But the original post said nothing about any party.In the most broadest interpretation of the term. Do you believe either party supports this?Isn't this whole occupation political?You guys make every thread something political. Why?This was Clive Bundy guy that Fox crowd was all pumped about until he dropped his sweet knowledge about "The Negro" right?
It appears the courts disagree with you.The initial judge claimed a 5 year term would be “grossly disproportionate” to the crime. 5 years for a fire that got out of control seems excessive.Because the judge ignored the law and imposed an unlawful sentence. The prosecution appealed it from day one.2. How is this NOT double jeopardy?
You can be convicted of a crime on the same facts in both a federal and a state court.1. How do 150 people fit in that building?
2. How is this NOT double jeopardy?
Trust me, if the Occupy folks had been armed with a single gun, the government would have responded immediately, snd they did in Oakland anyhow.When the whackos on the fring left had their Occupy Wall Street groups all over the country taking over city parks across the country, did the government violently respond or did they wait for months while those idiots stunk up the cities? Seems like the actually closest analogy to this situation then the utterly ridiculous strawmen being put out by a few deranged posters.