SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/Videos-put-Planned-Parenthood-back-before-Texas-6411447.phpPlanned Parenthood skips 'political' Texas Senate hearing
http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/Videos-put-Planned-Parenthood-back-before-Texas-6411447.phpPlanned Parenthood skips 'political' Texas Senate hearing
no idea why anyone would have a problem with this. By having procedures billed through medicade, done at their clinics rather than hospitals the US is actually saving money.
Smart move by PP.http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/Videos-put-Planned-Parenthood-back-before-Texas-6411447.phpPlanned Parenthood skips 'political' Texas Senate hearing
Maybe so, it sounds like it was going to be under oath.Smart move by PP.http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/Videos-put-Planned-Parenthood-back-before-Texas-6411447.phpPlanned Parenthood skips 'political' Texas Senate hearing
Did you mean this for the Jon Stewart thread?There's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_that’s_simply_not_true/
Yeah, that is what they were worried about.Maybe so, it sounds like it was going to be under oath.Smart move by PP.http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/Videos-put-Planned-Parenthood-back-before-Texas-6411447.phpPlanned Parenthood skips 'political' Texas Senate hearing
found it interesting. thanksThere's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_that’s_simply_not_true/
Texas has some crazy abortion laws.Maybe so, it sounds like it was going to be under oath.Smart move by PP.http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/Videos-put-Planned-Parenthood-back-before-Texas-6411447.phpPlanned Parenthood skips 'political' Texas Senate hearing
I gave up after the subtitled indicated she thinks Trump is funnier than Jon Stewartfound it interesting. thanksThere's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_that’s_simply_not_true/
And it was probably going to be a setup, show trial, probably including some previously unseen evidence, which isn't fair. And under oath? No way. I don't blame them. Hard to see how rational minds on either side take over here.Texas has some crazy abortion laws.Maybe so, it sounds like it was going to be under oath.Smart move by PP.http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/Videos-put-Planned-Parenthood-back-before-Texas-6411447.phpPlanned Parenthood skips 'political' Texas Senate hearing
Trump is waaaayyy "funnier" than Stewart. In his entire career, Stewart never came close to Trump's Rosie O'Donnell rant.I gave up after the subtitled indicated she thinks Trump is funnier than Jon Stewartfound it interesting. thanksThere's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_thats_simply_not_true/
...and he writes his own material...Trump is waaaayyy "funnier" than Stewart. In his entire career, Stewart never came close to Trump's Rosie O'Donnell rant.I gave up after the subtitled indicated she thinks Trump is funnier than Jon Stewartfound it interesting. thanksThere's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_thats_simply_not_true/
Texas has some crazyMaybe so, it sounds like it was going to be under oath.Smart move by PP.http://www.sfgate.com/news/texas/article/Videos-put-Planned-Parenthood-back-before-Texas-6411447.phpPlanned Parenthood skips 'political' Texas Senate hearingabortion laws.
I enjoyed reading this article because here is someone who is on the opposite side of the political spectrum from me who is able to see the good and the bad of both sides of the political spectrum. She is not just saying something is good or bad because it fits or doesn't fit with her ideology, she tries to look at it objectively and say whether it is good or bad. It is far different from this website where you generally have the liberals defending the liberal viewpoint and conservatives defending the conservative viewpoint, whether either side is legitimately defensible. The politicians on both sides have sucked for so long that we should all be rebelling against them. They aren't generally working for the good of the country, they are generally working for what is good for them.There's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_that’s_simply_not_true/
Agree 100%...there are just too many ideologues on both sides who simply don't have the ability to see anything other than how they want to see it...in some cases they are almost like the Gestapo or KGB and want to destroy anyone who doesn't toe their line which really is disgusting...or they will allow a law to be broken if it aids their agenda...we are really in a dangerous time in our country because ideology at all costs trumps (no pun intended) the general welfare of the country...I enjoyed reading this article because here is someone who is on the opposite side of the political spectrum from me who is able to see the good and the bad of both sides of the political spectrum. She is not just saying something is good or bad because it fits or doesn't fit with her ideology, she tries to look at it objectively and say whether it is good or bad. It is far different from this website where you generally have the liberals defending the liberal viewpoint and conservatives defending the conservative viewpoint, whether either side is legitimately defensible. The politicians on both sides have sucked for so long that we should all be rebelling against them. They aren't generally working for the good of the country, they are generally working for what is good for them.There's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_that’s_simply_not_true/
Part of the reason Trump is doing so well with some of the ridiculous stuff he is saying is because he saying things that a politician would never say. And people like him for no other reason than he isn't a normal politician.
There's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_that’s_simply_not_true/
Sneering at religion is juvenile, symptomatic of a stunted imagination.” It exposes a state of perpetual adolescence that has something to do with their parents– they’re still sneering at dad in some way.
Really good posting. Someone a few weeks ago described much of our current political climate as the Yankees vs Red Sox fans. My players used PEDs to win...that's ok because we beat them.Boston said:Agree 100%...there are just too many ideologues on both sides who simply don't have the ability to see anything other than how they want to see it...in some cases they are almost like the Gestapo or KGB and want to destroy anyone who doesn't toe their line which really is disgusting...or they will allow a law to be broken if it aids their agenda...we are really in a dangerous time in our country because ideology at all costs trumps (no pun intended) the general welfare of the country...dhockster said:I enjoyed reading this article because here is someone who is on the opposite side of the political spectrum from me who is able to see the good and the bad of both sides of the political spectrum. She is not just saying something is good or bad because it fits or doesn't fit with her ideology, she tries to look at it objectively and say whether it is good or bad. It is far different from this website where you generally have the liberals defending the liberal viewpoint and conservatives defending the conservative viewpoint, whether either side is legitimately defensible. The politicians on both sides have sucked for so long that we should all be rebelling against them. They aren't generally working for the good of the country, they are generally working for what is good for them.There's a lot more in this than just her views on this topic...one of the more dead-on critiques I have seen in quite some time...due to that I am sure it will be bashed by the usual suspects...
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_that’s_simply_not_true/
Part of the reason Trump is doing so well with some of the ridiculous stuff he is saying is because he saying things that a politician would never say. And people like him for no other reason than he isn't a normal politician.
Yes. Absolutely, more than ever.New video
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?intcmp=hpbt1
ouch. Anyone defending Planned Parenthood at this point...
They have been flat out awesome to several people I care about.New video
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?intcmp=hpbt1
ouch. Anyone defending Planned Parenthood at this point...
They have been flat out awesome to several people I care about.New video
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?intcmp=hpbt1
ouch. Anyone defending Planned Parenthood at this point...
When they stop helping women that need it, I'll stop supporting them.
What does that have to do with anything?They have been flat out awesome to several people I care about.New video
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?intcmp=hpbt1
ouch. Anyone defending Planned Parenthood at this point...
When they stop helping women that need it, I'll stop supporting them.
I'm not going to use the first analogy that comes to mind. But doing some good things isn't a reason to support an organization.They have been flat out awesome to several people I care about.New video
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?intcmp=hpbt1
ouch. Anyone defending Planned Parenthood at this point...
When they stop helping women that need it, I'll stop supporting them.![]()
I"m sure Mengele had similar expressions back in the day"Another boy!"
These are dismembered boys and girls then.
You mean....like the United States of America? Helped end WWII and the holocaust; butchered and killed Native Americans and held black people in slavery.What does that have to do with anything?They have been flat out awesome to several people I care about.New video
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?intcmp=hpbt1
ouch. Anyone defending Planned Parenthood at this point...
When they stop helping women that need it, I'll stop supporting them.
If an organization did amazing things with the right hand and horrific things with the left hand, would that organization still be one to be defended?
Look, you think they're babies. Most of us who are pro-choice don't think they are babies. That's the crux of our disagreement, and we're never going to see eye to eye on this. Never. So why are we wasting time discussing the details of what Planned Parenthood does? You didn't need these so-called "revelations" to despise them. Of course you're going to despise them because you think they're abetting the murder of innocents. We don't. You find everything they do as horrific. We don't. What's to gain from further argument or discussion?I don't support killing living babies out of the womb.
Of course it's human, it's not an elephant. The question is whether it's a human being or not. A person. Being male or female doesn't change the outcome of that discussion for either side of the debate.Not humans, just boys and girls.
Yes, thats a good analogy.You mean....like the United States of America? Helped end WWII and the holocaust; butchered and killed Native Americans and held black people in slavery.What does that have to do with anything?They have been flat out awesome to several people I care about.New video
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?intcmp=hpbt1
ouch. Anyone defending Planned Parenthood at this point...
When they stop helping women that need it, I'll stop supporting them.
If an organization did amazing things with the right hand and horrific things with the left hand, would that organization still be one to be defended?
There's really no question of thatOf course it's human, it's not an elephant. The question is whether it's a human being or not. A person. Being male or female doesn't change the outcome of that discussion for either side of the debate.Not humans, just boys and girls.
Of whether a fetus is a person? Yes, there is.There's really no question of thatOf course it's human, it's not an elephant. The question is whether it's a human being or not. A person. Being male or female doesn't change the outcome of that discussion for either side of the debate.Not humans, just boys and girls.
Of whether a fetus is a person? Yes, there is.There's really no question of thatOf course it's human, it's not an elephant. The question is whether it's a human being or not. A person. Being male or female doesn't change the outcome of that discussion for either side of the debate.Not humans, just boys and girls.
Of whether a fetus is a person? Yes, there is.There's really no question of thatOf course it's human, it's not an elephant. The question is whether it's a human being or not. A person. Being male or female doesn't change the outcome of that discussion for either side of the debate.Not humans, just boys and girls.![]()
Okay.Henry that's some Jesuitical reasoning, I would love to hear you convince a jury that a "boy" is not a "child".
I don't see what difference it makes. If they regard what they're doing as unethical or harmful, they won't do it. Isn't there still a hippocratic oath?Here's something odd I've noticed in reading these discussions. The pro abortion folks are pretty determined to make clear *they* personally do not think these fetuses are more than tissue, these are not persons or children's or boys or girls. - Question: what if the doctors doing the aborting or doing the chopping up do actually view them as persons? Is that possible?
when you type "pro abortion", are you actually trying to piss people off?Here's something odd I've noticed in reading these discussions. The pro abortion folks are pretty determined to make clear *they* personally do not think these fetuses are more than tissue, these are not persons or children's or boys or girls. - Question: what if the doctors doing the aborting or doing the chopping up do actually view them as persons? Is that possible?
So?Here's something odd I've noticed in reading these discussions. The pro abortion folks are pretty determined to make clear *they* personally do not think these fetuses are more than tissue, these are not persons or children's or boys or girls. - Question: what if the doctors doing the aborting or doing the chopping up do actually view them as persons? Is that possible?
That is a lie. It has been clearly determined in YOUR eyes. But you can't speak for everyone. I fully disagree, as do millions of others. And don't bring the US or the supreme court in here, unless you are willing to admit that you'd be staunchly against abortion if the supreme court overturned themselves and ruled that it was illegal.Of whether a fetus is a person? Yes, there is.There's really no question of thatOf course it's human, it's not an elephant. The question is whether it's a human being or not. A person. Being male or female doesn't change the outcome of that discussion for either side of the debate.Not humans, just boys and girls.![]()
![]()
It has been clearly determined that it is not a person.
It's almost like you read my post.Henry the doctor says "boy" not "male." The former is personal, the latter clinical.
We can tell far earlier than 16 weeks using blood tests.Okay.Henry that's some Jesuitical reasoning, I would love to hear you convince a jury that a "boy" is not a "child".
When a fetus is at about 16 weeks, we can tell whether it's a male or female fetus. At that time, the doctor generally says "it's a boy" or "it's a girl." Abortion is legal generally until viability - until the fetus is a child as defined under the law (viability outside the womb) at approximately 24 weeks. So when we agree legally that "it's a boy" and "it's not yet a child" that's what we're talking about.