What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Possible trade has league up in arms (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

ppierce

Footballguy
Guy has offered Gonzalez, Gafney and Addai to Finley and Clayton owner for Mark Clayton, Jamal Charles and Mike Wallace and our league is freaking out about it being unfari for the team getting Charles. We don't have league votes or anything but this doesn't seem that crazy to me. One team is threating to drop.

 
What's wrong with this trade?

Mike Wallace has a slight edge over Gaffney at this point in time. One can feel more comfortable with Gaffney because of his receptions and targets. Parallel movement here IMO (slight change).

Jamal Charles is better than Addai (hurt), but not by a whole lot.

And the guy gets a pretty good TE in Gonzo.

Without knowing league size, rosters, and WW; this seems ok to me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
bunch of babies who have #####ed about every trade they're not involved in. i didn't think trade was so crazy.

 
Why are they threatening to quit? This isn't a blockbuster trade that will change the balance of power right now.

 
Unless the guy getting Clayton doesn't know Clayton is injured, there's no grounds to complain about the trade. I tend to make some wacky trades and there are almost always a couple people complaining and/or ridiculing. Those trades often look very different by the end of the year though. In the end its their team and their money they paid for it, so they can manage their team however they like.

P.S. If someone really does quit over it, then A. good riddance and B. Declare the team ineligible for the playoffs, give it a lineup based on some free cheatsheet for the rest of the season, and gladly have 1 less person vying for the same pot.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top