ConnSKINS26
Footballguy
Jesus. Every time Wilson touches the ball he's a ball of fury.
That ship has sailed, my friend.agreed, nice body control and field awareness to come down with contested, fairly well covered pass dropped into corner of end zone by luck... he could be underrated this year...Okay, Hilton looks really really good.
Why so angry? If other people know he's good, then he SHOULD go higher.Great now every guppy in the nation wil have Hiton high on their "sleeper" list.
Good luck getting any value with him.
Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
I thought of the Ben to Santonio pass that won the Super Bowl.That Luck to Hilton pass was reminiscent of Manning to Harrison. A thing of beauty!
You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
I'm so confused by this response................Why so angry? If other people know he's good, then he SHOULD go higher.Great now every guppy in the nation wil have Hiton high on their "sleeper" list.
Good luck getting any value with him.
He has looked better than Ballard so far...Donald Brown: A threat to neither other Indy RBs nor the opposing defense.
he could finish top 15-20 WR (top 25-30ish as rookie, depending on format?)...That ship has sailed, my friend.agreed, nice body control and field awareness to come down with contested, fairly well covered pass dropped into corner of end zone by luck... he could be underrated this year...Okay, Hilton looks really really good.
Agreed.Gotta love thunderstorm coverage in the greater ATL over the football game.
Hasselbeck just threw a deep pass down the middle to him that was incomplete.Any targets to Fleener (is he playing?)
He dropped one and then got hit in the back with the second because he didn't turn his head around.Any targets to Fleener (is he playing?)
They also opened up the offense when he came in.He has looked better than Ballard so far...Donald Brown: A threat to neither other Indy
RBs nor the opposing defense.
Give a meteorologist prime time coverage...he's going to show you ALL his toys...Agreed.How ####### long are they going to show us this stupid radar? This is getting really oldGotta love thunderstorm coverage in the greater ATL over the football game.
awesome.Next thing we know, Jordan Cameron will throw a TD pass to Shane Vereen.
Nah... Give Alex P. Keaton... a break he has Alzheimers...You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
His ADP lately is WR30 or a little higher, early-mid 7th round pick.he could finish top 15-20 WR (top 25-30ish as rookie, depending on format?)...That ship has sailed, my friend.agreed, nice body control and field awareness to come down with contested, fairly well covered pass dropped into corner of end zone by luck... he could be underrated this year...Okay, Hilton looks really really good.
again, i haven't checked recently, but is his ADP that high?
You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
Anyone that thinks Andre Brown or David Wilson are top 15 backs are clearly biased. They will cannibalize each other into mediocrity.You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
What does the bolded statement even mean? It makes no sense. Biased in what way?Anyone that thinks Andre Brown or David Wilson are top 15 backs are clearly biased. They will cannibalize each other into mediocrity.You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
There is not a single part of that statement that is in any way confusing. Anyone that thinks that Andre Brown OR David Wilson are top 15 backs are biased towards whichever player they think will do so.What does the bolded statement even mean? It makes no sense. Biased in what way?Anyone that thinks Andre Brown or David Wilson are top 15 backs are clearly biased. They will cannibalize each other into mediocrity.You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
Want to put some money down on that?Anyone that thinks Andre Brown or David Wilson are top 15 backs are clearly biased. They will cannibalize each other into mediocrity.You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
You seem really confident, what kind of odds are you gonna give me.Want to put some money down on that?Anyone that thinks Andre Brown or David Wilson are top 15 backs are clearly biased. They will cannibalize each other into mediocrity.You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
So in other words, if anyone likes a player, they are biased?There is not a single part of that statement that is in any way confusing. Anyone that thinks that Andre Brown OR David Wilson are top 15 backs are biased towards whichever player they think will do so.What does the bolded statement even mean? It makes no sense. Biased in what way?Anyone that thinks Andre Brown or David Wilson are top 15 backs are clearly biased. They will cannibalize each other into mediocrity.You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
Yeah, none of what he said makes any sense, at all.So in other words, if anyone likes a player, they are biased?
Got it. Groundbreaking stuff. Oh, and not really the definition of "biased" either. But keep up the good work.
Or they simply have a different opinion/take on the situation than you do.There is not a single part of that statement that is in any way confusing. Anyone that thinks that Andre Brown OR David Wilson are top 15 backs are biased towards whichever player they think will do so.What does the bolded statement even mean? It makes no sense. Biased in what way?Anyone that thinks Andre Brown or David Wilson are top 15 backs are clearly biased. They will cannibalize each other into mediocrity.You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
No. Even when I watched him last season all I thought was that I was watching the next GREAT QB.Am I the only person who, when watching Luck, just feels disappointed? I've been critical of Luck in various threads in regards to his rookie season. Noting his lower than expected completion % among some other things. Let me say, I own Luck in a 16 team dynasty, so I do have a dog in this race and I am rooting for Luck!
Getting back to my point. I don't know what exactly it is, but he doesn't wow me when I see him play. He has a similar throwing motion to Philip Rivers where it looks like he's almost shoving the ball forward instead of throwing it. During tonight's game, he had 2 TDs (the Wayne TD was as fluky as it gets) and completed 70% of his passes, but again, it doesn't look right. I wish I could be more clear on what it is about him that makes me slightly underwhelmed. Does anyone else get a similar feeling from Luck?
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter 28mOn the interception return, Hasselbeck trying to make the tackle ended up rolling into Fleener's leg. Fleener went down and looked pained and came up limping.
I do NOT own him, but wish I did. So, I think you should be pleased. Think back to his receivers last year: he has a very old Wayne and a young WR in Ty who is not exactly a physical specimen, a couple rookie TEs... I think all things considered he did really well. Like I said, I would rather have him than any other young QB in dynasty.Am I the only person who, when watching Luck, just feels disappointed? I've been critical of Luck in various threads in regards to his rookie season. Noting his lower than expected completion % among some other things. Let me say, I own Luck in a 16 team dynasty, so I do have a dog in this race and I am rooting for Luck!
Getting back to my point. I don't know what exactly it is, but he doesn't wow me when I see him play. He has a similar throwing motion to Philip Rivers where it looks like he's almost shoving the ball forward instead of throwing it. During tonight's game, he had 2 TDs (the Wayne TD was as fluky as it gets) and completed 70% of his passes, but again, it doesn't look right. I wish I could be more clear on what it is about him that makes me slightly underwhelmed. Does anyone else get a similar feeling from Luck?
You were busting the guy because he thinks Brown is underrated, immediately putting words in his mouth suggesting that he believe Brown was a top 10 RB, well the difference between the people who are talking about Brown and the people who are talking up Wilson, is that the people who are talking up Wilson are acting like he is already a top 10 RB and that Brown isn't even in contention for the same production, when the opposite of both of those are true.So in other words, if anyone likes a player, they are biased?There is not a single part of that statement that is in any way confusing. Anyone that thinks that Andre Brown OR David Wilson are top 15 backs are biased towards whichever player they think will do so.What does the bolded statement even mean? It makes no sense. Biased in what way?Anyone that thinks Andre Brown or David Wilson are top 15 backs are clearly biased. They will cannibalize each other into mediocrity.You're the rock star who called him criminally undervalued.You're a very bitter guy.Yes, a guy who hasn't managed to stay healthy a single year so far is criminally undervalued because people don't see him as a top-10 RB. Keep fighting the good fight.I prefer to think of it as Brown being criminally undervalued.Anyone think Wilson could be this year's Spiller? As in, clearly the more talented back, but only gets <200 carries because the coach likes someone older and more dependable to get important snaps?
Got it. Groundbreaking stuff. Oh, and not really the definition of "biased" either. But keep up the good work.
I think he looks good. I'm not seeing what you see.Am I the only person who, when watching Luck, just feels disappointed? I've been critical of Luck in various threads in regards to his rookie season. Noting his lower than expected completion % among some other things. Let me say, I own Luck in a 16 team dynasty, so I do have a dog in this race and I am rooting for Luck!
Getting back to my point. I don't know what exactly it is, but he doesn't wow me when I see him play. He has a similar throwing motion to Philip Rivers where it looks like he's almost shoving the ball forward instead of throwing it. During tonight's game, he had 2 TDs (the Wayne TD was as fluky as it gets) and completed 70% of his passes, but again, it doesn't look right. I wish I could be more clear on what it is about him that makes me slightly underwhelmed. Does anyone else get a similar feeling from Luck?
E2A: I just want to be clear. I don't think Luck is going to be a bust by any means. If anything, he might peak at Eli Manning instead of a Peyton Manning. He was hyped as the most "sure" thing in the last 20 drafts at QB. My only point is he looks uncomfortable as a QB instead of fluid and precise like a Brady or Manning.
I missed where people are talking up Wilson as a top 10 RBYou were busting the guy because he thinks Brown is underrated, immediately putting words in his mouth suggesting that he believe Brown was a top 10 RB, well the difference between the people who are talking about Brown and the people who are talking up Wilson, is that the people who are talking up Wilson are acting like he is already a top 10 RB and that Brown isn't even in contention for the same production, when the opposite of both of those are true.
Like I said, anyone that thinks either of those two specific backs are top 15, are biased towards who they think will be. They are clearly ignoring everything except for the information that supports their opinion.
I agree he is the safest young QB for dynasty. Again, I think Eli Manning is his career floor (fantasy aspect) which is still pretty darn solid. You know he'll play every game and he will get better. I think it's his throwing motion that's making me feel uneasy. Keep it on your radar as you watch him play and see if you notice anything.I do NOT own him, but wish I did. So, I think you should be pleased. Think back to his receivers last year: he has a very old Wayne and a young WR in Ty who is not exactly a physical specimen, a couple rookie TEs... I think all things considered he did really well. Like I said, I would rather have him than any other young QB in dynasty.Am I the only person who, when watching Luck, just feels disappointed? I've been critical of Luck in various threads in regards to his rookie season. Noting his lower than expected completion % among some other things. Let me say, I own Luck in a 16 team dynasty, so I do have a dog in this race and I am rooting for Luck!
Getting back to my point. I don't know what exactly it is, but he doesn't wow me when I see him play. He has a similar throwing motion to Philip Rivers where it looks like he's almost shoving the ball forward instead of throwing it. During tonight's game, he had 2 TDs (the Wayne TD was as fluky as it gets) and completed 70% of his passes, but again, it doesn't look right. I wish I could be more clear on what it is about him that makes me slightly underwhelmed. Does anyone else get a similar feeling from Luck?
me, too...I do NOT own him, but wish I did. So, I think you should be pleased. Think back to his receivers last year: he has a very old Wayne and a young WR in Ty who is not exactly a physical specimen, a couple rookie TEs... I think all things considered he did really well. Like I said, I would rather have him than any other young QB in dynasty.Am I the only person who, when watching Luck, just feels disappointed? I've been critical of Luck in various threads in regards to his rookie season. Noting his lower than expected completion % among some other things. Let me say, I own Luck in a 16 team dynasty, so I do have a dog in this race and I am rooting for Luck!
Getting back to my point. I don't know what exactly it is, but he doesn't wow me when I see him play. He has a similar throwing motion to Philip Rivers where it looks like he's almost shoving the ball forward instead of throwing it. During tonight's game, he had 2 TDs (the Wayne TD was as fluky as it gets) and completed 70% of his passes, but again, it doesn't look right. I wish I could be more clear on what it is about him that makes me slightly underwhelmed. Does anyone else get a similar feeling from Luck?
I am very impressed with him. I think he carries the team. That stat they showed at the beginning about him being the most knocked down QB is pretty interesting. A lot can be read into that if one were so inclined.Am I the only person who, when watching Luck, just feels disappointed? I've been critical of Luck in various threads in regards to his rookie season. Noting his lower than expected completion % among some other things. Let me say, I own Luck in a 16 team dynasty, so I do have a dog in this race and I am rooting for Luck!
Getting back to my point. I don't know what exactly it is, but he doesn't wow me when I see him play. He has a similar throwing motion to Philip Rivers where it looks like he's almost shoving the ball forward instead of throwing it. During tonight's game, he had 2 TDs (the Wayne TD was as fluky as it gets) and completed 70% of his passes, but again, it doesn't look right. I wish I could be more clear on what it is about him that makes me slightly underwhelmed. Does anyone else get a similar feeling from Luck?
E2A: I just want to be clear. I don't think Luck is going to be a bust by any means. If anything, he might peak at Eli Manning instead of a Peyton Manning. He was hyped as the most "sure" thing in the last 20 drafts at QB. My only point is he looks uncomfortable as a QB instead of fluid and precise like a Brady or Manning.
I honestly don't see anything like what you are seeing. I think he looks excellent. If anyone can be said to be the next Peyton Manning, it's him. Obviously anything can happen and we'll just have to watch and see, but I think he's as sure of a thing to be the next great QB as it gets.Am I the only person who, when watching Luck, just feels disappointed? I've been critical of Luck in various threads in regards to his rookie season. Noting his lower than expected completion % among some other things. Let me say, I own Luck in a 16 team dynasty, so I do have a dog in this race and I am rooting for Luck!
Getting back to my point. I don't know what exactly it is, but he doesn't wow me when I see him play. He has a similar throwing motion to Philip Rivers where it looks like he's almost shoving the ball forward instead of throwing it. During tonight's game, he had 2 TDs (the Wayne TD was as fluky as it gets) and completed 70% of his passes, but again, it doesn't look right. I wish I could be more clear on what it is about him that makes me slightly underwhelmed. Does anyone else get a similar feeling from Luck?
E2A: I just want to be clear. I don't think Luck is going to be a bust by any means. If anything, he might peak at Eli Manning instead of a Peyton Manning. He was hyped as the most "sure" thing in the last 20 drafts at QB. My only point is he looks uncomfortable as a QB instead of fluid and precise like a Brady or Manning.
Chris Givens is not a ppr guy. Not sure where you get that from.After 2 preseason games these are the later ADP players that stand out for ppr leagues
C.Givens
A.Roberts
......A.Fasano.
Did I just write A.Fasano?!![]()
4 catches in 5 targets in only 21 pass attempts by Bradford. Looks good to me. Small sample size, of course, but it is a good trend.Chris Givens is not a ppr guy. Not sure where you get that from.After 2 preseason games these are the later ADP players that stand out for ppr leagues
C.Givens
A.Roberts
......A.Fasano.
Did I just write A.Fasano?!![]()
Do you know what "trend" means?4 catches in 5 targets in only 21 pass attempts by Bradford. Looks good to me. Small sample size, of course, but it is a good trend.Chris Givens is not a ppr guy. Not sure where you get that from.After 2 preseason games these are the later ADP players that stand out for ppr leagues
C.Givens
A.Roberts
......A.Fasano.
Did I just write A.Fasano?!![]()
Now we wait for game 3.