What is FBG's answer to last year's Mark Ingram debacle? They double down on yet another unproven rookie, who just happens to be injured this time and is questionable to even be ready for the start of the regular season. We have seen how holdouts have impacted already proven studs like Chris Johnson, who are healthy yet unable to get into game shape for the regular season. How do they think some unproven rookie who is injured and missing the entire preseason is going to be ready to put up RB1 numbers? Hint: They are insane. Last year they insisted on drafting Mark Ingram in the 2nd round, now they are stating the same thing for Trent Richardson even more vocally. Do not fall for it.
FBG is developing quite the history of completely overrating every single college player. Consider this your wake-up call FBG, put your focus back on the NFL. You aren't in college anymore.
PROTIP: Avoid this scrub.
Right, let's
not use the multitudes of talent evaluator's opinions, including our own eyes to see what this guy's all about.
instead, let's use a completely different player's example, who went to a completely different team in a completely different year into a completely different system with completely different coaches who has a completely different back story (except Bama), who's actually a completely different person all together from the one we are evaluating now.
Because obviously every player in even remotely similar situations end up with the
exact same career path. No need to use real judgment skills or insight of any kind with this guy. It's so much easier to assume he's exactly like the last guy. Homework done! let's go get some pizza.
Sorry if I came across like a jerk just now. It's not usually like me. But this "logic" has more holes in it than a soccer net.
