Agree in hindsight a follow up question would have been great but the conversation didn’t go as follows:What do you mean by immunized is an obvious follow up question
“I’m vaccinated” is a lie. “Im immunized” is admittedly a weasel word phrasing but it apparently satiated the Green Bay beat guys
If that was the extent of his remarks you would be correct“Are you vaccinated?”
”Yeah…..”
that is the lie
Respectfully you’re really trying to dissect this too much. It’s not the Zapruder film or a criminal interrogation. He was asked a yes or no question by a reporter and answered it in the affirmative. End of story but as Ted mentioned - we’ll agree to disagree.If that was the extent of his remarks you would be correct
However he expounded on this is and it didn’t even hit the head right, it begged for clarity
by your logic a police interview is “did you do it” and we go with whatever answer we get.
He said he tested dailyHe also apparently took advantage of all the benefits of being a vaccinated player - not getting tested, not wearing a mask, etc. - which are clearly afforded only to the vaccinated. If he wanted to take a principled position about his course of treatment, I don't think anyone would care. Its claiming he was and taking the benefits of vaccination knowing he hadn't been that gets him in trouble.
If your response offers contradictory or non clarifying information, I personally put the onus on the party seeking information to attempt to obtain clarityRespectfully you’re really trying to dissect this too much. It’s not the Zapruder film or a criminal interrogation. He was asked a yes or no question by a reporter and answered it in the affirmative. End of story but as Ted mentioned - we’ll agree to disagree.
where you say lie I say colloquialism. But Smack already covered my thoughts above“Are you vaccinated?”
”Yeah…..”
that is the lie
Your argument is fiction. "Yeah, no" and "Yeah, I'm immunized" are completely different responses. The first is a negative and the latter is affirmative with supporting subtrefuge.So if I ask someone if they’re going to do X
and they wish to indicate they will not
a conversational, colloquial language style might bring an answer
“yeah I’m not gonna do that”
have they lied?
Language is a breathing living construct, technically I suppose you could argue he lied but it’s simply not how language works
This will blow over and some desperate team will still cover and welcome him for as long as his skills hold up.Serious question, we know GB is likely going with Love after this season. If Love plays well, and Rodgers keeps sounding like a dummy, is his market suddenly a ton smaller than GB was hoping. I mean he'll be an almost 40 y/o QB, with potential leadership/common sense issues. Especially if Russell Wilson(a better player in basically every way in my opinion, at least in 2021) is available, and probably an over a decade younger higher upside player in Watson. Then there is the rookie class, which seemingly is a bad class, but all it takes is a couple teams to fall in love with a couple players(players who are almost 20 years younger than Rodgers)
Could GB struggle to even get a 1st rounder?
My thoughts exactly. As a Bronco fan, I'd gladly welcome him to the huddle next season too.I have Rodgers on a dynasty team, and I’ll forgive him for being such a shady dude though. He is a great QB.
I'm not saying his career is over from this, not by a longshot, just that it could be enough combined with his age, that he's more of a fallback option this offseason, than a target. Kinda like 2020 Rivers maybe?This will blow over and some desperate team will still cover and welcome him for as long as his skills hold up.
Rivers’ skill set had deteriorated at that point - Rodgers’ hasn’t yet.I'm not saying his career is over from this, not by a longshot, just that it could be enough combined with his age, that he's more of a fallback option this offseason, than a target. Kinda like 2020 Rivers maybe?
Didn’t you dramatically declare yourself OUT of this thread?The mental gymnastics some will go through.
I don’t have a problem with him not getting the shot (even if I believe most should) but anyone trying to say he didn’t at least try and deceive anyone is full of poop.
I don’t like the stance that Cousins or Beasley took, but I at least respect them for being upfront. Rodgers is a weasel coward. How anyone possibly defend that with semantical arguments is mind-blowing.
And there was a follow up that seems to be getting lost here where he went on to say some of his teammates were unvaccinated and he would be respectful of their decisions.
Well I was a bit shocked and disheartened by some one trying to claim more people were upset about Rodgers than Ruggs. It made me over-react a bit.Didn’t you dramatically declare yourself OUT of this thread?
Taking this to a field/football presence, the only parties it matters if he lied to are the team and the league.
I wouldn’t expect the team to regardless apart from solidifying or cementing a willingness to trade him
if he lied to the league, I fully expect him to be suspended for at least an additional game as he will need to be made an example of
I'm not sure Rodgers hasn't. I mean he's been on a pretty downward spiral since 2016 other than his MVP year last year.Rivers’ skill set had deteriorated at that point - Rodgers’ hasn’t yet.
 Me too.My thoughts exactly. As a Bronco fan, I'd gladly welcome him to the huddle next season too.
According to the league, Rodgers didn't talk to NFL medical personnel. https://twitter.com/bylindsayhjones/status/1456716684517994497According to Rodgers the NFL medical guru said that vaccinated people could not contract or pass Covid.
Your statement “no one believes Rodgers situation was worse”. I disagreed with that point regarding the oresnence or level of sentiment. , I did t agree that it was worse. There are people holding. Dry strong feelings on the shotWell I was a bit shocked and disheartened by some one trying to claim more people were upset about Rodgers than Ruggs. It made me over-react a bit.
I don’t think he lied to the league - I’m guessing they don’t just take a player’s word for it.
He lied at the press conference - although I know you don’t want to admit that for whatever reason. I’m not going to sit here and claim I’ve never lied about anything in my life. I’m not trying to be holier than though. I just find it funny that the guy wanted to “make a stand” yet couldn’t even own up to it. Period.
I don’t think he should be suspended at all.
That would be nice, but they could also try to sweep everything under the rug, like they did with the WFT investigation.I would assume The leagues actions will complete the picture of who knew what when
I can’t imagine Rodgers is the only one trying to thread this needle. It’s a copycat leagueThat would be nice, but they could also try to sweep everything under the rug, like they did with the WFT investigation.
Quick off the field note, do you think this whole ordeal gets Rodgers dropped by State Farm? I would think an insurance company would be especially unwilling to have any controversial opinions around them.
There's no such thing as 'wokesters'. You're just using a made up a generic term to belittle people.The wokesters are doing enough to belittle themselves. They need no assistance from me. Carry on.
He lied, and seemingly did not follow the protocols the NFL and NFLPA agreed to. It's as simple as that. I...
He's just a narcissist who wanted it both ways.
Yes, it was some one else that made the statement that people were madder at Rodgers than Ruggs and yes that was all you said.Your statement “no one believes Rodgers situation was worse”. I disagreed with that point regarding the oresnence or level of sentiment. , I did t agree that it was worse. There are people holding. Dry strong feelings on the shot
i would support Rodgers Being suspended if he DID lie to the league
but my only point I mentioning is, I would assume The leagues actions will complete the picture of who knew what when
Sorry to have triggered your sensitive nature. Let's get back to discussing fantasy football.There's no such thing as 'wokesters'. You're just using a made up a generic term to belittle people.
Wait, wasn't the whole thing about him restructuring his deal that it allowed him to become a free agent after this season?Serious question, we know GB is likely going with Love after this season. If Love plays well, and Rodgers keeps sounding like a dummy, is his market suddenly a ton smaller than GB was hoping? I mean he'll be an almost 40 y/o QB, with potential leadership/common sense issues. Especially if Russell Wilson (a better player in basically every way in my opinion, at least in 2021) is available, and probably an over a decade younger higher upside player in Watson. Then there is the rookie class, which seemingly is a bad class, but all it takes is a couple teams to fall in love with a couple players(players who are almost 20 years younger than Rodgers)
Could GB struggle to even get a 1st rounder?
No. Not this season. He voided the last year 2023 season. They made a deal to revisit after this year and left open discussing trading him after this year. But he will still be under contract with Green Bay after this season.Wait, wasn't the whole thing about him restructuring his deal that it allowed him to become a free agent after this season?
With as much as the union pushed and pushed for strong protocols to protect players, it’s surprising that they seem to be totally silent on one of their players potentially putting so many of their members at higher risk with his actions.https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/11/05/aaron-rodgers-says-he-didnt-agree-to-the-covid-protocols-but-his-union-did/
Someone needs to remind critical thinker that he's in a union.![]()
Edited my reply to avoid the wrath of moderationFair point. Of course this has nothing to do with being "woke". That is merely the same crowd Rodgers offended. I should have chosen a less divisive term, but I believe we all understand which group of people we are discussing here.
When Aaron said he was immunized, was his intent to have people think he had gotten his COVID vaccination shots? Of course it was. If your girlfriend said she was "on the pill", then got pregnant, would you be upset to find out she didn't mean birth control?
  Also, if he were really allergic to the vaccines, all he had to say in August was "no, because I'm allergic to the vaccines." People would have respected that and let it go. So that makes me think he's lying about that as well.
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the NFL is investigating the Packers and Aaron Rodgers for violations of COVID-19 protocols.
Rapoport added that two issues "have come to the forefront." The first issue is Rodgers choosing not to wear a mask while indoors at press conferences. Rodgers has already voiced his opposition to the rule that stipulates unvaccinated players must wear a mask while indoors with the team. He'll also be investigated for appearing in a group setting away from the team when he attended a Halloween party. Expect hefty fines to come down on Rodgers at some point. It's also possible that Green Bay is penalized in the form of draft picks for their handling of Rodgers. The reigning MVP is eligible to return from the reserve/COVID-19 list in Week 10.
SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
Nov 7, 2021, 10:05 AM ET
When Aaron said he was immunized, was his intent to have people think he had gotten his COVID vaccination shots? Of course it was. If your girlfriend said she was "on the pill", then got pregnant, would you be upset to find out she didn't mean birth control?
I know what you meant, but factual statement is that there's only 1700ish players in the NFL. 50k different NFL players have not been tested.Been tested for COVID: 50k+
Rodgers claims he informed both the league and the Packers that he was unvaccinated. I concede that Rodgers' veracity is in doubt, but if true, that makes a significant difference. If your wife told you and her doctor she was not on the pill, but lied to her friends, she is not guilty of deceiving you to get pregnant.TheWinz said:When Aaron said he was immunized, was his intent to have people think he had gotten his COVID vaccination shots? Of course it was. If your girlfriend said she was "on the pill", then got pregnant, would you be upset to find out she didn't mean birth control?