Relevant to the article / reasons he’d fall are very similar: Raw, both athletic (AR more so of course), inaccurate, didn’t show nearly enough in college to warrant a high pick.
Meh, IMO articles like that are space fillers for the quiet times.
Is the article sincerely suggesting Richardson could fall to round 3? Now, that would be a shock. There was some talk about Willis in the first round but it was nowhere near what we are hearing about Richardson.
Levis seems like the guy that may drop. No one seems to be seriously suggesting him as a surprise #1 overall pick and very few are even suggesting he will go before Richardson.
Then again maybe that's the smokescreen.
Bottom line I am not concerned if two unrelated data sets (Willis/Richardson) can be argued to maybe, possibly follow a similar trajectory down a meaningless pathway (i.e. ultimate draft position).
The only thing I am looking for are any similar data sets (i.e. on field similarities) and how those panned out on the NFL field. That's why I like Allen and Pryor as on-field comps for Richardson.
One success, one failure. Though I would argue Pryor was about 4 years ahead of his time. IMO he would easily be the #1 overall player if he were coming out in 2023.