As an OSU homer I've lived through Terrell Pryor and JT Barrett so I've become hardened to this. Both were downright AWFUL passers but man, could they move the ball with their legs. It's like Barry Sanders - you keep giving him the ball for two yard gains behind that line because you know eventually he's gonna Barry one up.
But that is the thing with Richardson I've been trying to tell people for years now. Compared to Richardson; Pryor and Barrett were AMAZING passers. If Richardson is the baseline, Barrett/Pryor may as well be Montana in comparison.
That's the thing that keeps getting overlooked with all of these name drops. Pryor and Barrett aren't comps as passers. They're too good.
Richardson is a worse passer than Tebow. By a lot.
I feel like Richardson's flaws are areas that can actually improve though. His arm strength is top end. His deep accuracy is pretty dang good. His mid to short accuracy is among the worst ever, but shouldn't that be fixable? His ability to read the field is not great also, but that's another area where improvement is possible.
You can't improve a QB's height, and you can only barely improve things like mobility, speed, and arm strength. On these fixed factors, he's all 10s. I'm not sure he can ever get his non-fixed factors up to the point where he functions, but if he does, he can tear it up. He's still very young, he's still very inexperienced. Can he grow into a QB? I'm nowhere near ready to say, "nope", even though the ultimate answer may be nope, I think it's far from certain as of today.
I have a theory on this...because you do wonder why his short accuracy is as bad as it is.
The short-to-intermediate stuff...it moves fast, all of the moving pieces in front of you. In your uni and in 'not your uni'. The long ball, that develops...it doesn't happen as quickly. You can find rhythm via your drop/set/release pattern.
You always hear about QB's spending inordinate amount of time on their mechanics. Almost like a golfer. But ultimately, they don't even want to think about this aspect of their game because they want it to get to an automatic state. But I also think that means matching their mechanics up with their eyes. In terms of what they're seeing and reacting to or understanding what they are seeing before it even happens so they can proactively know where they will go with the football.
With Richardson, I feel like this haunts him. He's behind in his eyes and his reads, which in turn affects his mechanics and accuracy. And he has little confidence here. So the matching of the play caller and the QB to execute the offense consistently is non-existent.
I remember in TC last year, the Colts were having a joint practice - I think with the Eagles. And the most worrisome aspect coming out of those session I remember was the defense calling out that all he did was run. And this was after an off-season where Richardson was proclaiming on podcasts stuff like the NFL wasn't that hard.
I'm figuring this offseason required a 'come to Jesus' type acknowledgement from him and dedication to being 'uncomfortable'. I haven't seen any/many stories on his offseason other than the shoulder issue - which isn't great but I just wonder if he's focused his energies in the right way to get better.