What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

QB Deshaun Watson, CLE (2 Viewers)

Anarchy99

Footballguy
No one traded for Jimmy G because he's due $25 million this year and the Niners wanted a first or second round pick for him.
It was both. No team was going to take on that salary and/or pay a 2nd (reportedly they were never asking for a 1st) without knowing if he could throw.

But yes, the financials also impacted the scenario.
I guess it depends on how far back we go back in the timeline. Last preseason, when NE had Cam but before they drafted Mac, the talk here was the Pats were interested in bringing back Jimmy, but IIRC the Niners demanded a first-round pick and something like a 3rd or 4th rounder. That or two 2nds. I forget the exact details. At least that was the rumor.
 

MAC_32

Footballguy
I expect the Browns to be in on Jimmy, but I do not think trading for his current contract is on the table.
Agreed. The challenge there is that Jimmy may not want to sign up for an 11 game audition for his next team. I suppose if all other avenues are exhausted, maybe. But it seems unlikely based on his past statements.
I don't know what to expect on that market over the next 2-3 weeks. The number of potential suitors won't be many, but all it takes is one. If I am Jimmy then there are some situations I may find more tempting than the Browns or at least close enough to let money drive decision making, but a place like Seattle? Pass. That's (arguably) the worst roster in the league before considering QB.
 

Anarchy99

Footballguy
I expect the Browns to be in on Jimmy, but I do not think trading for his current contract is on the table.
Agreed. The challenge there is that Jimmy may not want to sign up for an 11 game audition for his next team. I suppose if all other avenues are exhausted, maybe. But it seems unlikely based on his past statements.
I don't know what to expect on that market over the next 2-3 weeks. The number of potential suitors won't be many, but all it takes is one. If I am Jimmy then there are some situations I may find more tempting than the Browns or at least close enough to let money drive decision making, but a place like Seattle? Pass. That's (arguably) the worst roster in the league before considering QB.
A starter could go down somewhere for the entire season in training camp, and most teams don't really want to roll with a typical backup QB all year. If SF can't trade him, they might as well wait until the last possible day in camp to cut him (unless they want to be nice, but a competitor could snag him for free).
 

massraider

Footballguy
I don’t see the Browns spending $$$$ on JimmyG the interim QB.

And if he’s cut, I doubt he’d want to sign there. What’s the incentive for JimmyG to go there? Play 11 then become a backup?

Just doesn’t make sense for the Browns financially or for JimmyG’s career path.
Not that I disagree but:

Brown are trying to win a Super Bowl this year. If Jimmy can hold the fort until DeSensual Massage returns, what price tag would you put on that?
 

MAC_32

Footballguy
I expect the Browns to be in on Jimmy, but I do not think trading for his current contract is on the table.
Agreed. The challenge there is that Jimmy may not want to sign up for an 11 game audition for his next team. I suppose if all other avenues are exhausted, maybe. But it seems unlikely based on his past statements.
I don't know what to expect on that market over the next 2-3 weeks. The number of potential suitors won't be many, but all it takes is one. If I am Jimmy then there are some situations I may find more tempting than the Browns or at least close enough to let money drive decision making, but a place like Seattle? Pass. That's (arguably) the worst roster in the league before considering QB.
A starter could go down somewhere for the entire season in training camp, and most teams don't really want to roll with a typical backup QB all year. If SF can't trade him, they might as well wait until the last possible day in camp to cut him (unless they want to be nice, but a competitor could snag him for free).
Yep. The 9ers have zero incentive to cut him until the 11th hour.
 

MAC_32

Footballguy
I don’t see the Browns spending $$$$ on JimmyG the interim QB.

And if he’s cut, I doubt he’d want to sign there. What’s the incentive for JimmyG to go there? Play 11 then become a backup?

Just doesn’t make sense for the Browns financially or for JimmyG’s career path.
Not that I disagree but:

Brown are trying to win a Super Bowl this year. If Jimmy can hold the fort until DeSensual Massage returns, what price tag would you put on that?
A number a lot less than $25 million.
 

menobrown

Footballguy
No one traded for Jimmy G because he's due $25 million this year and the Niners wanted a first or second round pick for him.
It was both. No team was going to take on that salary and/or pay a 2nd (reportedly they were never asking for a 1st) without knowing if he could throw.

But yes, the financials also impacted the scenario.
Well whatever it was he can throw now and no one is going to trade for him and take on that salary.
 

menobrown

Footballguy
This is a lot better for his acclimation period then what I assumed, which was he just had to leave after August 30th and not come back until week 12 was over.

@AdamSchefter


Deshaun Watson’s 11-game suspension will begin Aug 30, on the NFL’s roster cutdown day. He may return to the team’s training facility and participate in limited activities on Oct 10. On Nov. 14, he can resume practicing, and Watson can play again Dec 4 against the Houston Texans.

 

Anarchy99

Footballguy
So 11 games means he'll miss:
@ Carolina
vs Jets
vs Steelers
@ Falcons
vs Chargers
vs Patriots
@ Ravens
vs Bengals
Bye - Week 9
@ Dolphins
@ Bills
vs Buccaneers

So half of their divisional games, half their NFC games, and 12 total weeks since the Bye is sandwiched in there. Will get to play in:

@ Texans
@ Bengals
vs Ravens
vs Saints
@ Commanders
@ Steelers
I am guessing something between 4-7 to 6-5 when Watson comes back if they roll with Jacoby. Could still get to 9 or 10 wins by year-end, a few x-factor teams in there we don't know how good/bad they are at the moment.
CLE should be able to handle CAR, NYJ, and ATL. But I could see them all losing the other games with Jacoby at QB. I'd be surprised if they got 6 wins with Brissett. I'd guess 4. Given the quality of teams in the AFC, I'd be surprised if they were still in the WC hunt late in the season. Maybe I am not giving them enough credit, but Brissett has looked really mediocre in the games I've seen him play. The Browns could easily end up with a losing record with that schedule and Watson missing 11 games.
 

Bracie Smathers

Footballguy
if I was getting odds, I would say a year.
MarkMaske@MarkMaske

From our story... A source on Deshaun Watson’s side of the case said the NFL “probably” will seek a suspension of a full season.

====================

Pete Smith@_PeteSmith_

This is why he's not getting a year. The Browns would benefit.

C.E.@cde_48

Question…if he’s suspended for the entire season, he won’t be able to hit FA until a year later since it won’t be counted as an accrued season, his cap charge won’t count this year, and the Browns could roll the savings from suspension, into 2023, correct?

=====================================
I'm sure Watson dug his heels in at 11 games so he could accrue a full season this year.
IMHO the NFL caved.
If he got suspended for one-more-game, he would forfeit a full year of his current contract, basically wiping out an entire year of his guaranteed contract.
Supposedly the NFL was saying they wanted to prevent Watson from playing Houston due to PR concerns which didn't fly. They wanted to punish him by preventing him from getting six games this year.
IMHO, the league should have suspended him for 12 games and made sure he didn't accrue a full season this year.
 

GregR

Footballguy
With this ruling, I believe Deshaun Watson is still allowed to practice with the team until the start of the season and play in preseason games, and, if I am not mistaken, he can return to practice after Week 6

He may return to the team’s training facility and participate in limited activities on Oct 10. On Nov. 14, he can resume practicing, and Watson can play again Dec 4 against the Houston Texans.

Thanks, I was going to say, the first didn't sound right at all, as suspended players can't practice from when the suspension starts until it ends, as far as I know. It would have had to be a special term agreed to and hadn't seen any mention of such.
 

SoBeDad

Footballguy
Watson comes back for game 13 @ the Texans. 2023 draft implications, since the Texans own the Brown's 1st and 3rd in the draft. I think both will cone into the game around 3-7 or 4-6, not in contention with SEA or CHI for the #1 pick. One team's selection will improve.
 
Last edited:

Buckna

RMT Beta Tester
So 11 games means he'll miss:
@ Carolina
vs Jets
vs Steelers
@ Falcons
vs Chargers
vs Patriots
@ Ravens
vs Bengals
Bye - Week 9
@ Dolphins
@ Bills
vs Buccaneers

So half of their divisional games, half their NFC games, and 12 total weeks since the Bye is sandwiched in there. Will get to play in:

@ Texans
@ Bengals
vs Ravens
vs Saints
@ Commanders
@ Steelers
I am guessing something between 4-7 to 6-5 when Watson comes back if they roll with Jacoby. Could still get to 9 or 10 wins by year-end, a few x-factor teams in there we don't know how good/bad they are at the moment.
CLE should be able to handle CAR, NYJ, and ATL. But I could see them all losing the other games with Jacoby at QB. I'd be surprised if they got 6 wins with Brissett. I'd guess 4. Given the quality of teams in the AFC, I'd be surprised if they were still in the WC hunt late in the season. Maybe I am not giving them enough credit, but Brissett has looked really mediocre in the games I've seen him play. The Browns could easily end up with a losing record with that schedule and Watson missing 11 games.
Certainly possible, hard to say how good the surrounding cast is in Cleveland. I am of the opinion they are a pretty good defense and strong running game and Baker's injured shoulder killed them last year. While Jacoby is not a starter in the league, I am not sure he's significantly worse than injured Baker though.

I'd say they obviously won't be favored against the Chargers, Pats, Ravens, Bengals, Bills and Bucs with Jacoby at the helm. CAR, NYJ, & ATL as you said, and I'd say they would likely at least split against MIA & PIT (remains to be seen what happens with both these teams this year with major changes going on.) That would put them at 4 wins with upside to win 1 or 2 more against division foes. Jacoby did manage to beat a LJax led Ravens last year with a team arguably as bad or worse or as good as the Browns around him.

After that, I wouldn't be surprised if 3 ~4 out of the 6 remaining games are against teams already out of the playoffs, but if PIT doesn't stumble with the QB change and Miami finally takes a step forward it could be the opposite with the Texans the only 'easy' game left on the schedule when Watson gets back. As a Texan fan in misery, I'd like nothing better than to see Cleveland lose as many games as possible though!
 

Hot Sauce Guy

Footballguy
No one traded for Jimmy G because he's due $25 million this year and the Niners wanted a first or second round pick for him.
It was both. No team was going to take on that salary and/or pay a 2nd (reportedly they were never asking for a 1st) without knowing if he could throw.

But yes, the financials also impacted the scenario.
Well whatever it was he can throw now and no one is going to trade for him and take on that salary.
That I agree with. But someone might trade for him if the Niners eat part of the salary. Then it comes down to whether the Niners value the trade package in the millions. Like, if they get a 2nd, is that worth $5M? or $10M? Cutting him costs a couple mil, so I'm skeptical they'd want to pay too much unless the trade package is significant, which I can't imagine it would be with the Browns.

It'll be interesting to see how this goes down, and if the Browns are in play for him.
 

Anarchy99

Footballguy
No one traded for Jimmy G because he's due $25 million this year and the Niners wanted a first or second round pick for him.
It was both. No team was going to take on that salary and/or pay a 2nd (reportedly they were never asking for a 1st) without knowing if he could throw.

But yes, the financials also impacted the scenario.
Well whatever it was he can throw now and no one is going to trade for him and take on that salary.
That I agree with. But someone might trade for him if the Niners eat part of the salary. Then it comes down to whether the Niners value the trade package in the millions. Like, if they get a 2nd, is that worth $5M? or $10M? Cutting him costs a couple mil, so I'm skeptical they'd want to pay too much unless the trade package is significant, which I can't imagine it would be with the Browns.

It'll be interesting to see how this goes down, and if the Browns are in play for him.
The only way I see SF getting a decent pick for him is if a true contender had "their guy" suffer a catastrophic injury by 8/31. Like Allen, Mahomes, or Brady going down for the season. Most teams probably don't have a real shot at winning anyway (or the cap space). The Niners would likely have to pay most of the contract anyway (as the acquiring team probably wouldn't be able to fit JG under the cap).
 

socrates

Footballguy
With this ruling, I believe Deshaun Watson is still allowed to practice with the team until the start of the season and play in preseason games, and, if I am not mistaken, he can return to practice after Week 6

He may return to the team’s training facility and participate in limited activities on Oct 10. On Nov. 14, he can resume practicing, and Watson can play again Dec 4 against the Houston Texans.

Thanks, I was going to say, the first didn't sound right at all, as suspended players can't practice from when the suspension starts until it ends, as far as I know. It would have had to be a special term agreed to and hadn't seen any mention of such.
Thanks. That is an important distinction.
 

zeeshan2

Footballguy
How many TD vs. Int. does Watson throw in his first game back from suspension?

If Watson's preseason debut is a glimpse of the rust to his game, it could be a slow return for him after what will have been nearly two season's of game inactivity.

With this ruling, I believe Deshaun Watson is still allowed to practice with the team until the start of the season and play in preseason games, and, if I am not mistaken, he can return to practice after Week 6, so we will see if he can shake the rust off.
 

Anarchy99

Footballguy
If more women come out of the woodwork and file more civil suits and / or there are new incidents, the Twitterverse will explode.
 

daveR

Footballguy
Deshaun Watson on why he’s apologizing then: “For everybody that was affected by this situation. There were a lot of people that were triggered.”

Jeebus.
Watson and Haslem are perfect for each other.
Not exactly. Haslem went with the ambiguous crap, accepting guilt. Watson blew it out of the water and maintained his innocence! Unbelievable!!! Just who the **** is Watson's legal team, and why do they get paid??? If they couldn't school him in what to say, why even let him talk?
 

Buckna

RMT Beta Tester
How many TD vs. Int. does Watson throw in his first game back from suspension?

If Watson's preseason debut is a glimpse of the rust to his game, it could be a slow return for him after what will have been nearly two season's of game inactivity.

With this ruling, I believe Deshaun Watson is still allowed to practice with the team until the start of the season and play in preseason games, and, if I am not mistaken, he can return to practice after Week 6, so we will see if he can shake the rust off.

"There is no timeline for Watson to undergo the mandatory evaluation from behavioral experts, but a league source said it’ll be “relatively soon.” If Watson (or any player) doesn’t follow the treatment plan, there can be disciplinary action or a delay in reinstatement."

Let the speculation begin on how his eval and treatment goes!
 

daveR

Footballguy
Watson's agent below. This whole process has always seemed like a sham.


@DavidMulugheta


To be clear, Judge Robinson repeated the NFL’s narrative. She received a brief from the NFL weeks before we had the opportunity to talk to her. In our 1st call with the Judge she referred to “Deshaun’s pattern of behavior”. Her mind was made up before we ever presented a counter.

Wow! Tweet deleted already.
 
I had originally been in the 6-8 games suspension. As a Browns fan, I am good with the 11 games and the fine. Hoping this is behind us and we can move forward. Hoping Brissett can shock us all and keep us above .500. By the way Watson looked in the first preseason game, I doubt he is going to be very sharp his first game back.
 

Buckna

RMT Beta Tester
Watson's agent below. This whole process has always seemed like a sham.


@DavidMulugheta


To be clear, Judge Robinson repeated the NFL’s narrative. She received a brief from the NFL weeks before we had the opportunity to talk to her. In our 1st call with the Judge she referred to “Deshaun’s pattern of behavior”. Her mind was made up before we ever presented a counter.

Wow! Tweet deleted already.
LOL, was about to say the same. Deleted that quick
 

menobrown

Footballguy
Watson's agent below. This whole process has always seemed like a sham.


@DavidMulugheta


To be clear, Judge Robinson repeated the NFL’s narrative. She received a brief from the NFL weeks before we had the opportunity to talk to her. In our 1st call with the Judge she referred to “Deshaun’s pattern of behavior”. Her mind was made up before we ever presented a counter.

Wow! Tweet deleted already.
Wow indeed, he sure did. To late since NFLN was disussing it. Seems to have replaced it with this:


@DavidMulugheta


Deshaun has always stated he is innocent of sexual assault. Nothing has changed in what he said. He also said he is remorseful, the decisions he made have created this situation. The settlement allows him to move forward with his life and career.

 

greenmountaingoat

Footballguy
Not reacting to the trolling sock puppet has been a good test for me in my message boarding quest for enlightenment.

Since we cannot change what has happened, we can only hope that DW (or anyone else inclined to deviant behavior) will at minimum decide that the costs of certain behaviors exceed their benefits.

Moving on...

For redraft, he's not draftable IMO. His greatest benefit is to someone that waits on QB and gets Cousins or whatever. And at that point maybe you're doing some streaming so you're clogging your roster. He's a wasted pick for anyone with a top 6 QB. He's best left on the waiver and play chicken or keep away, however you want to look at it.

Best ball, he's actually a fun late pick, especially if your QB1 has a late bye. No idea what a good pick range ought to be. Haven't done one of these in a while but if he's going late enough, those 5 games are pretty important.

Dynasty, I'd say he's a buy. He's been a top 5 guy for the most part. If you're not contending this year and can unload a productive QB to a contending team, I think it's a smart move to punt the year. Some folks won't want to deal with him, I get it but if you don't care and aren't winning anything this year...
 
Last edited:

Stinkin Ref

IBL Representative
with the one case against him still pending a civil trail....and if it wasn't one of the cases the NFL presented to Robinson....if that case is not "settled" and he is found/guilty /liable....can the NFL bring that back up as another/additional violation of the PCP....?....and basically ask for more games once the case comes to a conclusion....
 

Anarchy99

Footballguy
with the one case against him still pending a civil trail....and if it wasn't one of the cases the NFL presented to Robinson....if that case is not "settled" and he is found/guilty /liable....can the NFL bring that back up as another/additional violation of the PCP....?....and basically ask for more games once the case comes to a conclusion....
What the league released doesn't clearly specify this issue, but it does say that "this concludes the process." Who knows if the one outstanding case is covered by that or not.
 

Hankmoody

Footballguy
I'm sure Watson dug his heels in at 11 games so he could accrue a full season this year.
IMHO the NFL caved.
If he got suspended for one-more-game, he would forfeit a full year of his current contract, basically wiping out an entire year of his guaranteed contract.
Supposedly the NFL was saying they wanted to prevent Watson from playing Houston due to PR concerns which didn't fly. They wanted to punish him by preventing him from getting six games this year.
IMHO, the league should have suspended him for 12 games and made sure he didn't accrue a full season this year.
This isn't correct. If he's on full pay status for even one game the contract progresses. He would lose what's called an accrued season, which is essentially a year of seniority, but there's nothing at stake for him since he's got enough of those already.
 

daveR

Footballguy
with the one case against him still pending a civil trail....and if it wasn't one of the cases the NFL presented to Robinson....if that case is not "settled" and he is found/guilty /liable....can the NFL bring that back up as another/additional violation of the PCP....?....and basically ask for more games once the case comes to a conclusion....
After hearing him once again claim innocence and waiting for a chance to prove it, I wonder if the last civil case remains in place by HIS choice.
 

Anarchy99

Footballguy
It makes sense for Watson to keep it at 11 games. He needed 6 games to get a year of service time in.
He's a vested veteran, additional accrued seasons don't mean much to him.
The articles I have read on the settlement point out that by playing in 6 games, this season would qualify Watson for an accrued season. Not really sure if that matters or not at this point in his career. Maybe @Maurile Tremblay can add some perspective.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top