Brunell4MVP
Footballguy
He "blew up" last season too. 3000 yards, 9.7 y/a and 31:3 TD:INT ratio.I think the concern about age has a lot to do with these two questions:
A. Why didn't he blow up at a younger age, like most future elite prospects do?
B. Should his late college production be discounted by the idea that he was playing as a 'grown man' against college-aged kids?
I don't know the answer to either in this case, as I do think both questions are more than a bit nuanced - but,
C. The statistical history of such situations doesn't speak favorably either.
Add up these three thoughts and I see why his age becomes a decent/major consideration. Good luck to any team's scouting that finds enough good answers to A and B to justify stumping for Hooker despite C.
Not sure why he left VaTech but he was a 63% passer in 300+ attempts over two seasons, at 9.3 y/a and a 22:7 TD:INT ratio.
He's always been good.
As a VT fan I don't fault him at all for leaving VT. Coach Fuentes had poor relationships with many of his players. Many recruits left once they got there. Fuentes lost his entire WR corps one offseason. I'm not even sure he's been hired after getting canned by VT.
It's a total guess if Hooker will be good. Physically he is quite gifted