Has it been mentioned yet that in his last 9 playoff games (going back to 2010), Flacco has 20 TDs to 2 Ints. Only 4 of these games can in the magical 2012 playoffs and most have come on the road.
Of course, he's just slightly above average and it's all the defense.
Peton Manning's last 9 playoff games - 16 TDs, 7 Ints 1 away game, 2 neutral fields, the rest home
Tom Brady's last 9 playoff games - 17 TDs, 10 Ints 1 awaygame, 1 neutral field, the rest home
Flacco - 2 at home, 1 neutral field, the rest away
So other than his first 2 years in the league, Flacco has been awesome in the playoffs, almost exclusively on the road. Two of the best QBs in history have been very average in the playoffs, mostly at home.
But it's all because of Baltimore's great D.
Mark Sanchez's stats and win/loss record are better than Peyton/Brady's as well, even though ALL of Sanchez's games were on the road and he was a rookie for 3 of them. It's not hard to protect the football and win games when your opponents aren't scoring 17+ points as often as the Ravens/Jets opponents weren't.
So here's the question. Are you willing to apply your argument to players beyond Flacco and claim that Mark Sanchez is a great QB, or are you going to choose only to apply it when you're talking about the player you like?
You can't have it both ways. So pick one. Either Mark Sanchez is an elite quarterback or performance in a small collection of playoff games behind a good defense is not a huge indication of how good a QB is.
W/L percentage in the playoffs
Flacco: 72%
Sanchez: 66%
QB Rating in the playoffs
Flacco: 88.2
Sanchez: 94.3
TD/INT ratio in the playoffs
Flacco: 2.625:1
Sanchez: 3:1
YPA in the playoffs
Flacco: 7.29
Sanchez: 7.36
By your own argument, Sanchez is an elite quarterback. So either your argument is flawed, or Sanchez is an elite QB. Which is it?
I specifically noted Flacco's last 9 games (acknowledging that in his first two seasons his numbers were really bad). Sanchez went 2 years, Flacco is on his 6th. Flacco's sample size is much larger, recent, and extended over multiple years. I held the same parameters for the two all time greats noted above.
Are you really arguing that since 2010 Flacco has been an elite playoff qb? 20TDs vs 2 Ints over 9 games is terrific, no matter how you want to spin it. The fact that Brady and Manning aren't close to those numbers should cement that for you.
Why are you trying to so hard minimize Flacco's impact on the games?
BAHAHAHA, seriously? HAHAHAHAHA
Cry because the poster talks about Sanchez in 6 games over 2 seasons then point to Flacco in 9 games going on 4 seasons (remember he was out of the playoffs last year) neither is a particular large sample size...
I am not saying Sanchez is elite and by the eye test Flacco does more in the playoff games to help his team win than Sanchez from my point of view. Flacco in my opinion is better than Sanchez in the playoffs but Sanchez of the playoffs is not the Sanchez we know these days.
Also I still don't understand why Ravens/Flacco fans feel hurt over having their defense called great/one of the best defenses year in and year out. Flacco is not relied on to win the games single handed but he is needed. I do think its 65% defense 35% offense (except Super Bowl run) with a pretty good portion of the offense being Flacco.
What if the Raven gave up the playoff average scores since 2008? (24PPG give up)
Extra Wins: @Pitt (2010 - tie w/ 24 points)
Extra Losses: @TEN (2008), HOU (2010), @IND (2012 - tie w/ 24 points)
*this doesn't also take into account things like better field position, scores, and turnovers created by the defense
So in the end again Flacco gets too much credit right now for the team success because prior to the Super Bowl run he was not the one leading the team. This postseason and next are the keys to bringing me over to the playoff Flacco that everyone seems to want to talk about.