What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Kirk Cousins, ATL (2 Viewers)

In some ways Washington (albeit not on purpose) actually did him a favor, They paid him over $40MM for the last two seasons and he can still now go out and get a big contract. Even if he "only" gets the $71MM guaranteed that Alex Smith just got - that plus what he's already banked isn't too shabby.
Yep. I am sure 2 years ago he would have preferred the long-term deal, but I doubt he is sad about how it played out. 

 
2018 is going to be a really interesting year, Kirk Cousins wise.  So far, he has had the benefit of being a happy surprise in the sense that he was a backup to the Big Superstar (RGIII) who legit outplayed him and showed his worth to the team.  He also had the benefit of being pitted against the thoroughly unlikeable duo of Snyder and Allen, who would not do right by him contract wise.  He was a "face" who had excellent "heels" to work against.  How could you fail to root for the guy in those circumstances?

Once he goes to a team like the Broncos who are managed better and once he is compensated like a true franchise Quarterback, will expectations rise?  And what happens if next year he does in Denver what he did in Washington, produce good statistics but fail to make clutch plays when needed (or worse yet, deliver untimely turnovers when it counts) -- will the Internet still fawn on him as they are doing now?

Expectations are about to seriously rise for this guy.  He's used to betting on himself so I'm sure he's up for the challenge.  It will be an interesting year to say the least...  

 
2018 is going to be a really interesting year, Kirk Cousins wise.  So far, he has had the benefit of being a happy surprise in the sense that he was a backup to the Big Superstar (RGIII) who legit outplayed him and showed his worth to the team.  He also had the benefit of being pitted against the thoroughly unlikeable duo of Snyder and Allen, who would not do right by him contract wise.  He was a "face" who had excellent "heels" to work against.  How could you fail to root for the guy in those circumstances?

Once he goes to a team like the Broncos who are managed better and once he is compensated like a true franchise Quarterback, will expectations rise?  And what happens if next year he does in Denver what he did in Washington, produce good statistics but fail to make clutch plays when needed (or worse yet, deliver untimely turnovers when it counts) -- will the Internet still fawn on him as they are doing now?

Expectations are about to seriously rise for this guy.  He's used to betting on himself so I'm sure he's up for the challenge.  It will be an interesting year to say the least...  
If Kubiak was still there  I would think Cousins would be just fine, not sure what to make of Vance in Denver. I would think you want to bring on of them Washington/Shanahan types with him to be OC or B coach at least

 
It's crazy what some of these QBs have been able to make over the last few years. Guys like Alex Smith and Sam Bradford. Even Brock Oswelier got a giant bag of money.

And I'm not sure anyone will successfully argue that Stafford should be the highest paid QB in the league, but at least the Lions were able to avoid the situation that the Redskins currently find themselves in. Cousins' numbers are almost the same as Stafford over the last 3 years. I would rather have Stafford but I can see how Cousins will break the bank thanks in part to the Lions front office.

 
It's crazy what some of these QBs have been able to make over the last few years. Guys like Alex Smith and Sam Bradford. Even Brock Oswelier got a giant bag of money.

And I'm not sure anyone will successfully argue that Stafford should be the highest paid QB in the league, but at least the Lions were able to avoid the situation that the Redskins currently find themselves in. Cousins' numbers are almost the same as Stafford over the last 3 years. I would rather have Stafford but I can see how Cousins will break the bank thanks in part to the Lions front office.
It has nothing to do with the Lions' front office - it's just timing. Whichever above average QB who's contract happens to be up next, gets paid and most likely paid better than everyone else.

 
It has nothing to do with the Lions' front office - it's just timing. Whichever above average QB who's contract happens to be up next, gets paid and most likely paid better than everyone else.
This. It is just how the market works.

Stafford will be making $26.5 million this season. It goes up to $29.5 in 2019 then $31.5 million in 2020. 

Kind of already calculating in what starting QBs will be making in the years ahead.

$30 million is about 17% of the total cap space projected for 2018 which seems to be going up more every year (dismissing any notion of the NFLs popularity or viewership waning) while a lot of money of course, its not that big of percentage of the total cap considering how important the starting QB position is to a team. Only the top 40 contracts count towards the cap anyways.

 
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't think Cousins will "chase the money" this offseason.  Quite the opposite, in my opinion.  He just got $40 million bucks for the last two years.  FORTY MILLION.  Suffice it to say, no matter where he lands, he's going to get a nice contract.  Even if he gives a team a bargain basement deal, all things considered for QB's and their going rates etc., he still stands to make a ton MORE money regardless of where he lands.  I think he is in the best possible situation a guy in his position can be in.  He doesn't need to chase the money and can look around to find a team that best suits his game and chances to win a super bowl.  It may not be the team with the most money or best deal, but it aint gonna suck.  Good for him. 

Denver seems like the perfect fit to me.  Jacksonville and Arizona are close seconds since both have solid defenses and with DJ coming back, very solid running games. 

 
If he want's his best chance at a Super Bowl, he'll sign with Jax (best D and run game). Otherwise, he's just chasing the money.
First the Jaguars have to actually offer him a contract. Maybe they will but that doesn't seem a certainty. 

Second, while you're probably right that a Cousins led Jaguars have the best chance to win a super bowl, signing with Denver, Arizona, or Minnesota, at the least wouldn't be much worse chances. Likely they're on par. 

I know you'll think I'm nuts, but I actually think cousins could lead the Jets to a super bowl within the first 3 years. They'll have to hit at receiver and get a new starting RB, but they're closer to contention than many think. 

Besides, who cares if he does "chase the money"?  He probably thinks he can win anywhere. How much more of a "hero" would he be if he signed with the Browns and brought them to a super bowl? I don't think he signs there, but the idea for the franchise that they could use their 1 and 4 to take Barkley, trade down, take defensive help, etc (lots of options) while actually getting a starting caliber QB might be enough for them to break the bank. He's obviously not going back home to Chicago, but Cleveland might actually have an appeal to him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cleveland would be a very interesting spot for Cousins.  Imagine him at QB, drafting Barkley with the #1 and a stud lineman with the #4, and adding them to an offense with Josh Gordon and Corey Coleman?  With Haley as offensive coordinator? That's a damn good offense.

 
Just watching a clip of Kirk Cousins on live interview and he says that winning is his highest priority. He has money. He wants to win a lot of games and hopefully a super bowl.

Seems like a slam dunk that this would narrow things down to the Vikings, Jacksonville and Denver.

The Vikings are better positioned than both of the other teams because they do not currently have a starting QB. They do not need to trade Bortles like Jacksonville would and they have more cap space than Denver has. Denvers WR are older than the Vikings. All 3 teams do have some good weapons and supporting cast for Cousins to be successful.

Who the Vikings hire as their offensive coordinator will have some influence on Cousins decision. He praised Shanahans west coast offense, Sean McVey and that he wants to be in  a similar offensive system with a good play caller. His comments made me think Bevel might hurt the Vikings chances perhaps. 

 
Cousins and the Vikings are a perfect fit. That would be fun to watch. I think Denver is overrated. That D isn't the D it was 3 years ago. Their cap space isn't going g to allow them to build much else. RBs are average. Vikings are truly a "QB away" type team. 

 
I think people are making too much of the "how much money matters" to Kirk thing when talking about chances of winning based on where he goes.  

Say for example he simply goes to the highest bidder, that doesn't mean "football" matters any less to him.  It doesnt mean he cares any less about football by going to the Browns for 35 million a year as opposed to going to the Broncos for 27 million a year.  

Also, just because he goes tot he highest bidder doesnt mean he cares any less about winning, especially if he is confident and think he can win anywhere.

Of course money matters to Kirk and every other player in the league.  You are a total idiot if you think it doesn't.  

edit..........I suppose I am not explaining that the way I want to.  Beer will do that do ya.  I suppose what I mean is that a guy can want to win as much as anyone, but might not be able to turn down an extra 5+ million per year in order to have a perceived better chance of winning.  

If I decided to leave my current job and move across the country, had three offers from hospitals, does it make me any less passionate about my work if I go with the highest bidder?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think people are making too much of the "how much money matters" to Kirk thing when talking about chances of winning based on where he goes.  

Say for example he simply goes to the highest bidder, that doesn't mean "football" matters any less to him.  It doesnt mean he cares any less about football by going to the Browns for 35 million a year as opposed to going to the Broncos for 27 million a year.  

Also, just because he goes tot he highest bidder doesnt mean he cares any less about winning, especially if he is confident and think he can win anywhere.

Of course money matters to Kirk and every other player in the league.  You are a total idiot if you think it doesn't.  

edit..........I suppose I am not explaining that the way I want to.  Beer will do that do ya.  I suppose what I mean is that a guy can want to win as much as anyone, but might not be able to turn down an extra 5+ million per year in order to have a perceived better chance of winning.  

If I decided to leave my current job and move across the country, had three offers from hospitals, does it make me any less passionate about my work if I go with the highest bidder?
Agreed on your point but Kirk isn't deciding to leave his current employer. He basically* got fired because they don't think he's worth the money he'll demand. 

But yes, if I'm forced to find a new employer, signing with the one who pays me most to do the exact same job doesn't make me any less of an attorney than if I signed with a firm known for "winning".

 
He's spent the last 2 offseasons saying "I want to be where I'm wanted" which is a euphemism for "show me the ####### money", so it's been pretty funny as Redskins fan to see him craft his words this offseason. 

 
This. It is just how the market works.

Stafford will be making $26.5 million this season. It goes up to $29.5 in 2019 then $31.5 million in 2020. 

Kind of already calculating in what starting QBs will be making in the years ahead.

$30 million is about 17% of the total cap space projected for 2018 which seems to be going up more every year (dismissing any notion of the NFLs popularity or viewership waning) while a lot of money of course, its not that big of percentage of the total cap considering how important the starting QB position is to a team. Only the top 40 contracts count towards the cap anyways.
Stafford's contract is crazy. (10m of the numbers you mention refer to already paid out signing bonus)

If anyone gets at contract close to Stafford's it'll be Brees. Cousins will have to have some crazy people bidding to get there.

 
Agreed on your point but Kirk isn't deciding to leave his current employer. He basically* got fired because they don't think he's worth the money he'll demand. 

But yes, if I'm forced to find a new employer, signing with the one who pays me most to do the exact same job doesn't make me any less of an attorney than if I signed with a firm known for "winning".
The only sure way for WAS to keep him is to franchise tag him at 34m. I think we all agree that this is a bit much.

That said there is also a dollar amount attached to "winning" - in sponsorships etc. So, honestly I think it is a bit more complicated that the numbers in the (future) employment contract.

 
"Weis noted that his former Chiefs boss, Browns offensive coordinator Todd Haley, is "a very good playcaller'' which should be attractive to offensive players. He also believes Cousins is in the class of a Drew Brees and worth the big contract."

Sorry, but :no: , he's not. Not even close.

 
And looking at the roster. It's not bad for a 0-16 team
Agreed, just a matter of how guys actually in the NFL view the situation here.  I mean, on paper, we have a good line, decent skill pieces, a decent defense, the best draft pick assortment in NFL history, and a huge amount of cap space remaining even after signing COusins to a huge contract.  

Just adding Cousins to our roster from last year makes us just about as good as Washington was.  Now add in that we aren't losing any of our good players, we add a lot of great high draft picks, and whatever we can add with the 60+ remaining cap space AFTER signing Cousins.

The problem with all this is the stigma of Cleveland being addicted to losing.  Not just losing but dysfunctional losing.  

 
Paul Allen of KFAN Minneapolis reports the Vikings are "number one with a bullet" on Kirk Cousins' wish list.

Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer agrees that Minnesota would be a "prime location" for the impending free agent. Cousins has garnered widespread interest since Washington traded for Alex Smith last week with the Broncos, Cardinals, Jaguars, Jets and Vikings emerging as his top suitors. Cousins reportedly has a desire to 'win right away," which would make Minnesota an appealing destination. The Vikings also boast one of the league's strongest receiving duos in Adam Thielen and Stefon Diggs. With Sam Bradford, Teddy Bridgewater and Case Keenum all headed for free agency, the NFC runner-ups will be aggressive in pursuing a quarterback this offseason.

Related: Vikings

Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer 

Feb 4 - 10:51 AM
 
According to ESPN's Adam Schefter, the Redskins will "consider" placing the franchise tag on Kirk Cousins.

The Redskins are committed to Alex Smith as their starting quarterback but could conceivably tag Cousins and trade him to a quarterback-needy team for draft picks. This way the Redskins would also have some influence over where Cousins lands rather than letting him hit free agency and sign with a team of his choosing. Of course, Washington wouldn't be able to execute a trade until Cousins signs his $34.5 million franchise tender, which he could put off for weeks or even months while still counting against the Redskins' salary cap. The Redskins would also lose out on a 2019 compensatory pick if they choose to tag Cousins. Ultimately, we expect Cousins to hit the open market.

Source: ESPN.com 

Feb 4 - 8:37 AM
 
NBC Sports Washington doesn’t expect the Redskins to "tag-and-trade" free agent Kirk Cousins.

The Redskins don’t own Cousins’ rights and would need him to sign a franchise/transition tender to trade him. That would cost Washington at least $29 million in cap space, making it highly unlikely. Cousins is going to hit the free-agent market and has already been linked to the Jets, Broncos, Vikings, and Jaguars. The Redskins will get a 2019 third-round compensatory pick for Cousins. Feb 2 - 6:16 PM

Source: NBC Washington
 
reading the tea leaves, I fully expect Elway to make a run at Cousins and to throw a ton of money at him.

Here's the deal: Broncos brass believes they still have a championship caliber defense (as long as Talib is kept).  The team is a QB and good OL away from being a contender again.  The OL could be really shored up in the draft - Quentin Nelson at guard would solve a huge hole in the OL, leaving RT the only weak spot. 

Using the #5 pick on QB means the 2018 season will be (another) rebuilding season.  Elway wants to win now, not 2019.  The most direct path back to contention is to sign Cousins.

Elway signed the last great QB free agent to hit the market (Manning), and had him in the SB within a couple of years and winning a 'ship by year 4.  That's a pretty compelling argument to make.

 
Can the redskins afford to tag him? If im him i sign that tag as soon ad they put it on him if they cant afford it
Probably short term, yea - but I think the issue then, Cousins doesn't sign it, but because they put the offer out there it counts to their cap, and their FA period is the suck and they miss out on upgrading where they need.

 
The problem for the Vikings with this is money.
They have projected $50M in cap space, 7th most.  Now the Browns and Jets have more money but the Vikings have $24M more than Denver.

I've had Vikings as favorite for awhile now myself, and would handicap them in this order and briefly why.

1. Vikings- cap space, best talent of contending teams for his services if winning matters to Cousins. Way better offensive supporting cast. He does not strike me as the kind of guy who prefers NY to Minnesota. Also I think stability will play a role in this. Vance Joseph, Hue and Bowles all seemed to barely survive getting fired and I tend to think all are on short leases.

2. Jets- Cap space second most of all teams I think would be vying for his services.

3. Broncos- cap space not in same zone as others but they can make it work, terrible OL and aging WR's. Also with pick #5 Denver might not get into as much of a bidding war if they think they can get a QB at 5 or move up. Similar situation for Jets at #6 but without moving up they got Denver in front of them and that could make all the difference in the world.

4. Browns-most money but with pick one they can get their long term QB. Smith made sense as a bridge, but not a long term commitment to Cousins.

5. Cardinals-  major need but not enough money.

 
I think the Browns SHOULD sign him.  I don't think they will.  What they  SHOULD do, imo - sign Cousins,  draft Barkley and Fitzpatrick/Chubb/other BPA.   Get back to a culture of winning. But they won't, because they're going to draft a rookie QB - who may or may not work out.

 
Minny seems like the best fit.   My gut says he goes to Denver, Vikes go with Bridgewater, and the Jets get Mayfield at 6.  

 
The problem for the Vikings with this is money.  Sure they could make it happen but they would need to make cuts and still have enough to cover the Cousins contract and have the money to cover the rookie class. I do believe it can be done. I think it could mean trading a pretty good player or making significant cuts. Cousins' contract could be creatively drawn up to help with this problem so it can be done though more difficult for the Vikings and not as difficult for other teams. The good thing for Cousins is the trade helped the timing of teams cap guys to get creative. If Spielman and Elway want to get creative then they are going through all the scenarios now. If I was a GM just as an exercise for my people I would ask them to find a way just to see how creative my people could get. Elway or Spielman wants him badly enough they can go get him the question becomes cost and if he is worth said cost.
The Vikings have $56 million cap space as all their QB contracts cleared. They also have a hole at defensive tackle and likely at guard if Joe Berger retires as expected. From what I am reading Shariff Floyd might free up another $7 million.

Its more than enough money for Cousins even at $30 million per year as has been the reported price, but may be a bit on the high side, I don't know.

I think it is good salesmanship on the Browns part to compare Cousins to Drew Brees and hint they may be willing to pay him like it. A bidding war could cause the price to go up.

The Vikings do have several players that they will want to re-sign that they need to budget money for. So that is the tricky part, but I have full confidence they can make it work.

Another way to look at it is the Vikings spent $21 million on the QB position last season. So if Cousins is $30 it is going to cost the Vikings a higher percentage of their total cap than it did last year

The Vikings have been trying to save money at the QB position for a pretty long time now before the Bradford trade, but they aren't paying Peterson a ton of money anymore, so there is money available for spending more at the QB position now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How much do they have to keep for their rookie picks? I'm thinking 5 to 8 million. I agree they can do it. I just think if it does become a bidding war Cousins will have to decide that money really does not make a difference. For fantasy, this might be the best of all the landing spots.
Yeah the Vikings like to have cushion of another $10 million after rookie picks for emergency signings. But go big or go home. I think they need to go after the best QB available and I think that is Cousins.

If this means the Vikings have to cut Jarius Wright or Kyle Rudolph (or both) to free up Money for Diggs, Waynes, Hunter, Kendricks then so be it. Decisions to be made on if Anthony Barr deserves to be the 2nd highest player on the Vikings if they do add Cousins, then he would be 3rd. Going to have to make those decisions anyways.

The Vikings have talked about how good it was to have options in multiple QBs and I think they realize the value of a quality back up QB. So they are still likely to spend some money there as well. $3,5 million last year for Keenum and Bridgewater. I could see that number going up as well. So decisions,

 
How great would it be if he landed in Minnesota? As a Dynasty owner of Cousins, I would love to see him as the Vikings QB.  The football fan in me wants him to land in Cleveland to see the rebirth of that franchise. 
I think any Qb who believes in themselves should be confident enough to turn the Browns around. I can see Cousins doing well if he goes there.

The Vikings would then need to consider lesser although more cap friendly options.

 
How great would it be if he landed in Minnesota? As a Dynasty owner of Cousins, I would love to see him as the Vikings QB.  The football fan in me wants him to land in Cleveland to see the rebirth of that franchise. 
As a guy who grew up near Detroit, I'm okay with Cleveland continuing to be the laughingstock of the league.

But yes, it would actually be good for the league for the browns to be competitive.

 
Can the redskins afford to tag him? If im him i sign that tag as soon ad they put it on him if they cant afford it
They can but that's not the biggest issue.  Cousins is likely to tell them, if he hasn't already, that if they tag him he will not negotiate with any potential trade partners.  That would kill all possibilities of a trade because no team is going to trade for Cousins without having a deal agreed upon. 

 
The Vikings have $56 million cap space as all their QB contracts cleared. They also have a hole at defensive tackle and likely at guard if Joe Berger retires as expected. From what I am reading Shariff Floyd might free up another $7 million.

Its more than enough money for Cousins even at $30 million per year as has been the reported price, but may be a bit on the high side, I don't know.

I think it is good salesmanship on the Browns part to compare Cousins to Drew Brees and hint they may be willing to pay him like it. A bidding war could cause the price to go up.

The Vikings do have several players that they will want to re-sign that they need to budget money for. So that is the tricky part, but I have full confidence they can make it work.

Another way to look at it is the Vikings spent $21 million on the QB position last season. So if Cousins is $30 it is going to cost the Vikings a higher percentage of their total cap than it did last year

The Vikings have been trying to save money at the QB position for a pretty long time now before the Bradford trade, but they aren't paying Peterson a ton of money anymore, so there is money available for spending more at the QB position now.
All three of the Vikings QBs are URFAs so that will actually loosen up the QB market if they jump into the mix rather than tighten it up because some of those QBs fit better as short-term bridges for developing rookie QBs and this draft class 'should' see four rookies drafted in the first round.

The Browns did NOT compare Cousins to Drew Brees, Charlie Weis did.

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2018/02/kirk_cousins_price_tag_likely.html#incart_river_index

... "I was talking with Coach (Charlie) Weis .....Weis noted that his former Chiefs boss, Browns offensive coordinator Todd Haley, is "a very good playcaller'' which should be attractive to offensive players. He also believes Cousins is in the class of a Drew Brees and worth the big contract.
Cousins has stated he wants to play for a winner and the Vikings certainly fit the mold but they can't afford to sign him and keep those URFA QBs so if they go after him the QB market should loosen up and those teams at the top of the draft can get their rookie and a short-term bridge QB.

 
They can but that's not the biggest issue.  Cousins is likely to tell them, if he hasn't already, that if they tag him he will not negotiate with any potential trade partners.  That would kill all possibilities of a trade because no team is going to trade for Cousins without having a deal agreed upon. 
If Cousins gets tagged, he should sign that tender before it's even fully printed from the fax machine.

 
If Cousins gets tagged, he should sign that tender before it's even fully printed from the fax machine.
Oh yeah, he'd sign it, like you said before the ink was dry, but then he would sit on his hands.  Redskins can't trade him and the money's guaranteed so they can't get out of it.  That's the threat, and why they can't risk tagging him.  They would have had to have worked something out in advance, which would have been possible but still unlikely before the Smith deal.  Once that broke it was over.  Cousins played it out and he won.  Know when to fold 'em.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Cousins gets tagged, he should sign that tender before it's even fully printed from the fax machine.
Kirk has said that he wants more than just money, that he wants to win so he wouldn't sign anything if he did not have a say on where he wants to play so the market of available teams would drop to wherever Kirk prefers to play. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top