What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Lamar Jackson, BAL (1 Viewer)

So you are saying you are downgrading Andrews from one of the best TE's in the league to terrible because of a strip last night?

We will just have to disagree.  I actually think the opposite that this wr corp with an actual qb would be dynamite.  
I never downgraded Andrews, just pointed out that he also cost them the game. Not only are the #1 and #2 wrs below average, so are the #3 and #4. I'm not saying Lamar is a great passer, but most people who use analytics agree that the receiving core for the Ravens is way below average. 

 
I never downgraded Andrews, just pointed out that he also cost them the game. Not only are the #1 and #2 wrs below average, so are the #3 and #4. I'm not saying Lamar is a great passer, but most people who use analytics agree that the receiving core for the Ravens is way below average. 


I'd be interested to see the analytics if you have a link.  I did a quick google search and didn't come up with anything.  

I can't see how they are way below average.  Average for sure...just not way below nor an excuse for Lamar to be as poor as he is.

 
I'd be interested to see the analytics if you have a link.  I did a quick google search and didn't come up with anything.  

I can't see how they are way below average.  Average for sure...just not way below nor an excuse for Lamar to be as poor as he is.
The pff ranking of all 32 teams receiving core, with Bateman, had them at 23 for a prediction. In that link I posted earlier and below, it says they were the 4th worst in 2020. They lost Hurst, a good receiving TE, and gained Watkins, who cames off a 64.5 pff rating. 

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-ranking-all-nfl-receiving-corps-ahead-of-the-2021-season

 




I have Lamar and think he will put up big points.  What worries me is that eventually an injury is going to happen.  The NFL is tough on running QBs.

 
The pff ranking of all 32 teams receiving core, with Bateman, had them at 23 for a prediction. In that link I posted earlier and below, it says they were the 4th worst in 2020. They lost Hurst, a good receiving TE, and gained Watkins, who cames off a 64.5 pff rating. 

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-ranking-all-nfl-receiving-corps-ahead-of-the-2021-season


I'm interested more in the analytics.  Read about the teams that are above the ravens and i suspect that they are all bunched very close together on the analytics side.  

Watkins has a 2021 PFF grade of 75 so...

 
I'm interested more in the analytics.  Read about the teams that are above the ravens and i suspect that they are all bunched very close together on the analytics side.  

Watkins has a 2021 PFF grade of 75 so...
With Lamar as QB! Maybe he can do what Mahomes couldn't in 3 seasons.

 
There is a disconnect between Lamar's analytic rating and people's perception of his passing ability. Last night showed that Lamar has good touch on the deep passes. One deep completion to Brown and one to Watkins. Like any QB, he needs pass protection, although on the TD pass to Brown he succeeded with poor protection. My main concern is his injury risk. If Andrews hangs onto that pass in overtime, we might be talking differently about Lamar today. 

https://twitter.com/QBDataMine/status/1367253941440958465?s=19

 
There is a disconnect between Lamar's analytic rating and people's perception of his passing ability. Last night showed that Lamar has good touch on the deep passes. One deep completion to Brown and one to Watkins. Like any QB, he needs pass protection, although on the TD pass to Brown he succeeded with poor protection. My main concern is his injury risk. If Andrews hangs onto that pass in overtime, we might be talking differently about Lamar today. 

https://twitter.com/QBDataMine/status/1367253941440958465?s=19


My concern is his injury risk and what a major injury is going to do to him. 

He does well when he extends plays.  

That being said the other issue, and you saw it last night, is that every 5th pass is just awful.  Like high school awful.  I can think of a couple last night where he just missed an open wr by 5 yards.  As an owner, and therefore a watcher of his games, it seems like that every game.  

 
Lamar was pressured on 54.5% of his dropbacks, the highest ever in the NextGen stats era, despite the Raiders only blitzing 3 times. That’s astounding!

 
Lamar Jackson completed 18-of-26 passes for 239 yards, one touchdown and two interceptions, rushing 16 times for 107 yards and another two scores in the Ravens' 36-35 Week 2 win over the Chiefs.

Jackson started off shaky, overthrowing Marquise Brown on Baltimore's first play from scrimmage for what would have been an 80-yard touchdown. He then forced a pick-six to Chiefs FS Tyrann Mathieu on the next throw. Jackson's second interception was thrown to Mathieu again in triple coverage. He scored on a pair of designed runs in the fourth quarter, and a Clyde Edwards-Helaire fumble allowed Jackson to ice the game on a 4th-and-1 and complete the comeback win. Jackson's passing has left a lot to be desired through two weeks, but he's made up for it by averaging 97 rushing yards per game. The Ravens pass offense could get some help later this month with Rashod Bateman close to returning from IR.

 
he still is not a very good passer....you have to make him throw....you just have to....he is a video game running the ball....but he is eventually going to take a nasty hit or get twisted the wrong way, rolled up on....bell rung into the turf....something....I guess enjoy it while you can but I agree the hit is coming at some point....

 
thought he threw some outstanding passes last night.  he still had some duds, i admit.  his running sets up his passing.  last night showed that.

 
Funny that on the very first page of this thread from 4 1/2 years ago there were people saying stuff like "that big hit is coming"...still waiting for him to miss a game due to injury. 

 
Baltimore tends to win when they just let him play with reckless abandon.  He ran like crazy in the 4th, many of them designed, which works.

Still not a great pocket passer and the hit is coming. He doesn't go out of bounds, he doesn't slide - it's coming

 
Baltimore tends to win when they just let him play with reckless abandon.  He ran like crazy in the 4th, many of them designed, which works.

Still not a great pocket passer and the hit is coming. He doesn't go out of bounds, he doesn't slide - it's coming
Guess what: Pocket passers get hit too. Four quarterbacks went down this weekend alone. Two others got hurt but came back in the game (Carr, Mayfield). Other than Tyrod Taylor, who wasn't hit, they weren't running QBs.

It's a silly complaint.

 
Guess what: Pocket passers get hit too. Four quarterbacks went down this weekend alone. Two others got hurt but came back in the game (Carr, Mayfield). Other than Tyrod Taylor, who wasn't hit, they weren't running QBs.

It's a silly complaint.


And I believe there is something to be said for him initiating contact to mitigate any "surprise" injuries.

 
CalBear said:
Guess what: Pocket passers get hit too. Four quarterbacks went down this weekend alone. Two others got hurt but came back in the game (Carr, Mayfield). Other than Tyrod Taylor, who wasn't hit, they weren't running QBs.

It's a silly complaint.


They don't get hit 20 times a game...that's a pretty easy differentiation 

He's a rb that throws...

 
killface said:
Baltimore tends to win when they just let him play with reckless abandon.  He ran like crazy in the 4th, many of them designed, which works.

Still not a great pocket passer and the hit is coming. He doesn't go out of bounds, he doesn't slide - it's coming
The bolded isn’t true, but I can understand how you’d feel that way if you don’t see every game of his and he was certainly taking way more hits than usual last given the nature of the game. But generally he absolutely will give himself up by going down or getting out of bounds several times a game.

 
The bolded isn’t true, but I can understand how you’d feel that way if you don’t see every game of his and he was certainly taking way more hits than usual last given the nature of the game. But generally he absolutely will give himself up by going down or getting out of bounds several times a game.


I'm an owner and the guy takes a lot of hits

 
Sure. But that’s not what you said where I quoted. He does avoid a good deal of them.


I guess your definition and my definition is different for 'avoid a good deal of them'.  Guys like Rodgers (in his prime), Allen, even Murray really work to avoid hits. 

I see a difference with him than most qbs

 
while obviously its not really possible to predict an injury....it's also obvious that he and his team put him in situations that seem to increase the chances....they are designing runs for him....about 12-15 a game or so in addition to other times where he may just tuck it and go when it originally was going to be a pass....just cause that is instinctive for him....it does feel like you can only poke the bear so often...and if they are relying on him to convert big plays at big times (which they do) that in itself leads to more contact instead of just going down or running out of bounds as he will feel the need to get as much as he can on a play....which many times involves sacrificing your body for the extra yardage...

 
They don't get hit 20 times a game...that's a pretty easy differentiation 

He's a rb that throws...
Look, I guarantee that Lamar Jackson will at some point take a hit that knocks him out of a game or a season. So did Tom Brady. So did Peyton Manning. So did Ben Roethlisberger. So did Aaron Rodgers. So did Dak Prescott. 

There's only one top QB in the league who's 30+ years old and who's never missed at least half a season to injury, and that's Russell Wilson and his 800+ rushing attempts and 4500+ rushing yards (both tops in the league for a QB over that time). 

It's probably safer to be out in space getting tackled by a safety than getting landed on by a stack of 300-pound linemen in the pocket. Certainly there's no reason to downgrade Jackson based on the possibility that he might get hurt in the future.

 
I guess your definition and my definition is different for 'avoid a good deal of them'.  Guys like Rodgers (in his prime), Allen, even Murray really work to avoid hits. 

I see a difference with him than most qbs
Weird examples since Rodgers missed a year or 2 in his prime with injuries. Murray was banged up last year and from what I’ve seen of Allen he’s a far more physical runner and takes some serious shots himself whereas Lamar is more elusive.

But we’re getting away from the point here which was me disputing you saying he never goes out of bounds and never slides. I’ve watched every snap of his career. He avoids a lot of contact. And of course as the top running Qb still takes more hits than anyone else. But people acting like he takes 15-20 hits a game like a Rb and saying he never avoids them just haven’t seen him enough.

 
Look, I guarantee that Lamar Jackson will at some point take a hit that knocks him out of a game or a season. So did Tom Brady. So did Peyton Manning. So did Ben Roethlisberger. So did Aaron Rodgers. So did Dak Prescott. 

There's only one top QB in the league who's 30+ years old and who's never missed at least half a season to injury, and that's Russell Wilson and his 800+ rushing attempts and 4500+ rushing yards (both tops in the league for a QB over that time). 

It's probably safer to be out in space getting tackled by a safety than getting landed on by a stack of 300-pound linemen in the pocket. Certainly there's no reason to downgrade Jackson based on the possibility that he might get hurt in the future.
bolded...I think this actually does happen more than you think....it just hasn't really come to fruition or had a reason yet for people to come out and say it.....although I believe many have on these boards....I think some have said they just don't think his style of play is sustainable so they pass or move him down their rankings...maybe don't want to pay the price you had to pay to get him because of it ....especially after his MVP year....but I think in some ways it is always at least a small consideration for most when he is being drafted in FF....as much as I give Jackson more credit in 4 PPPTD leagues because of his rushing stats....I do also factor in that he puts himself at risk more than others....you really can't argue that his chances of getting hurt are a little higher than the other top QB's that put up his type numbers....how much he gets "downgraded" probably varies from person to person... :shrug: :2cents:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Look, I guarantee that Lamar Jackson will at some point take a hit that knocks him out of a game or a season. So did Tom Brady. So did Peyton Manning. So did Ben Roethlisberger. So did Aaron Rodgers. So did Dak Prescott. 

There's only one top QB in the league who's 30+ years old and who's never missed at least half a season to injury, and that's Russell Wilson and his 800+ rushing attempts and 4500+ rushing yards (both tops in the league for a QB over that time). 

It's probably safer to be out in space getting tackled by a safety than getting landed on by a stack of 300-pound linemen in the pocket. Certainly there's no reason to downgrade Jackson based on the possibility that he might get hurt in the future.
Great points.  Add running forward vs standing like a statue with your arm extended in a throwing motion.

 
ignoring mitigated risk has sunk a lot of ships....we get hung up on football is a physical sport and any player can get hurt on any play....there is a reason many of the most electric WR's/etc no longer return punts and kickoffs.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
killface said:
Baltimore would be smart not to pay this guy.

You can't run that much as a qb.  The hit is coming
 I disagree.  Even if his career isn't as long because of his style, you maximize your chances of winning with him now.  He will never be a great passer, but he is as good a playmaker as there is in the league right now.  He is not a conventional QB, but he makes plays and wins A LOT.  The Ravens would be wise to pay him. 

 
 I disagree.  Even if his career isn't as long because of his style, you maximize your chances of winning with him now.  He will never be a great passer, but he is as good a playmaker as there is in the league right now.  He is not a conventional QB, but he makes plays and wins A LOT.  The Ravens would be wise to pay him. 


I would just franchise him every year.  He gets rich and you don't have a long term commitment

 
We agree if he’s back there returning kicks or punts we should all be concerned.
my point was really just keeping him out of harms way by limiting his chances at getting hurt.....they don't really do that....but then I started thinking, if he doesn't play this way....what good is he really....because he would then just probably be a middle of the road guy cause his passing game is nothing special....some might even say below average compared to 31 other starters...

 
I would just franchise him every year.  He gets rich and you don't have a long term commitment
There are rules in place to prevent this type of thing, or at least make it financially non-viable.

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-franchise-tag-meaning-deadlines-values-rules/1o185fk9ywga31hax6m1ahgn3q#:~:text=Players can be tagged in,of the player's previous salary.

 

Players can be tagged in consecutive years, but the team must pay the player more each year he is tagged. (Kirk Cousins can tell you all about it.) For a player to be franchise tagged two straight years, the team must pay 120 percent of the player's previous salary. If it's three straight years, the team would need to pay the player 144 percent of his previous salary.

From the CBA: Any club that designates a player as a franchise player for the third time shall, on the date the third such designation is made, be deemed to have tendered the player a one-year NFL player contract for the greater of ...

— (A) the average of the five largest prior year salaries for players at the position with the highest such average

— (B) 120 percent of the average of the five largest prior year salaries for players at the position at which the player participated in the most plays during the prior league year

— or (C) 144 percent of his prior year salary.

If the club designates the player as a franchise player for the third time, the designating club shall be the only club with which the player may negotiate or sign a player contract.

 
There are rules in place to prevent this type of thing, or at least make it financially non-viable.

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-franchise-tag-meaning-deadlines-values-rules/1o185fk9ywga31hax6m1ahgn3q#:~:text=Players can be tagged in,of the player's previous salary.

 

Players can be tagged in consecutive years, but the team must pay the player more each year he is tagged. (Kirk Cousins can tell you all about it.) For a player to be franchise tagged two straight years, the team must pay 120 percent of the player's previous salary. If it's three straight years, the team would need to pay the player 144 percent of his previous salary.

From the CBA: Any club that designates a player as a franchise player for the third time shall, on the date the third such designation is made, be deemed to have tendered the player a one-year NFL player contract for the greater of ...

— (A) the average of the five largest prior year salaries for players at the position with the highest such average

— (B) 120 percent of the average of the five largest prior year salaries for players at the position at which the player participated in the most plays during the prior league year

— or (C) 144 percent of his prior year salary.

If the club designates the player as a franchise player for the third time, the designating club shall be the only club with which the player may negotiate or sign a player contract.


I would franchise him until i couldn't....

 
I would just franchise him every year.  He gets rich and you don't have a long term commitment
The problem there is he could easily hold out if you franchise him too many times.  We are seeing that more, where players get ticked off when franchised too many times. 

On the flip side, it looks like he hurt himself a little on that stupid flip on the winning TD. Sounds like he is just sore and will be fine to play, but a QB needs to have better sense than to hurl himself like that and risk getting injured just for the sake of showing off.  That kind of judgment makes me pause a bit with him. 

 
Lamar Jackson (unknown) was absent from the media portion of practice.

Jackson did note that his hip was sore in yesterday's media session so this isn't exactly a glaring surprise, but obviously it's eye-catching when one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL misses a practice day. We'll update once more information is available, likely with the official injury report.

SOURCE: Jeff Zrbiec on Twitter

Sep 23, 2021, 1:44 PM ET

 
Just got a notice in my ESPN league that he is now listed as questionable. Does anyone have better news than that?

 
Apparently he missed practice today. An alert I read is that his hip is sore because of that flip into the endzone Sunday Night. 

smh

I wasn't aware that missing practice puts you on the Q list...or if there is more to it than that

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top