Donnybrook
Footballguy
Do you think that the rookie pay scale deflates or inflates rookie QB value? I would say it inflates their value. It doesn't set you back as far and encourages you to gamble. Do you think Rodgers would fall to 24 in 2024?unpredictable, absolutely. but in your examples, foles was a FA backup, wilson was a 3rd rounder, brady a 6th. spending the 8th overall pick and blowing 2-3 years of rookie scale seems odd to me. atlanta could’ve gone odunze, then looked at a qb next year (4 have potential 1st round grades) or heck, the year after. rodgers was 24th overall for reference. the logic of signing cousins and then drafting his replacement before he has played a snap shukes me.I can't believe I am here defending the Atlanta pick but unpredictable stuff happens in the NFL all the time. Nick Foles won a super bowl when Philly's franchise QB Carson Wentz got injured. How about when rookie Russel Wilson usurping Matt Flynn even after he signed a relatively huge contract. Drew Bledsoe and Tom Brady. Doug Williams and Jay Schroeder.The more germane question is "How does Penix help ATL win a Super Bowl while Kirk Cousins is their starting QB?"They have closed their window, because their 1st round pick won't help them win this year. Is that your thesis?If you draft Penix, do you close your window to win for a few years, which is why you signed Cousins in the first place? YesIf you have Cousins, do you have your QB of the future? No.
Does that seem like a rational thought to you?
Kirk should have voiced nothing but support for the pick. Entitlement is not a good look IMO.
You are not getting a competent QB to sign for a rookie type deal. Gardner Minshew signed a 2 year , $25 M contract. You are getting Penix on a 4 year deal for $22 M or thereabouts.