What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB/WR combo (Cutler and Marshall), how do you feel about it? (1 Viewer)

BigEHokie

Footballguy
I've seriously drank the Cutler and Marshall koolaid since training camp and it seems as though they are my two best options at that position on my team. What is the board's thoughts on using same team QB/WR combos? I know it could be a recipe for success or a recipe for disaster, so I'm on the fence as to if I should play them both.

 
I've seriously drank the Cutler and Marshall koolaid since training camp and it seems as though they are my two best options at that position on my team. What is the board's thoughts on using same team QB/WR combos? I know it could be a recipe for success or a recipe for disaster, so I'm on the fence as to if I should play them both.
It's good, but not quite as good as the Cutler/Marshall/Royal/Scheffler Superfecta.
 
Check the Eddie Royal thread. Many of us out there have Cutler and Marshall AND Royal.

And I'm starting all of them until I see a reason not to.

 
I've got Cutler in all 2 of my leagues as my #1. (one dynasty)

I'm in :wub: with him.

I think the emergence of Royal will make Marshall less attractive, but makes Cutler a top 5 QB.

 
I've seriously drank the Cutler and Marshall koolaid since training camp and it seems as though they are my two best options at that position on my team. What is the board's thoughts on using same team QB/WR combos? I know it could be a recipe for success or a recipe for disaster, so I'm on the fence as to if I should play them both.
Luck favors the bold...if you've already drank the cool aid then there is no time for second guessing. You're commited. Go with what ya got, but don't sweat it.
 
That is one of better QB/WR combo in the league right now. And with coming out party of New Eddie, Threesome could match or even out perform three amigos of PM/Wayne/Marvin or Palmer/85/TJ or Warner/Boldin/Fitz or Brady I mean Cassel/Moss/Welker

But I am Broncos homer.

 
That is one of better QB/WR combo in the league right now. And with coming out party of New Eddie, Threesome could match or even out perform three amigos of PM/Wayne/Marvin or Palmer/85/TJ or Warner/Boldin/Fitz or Brady I mean Cassel/Moss/WelkerBut I am Broncos homer.
The main difference is that the Broncos won't throw the ball 40 times in a game. All of those other groups did/do.The Denver running game is both a strength and weakness for the passing game for fantasy purposes. They will have comparable TD numbers, but lesser completions & yards than the Cincy, Indy & NE groups.
 
That is one of better QB/WR combo in the league right now. And with coming out party of New Eddie, Threesome could match or even out perform three amigos of PM/Wayne/Marvin or Palmer/85/TJ or Warner/Boldin/Fitz or Brady I mean Cassel/Moss/WelkerBut I am Broncos homer.
The main difference is that the Broncos won't throw the ball 40 times in a game. All of those other groups did/do.The Denver running game is both a strength and weakness for the passing game for fantasy purposes. They will have comparable TD numbers, but lesser completions & yards than the Cincy, Indy & NE groups.
What do you see in Denver's running game which makes you think they'll be anything special?
 
That is one of better QB/WR combo in the league right now. And with coming out party of New Eddie, Threesome could match or even out perform three amigos of PM/Wayne/Marvin or Palmer/85/TJ or Warner/Boldin/Fitz or Brady I mean Cassel/Moss/WelkerBut I am Broncos homer.
The main difference is that the Broncos won't throw the ball 40 times in a game. All of those other groups did/do.The Denver running game is both a strength and weakness for the passing game for fantasy purposes. They will have comparable TD numbers, but lesser completions & yards than the Cincy, Indy & NE groups.
What do you see in Denver's running game which makes you think they'll be anything special?
Number of attempts
 
How do I feel about Cutler and Marshall? I feel like Cutler just lit up one of the worst teams in football and people are going a little overboard about it. Obviously a good sign, but I still need to see more before I start saying Cutler and Marshall will be Top 5 at their respective positions by the end of the year. But again, a good sign.

 
I've got Cutler in all 2 of my leagues as my #1. (one dynasty)I'm in :popcorn: with him.I think the emergence of Royal will make Marshall less attractive, but makes Cutler a top 5 QB.
I really do not see why Royal would make Marshall less attractive, Marshall is still the #1 WR on this team. Let's look at it this way Cutler had really no one to throw to except Royal the same as McNabb having to throw to D. Jackson. I think Cutler/Marshall combo has to is like having Romo/TO.
 
I've got Cutler in all 2 of my leagues as my #1. (one dynasty)I'm in :popcorn: with him.I think the emergence of Royal will make Marshall less attractive, but makes Cutler a top 5 QB.
I really do not see why Royal would make Marshall less attractive, Marshall is still the #1 WR on this team. Let's look at it this way Cutler had really no one to throw to except Royal the same as McNabb having to throw to D. Jackson. I think Cutler/Marshall combo has to is like having Romo/TO.
# of targets is why. Last year Marshall was close to if not the league leader in targets. With a legit #2 option, he will see fewer targets.Most people drafted Marshall assuming he'd have D-Jax starting opposite him. Royal looks much better than D-Jax.
 
I LOVE starting the QB/WR combo when the combo is a good one like Cutler/Marshall. I think they are probably 3rd on the list now only behind Manning/Wayne, Romo/TO, (were behind Brady/Moss as well).

 
Thats a pretty good duo to have. Im more into the QB/TE hookup cause if a QB gets trounced, its just your TE who also has a bad game

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top